XSF logo XMPP Council - 2012-03-07


  1. Tobias has left
  2. Tobias has joined
  3. Tobias has left
  4. Tobias has joined
  5. Tobias has left
  6. bear has joined
  7. bear has left
  8. linuxwolf has joined
  9. linuxwolf has left
  10. linuxwolf has joined
  11. bear has joined
  12. Kev has left
  13. linuxwolf has left
  14. Tobias has joined
  15. Tobias has left
  16. Tobias has joined
  17. Kev has left
  18. linuxwolf has joined
  19. Kev has left
  20. Neustradamus has left
  21. Neustradamus has joined
  22. stpeter has joined
  23. ralphm has joined
  24. ralphm Hi!
  25. stpeter hallo Ralph!
  26. Kev Hi.
  27. Tobias hi
  28. Kev Well remembered, I'm trying to rebuild my router on a USB stick, as the 2.5inch internal hard drive failed and I don't have a spare.
  29. linuxwolf /-:
  30. Kev You might ask why I need a Linux router, in addition to my ISP's - and that's because I have vaguely complicated multiple-subnet setups where some subnets can route over NAT over a VPN into Isode, while my wife's games machine, the X-Box etc. can't.
  31. Kev As well as faking DNS, naturally :)
  32. stpeter heh
  33. linuxwolf actually, I assumed it was because you are a Geek, and have need/want of something more
  34. linuxwolf (-:
  35. ralphm stpeter: were you aware of http://sipsimpleclient.com/wiki/DesignXMPP
  36. stpeter ralphm: no
  37. ralphm Adrian Georgescu passed me a note about Wokkel being chosen for the project.
  38. stpeter nice
  39. ralphm And this appears to be a NLNet thing
  40. stpeter aha
  41. stpeter yeah, they are interested in such projects
  42. MattJ has joined
  43. Tobias http://nlnet.nl/project/current.html interesting...they also funded a DNSSEC for Jitsi project
  44. stpeter ralphm: is Adrian working on that?
  45. Zash has joined
  46. stpeter notes that they link to the old gatewaying specs
  47. stpeter perhaps someday we'll finish those off
  48. ralphm stpeter: yes. ag-projects is his thing (note the initials)
  49. ralphm stpeter: http://www.nlnet.nl/project/xmpp-sip/ is the NLNet page
  50. stpeter thanks for the pointer
  51. Kev Right.
  52. Kev Nothing to discuss, so let's abort quickly.
  53. Kev 1) Roll call.
  54. Kev I'm here.
  55. stpeter might be related to http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ivov-xmpp-cusax-00.txt
  56. linuxwolf presente
  57. MattJ Here
  58. Tobias here
  59. Kev And given he's mid conversation, Ralph probably is too :)
  60. Kev I'm not wrong about having no agenda items for today am I?
  61. ralphm haha
  62. linuxwolf nothing that I saw
  63. MattJ 172 perhaps, but we can push it off for a week - I haven't looked at it
  64. Kev I thought Peter asked for 172 for next week.
  65. MattJ I again assumed no-agenda-no-meeting
  66. Kev MattJ: I was quite clear on-list, I think :)
  67. ralphm Kev: you're on the internet. Of course you are wrong
  68. MattJ I think he probably assumed the same :)
  69. linuxwolf ralphm: obviously
  70. Kev Ok then.
  71. Kev 2) Date of next meeting
  72. Kev Week today?
  73. linuxwolf wfm
  74. Tobias sure
  75. ralphm +1
  76. MattJ +1
  77. Kev 3) AOB?
  78. stpeter I like to have a meeting, even if it's a no-meeting meeting
  79. stpeter :)
  80. linuxwolf none from me
  81. stpeter I got nothin'
  82. MattJ Likewise
  83. Tobias dito
  84. linuxwolf waits for gavel
  85. ralphm stpeter: I too like the feeling of having accomplished something :-)
  86. Kev Excellent. See you good chaps next week.
  87. Kev Thanks all
  88. Kev nags the vabel.
  89. MattJ Oh well, I'm fine with anything consistent :)
  90. MattJ Otherwise I find it hard to keep up
  91. Kev I'm trying to be consistent.
  92. MattJ But if we're on Wednesdays and into agenda-free meetings now, I'm fine
  93. MattJ You're all just conspiring to confuse me
  94. stpeter update the calendar
  95. Kev Thanks Peter.
  96. Zash has left
  97. ralphm MattJ: I'm still curious about the confusement. We just meet every week in the same timeslot (now) and sometimes we declare it over pretty soon.
  98. stpeter ralphm: I think we did Tuesday for a few weeks
  99. ralphm now /that/ was confusing :-D
  100. stpeter :)
  101. MattJ Indeed, apparently it wasn't permanent - I thought it was
  102. MattJ My mistake, but confusing
  103. MattJ and surely I didn't imagine all the weeks we've skipped meetings due to having nothing on the agenda?
  104. ralphm seriously though, thanks to having someone keeping the ics in sync, my exo-corteces take care of the rest.
  105. Kev MattJ: No, we've done that in the past. It then occurred to me that maybe it's better to maintain momentum and meet anyway.
  106. MattJ Sure, and I probably prefer that too
  107. MattJ It's just the transition I can't deal with :)
  108. MattJ and I didn't see a conscious decision to change this on the mailing list
  109. Kev I suggested, no-one objected.
  110. MattJ I guess I missed that
  111. MattJ But like I said, I'm fine with it
  112. Kev You even replied to the mail in which I suggested it :)
  113. MattJ I was waiting for you to say something like that
  114. MattJ sighs
  115. Tobias has left
  116. stpeter :)
  117. Tobias has joined
  118. Tobias has left
  119. Kev has left
  120. Kev has left
  121. Tobias has joined
  122. Tobias has joined
  123. Tobias has joined
  124. ralphm has left
  125. ralphm has joined
  126. linuxwolf has left