-
Zash
Meeting?
-
fippo
i don't think we have an agenda...
-
winfried
BOSH patches?
-
Kev
fippo: I haven't sent an agenda, which isn't quite the same as there not being one.
-
Kev
winfried: I don't have that on the agenda. I do have on the agenda choosing a XEP Editor team that can issue the calls for Council to shove stuff on the agenda though :)
-
Kev
The things I have on the agenda for today are: 2) 152 vote 3) Select editors 4) deprecate non-forms from 55?
-
Kev
And 'tis time, 'tis time.
-
Kev
1) Rolls
-
Kev
I'm here.
-
Lance
Here
-
ralphm
Here
-
fippo
here
-
Kev
Tobias: ?
-
Tobias
here
-
Kev
2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0152.html Move to Draft?
-
Lance
+1
-
fippo
'+1
-
Tobias
+1
-
Kev
I'll +1, grumbling a bit that the people who most need it didn't comment saying so.
-
Kev
3) Select editors
-
Kev
So, the deal here is that we pick the XEP Editors we think we should have, and then present the list to Board for them to ratify.
-
ralphm
How many implementations are there or 0152?
-
Kev
ralphm: "Some"
-
ralphm
Kev: is that >=2, interoperable?
-
Kev
By my reckoning, we've had as volunteers Dave, m&m, Ashley, Stefan (Strigler), Lloyd, Steffen (Larsen).
-
Kev
ralphm: That's the requirement for Final, not Draft.
-
ralphm
Kev: I know this, of course.
-
Tobias
what's the size we're aiming at for that team?
-
winfried
I was at the list too
-
Kev
But yes, I believe there are >=2. I do not know if they're interoperable, due to the lack of responses on list.
-
Kev
winfried: My bad, I stopped typing before getting to the bottom of the thread.
-
ralphm
Kev: I just wanted to know if there has been enough gathered experience, given the lack of real LC comments.
-
Kev
Tobias: Up to us, I think.
-
bear
> 2 and < too many
-
fippo
ralphm: i know a thing which solves the same usecase and i think 0152 is a good fit for the requirements
-
Kev
ralphm: I'm basically trusting Peter here, who said it should be Draft, and Lance, who's implemented it IIRC.
-
ralphm
bear: thanks
-
ralphm
fippo, Kev: right
-
Kev
(I also volunteered for the editor role)
-
Kev
My inclination for the Editor team is to just choose those people who aren't already serving on Board/Council from the list, and filter no further than that.
-
ralphm
My personal stance on the Editor Team is that sitting council and board members should not be serving.
-
Kev
ralphm: My stance is that there's no problem with overlap with Council, probably no problem with Board, but that people on Council/Board are doing enough already :)
-
Kev
Lance / fippo / Tobias: What are your thoughts on this?
-
Lance
I'm fine appointing all non-council, non-board to the team
-
Tobias
i'm fine with that too
-
fippo
wfm, too.
-
ralphm
Kev: indeed
-
ralphm
I'm still ok with them providing review comments on pull requests, of course
-
Kev
Fab. In that case, I'll suggest this at the immenent Board meeting for them to ratify.
-
Kev
I'll also learn to typo.
-
Tobias
one thing at a time
-
Kev
4) There was discussion at the summit about deprecating the non-xep4 bit of xep55. What do people think of doing that?
-
fippo
does that change the current workflow where some people have direct git access? (e.g. me)?
-
fippo
i'm happy to have more people who review diffs though
-
Tobias
fippo, i think not
-
Kev
My view is that xep55 is a mess, but that it's widely deployed and if we want to drastically change semantics, it's better to just obsolete it with a new one.
-
Lance
Kev: +1 on that sentiment
-
Kev
fippo: I am assuming not, but the editor team might decide otherwise.
-
bear
how the editorial team works will be decided by them after it's been formed
-
Tobias
yup, jabber search is widely implemented in servers and clients, the way it currently is
-
ralphm
Kev: I had the same idea, just do a new one, with a new namespace, like we did with delay
-
Kev
I think people will shout if they start taking away the ability to push patches from people who already have it, so they are probably not foolhardy enough to try, but I think it's the editor team's decision to not fight that particular beast ;)
-
Kev
Cool. I think that's us done for action items (by next week the editor team will probably be asking for BOSH voting :))
-
Kev
5) Date of next
-
Kev
SBTSBC?
-
Lance
wfm
-
Tobias
wfm
-
Kev
fippo?
-
fippo
wfm
-
Kev
6) AOB?
-
Tobias
none here
-
Lance
none here
-
Kev
Good enough.
-
Kev
Thanks all.
- Kev bangs the gavel.
-
winfried
thank you kev!
-
Tobias
thanks Kev
-
stpeter
oh sigh, I spaced out the meeting
- stpeter checks out the room logs
-
bear
and here I thought you had amazing timing to arrive *just* as it ended
-
stpeter
heh
-
Tobias
at least in time for the board shenanigans
-
stpeter
:)
-
stpeter
ok, that all looks good