XSF logo XSF Communications Team - 2019-10-19


  1. LNJ has joined
  2. debacle has left
  3. arnaudj has left
  4. afp has left
  5. afp has joined
  6. LNJ has left
  7. LNJ has joined
  8. arnaudj has joined
  9. Martin has left
  10. LNJ has left
  11. Martin has joined
  12. arnaudj has left
  13. jcbrand has joined
  14. debacle has joined
  15. LNJ has joined
  16. arnaudj has joined
  17. Martin has left
  18. Martin has joined
  19. emus has joined
  20. arnaudj has left
  21. arnaudj has joined
  22. debacle has left
  23. arnaudj has left
  24. arnaudj has joined
  25. debacle has joined
  26. Martin has left
  27. Martin has joined
  28. afp has left
  29. afp has joined
  30. afp has left
  31. debacle has left
  32. afp has joined
  33. jcbrand has left
  34. winfried has left
  35. winfried has joined
  36. ralphm has left
  37. ralphm has joined
  38. winfried has left
  39. winfried has joined
  40. winfried has left
  41. winfried has joined
  42. vanitasvitae The heise article got updated. The recommendation is for Cisco Jabber now.
  43. vanitasvitae Maybe @xmpp could issue a statement/recommendation towards open implementations?
  44. jcbrand has joined
  45. emus vanitasvitae: please Nÿco But as always, stay polite & progressive
  46. emus we should mention this aswell in the newsletter?
  47. vanitasvitae Maybe something along the lines of "While we appreciate the EU Parliament taking control over their communications by using a self-hosted solution (Cisco Jabber is self hosted right?), we ask why not go a step further and chose a truely open system based on a truely open standard like XMPP?" with a link to xmpp.org's server software page plus maybe a link that clarifies the differences between Cisco Jabber and XMPP.
  48. vanitasvitae And maybe replace "we ask why not" with "we encourage them to".
  49. Martin vanitasvitae: Is there something official describing the differences?
  50. vanitasvitae I'd assume
  51. vanitasvitae AFAIK Holger once wrote something (unofficial?) but there should be more resources.
  52. jcbrand has left
  53. jcbrand has joined
  54. jcbrand has left
  55. Martin has left
  56. afp has left
  57. afp has joined
  58. emus > AFAIK Holger once wrote something (unofficial?) but there should be more resources. yep, if they really continue about that topic, the XSF CommTeam (!) should provide some more resources
  59. Martin has joined
  60. debacle has joined
  61. pep. vanitasvitae, technically, while I'm not especially happy with Cisco Jabber, we can probably still federate right?
  62. pep. But yeah they wouldn't have the same disparate^Wawesome experience as most XMPP users experience nowadays :)
  63. pep. But yeah they wouldn't have the same disparate^Wawesome experience as most XMPP users nowadays :)
  64. vanitasvitae Hm, is Cisco Jabber iOS actually useful? :D
  65. jcbrand has joined
  66. emus I think they (and others) should know what is what
  67. LNJ has left
  68. LNJ has joined
  69. LNJ has left
  70. winfried has left
  71. winfried has joined
  72. winfried has left
  73. winfried has joined
  74. jcbrand has left
  75. afp has left
  76. emus has left
  77. emus has joined
  78. LNJ has joined
  79. afp has joined
  80. LNJ has left