MattJI need to read it through, and I'll post to the list
m&mI have further objections to publishing
KevI've got assorted issues with it, but not enough to prevent it going on the vine.
Tobias+1 for publishing as experimental and fixing remaining issues then
Kev4) Date of next meeting?
KevIt'd be easier for me for it to not be next week, but I can possibly manage if we need it.
m&m-1 to next week
MattJ+0 to next week
m&mUs 'Murricans have a holiday
m&m7/11 works for me
m&mand not just for Slurpees
KevAh, yes, when we good British folks gave the Merkins a kind and thoughtful present of independence.
Tobiasthat'd work for me
When the client becomes visible, the server MUST treat that state as equivalent to an active session before receiving initial presence from the client, with one exception: if the client sent directed presence to any entities while in the invisible state, the server MUST treat those entities as under point 2 of Section 4.6.3 of RFC 6121 (i.e., the server MUST ensure that it sends unavailable presence to those entities if the client subsequently goes offline after becoming visible).