XSF logo XSF Communications Team - 2019-08-29


  1. LNJ has joined
  2. LNJ has left
  3. arnaudj has joined
  4. arnaudj has left
  5. arnaudj has joined
  6. debacle has joined
  7. Nÿco has joined
  8. Nÿco here
  9. Nÿco the wiki page is frozen now, I've passed on git: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/602
  10. Nÿco please review
  11. Nÿco meanwhile, I am waiting for JC to give me access to TinyLetter
  12. Nÿco if possible, I want to publish it on Tuesday 3rd
  13. Nÿco pep, are you on github, so I assign you the review as well?
  14. SouL I'll check later after work, thank you Nÿco :D
  15. Nÿco thx
  16. Nÿco SouL what's your github handle?
  17. SouL SeveFP
  18. pep. Nÿco: ppjet6. I'm not available until later in the afternoon though
  19. debacle has left
  20. Nÿco thx, no hurry :)
  21. Nÿco oops, can't find you...
  22. arnaudj has left
  23. arnaudj has joined
  24. LNJ has joined
  25. Nÿco hey commTeam, since we launched the newsletter, until now, I have only collected links on the wiki, sometimes just done some very basic copywriting...
  26. Nÿco please I used to edit the XMPP Roundup, I took over stpeter then
  27. Nÿco the difference between the times of the roundup and the newsletter is the maturity of use of social media
  28. Nÿco and I am a bit surprised that we - as a community - use social media pretty badly
  29. Nÿco so we could write a short kind of guide for us all
  30. Nÿco how to write a post: text, image, hashtags, link
  31. Nÿco how to schedule posts: buffer, tweetdeck, hootsuite, etc.
  32. Nÿco how to analyses your analytics (funnels, acquisition, etc.)
  33. Nÿco all the best practices are already available everywhere online, it's just a matter of shaping it for us all
  34. Nÿco btw, is the team member list correct? https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/CommTeam#Team_members
  35. Nÿco hmmm... not the same: https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/comm-team.html
  36. SouL Yeah, that list was made two summits ago :D
  37. SouL Probably Daniel has not been active
  38. SouL I haven't seen him around here
  39. SouL In terms of activity, the one on the website is quite accurate
  40. Nÿco ok, thx
  41. Nÿco tbh, I am not around here often...
  42. Nÿco maybe we should recruit?
  43. SouL I think we are enough for what we do right now
  44. SouL It depends on the objectives :D
  45. jcbrand Nÿco: I sent you the credentials yesterday already. In chat via OMEMO
  46. Nÿco that's the problem: wrong key
  47. Nÿco can't read it
  48. jcbrand I sent them again
  49. Nÿco thx a lot, it works, I'm playing with the interface in order to familiarise now, I'll wait for more reviews before really posting
  50. Nÿco jcbrand why did you choose tinyletter over others?
  51. Nÿco I did that: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Basic_communication_guide_for_XMPP_techies
  52. arnaudj has left
  53. arnaudj has joined
  54. pep. Nÿco: Ppjet6 with a caps then? I should also be in the xsf group somewhere
  55. Nÿco arg, I can't find you... :'(
  56. jcbrand > jcbrand why did you choose tinyletter over others? I don't remember, heard good things about them
  57. Nÿco ok, good enough :)
  58. afp has left
  59. afp has joined
  60. pep. https://github.com/ppjet6
  61. Nÿco wow, I followed you
  62. Nÿco the GitHub's search engine sucks
  63. ralphm Huh? https://github.com/search?q=maxime+buquet&type=Users
  64. Nÿco for some reason, I can't add you
  65. Nÿco https://movim.eu:5280/upload/1ab8cd5d50a081e2fdf8ce43dca3047f8bd49889/Ef4RUUKDiMbezrkudUYb4MGUxATodfzawgtZVMJR/Capture_d_e_cran_2019-08-29_a__15.23.59.png
  66. Nÿco but I can you can do a review
  67. ralphm Oh, that's probably because pep isn't part of the team
  68. pep. K
  69. Nÿco I guessed that, can you please add him?
  70. ralphm I can address that after Board
  71. Nÿco thx
  72. Nÿco you have 5 min, you can do it now :)
  73. pep. I was actually wondering if it made sense to merge both teams tbh
  74. Nÿco ah
  75. pep. Commteam and scam
  76. Nÿco that's a github team
  77. pep. Surrender
  78. pep. Sure
  79. Nÿco oh, commteam and scam have some stuff in common, indeed
  80. pep. Just a related thought
  81. Nÿco I think I kind of agree...
  82. ralphm Well, they are separate work teams in the XSF, and I agree they should work together, but merging them doesn't feel like the best of ideas
  83. Nÿco why not?
  84. pep. There's a slight nuance but both have more or less the same goal, i.e., outreach. Plus it's not like we had many active people..
  85. nyco has joined
  86. Nÿco why not?
  87. Nÿco why not?
  88. Nÿco why not?
  89. nyco wow
  90. ralphm Because, e.g. I like to help out with meetups, etc, and not (currently) with writing newsletters or other types of communication
  91. ralphm .
  92. nyco Movim fell down
  93. nyco sorry for the multiple attempts
  94. pep. ralphm: who says you have to do everything
  95. nyco actually, no one in scam helps on meetups organisation as far as I know
  96. ralphm nyco: why did we add a new person recently then?
  97. pep. nyco: ??
  98. ralphm Also, I've been working on the Summit again
  99. pep. ralphm: are you efforts public?
  100. ralphm I sent a mail on the dates
  101. pep. Yes
  102. ralphm And there's a separate private discussion on the FOSDEM devroom
  103. pep. Ah, I wasn't aware of that
  104. pep. URI?
  105. ralphm which part of "private discussion" was unclear?
  106. pep. Ok so there's no way to help even, better :)
  107. pep. I love these small elitists groups
  108. pep. I love these small elitist groups
  109. ralphm No need for now, at least
  110. ralphm Mostly handled by the realtime communications people anyway
  111. ralphm For this team, though, I would be interested in having some good handout and other presentational material
  112. ralphm Maybe a pull-up banner
  113. pep. Btw, Matrix appeared as "Matrix.org" on the stand map, would it be possible for XMPP to also appear on that map, and not just "realtime lounge". Or make matrix go in there as well
  114. ralphm I'll think about that. We've gone as Realtime Lounge for a couple of years now, and in 2018 they were part of it, and this year they were separate.
  115. ralphm I also talked to organizers on a different location / setup
  116. pep. Right, it's really not visible in that corner
  117. ralphm Well, also very crowded
  118. ralphm When we started with the Lounge, there were almost half the number of stands in total
  119. pep. Maybe someday fosdem will change venues :x
  120. pep. Or get a voucher system like CCC or something
  121. ralphm I don't know CCC's setup
  122. ralphm But ULB is great in that it is free
  123. pep. Not sure any of this is beneficial to fosdem, but it's really crowded and doesn't really make me want to go
  124. nyco has left
  125. pep. “Nÿco: actually, no one in scam helps on meetups organisation as far as I know“ what did this mean btw
  126. ralphm Sometime he misfires :-D
  127. pep. Because we've been handling froscon and Camp lately, Daniel, Dino people and me for froscon, and dino, mathieui and me for Camp
  128. pep. And there's more coming
  129. pep. Ah maybe he's not connected
  130. Nÿco meetups organisers are not part of SCAM team
  131. pep. https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Meetups these?
  132. pep. Is this strictly required? We can help setting them up, we should, (also proposing content? Etc.), but we don't especially have to take part?
  133. pep. They don't have to join either? I'd prefer to let them do whatever they want, make the entry easy, and then only if they're interested they can join (not sure what that would bring them though)
  134. pep. Often these grow organically, it just happens. I'd like for them to contacts us and ask for help but at think by this point it's either already happening, or dead
  135. pep. Often these grow organically, it just happens. I'd like for them to contacts us and ask for help but I think by this point it's either already happening, or dead
  136. pep. I have been trying to push people here and there though to start again, in Paris for example
  137. pep. I can poke other people in different places maybe
  138. ralphm Nÿco: the point I tried to make is that we added pep. to SCAM specifically for his work on meetups.
  139. ralphm Maybe you weren't in that meeting.
  140. pep. That was at the summit
  141. pep. Though, terminology might be confusing here. What I try to organise is generally called "sprints". I believe what's called "meetup" is more user oriented
  142. pep. Only the target is different but that's already a significant change :p
  143. ralphm Yeah, I suppose we could rename to SCAMS, but that seems superfluous.
  144. pep. Yeah that's fine
  145. Guus has left
  146. Guus has joined
  147. arnaudj has left
  148. arnaudj has joined
  149. arnaudj has left
  150. arnaudj has joined
  151. arnaudj has left
  152. arnaudj has joined
  153. afp has left
  154. afp has joined
  155. debacle has joined
  156. debacle has left
  157. LNJ has left
  158. jcbrand has left
  159. arnaudj has left
  160. arnaudj has joined
  161. arnaudj has left
  162. arnaudj has joined
  163. afp has left
  164. afp has joined