XMPP Council - 2016-05-25


  1. Lance

    it is time

  2. Lance

    0) Roll call

  3. Dave Cridland

    Afternoon.

  4. Lance

    Tobias MattJ psa Dave Cridland

  5. psa

    here

  6. Tobias

    here

  7. SamWhited is not here to take notes again; sorry. Poorly timed meetings.

  8. ralphm

    Here

  9. Dave Cridland

    ralphm, You're three years late.

  10. Lance

    1) ProtoXEP: http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/spam-report.html

  11. Lance

    I'm +1

  12. Tobias

    will vote on list

  13. MattJ

    Hey

  14. MattJ

    +1 :)

  15. Dave Cridland

    +1, though I think it needs work.

  16. MattJ

    Dave Cridland, I look forward to your feedback

  17. MattJ

    I think it's good as it is

  18. Lance

    psa?

  19. Dave Cridland

    You don't have it? I thought I'd sent to the list.

  20. MattJ

    Oh, I guess I missed it

  21. psa

    I'm not sure how it interacts with / replaces http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0287.html

  22. psa

    but I can post to the list about it

  23. Lance

    ta

  24. Lance

    2) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/userrating.html

  25. MattJ

    This one I think needs more work, but I'm +1 to experimental

  26. Tobias

    will vote on list

  27. psa

    (I see that Matthew already replied to the query about XEP-0287 so I'm +1 to publishing spam-report)

  28. psa

    and userrating also replaces http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0275.html

  29. psa

    I see that we're in reinvent the wheel mode :-)

  30. Dave Cridland

    Ah, I'm confused.

  31. psa

    I will post to the list about userrating

  32. Dave Cridland

    It'#s user rating I sent feedback on, not spam reporting.

  33. MattJ

    Ah, ok

  34. Lance

    i'll vote on list as well for userrating

  35. Lance

    3) Date of next

  36. Dave Cridland

    Maybe I should actually look at both in the light of 287/275 and see whether this is just a duplication or if it's introducing something genuinely new.

  37. psa

    on first view I see some overlap between 275 and userrating

  38. psa

    perhaps some combination is in order

  39. Lance

    Date of next, sbtsbc?

  40. Tobias

    Lance, wfm

  41. psa

    WFM

  42. Tobias

    btw: who moves things from https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pulls on our agenda?

  43. MattJ

    wfm

  44. Lance

    4) AOB?

  45. psa

    Tobias: maybe our Chair?

  46. psa

    no AOB except Tobias's question

  47. Lance

    that'd be me

  48. MattJ

    psa, Dave Cridland: User Rating definitely has some overlap with XEP-0275

  49. Tobias

    ah..ok

  50. MattJ

    No AOB here

  51. Dave Cridland

    No AOB.

  52. Tobias

    no further aob here

  53. Lance bangs gavel

  54. Lance

    thanks all

  55. Tobias

    thx Lance

  56. Dave Cridland

    MattJ, Overlap is OK. Complete replacement is OK. But only if we think 275/287 is a dead-end technically.

  57. MattJ

    As mentioned on the list, I don't think Spam Reporting has much overlap with XEP-0287

  58. SamWhited

    👍 will publish the reporting one and the outstanding jingle PR when I'm next at my desk.

  59. Lance

    a more accurate title would be User Blocking Annotations

  60. Tobias

    SamWhited, there's also a XEP-300 PR

  61. MattJ

    Yeah, I think the title could be improved for clarity

  62. SamWhited

    Anyone have ideas for a shortname for the spam reporting one?

  63. Dave Cridland

    Do we really use shortnames?

  64. SamWhited

    They're in there, so I assumed we should create one but I have no idea what it's actually for ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  65. Dave Cridland

    Xep-Editor-Tastic!

  66. ralphm

    Because mam or pubsub is better than typing out the full xep title

  67. ralphm

    And settling on a single short name is useful

  68. Zash

    I remember something about shortnames being assigned when it's draft or somesuch

  69. Tobias

    Lance, where did I +1 for spam reports? i said i'll vote on list ;)

  70. Lance

    woops. sorry about that, misread lines :(

  71. Tobias

    no problem :)

  72. Flow

    SamWhited: Smack uses shortnames as part of the java package scheme of the API. I've already requested the editor to keep a registry of shortnames to keep them unique. That would be really great.

  73. Flow also thinks that shortnames should be assigned in 'experimental' (but i could not found an official policy on that or if they need to be unique)

  74. MattJ

    Yep, shortnames are really useful

  75. SamWhited

    Yah, short names sound good to me. I don't know that anyone is handling registrar stuff right now?