KevI'm strongly tempted to write up a mock and implement 220/288 myself just so I can claim to understand them properly, but realistically I won't have time in the next fortnight and will vote 'blind'.
MattJHad another meeting fullscreen and didn't realise the itme
ralphmKev: maybe I should give that an actual attempt, while in-between jobs
KevI'd like to request an extended LC for this - the LC has had no feedback and I could only find one comment from Lance going back a few months when Peter said he wanted to advance it saying "good" or thereabouts.
MattJHas anyone implemented it?
KevLance said something like "It's solved several problems for us already".
ralphmthat's one implementation
ralphmdon't we want two?
KevWant, yes. We don't require it until Final.
KevThankfully, or there's no chance of me getting 289 to Draft :)
MattJIt certainly seems like something that will solve problems - I'm actually not opposed to moving it on as-is
KevMattJ: So you think we shouldn't extend the LC until someone replies?
MattJKev, well I'm not opposed to extending it, but I don't see that it's strictly necessary
MattJMore feedback would always be nicer - do you think we'll get it?
m&mI'm not opposed to extending either
KevMoving to Draft when absolutely no-one has spoken in the LC supporting the idea seems bad.
ralphmKev: good point
MattJWell extend it and poke Lance daily :)
KevAll happy with that?
m&mI'll ask stpeter if he's aware of other interest
Accept as Experimental?
XEP-xxxx: File Information Sharing
KevI don't mind publishing this, although I have absolutely no idea what http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0254.html has to do with it :)