-
debacle
emus, is this the right MUC for newsletter input?
-
debacle
or shall I edit the wiki?
-
debacle
It is about a new software release. But it is not a client, not a server, and not a library. It is a component! ;-) I assume, server components go to server, right?
-
emus
debacle: There is a "Others" Section
-
emus
If you put it in the wiki, please do me a favor and directly make a statement out of it as all the others
-
emus
is it from march?
-
debacle
we released during the sprint
-
debacle
it was part of the sprint
-
debacle
Other is not a subsection of Sofware releases, it is a different thing.
-
debacle
I put it under servers then.
-
debacle
components are server-side, so it fits
-
emus
debacle: Is fine for me
-
emus
You can also put that under the speint section in Events
-
emus
as an outcome of the Sprint
-
debacle
yes, but then we should collect more results. there were much more important things ;-)
-
emus
I can only put what people released or where I somehow can reference to
-
emus
Reminder for myself: Update to english version https://www.dbjr.de/en/article/entwicklerinnentreffen-zu-freier-kommunikation/
-
emus
Still the open question if there is someone happy to review at least the XEP section on the march entries
-
SouL
If anyone can take a look at it https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/689/files
-
emus
SouL: No guys, stop
-
emus
this is the old one. I havent dropped it there. If you want we to update there already, I can do so
-
emus
I havent dropped the current edits from the wiki✎ -
emus
I havent dropped the current edits from the wiki* ✏
-
emus
will do later
-
emus
SouL, pep., jcbrand: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/689 Hello guys, its in Github now. So please review, *but please dont merge now*. One link is missing, will do tomorrow Good night