XSF Communications Team - 2020-03-10

https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/903

Yep. Let's refrain from commenting on it if it's not for the form though :P

I dont get it?

We try to keep github issues free of standards discussions :)

pep.: Ah okay, but it was so thankful 😍 No, is fine, I delete it

no don't

That level is fine :)

It's just that we don't want a real chat in there

Ah, okay too late 😅

So we don't multiply discussion venues

Now everyone at least got it in their email :) I clicked some emojis

hehe

We got Internet connection again, I think I can continue work tonight

great :)

What happened?

pep.: "Vodafone" happened^^

hah

We dont know what was wrong: I could access some sites, some not (I mean everyone in the network). We tried resets etc... now we got a new ....what ever that vodafone router thing is called^^ ✏

https://blog.process-one.net/go-xmpp-v0-5-0/

https://blog.jabberhead.tk/2020/03/10/omemo-specification-sprint/

i yeahi

vanitasvitae: > Huge thanks to them for having us! Don'rvyou mean hosting?

having us means basically the same

"Thanks for having me" is something like "Thanks for being here"

Omg.... what exactly do I need to look for in the mailinglist? pep. ?

let me see

There are quite a few :/

and, actually, thats March, is that right?

I mean, I personally don't 100% get whats important for the newsletter, and how I workthrough it best?

The target of the XSF is developers (XMPP users, not XMPP client users), so it makes sense

(nor XMPP server users)

Ok so.. I have the following:

Yes, I understand - but I don understand how to look for what xeps? 😅️

As I said - I hate mailing lists xD

and mail in general

Not that I dont use it actively, but in general, I have my reasons xD

sorry, I forgot you also send me the February link

So, I just grep something like: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037037.html

Okay, now I think I got it

pep. Im gonna collect it, then you can review

ProtoXEP: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037034.html : Simple JSON Messaging - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037063.html : Extended Channel Search - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037035.html : Trust Messages Active: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037032.html : XEP-0345 (Form of Membership Applications) Experimental: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037091.html : XEP-0434 (Trust Messages) Deferred: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036998.html : XEP-0386 (Bind 2.0) Last Call: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036997.html : XEP-0398 (User Avatar to vCard-Based Avatars Conversion) - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037037.html : XEP-0402 (PEP Native Bookmarks) Draft: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036990.html : XEP-0363 (HTTP File Upload) Call for Experience: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037071.html : XEP-0066: Out of Band Data - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036992.html : XEP-0368: SRV records for XMPP over TLS - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036986.html : XEP-0198: Stream Management

That's what I have

There are "duplicates", some went through multiple stages in a month

Puhh... I have to learn a lot I guesss

pep. ProtoXEP = New ?

yes

"Proposed Extension" in the list

Ah wait no

hmmm

hah, that's confusing

"Proposed" is the state XEPs are in when they're in Last Call

But "Proposed Extension" in the list is used for ProtoXEPs :p

Read 0001 someday when you have time :)

Okay, Im gonna do it - I think New suits, or?

New suits?

The ProtoXEP suits the section 'New', agreed?

Yes

I have a better suggestion: We create a new section called: === Miscellaneous ====

becuase, what to do with: Call for Experience:

Draft:

Or.. coming back: ProtoXEP:

So what would it look like?

wait+

I create the draft

ok

pep. I'm not satisfied with formating, but its readable