XMPP Council - 2013-10-02


  1. Lance has left
  2. stpeter has left
  3. Lance has joined
  4. Lance has left
  5. stpeter has joined
  6. stpeter has left
  7. stpeter has joined
  8. stpeter has left
  9. Lance has joined
  10. Tobias has joined
  11. Tobias has left
  12. Lance has joined
  13. Tobias has joined
  14. Lance has joined
  15. Lance has left
  16. Lance has joined
  17. Lance has left
  18. jabberjocke has joined
  19. Tobias has left
  20. Tobias has joined
  21. Kev has left
  22. Tobias has left
  23. Tobias has joined
  24. Kev has left
  25. Kev has left
  26. m&m has joined
  27. m&m has left
  28. m&m has joined
  29. Tobias has left
  30. Tobias has joined
  31. stpeter has joined
  32. stpeter has left
  33. stpeter has joined
  34. Tobias has joined
  35. tato has joined
  36. Tobias has joined
  37. stpeter wanders off briefly to find a better place to sit, bbiaf
  38. stpeter has left
  39. ralphm has joined
  40. stpeter has joined
  41. stpeter has left
  42. stpeter has joined
  43. stpeter ah nice, I found a room called "Solace" :-)
  44. ralphm :-D
  45. m&m T - 5 minutes
  46. Lance has joined
  47. Kev And ding.
  48. Kev 1) Roll call.
  49. Kev I'm here!
  50. Tobias too
  51. m&m presente
  52. Tobias invited mattj
  53. Kev Tobias: By just dragging him to the window? :)
  54. ralphm here
  55. Tobias Kev, how else would one do it? :)
  56. Kev Right.
  57. Kev But in his absence...
  58. Kev 2) XEP-0301. Move to Draft?
  59. Kev I think everyone's comments have now been addressed and this needs a revote.
  60. Kev And I need to give it a re-read first.
  61. stpeter it's the re-XEP -- review, revise, repost, reread
  62. m&m I did re-read, and I'm +1
  63. Kev Excellent.
  64. Tobias i'm +1 too, my issue got addressed
  65. m&m I'm not going to nit any further; I'll send the list to the XEP editor
  66. m&m things like using typographer's quotes
  67. Kev m&m: Requiring them to change the English grammar for American was just harsh :p
  68. m&m super ultra mega minor
  69. m&m ASCII should have been good enough for everyone! (-:
  70. stpeter yeah I can clean up some of the minor issues
  71. Kev ralphm: ?
  72. ralphm Yeah, it looks good to me. +1
  73. Kev Fab.
  74. Kev I think that was our only voting item.
  75. Kev 3) Date of next.
  76. m&m SBTSBC WFM
  77. Kev Excellent.
  78. stpeter updates http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/twelfth-council/ in real time
  79. Kanchil stpeter: http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/twelfth-council/: Twelfth Council – The XMPP Standards Foundation
  80. Kev 4) AOB.
  81. Tobias wfm
  82. stpeter OB
  83. Kev I have an outstanding +1 from 297, which I'll leave here.
  84. m&m the Council and Board nominees are still light
  85. stpeter Kev: you are +1 on 297?
  86. Kev stpeter: Yes.
  87. stpeter Tobias: did you vote on 220?
  88. Tobias i'll add mine till the end of the week
  89. Tobias stpeter, didn't i reply on list?
  90. stpeter Tobias: maybe I missed it
  91. Kev Matt and Tobias both said they were intending standing for Council and haven't yet.
  92. Kev I don't recall, but I think Ralph said the same?
  93. ralphm yes
  94. m&m Lance still hasn't completed the form (-:
  95. m&m notes to pester him again
  96. Tobias stpeter, you even replied to the mail :)
  97. stpeter Tobias: ouch
  98. Tobias but you probably replied to a lot mails that day
  99. Tobias :)
  100. stpeter ah, i see, yes
  101. stpeter n/m then
  102. Kev m&m: Were you suggesting there's something Council needs to do about the lists standing?
  103. m&m just make sure you fill out your nomination if you're running again
  104. m&m proxy voting starts in less than a fortnight!
  105. ralphm m&m: come on man, I still have 12 days!
  106. Kev OK. AOAOB?
  107. ralphm m&m: keeping things exciting
  108. stpeter voting tally updated again, will process those documents today
  109. m&m stpeter: thank you
  110. Kev stpeter: Thanks.
  111. stpeter sure thing
  112. Kev OK, we're done then?
  113. Kev Thanks all.
  114. stpeter seems so
  115. Kev bangs the gavel.
  116. m&m ciao
  117. Tobias adiós
  118. stpeter processes XEPs before his next conference call
  119. ralphm thanks!
  120. ralphm houdoe!
  121. stpeter Tobias: actually, I had advanced XEP-0220 but neglected to update the tally page ;-)
  122. stpeter I still don't know why I'm an author in 297 :P
  123. Kev I guess Matt added you.
  124. stpeter I guess I might remove myself ;-)
  125. Tobias hehe
  126. Kev stpeter: You're an author because you added yourself in version 0.5, commit 67282456 :)
  127. Kev Although I suspect the diff was Matt's, given the changelog.
  128. stpeter nod
  129. stpeter I wrote the schema
  130. stpeter but that's trivial
  131. Kev stpeter: If you /want/ to, you can fake other people's authorship of commits in Git.
  132. Kev So if people send you a patch, but you have to apply it, you can do so in their name.
  133. stpeter true, although I could fake a lot of stuff if I wanted to
  134. Kev I meant that this might be a useful thing to fake :)
  135. stpeter actually XEP-0297 is missing the registrar section
  136. stpeter adds
  137. ralphm Kev: but wait, git has a feature that makes it possible to differentiate between author and committer. No need to fake.
  138. Kev ralphm: I don't think you're addressing the use case that I was suggesting.
  139. Kev The problem isn't knowing that it was Peter who pushed other people's Git patches. It's knowing who sent the diff when Peter has to apply a diff and create a git commit from it.
  140. Kev (Because people send Peter diffs, rather than the result of git format-patch)
  141. Kev If people send git format-patch, then all is well with the world.
  142. ralphm Kev: git commit --author
  143. Kev Indeed. Which is the faking of the author of a commit that I was suggesting Peter does.
  144. Kev It would have been quicker to say "I agree with Kev" :D
  145. ralphm that's not faking, that's setting the metadata properly
  146. ralphm see what I object to?
  147. ralphm you call it faking, I am saying this feature was explicitly created for this use case
  148. Kev Yes. You're agreeing with me, but arguing with the words I used to express the opinion you agree with :D
  149. ralphm Kev: yeah, that's what I do.
  150. ralphm Kev: should sound familiar :-D
  151. Kev As long as we're agreed on that.
  152. Lance has joined
  153. MattJ has joined
  154. Zash has joined
  155. Zash has left
  156. stpeter has left
  157. Lance has joined
  158. Lance has joined
  159. tato has left
  160. Tobias has left
  161. Tobias has joined
  162. Tobias has left
  163. m&m has left
  164. m&m has joined
  165. Lance has left
  166. Lance has joined
  167. Neustradamus has joined
  168. Tobias has left
  169. Tobias has joined
  170. m&m has left
  171. Tobias has left
  172. Neustradamus has joined
  173. m&m has joined