Wednesday, January 10, 2018
council@muc.xmpp.org
January
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
       
             
XMPP Council Room | http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xmpp-council/ | Room logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/council/ | https://trello.com/b/ww7zWMlI/xmpp-council-agenda

[00:02:11] *** SouL has left the room
[00:02:13] *** SouL shows as "online"
[00:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[00:02:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[00:17:09] *** SouL has left the room
[00:17:10] *** SouL shows as "online"
[00:17:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[00:17:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[00:18:12] *** Dave has left the room
[00:18:14] *** Dave has joined the room
[00:18:58] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[00:29:23] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[00:31:09] *** SouL has left the room
[00:31:10] *** SouL shows as "online"
[00:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[00:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[00:36:02] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[00:47:09] *** SouL has left the room
[00:47:10] *** SouL shows as "online"
[00:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[00:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[00:48:52] *** Dave has left the room
[00:48:55] *** Dave has joined the room
[00:57:30] *** jere has joined the room
[01:01:09] *** SouL has left the room
[01:01:11] *** SouL shows as "online"
[01:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[01:02:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:17:22] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[01:17:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:18:42] *** Dave has left the room
[01:18:44] *** Dave has joined the room
[01:18:59] *** Dave has left the room
[01:19:09] *** SouL has left the room
[01:19:11] *** SouL shows as "online"
[01:19:11] *** Dave has joined the room
[01:31:34] *** SouL has left the room
[01:31:34] *** SouL shows as "online"
[01:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[01:32:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:34:21] *** daniel has joined the room
[01:43:54] *** jere has left the room
[01:46:33] *** SouL has left the room
[01:46:34] *** SouL shows as "online"
[01:47:22] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[01:47:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:49:12] *** Dave has left the room
[01:49:33] *** Dave has joined the room
[01:51:22] *** SamWhited has left the room
[01:52:10] *** jere has joined the room
[02:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[02:02:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[02:02:32] *** SouL has left the room
[02:02:34] *** SouL shows as "online"
[02:03:55] *** Tobias has joined the room
[02:12:35] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[02:16:33] *** SouL has left the room
[02:16:35] *** SouL shows as "online"
[02:17:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[02:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[02:19:41] *** Dave has left the room
[02:19:44] *** Dave has joined the room
[02:19:49] *** Dave has left the room
[02:20:03] *** Dave has joined the room
[02:30:24] *** SamWhited has left the room
[02:31:36] *** SouL has left the room
[02:31:38] *** SouL shows as "online"
[02:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[02:32:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[02:38:10] *** Dave has left the room
[02:38:12] *** Dave has joined the room
[02:38:19] *** Dave has left the room
[02:38:31] *** Dave has joined the room
[02:46:33] *** SouL has left the room
[02:46:35] *** SouL shows as "online"
[02:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[02:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[03:01:33] *** SouL has left the room
[03:01:36] *** SouL shows as "online"
[03:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[03:02:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[03:09:41] *** Dave has left the room
[03:09:43] *** Dave has joined the room
[03:17:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[03:17:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[03:25:21] *** SouL has left the room
[03:25:23] *** SouL shows as "online"
[03:30:22] *** Dave has left the room
[03:30:26] *** Dave has joined the room
[03:30:29] *** Dave has left the room
[03:30:41] *** Dave has joined the room
[03:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[03:32:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[03:34:33] *** SouL shows as "online"
[03:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[03:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[04:01:17] *** Dave has left the room
[04:01:20] *** Dave has joined the room
[04:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[04:02:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[04:17:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[04:17:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[04:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[04:32:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[04:33:05] *** Dave has left the room
[04:33:07] *** Dave has joined the room
[04:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[04:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[04:58:05] *** Dave has left the room
[04:58:07] *** Dave has joined the room
[05:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[05:02:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[05:15:04] *** Dave has left the room
[05:15:09] *** Dave has joined the room
[05:15:19] *** Dave has left the room
[05:15:39] *** Dave has joined the room
[05:17:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[05:17:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[05:25:45] *** Dave has left the room
[05:25:49] *** Dave has joined the room
[05:25:52] *** Dave has left the room
[05:26:04] *** Dave has joined the room
[05:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[05:32:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[05:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[05:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[05:56:25] *** Dave has left the room
[05:56:31] *** Dave has joined the room
[05:56:39] *** Dave has left the room
[05:56:51] *** Dave has joined the room
[06:02:13] *** Tobias has left the room
[06:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:02:25] *** Tobias has joined the room
[06:02:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[06:11:56] *** Dave has left the room
[06:12:09] *** Dave has joined the room
[06:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[06:20:03] *** genofire shows as "online"
[06:21:30] *** Zash shows as "online"
[06:21:36] *** Zash shows as "online"
[06:21:42] *** Dave has left the room
[06:21:45] *** Dave has joined the room
[06:21:50] *** Dave has left the room
[06:22:03] *** Dave has joined the room
[06:25:05] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[06:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:32:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[06:35:05] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[06:41:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[06:46:43] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[06:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[06:51:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[06:52:09] *** Dave has left the room
[06:52:15] *** Dave has joined the room
[06:52:16] *** Dave has left the room
[06:52:30] *** Dave has joined the room
[06:58:47] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:58:50] *** ralphm has left the room
[07:00:17] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:02:22] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:02:27] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[07:05:22] *** ralphm has left the room
[07:10:17] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[07:15:21] *** ralphm has joined the room
[07:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[07:20:40] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[07:22:57] *** Dave has left the room
[07:22:59] *** Dave has joined the room
[07:25:40] *** Zash has left the room
[07:25:52] *** Dave has left the room
[07:25:57] *** Zash has left the room
[07:26:31] *** Dave has joined the room
[07:27:12] *** Zash has joined the room
[07:28:27] *** daniel has left the room
[07:29:48] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[07:35:20] *** daniel has left the room
[07:39:48] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:40:23] *** Dave has left the room
[07:40:25] *** Dave has joined the room
[07:40:35] *** Dave has left the room
[07:41:20] *** Dave has joined the room
[07:43:55] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:45:20] *** daniel has left the room
[07:45:54] *** Kev shows as "online"
[07:45:56] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:47:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[07:48:58] *** Dave has left the room
[07:49:04] *** Dave has joined the room
[07:49:09] *** Dave has left the room
[07:49:28] *** Dave has joined the room
[07:50:42] *** Dave has left the room
[07:50:55] *** Dave has joined the room
[07:51:32] *** jonasw has left the room
[07:51:32] *** jonasw has joined the room
[08:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:02:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:07:47] *** Dave has left the room
[08:07:51] *** Dave has joined the room
[08:09:51] *** daniel has left the room
[08:12:22] *** daniel has joined the room
[08:12:43] *** genofire shows as "online"
[08:16:21] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:16:53] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:17:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:17:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:17:45] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:19:57] *** daniel has left the room
[08:20:16] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:21:13] *** daniel has left the room
[08:22:39] *** Dave has left the room
[08:23:06] *** Dave has joined the room
[08:27:07] *** daniel has left the room
[08:27:45] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[08:29:02] *** daniel has joined the room
[08:30:04] *** Dave has left the room
[08:30:05] *** Dave has joined the room
[08:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:32:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:35:53] *** Dave has left the room
[08:35:54] *** Dave has joined the room
[08:41:04] *** pep. shows as "online"
[08:43:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[08:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:53:27] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:01:17] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:01:49] *** ralphm has left the room
[09:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:02:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:03:27] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:05:09] *** Zash shows as "online"
[09:07:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[09:10:37] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:12:45] *** Zash has left the room
[09:13:03] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:13:59] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:15:02] *** Zash shows as "online"
[09:15:09] *** Zash shows as "online"
[09:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:17:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:18:17] *** daniel has left the room
[09:22:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[09:23:57] *** daniel has joined the room
[09:23:59] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:32:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:32:53] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:40:52] *** Dave has left the room
[09:40:54] *** Dave has joined the room
[09:41:27] *** Dave has left the room
[09:41:40] *** Dave has joined the room
[09:42:51] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:44:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:47:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:02:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:08:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:09:43] *** daniel has left the room
[10:12:09] *** Dave has left the room
[10:12:11] *** Dave has joined the room
[10:12:21] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:14:39] *** ralphm has left the room
[10:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:18:07] *** daniel has joined the room
[10:22:21] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:28:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:32:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:33:22] *** Dave has left the room
[10:33:24] *** Dave has joined the room
[10:35:04] *** ralphm has left the room
[10:41:50] *** Dave has left the room
[10:41:53] *** Dave has joined the room
[10:42:12] *** jere has joined the room
[10:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:47:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:51:47] *** Flow has joined the room
[10:53:39] *** Zash has left the room
[10:57:30] *** Dave shows as "online"
[10:59:51] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[11:01:07] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:02:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:02:27] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:05:08] *** Dave has left the room
[11:05:11] *** Dave shows as "online"
[11:05:14] *** Dave has left the room
[11:05:29] *** Dave shows as "online"
[11:08:27] *** Kev shows as "away"
[11:08:27] *** Kev shows as "away"
[11:08:57] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:09:12] *** Kev shows as "online"
[11:09:12] *** Kev shows as "online"
[11:10:25] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:11:27] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:17:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:17:28] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:17:51] *** ralphm has left the room
[11:19:25] *** Kev has left the room
[11:19:26] *** Kev has left the room
[11:21:19] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:21:33] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[11:21:33] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[11:24:23] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:26:55] *** daniel has left the room
[11:27:03] *** daniel has joined the room
[11:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:32:27] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:36:05] *** Dave has left the room
[11:36:07] *** Dave shows as "online"
[11:39:21] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:41:01] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:42:28] *** ralphm has left the room
[11:46:42] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:47:27] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:49:20] *** Dave shows as "online"
[11:55:00] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:55:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:55:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:55:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:55:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:55:52] *** Link Mauve has left the room
[11:55:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:56:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:56:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:56:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:56:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:56:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:56:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:56:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:34] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:42] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:57:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:58:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:58:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:58:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:58:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:58:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:58:44] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:58:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:48] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:59:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[11:59:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:00:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:00:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:00:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:00:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:00:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:00:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:00:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:12] *** Link Mauve has joined the room
[12:01:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:01:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:02:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:02:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:02:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:02:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:02:30] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:02:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:02:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:02:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:03:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:03:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:03:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:03:27] *** ralphm has joined the room
[12:04:10] *** Dave shows as "online"
[12:06:40] *** Dave has left the room
[12:06:42] *** Dave shows as "online"
[12:07:30] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[12:07:47] *** genofire shows as "online"
[12:14:45] *** Link Mauve has left the room
[12:17:03] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[12:17:27] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:17:32] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:21:46] *** Link Mauve has joined the room
[12:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:32:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:36:47] *** Dave has left the room
[12:36:51] *** Dave shows as "online"
[12:36:52] *** Dave has left the room
[12:37:06] *** Dave shows as "online"
[12:44:16] *** daniel has left the room
[12:47:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:47:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:48:05] *** daniel has joined the room
[12:52:23] *** Kev has left the room
[12:52:33] *** daniel has left the room
[12:56:38] *** daniel has joined the room
[12:59:46] *** ralphm has joined the room
[13:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:02:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[13:06:27] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:06:50] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[13:07:27] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:07:32] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:07:40] *** Dave has left the room
[13:07:42] *** Dave shows as "online"
[13:07:45] *** daniel has left the room
[13:07:53] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:08:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[13:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:17:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[13:18:47] *** ralphm has left the room
[13:26:37] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[13:28:10] *** Kev shows as "online"
[13:28:11] *** Kev shows as "online"
[13:28:22] *** daniel has left the room
[13:28:34] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:32:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[13:32:29] *** daniel has left the room
[13:32:42] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:36:04] *** daniel has left the room
[13:36:15] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:38:02] *** Dave has left the room
[13:38:04] *** Dave shows as "online"
[13:38:41] *** Holger has left the room
[13:39:12] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:40:22] *** ralphm has joined the room
[13:41:06] *** Dave shows as "online"
[13:44:51] *** Holger has joined the room
[13:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[13:49:24] *** ralphm has left the room
[13:49:47] *** ralphm has joined the room
[13:53:29] *** jere has left the room
[13:53:37] *** jere has joined the room
[14:00:41] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[14:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:02:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:02:41] *** daniel has left the room
[14:02:43] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[14:02:49] *** daniel has joined the room
[14:08:08] *** Dave has left the room
[14:08:12] *** Dave shows as "online"
[14:08:26] *** Dave has left the room
[14:08:34] *** Dave shows as "online"
[14:10:09] *** ralphm has joined the room
[14:13:08] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[14:13:43] *** daniel has left the room
[14:15:48] *** Dave has left the room
[14:15:50] *** Dave shows as "online"
[14:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:17:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:17:56] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:20:11] *** ralphm has left the room
[14:20:45] *** daniel has joined the room
[14:23:08] *** Dave shows as "online"
[14:28:43] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[14:30:44] *** ralphm has joined the room
[14:32:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:38:36] <Kev> https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/client-key.html would probably benefit from renaming as well.
[14:38:59] <Zash> Naming things
[14:39:42] <Ge0rG> Like user-invite?
[14:41:06] <Dave> Kev, Renaming?
[14:42:05] <Kev> I would expect a client to submit an automatically generated name for themselves in most instances, but have the user able to rename things in the event that they have, for example, two devices with Swift for iOS on.
[14:42:15] <Kev> That's how these things have typically worked in my limited experience.
[14:42:35] <Kev> Last-used is also useful in these instances.
[14:42:55] <Ge0rG> Kev: oh, renaming the client name.
[14:43:31] <Ge0rG> It might also make sense to differentiate long-term CLIENT-KEYs from short-term ones for resumption.
[14:43:52] <Ge0rG> It will be very confusing if a client name is present twice, with different keys, one for 24h and another for 30d.
[14:44:40] *** Holger has left the room
[14:44:40] *** Holger has joined the room
[14:46:51] <Ge0rG> If you read the proto-XEP in an unfortunate scrolling position, §3.2 reads like "Kev Revocation"
[14:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:47:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:47:52] <Dave> You can revoke Kev, but he has a TTL as well, as do we all.
[14:50:51] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[14:50:54] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[14:55:30] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[15:01:34] *** ralphm has joined the room
[15:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[15:02:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:03:18] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:05:43] *** Holger has joined the room
[15:15:05] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:15:59] *** genofire shows as "online"
[15:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[15:17:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:22:30] *** Dave has left the room
[15:22:32] *** Dave shows as "online"
[15:22:38] *** Dave has left the room
[15:22:52] *** Dave shows as "online"
[15:24:59] *** daniel has left the room
[15:32:09] *** ralphm has joined the room
[15:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[15:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:37:28] *** ralphm has left the room
[15:39:55] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:43:06] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[15:47:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:51:02] *** Dave shows as "online"
[15:53:31] *** Dave has left the room
[15:53:33] *** Dave shows as "online"
[15:56:49] *** ralphm has joined the room
[15:58:04] *** daniel has left the room
[15:58:36] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:59:33] <Dave> Are we sitting comfortably?
[16:00:04] <Ge0rG> Yes, sir!
[16:00:39] <Kev> Then let's begin.
[16:00:50] <Dave> Kev, Glad someone got that. :-)
[16:01:06] <Dave> 1) Role Call - Who's here?
[16:01:17] <Kev> I seem to be.
[16:01:20] <daniel> here
[16:01:45] <Dave> SamWhited, ?
[16:02:14] <Ge0rG> still here
[16:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[16:02:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[16:02:30] <Dave> Green-ness from SamWhited but no response, so I'll assume absence for now.
[16:02:34] <Dave> We'll move on...
[16:02:38] <Dave> 2) Agenda
[16:03:04] <Dave> As emailed, but we have one additional ProtoXEP to consider.
[16:03:16] <Kev> I suggest we don't, actually.
[16:03:24] <SamWhited> here now, sorry about that
[16:03:37] <Dave> As far as I can tell from the rules, I should open that vote now, but I'm happy to defer it if we think we ought to?
[16:03:39] <Kev> In as much as if we want to encourage people to be voting in meeting, rather than onlist (and I think we do), slipping things into the agenda without notice is counter to that.
[16:03:40] <Ge0rG> Dave: you skipped the initial #2 from your agenda email.
[16:04:04] <Dave> Ge0rG, I'm renumbering, sorry.
[16:04:04] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:04:06] *** daniel has left the room
[16:04:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:04:22] <Ge0rG> I have no strong opinions on hurrying my and MArc's protoXEP. It wasn't even yet officially announced to the ML.
[16:04:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:04:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:04:41] <Dave> Kev, If everyone's happy with that, we can push it off until next week.
[16:04:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:04:43] <jonasw> (it will be once the mailman passes my mail through; I sent it just now)
[16:04:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:04:55] <Dave> Ge0rG, Oh, in which case it's missed this meeting, so perfect.
[16:04:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:02] <Kev> (When I'll probably be on the road and will have to onlist anyway, unhelpfully)
[16:05:04] <Dave> So, moving on.
[16:05:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:13] <Dave> 3) Did everyone have a nice Christmas?
[16:05:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:18] <Kev> So, long story...
[16:05:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:31] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:32] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:38] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:05:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:00] <Kev> But for the sake of brevity, yes thank you.
[16:06:06] <Ge0rG> Yes, without further detail.
[16:06:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:14] <SamWhited> On list.
[16:06:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:18] <Dave> 4) ProtoXEP: PEP Avatar to vCard conversion.
[16:06:24] <SamWhited> ahem, I mean, "yes, thank you"
[16:06:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:28] <Kev> https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/pep-vcard-conversion.html
[16:06:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:41] <Dave> Kev, Thanks.
[16:06:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:42] <Ge0rG> on list
[16:06:44] <Kev> I've got a few quibbles with this that I'll try to send out on standards@, but nothing to block publication.
[16:06:45] <SamWhited> +1
[16:06:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:06:50] <Kev> (+1)
[16:06:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:07:00] <daniel> +1
[16:07:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:07:10] <Dave> +1 from me.
[16:07:15] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:07:22] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:07:25] <Dave> I read that as everyone +1, and an on list from Ge0rG.
[16:07:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:07:35] <Kev> Yes.
[16:07:38] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:07:46] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:07:53] <Dave> 5) Client Key Support: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/client-key.html
[16:07:54] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:01] <Dave> I'm obviously +1.
[16:08:02] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:11] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:13] <Kev> Could do with some extra stuff, I think, mentioned earlier, but good for publication. +1
[16:08:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:41] <Ge0rG> +1, even though we need to put some more thought into the network-interruption-during-auth issue.
[16:08:47] <SamWhited> +1
[16:08:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:08:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:09:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:09:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:09:19] <Dave> daniel, ?
[16:09:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:09:25] <daniel> on list
[16:09:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:09:38] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:09:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:09:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:00] <Dave> Thanks.
[16:10:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:18] <Dave> 6) TOTP 2FA - https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/totp-2fa.html
[16:10:20] <Kev> +1
[16:10:23] <Ge0rG> on list.
[16:10:24] <daniel> on list as well
[16:10:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:27] <Dave> +1 from me too.
[16:10:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:38] <SamWhited> on list
[16:10:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:50] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:10:58] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:11:10] <Kev> I do think client-key needs examples of it being used.
[16:11:11] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:11:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:11:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:11:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:11:31] <Ge0rG> Kev: examples in the XEP text?
[16:11:36] <Kev> Yes.
[16:11:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:11:40] <Dave> Kev, Yeah, I agree. Needs examples in the I-D too.
[16:11:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:11:49] <Dave> Kev, Same with TOTP.
[16:11:54] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:02] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:15] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:18] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:34] <Dave> 7) Deprecate XEP-0126: Invisibility
[16:12:42] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:44] <Kev> What was the background to this proposal?
[16:12:50] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:12:54] <Kev> (I'm almost certainly +1, but just for flavour...)
[16:12:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:01] <Dave> I'm +1 for this, we should be advising people to do invisibility via Privacy Lists anymore.
[16:13:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:14] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:18] <Kev> Insert negation of choice.
[16:13:22] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:34] <Dave> Kev, I assumed this was SamWhited's general push toward deprecating old stuff.
[16:13:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:43] <Dave> Kev, And yes. Shouldn't be advising.
[16:13:43] *** Dave has left the room
[16:13:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:49] *** Dave shows as "online"
[16:13:49] *** Dave has left the room
[16:13:52] <SamWhited> Yah, background is that privacy lists are deprecated and there are multiple ways to do invisibility which is confusing (I had this specifically brought up at a meetup by some random people)
[16:13:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:13:59] *** Dave shows as "online"
[16:14:02] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:14:05] <Kev> +1
[16:14:07] <SamWhited> +1
[16:14:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:14:13] <Ge0rG> What is the encouraged way to do invisibility?
[16:14:18] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:14:25] <Kev> Ge0rG: With a cloak from Hogwarts.
[16:14:26] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:14:35] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:14:35] <Dave> Ge0rG, XEP-0186 from memory. I may have the number wrong, but it's somewhere around there.
[16:14:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:14:45] <daniel> +1
[16:14:47] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:14:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:14:50] <Ge0rG> Kev: that can be circumvented with the Marauder's Map.
[16:14:51] <SamWhited> Ge0rG: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0186.html
[16:14:54] <Kev> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0186.html
[16:14:58] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:15:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:15:09] <Dave> Kev, Did I mention that Hogwart's is being closed? Or at least, the Great Hall part of it?
[16:15:14] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:15:17] <Dave> But anyway.
[16:15:22] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:15:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:15:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:15:39] <Dave> I see a +1 from everyone except Ge0rG.
[16:15:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:15:52] <Ge0rG> I suppose this is an "on list" from me then, I don't want to rush things without skimming through both XEPs
[16:15:54] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:02] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:15] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:19] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:26] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:50] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:16:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:07] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:11] <Dave> 8) Trello Tidy
[16:17:18] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[16:17:22] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[16:17:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:29] <Dave> A few things in Trello I'm not clear about the status of:
[16:17:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:46] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:54] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:17:58] <Ge0rG> BTW, who is taking notes?
[16:18:02] <Dave> a) There's a bunch of stuff in Pending that I think has expired and/or been voted on.
[16:18:04] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:18:15] <Dave> Ge0rG, Yeah, nobody volunteered so I'll write something up later.
[16:18:25] <Ge0rG> Dave: thanks
[16:19:19] <Ge0rG> Are pep-vcard-conversion and "Deprecating 84" in conflict?
[16:19:41] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:19:52] <SamWhited> Yes, but even if we decide to deprecate one of the avatar formats I don't think it hurts to have the informational work around available for a while
[16:19:52] <Dave> In particular, I think we were bound by rules to repeat the Last Call for XEP-0387, but I don't see that as having happened.
[16:20:05] *** Dave has left the room
[16:20:08] *** Dave shows as "online"
[16:20:09] <Dave> But also, people have continued commenting on the previous Last Call thread.
[16:20:57] <SamWhited> I am not interested in addressing feedback that came in after the last call was over. Forcing it to be restarted and never getting this out the door is starting to drive me mad. Feedback will be addressed in a future version (lots of it is very good), but not in this one unless someone else wants to take over.
[16:20:57] <Ge0rG> The Last-but-one Call?
[16:21:45] <Dave> SamWhited, I'm fine with that.
[16:22:01] <Dave> SamWhited, I'm just trying to figure out if we can actually vote it through at this point.
[16:22:35] <Ge0rG> According to my mail log, the last Last Call was going from December 7th to December 21st, and there was no feedback after December 11th.
[16:22:56] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:23:05] <Dave> Ge0rG, I can't find that Last Call announced on the mailing list, which is my problem. Was it?
[16:23:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:23:33] <Dave> Oh, wait, yes it was.
[16:23:37] <Dave> Title changed, of course.
[16:23:41] <Ge0rG> Dave: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2017-December/034019.html
[16:24:10] <Dave> So yes, we *can* vote on this (and I should have put it on the agenda, sorry)
[16:24:21] <Ge0rG> So while the discussion was under the Last-but-one Call email thread, I don't think the content should be ignored.
[16:24:45] <Kev> We can vote, but I don't think the feedback there has been incorporated as of yet.
[16:25:04] <SamWhited> It will be incorporated in the 2019 suites since it came in after the LC had ended.
[16:25:22] <Kev> https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2017-December/034019.html - that last call?
[16:25:26] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: are you speaking of the October LC?
[16:25:32] <Dave> SamWhited, No, looks like there was a Last Call open at the time.
[16:26:27] <SamWhited> I don't recall. I'm reasonably sure I had all feedback addressed, then the council changed before the voting was finished and now we have another LC and more feedback.
[16:27:14] <Dave> SamWhited, Sounds about right. Can you incorporate that feedback and we'll vote (and hopfully publish) next week?
[16:27:42] <Kev> I think that flow of events is correct, but the implication that the more recent feedback doesn't need addressing doesn't seem right to me.
[16:27:46] <SamWhited> No, I would like us to vote on the current form. We can address anything else remaining in next years.
[16:28:35] <Kev> That seems to be a sake of process for the sake of process.
[16:28:45] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: are you going to keep a list of open feedback items for next year's Compliance Suite?
[16:28:57] <SamWhited> I disagree, restarting the LC seems to be process for the sake of process
[16:29:14] <SamWhited> I just want compliance suites to actually exist in the year that is in the title.
[16:29:26] <Ge0rG> I don't know, without re-reading the whole thread and the XEP, which feedback is still pending and needs to be carried over into 2019.
[16:29:46] <Kev> I mean issuing a vote when you already know that one of Council has outstanding feedback that isn't getting addressed seems to be a redundant action.
[16:30:24] <Kev> If I issue a PR to address my feedback, does that make this any easier?
[16:30:42] <Kev> Not that I have any spare cycles.
[16:31:03] *** daniel has left the room
[16:31:32] <SamWhited> No, it doesn't, the point is to not go through multiple more weeks with multiple more changes which will just lead to more people having disagreements and more revisions. At some point we just have to say "this is good enough for this year". That *should* have happened before this year started, and it was on track to, then an excuse was made to continue putting it off and submit feedback late.
[16:31:41] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[16:32:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[16:32:53] <Kev> The way I see this, me being on Council requires me to do a thorough review of it before advancement. I did that, and found stuff that needs addressing. Whether that was given during the renewed LC, or at vote time, doesn't change that. But doing it during LC gives the opportunity to address it before the vote.
[16:34:02] <Dave> SamWhited, Yes, we do have to decide when to say it's good enough. And it's Council that does that, via the process in XEP-0001. I don't think ignoring feedback is a solution here.
[16:35:00] <Dave> ANyway, we're running out of time, so I'll move on for now.
[16:35:06] <Ge0rG> Kev: if your feedback is not incorporated before the vote, does that imply a -1?
[16:35:35] <Dave> I think we'll skip to:
[16:35:37] <Kev> Ge0rG: Well, yes. Unless the discussion leads to my feedback being wrong-or-such.
[16:35:41] <Dave> 9) AOB
[16:35:41] <Ge0rG> Maybe we can arrange for a vote of the XEP as-is, _now_, and have Kev make the PR and Sam start a "Compliance Suite 2019" with the feedback incorporated in the next weeks?
[16:36:18] <Kev> No real AOB here. I'll send out a request for agenda for the Summit shortly, but nothing much for Council to do about that.
[16:36:20] <Ge0rG> We've had a Council re-election and holiday season block progress for some time already.
[16:36:23] <daniel> AOB: publish-options
[16:36:41] <daniel> can we vote on one of the PRs
[16:36:48] <daniel> preferably the latest one
[16:37:29] <Dave> daniel, We can; I saw these were voted on, but the vote was deferred for more feedback from the list - but I didn't see any discussion there.
[16:37:33] <Ge0rG> daniel: IIRC you wanted to ask for comments from the community?
[16:38:18] <Ge0rG> As I lack experience with pubsub and understanding of the complexities of 0060, I'd like to hear from parties implementing this and/or impacted by the change.
[16:38:41] <daniel> Ge0rG, i wanted to ask for comments? i already did. that was mostly ignored. so i assume people either don't care or it's 'above their heads'/the don't have an opinion on that
[16:39:00] <daniel> not sure how waiting longer or bumping the thread will be any help
[16:39:17] <daniel> at some point council will have to make a decision
[16:39:32] <daniel> as you can't force 'the community' to have an opinion on that
[16:39:33] <Dave> daniel, OK, but the vote was explicitly deferred in order to gain feedback. Hence I didn't put it on this week's agenda.
[16:39:51] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:40:16] <Ge0rG> I don't know of PubSub implementations outside of the ones represented by xsf@ lurkers.
[16:40:18] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:40:22] <daniel> Dave, how would you like me to gather feedback then?
[16:40:26] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:40:34] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:40:36] <Dave> daniel, If you're asking for a vote in the absence of community feedback, I think I'd want to vote on-list to find the time to really study these in any case.
[16:40:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:40:50] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:40:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:17] <Dave> daniel, I'm not - I wasn't in that meeting. I'm just going by the decision made in my absence. Let's vote on this next week, feedback or not.
[16:41:18] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:19] <Ge0rG> Do we have council members who are working on affected implementations, besides of daniel?
[16:41:22] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:24] <Kev> I think anything in AOB that's going to need Council to do reading to get context in their heads is going to result on on-list at best, so may as well be a formal item in the following meeting. But I can onlist.
[16:41:30] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:36] <Kev> Ge0rG: All pubsub implementations are affected, I think. So yes.
[16:41:38] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:41:58] <Ge0rG> Kev: it would be great to have feedback from those Council members, then. On list.
[16:41:59] <daniel> Dave, i'm more than fine with council members taking their time. i just want them to take that time and not prolong this for ages
[16:42:07] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:42:10] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:42:13] <SamWhited> I'm all for voting on list, this meeting or next. I don't think we're going to get any community feedback on this as XEP-0060 is just too complicated and very few people understand it and even fewer have implemented it.
[16:42:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:42:25] <daniel> or come up with a strategy to gather feedback from people who work with pubsub
[16:42:26] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:42:29] <Dave> daniel, It'll be on next week. That's the first of the XEP-0060 trello cards, is it?
[16:42:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:42:42] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:42:43] <daniel> ok
[16:42:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:42:58] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:43:01] <Dave> So:
[16:43:01] <Kev> If someone starts a thread, or bumps the current thread, asking for feedback, I'll give mine there. Then maybe that will encourage others to give feedback on standards@. Or maybe it won't, but it's a chance.
[16:43:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:43:07] <Dave> 10) Next meeting
[16:43:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:43:19] <Dave> Same time next week?
[16:43:20] <Ge0rG> +1W WFM
[16:43:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:43:23] <Kev> I can't do next week, but enjoy yourselves without me.
[16:43:24] <SamWhited> WFM
[16:43:31] <Dave> Kev has given apologies already, anyone else?
[16:43:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:43:46] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:43:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:44:02] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:44:10] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:44:26] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:44:30] <Dave> I'll take that as a no.
[16:44:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:44:38] <Dave> So I think we're done.
[16:44:44] <Dave> 11) Ite, Meeting Est.
[16:44:48] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:44:50] <Dave> Now I can go write the minutes.
[16:44:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:45:00] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:45:01] <Kev> Thanks all.
[16:45:08] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:45:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:45:24] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:45:32] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:45:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:45:56] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:46:04] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:46:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:46:20] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:46:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:46:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:46:45] *** SouL shows as "online"
[16:46:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:46:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:08] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[16:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[16:47:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:40] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:49] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:47:56] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:48:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:48:12] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:48:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:48:28] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:48:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:48:44] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:48:52] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:08] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:23] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:49:24] *** ralphm has joined the room
[16:49:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:32] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:42] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:48] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:49:56] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:50:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:50:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:50:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:50:28] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:50:37] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:50:45] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:50:53] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:00] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:17] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:41] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:48] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:51:56] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:52:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:52:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:52:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:52:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:52:42] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:52:44] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:52:52] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:09] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:16] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:25] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:42] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:48] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:53:57] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:54:05] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:54:13] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:54:21] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:54:29] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:54:38] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:55:37] <SamWhited> So, RE Compliance Suites: I think it is important to work to a deadline on these. The beginning of the year may be an arbitrary deadline, but if we're going to consistently issue guidelines we can't keep doing a repeat of the 2010 or 2012 ones where they end up being in experimental for 5 years (or even half of a year). This is not a normal XEP where we can never make changes again after final and once the community adopts it it's hard to change, we have another shot every year. I hope that clarifies my position a bit.
[16:56:08] <SamWhited> If a council member thinks that it would be harmful to issue these as guidelines, they can of course -1 but I don't think any of the problems with it are that serious.
[16:56:42] *** Dave has left the room
[16:56:47] *** Dave shows as "online"
[16:56:57] *** Dave has left the room
[16:57:09] *** Dave shows as "online"
[16:57:51] *** daniel has left the room
[16:58:08] *** Dave has left the room
[16:58:26] *** genofire shows as "online"
[16:58:27] *** Dave shows as "online"
[16:59:07] <Kev> I think missing things out, or recommending the 'wrong' thing (e.g. '84 instead of '153, not doing '49/'54) can be actively harmful for interop, as we expect new implementations to use these specs as a 'what do I need to implement at the moment', which is why I care. You've noted before that it's confusing when there are multiple options on the table and people don't know which to choose. If we point people in the wrong direction for the current reality with the compliance suites, that's adding to the confusion.
[16:59:30] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:59:34] <Kev> It's not the same as having some nice feature that we could include, but don't, for things like that, in my view.
[16:59:55] <jonasw> I think the argument was that the compliance suites should posit how things *should* be, not how they currently are?
[17:01:32] <Ge0rG> Isn't it somewhere in between? What is needed for interop, and what is needed for a nice future?
[17:01:33] <Kev> How far ahead? The 153/84 thing isn't clear at all. '49 has been the status quo for a decade and a half, and shows no signs of changing, etc.
[17:02:14] <SamWhited> Then that feedback should have been sent when it was in LC
[17:02:20] <Kev> If we have compliance suites where implementing the suggestions means that you can't interoperate with the same features as everyone else does them, that seems deeply unhelpful unless we're very clear that it's aspirational.
[17:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[17:02:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:02:59] <Kev> SamWhited: There's two things with that. 1) There has been a new LC, triggered by the change of Council, since. 2) Council's review on advancement is not the same as LC feedback from the public.
[17:03:57] <SamWhited> 1 is process for processes sake and I don't think ever should have happened
[17:04:17] <SamWhited> 2 I disagree, council should have gotten their feedback in before it came to them for a vote so that it could have been addressed
[17:04:48] <Kev> I wasn't Council for the previous LC, and it hasn't been voted yet. Which is one of the reasons for (1).
[17:04:48] <SamWhited> If there is disagreement and it's not addressed they are obviously free to -1, but we should still get feedback to the author in a timely manner instead of giving it when we -1
[17:05:01] <SamWhited> I don't see why your feedback would change because you are or are not council
[17:05:21] <Kev> Did you do the same level of review of all XEPs going through the process before you were on Council, honestly?
[17:05:55] <Kev> The level of review expected by Council is not the same as that expected by every other person in the community.
[17:06:06] <SamWhited> I suppose that's fair; if I reviewed them at all I gave the same amount, but I didn't review all of them before I was council.
[17:06:08] <Kev> The level of review expected by Council is not the same as that expected from every other person in the community.
[17:06:40] <Kev> The reason I took a break from Council, as it happens, was purely because I couldn't afford to spend the many hours every week it often takes me to be on Council.
[17:06:53] <SamWhited> Either way, this is about deadlines and I think we should have made the deadline and should still get these out as quickly as possible even if they're not perfect. I don't see any major problems with them as they are now (for compatibility or otherwise) so I would like to have it voted on. If it's -1ed because someone disagrees then so be it.
[17:06:54] <jonasw> (FWIW, this was the final argument which convinced me to issue the LC, I didn’t do that for process’ sake)
[17:08:06] <Ge0rG> So how can we move on from here?
[17:08:13] <Kev> If this had made it through previous Council, this wouldn't have come up, but as things stand, the XEP is in front of me and as Council I do have to make the vote I think is appropriate - and I do think some of the recommendations in there will add to confusion and therefore be potentially harmful.
[17:08:35] <Kev> I have offered to propose the changes I think are needed myself, to try to unstall this, but I can't force that.
[17:08:37] <SamWhited> More harmful than continuing to not have compliance suites even though we could immediately fix them in the experimental suites for next year?
[17:08:47] <Kev> (I really don't want to, because I'm time-poor, but I will).
[17:09:27] <Kev> We could immediately fix them in the suites for this year, and have them advanced, too.
[17:10:05] <Kev> The time to write the changes for the current text is presumably shorter than to write a new protoXEP, and we've not voted on either yet.
[17:10:18] <SamWhited> But that will take multiple more weeks and I think it's much more important to have compliance suites issued in a timely manner.
[17:10:52] <Kev> Does it need to?
[17:11:49] <Kev> It would be uncomfortable for me to fit submitting a patch in before next meeting, but I will if that's the only way to unstick this.
[17:12:15] <jonasw> FWIW, there’s no need for a new LC if changes are incorporated
[17:12:18] <Kev> Vote happens next Wednesday. Everyone other than me votes in meeting. I vote onlist at the start of the following week. 12 days and it's done.
[17:12:23] <Kev> jonasw: I know.
[17:12:25] <jonasw> if I’m reading XEP-0001 correctly
[17:12:30] <jonasw> I’m not sure that SamWhited knows.
[17:12:42] <SamWhited> I am aware
[17:12:51] <jonasw> so I don’t see how this will take weeks.
[17:12:58] <jonasw> update today, vote next week, 1w exactly, done.
[17:12:59] <SamWhited> I am just sick to death of us having to have everything be perfect and not being able to meet a simple deadline.
[17:13:24] <SamWhited> As soon as there are new changes there will be someone else mad about it and we'll bike shed for another month. I hope to be proven wrong on that, of course.
[17:13:34] <Kev> I think the only deadline is actually the Author having addressed feedback before Council votes on it ;)
[17:13:44] <jonasw> SamWhited, no, they won’t be asked
[17:13:52] <SamWhited> And that was done, then the council didn't vote for weeks and made up an excuse to put it back into LC again.
[17:14:14] <jonasw> well, okay, they will be asked implicitly, but I doubt that there will be much going on w.r.t. to that.
[17:14:14] <Kev> I think you're wrongly fixating on LC here.
[17:14:32] <Kev> The only thing the LC has meant is that my feedback went to list as LC feedback, rather than as justification for -1.
[17:14:52] <moparisthebest> as an aside I think SamWhited is right, for instance the new https://dino.im/ website advertises "compliant with the official XMPP Compliance Suites 2016." and to someone not deeply involved in XSF that looks like it's 2 years out-dated
[17:14:54] <Ge0rG> With the LC over, one way or another, Council are the only ones who are allowed (and required) to provide feedback now.
[17:14:59] <Kev> In both cases the Author's expected to address it to the satisfaction of Council.
[17:15:14] <Kev> Ge0rG: Well, that's not true. Anyone is allowed to provide feedback at any time.
[17:15:27] <Ge0rG> Kev: damn.
[17:15:36] <Kev> LC is a request for a specific type of feedback, at a specific time. But standards@ is not muted the rest of the time.
[17:15:37] <jonasw> but council does not need to issue a new LC
[17:15:48] <jonasw> council is free to advance a XEP in its current state, no matter which pending feedback there is
[17:15:48] *** ralphm has joined the room
[17:15:57] <SamWhited> It was addressed to the satisfaction of council as far as I understood it, then the goalposts shifted and here we are over a week into 2018 and we still only have 2016 compliance suites.
[17:16:10] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:16:31] <Kev> If it was addressed to the satisfaction of old Council, surely it would have been advanced by now?
[17:17:09] <Kev> But regardless, current state is, I think:
[17:17:12] <SamWhited> One would think. These are also the same compliance suites that should have been 2017 ones but we kept bikeshedding details until eventually I just renamed them 2018.
[17:17:18] <Kev> Sam wants a compliance suite 2018 to be advanced.
[17:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[17:17:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:17:34] <Kev> Kev wants changes made to compliance suites 2018. Kev wants compliance suites 2018 advanced.
[17:17:48] <Kev> OK. So old Council failed. That can be a thing.
[17:18:00] <Kev> New Council are here, and there is a clear path to how to get this advanced imminently.
[17:18:19] <Kev> I don't currently understanding why you don't want to take it.
[17:18:25] <Kev> I also don't English, obviously.
[17:19:05] <Kev> If it's that you think the changes I'm proposing are actively wrong, I don't think that was reflected in your replies to date.
[17:19:54] *** genofire shows as "online"
[17:20:00] <SamWhited> We should have voted weeks ago, we should have voted this week, etc. every time there is some excuse why we should vote later. More changes will just lead to more delays.
[17:20:16] <SamWhited> But I do think the feedback was good, FWIW, just not worth spending more time on until next years.
[17:20:17] <Kev> I don't think it was on Dave's agenda for voting this week.
[17:20:40] <jonasw> SamWhited, do you really think that people are actively making up excuses to sabotage the compliance suites to be published?
[17:20:43] <SamWhited> There has been a card on trello for months asking for a vote.
[17:20:47] <jonasw> SamWhited, do you really think that people are actively making up excuses to sabotage the compliance suites from being published?
[17:20:49] <SamWhited> jonasw: not in a malicious way, but yes
[17:20:51] <Kev> I get, I totally get, the frustration in this dragging on. But I'm offering an out here by doing the work needed to get this through.
[17:20:58] <jonasw> what is a non-malicious way of doing that?
[17:20:59] <Kev> And entirely not because I love doing XEP work.
[17:21:53] <Kev> So, separating 'how we got here' from 'where we go next', I'm not currently clear why you would rather it go to vote next week in a form it'll be rejected, rather than go to vote next week in a form I have no reason to anticipate won't be accepted.
[17:21:56] <jonasw> Kev, if you can summarize in two sentences what changes you want, I’ll make a PR for you.
[17:22:40] <Kev> jonasw: Thanks. I think at the point I've trawled my previous comments and got it down to two sentences, I may as well submit the PR, but I very much appreciate the sentiment.
[17:22:50] <jonasw> k
[17:23:46] <SamWhited> (just got pulled into an actual work meeting, sorry, maybe be unresponsive for an hour or so)
[17:28:50] *** Dave has left the room
[17:28:52] *** Dave shows as "online"
[17:29:03] *** Dave has left the room
[17:29:11] *** Dave shows as "online"
[17:32:05] *** Dave has left the room
[17:32:08] *** Dave shows as "online"
[17:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[17:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:34:29] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm away"
[17:40:08] *** daniel has left the room
[17:40:14] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:40:51] *** SamWhited has left the room
[17:45:44] *** daniel has left the room
[17:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[17:47:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:50:15] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:50:32] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:51:01] *** jere has joined the room
[17:51:34] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:51:48] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:56:19] <Kev> https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/554 seems to be stuck in limbo, after we agreed on needing it in Council last year. I think that needs a Council vote too.
[17:56:50] *** Kev shows as "away"
[17:57:53] *Kev adds to agenda.
[17:57:56] *** ralphm has joined the room
[17:58:33] <Ge0rG> Kev: thanks
[17:59:11] *** Dave has left the room
[17:59:25] *** Dave shows as "online"
[18:00:16] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:01:48] *** Dave shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:02:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:05:00] *** genofire shows as "online"
[18:15:36] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:16:34] *** daniel has left the room
[18:16:56] *** genofire shows as "online"
[18:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:19:30] *** Tobias has joined the room
[18:20:07] *** Dave has left the room
[18:20:10] *** Dave shows as "online"
[18:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:32:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:35:52] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:41:00] *** Dave shows as "online"
[18:41:06] *** genofire shows as "online"
[18:45:07] *** Dave has left the room
[18:45:11] *** Dave shows as "online"
[18:45:24] *** Dave has left the room
[18:45:32] *** Dave shows as "online"
[18:45:50] *** ralphm has joined the room
[18:46:22] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:49:12] *** genofire shows as "online"
[18:54:30] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:54:42] *** Dave shows as "online"
[18:54:43] <Kev> I have submitted a PR that addresses my feedback, and which I will happily +1 if merged.
[18:54:44] <Kev> https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/569
[18:54:52] <Kev> From the PR message:
[18:55:03] <Kev> This addresses, I believe, all the issues I raised. Where I was wrong (84), or it was contentious (220), I've dropped the point. Where Sam felt it was worth watering down (needing 153, but only read-only), I've done so.
[18:56:20] <Kev> If other Council folks would be kind enough to review this and check if I've screwed anything up, or this would alter their +1 of the spec, please let me know early. Ideally before Sam reviews it, to make this painless for him.
[18:56:47] <Kev> Assuming this gets merged in time, I suggest a vote on advancement next week.
[18:57:06] <Kev> daniel, Ge0rG, Dave: ^
[18:58:07] <Kev> I will be mostly out of action between morning Friday and next meeting, so if people have things I need to address, please let me know by then.
[18:59:27] *** Kev has left the room
[19:00:07] <Ge0rG> Damn. Reading those diffs is really a painful excercise in following up indirections.
[19:00:54] <Ge0rG> We should add aliases &yes; and &no; for the #1000x codes
[19:01:07] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:01:50] *** genofire shows as "online"
[19:02:13] <Zash> The what
[19:02:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[19:02:22] *** Dave has left the room
[19:02:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:02:27] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:02:30] *** Dave has left the room
[19:02:44] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:03:05] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[19:05:22] <Ge0rG> So ✓ is "yes" and ✕ is "no", and you need to know the order of the columns from elsewhere in the document
[19:06:22] *** Zash has left the room
[19:07:10] <Ge0rG> Kev: so you've added 223 to the "IM / Advanced Server" profile, but not 222.
[19:07:30] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:08:03] <Zash> How was it you fetched PRs from git?
[19:08:42] <SamWhited> Ge0rG: if you know XML-y things I would love suggestions on how to fix that… I constantly put things in the wrong place because I couldn't remember what the number of each one was.
[19:08:46] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:08:49] <Ge0rG> Zash: `git fetch <remote> pull/25/head:<localname>`
[19:08:54] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:09:11] <SamWhited> Although, it's always UTF-8 encoded no? Maybe I just don't need to escape them… not sure why I didn't think of that before, I should try that.
[19:09:50] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: might be as easy as this:
`<!ENTITY yes "✓">`
[19:09:59] <SamWhited> oh, that's a good idea too…
[19:10:05] <SamWhited> Thanks, I'll update that in next years.
[19:10:11] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: great!
[19:10:23] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: I hope you keep track of the pending changes for 2019.
[19:10:24] *** genofire shows as "online"
[19:13:38] *** Kev shows as "online"
[19:13:54] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:14:53] <Kev> Kev: so you've added 223 to the "IM / Advanced Server" profile, but not 222.

Yes, because 223 is needed for 48, but this might not be clear. It was already required, I just called it out.
[19:15:05] <Ge0rG> Kev: 48 RECOMMENDs 223, but it does not REQUIRE it.
[19:15:08] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:15:24] <Ge0rG> I still think it is good to call out support for 223, but then we should also add 222.
[19:15:48] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:15:58] <Ge0rG> Anyway, I'm okay with any subset, including the empty one, of {222, 223} be part of CS2018.
[19:16:30] <Kev> Ge0rG: I'm trying to keep the diff as small as possible while addressing my comments. If you really want 222 if 223 is added, I'd be inclined to remove 223, but I think what I've got there is helpful.
[19:16:45] <Kev> Ok, thanks. In that case, I'd go with what's there.
[19:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[19:17:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:17:26] <Kev> I was pondering whether to have 223 as a client or not. I'm happy to make that change if people want.
[19:18:03] <Ge0rG> Kev: my feeling tells me to replace the "N/A", but then again I haven't implemented PEP yet anyway.
[19:20:10] *** genofire shows as "online"
[19:20:49] *** Dave has left the room
[19:20:52] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:20:55] *** Dave has left the room
[19:21:11] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:25:16] *** Dave shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:25:26] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:27:28] *** genofire shows as "online"
[19:29:21] *** ralphm has joined the room
[19:30:39] *** Kev shows as "away"
[19:32:31] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[19:32:36] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:35:06] *** Dave has left the room
[19:35:08] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:35:16] *** Dave shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:37:26] *** Dave has left the room
[19:37:39] *** Dave shows as "online"
[19:38:19] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:41:40] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[19:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:48:25] *** ralphm has joined the room
[19:49:53] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[19:50:50] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[19:50:56] <pep.> ooi, why are the compliance suites dated by year, and not versioned? Is there a rationale somewhere?
[19:51:00] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[19:51:27] <pep.> I think that forces imaginary deadlines for no reason
[19:51:40] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:53:36] <daniel> pep.: so people see that this is recent and is actively being worked on
[19:53:58] *** genofire shows as "online"
[19:54:15] <daniel> Come the year 2022 you have no idea whether version 3 of the compliance suite is still current or something that hasn't been worked on in years
[19:55:15] <pep.> I see your point, but I don't know if end-users need to know or care. I don't think they should even have to know about XMPP in the first place
[19:55:45] <pep.> Developers will know what version X of XEP-Y means
[19:56:14] <daniel> I wasn't talking about end users
[19:56:21] <daniel> And no developers don't know
[19:56:24] <Zash> Weren't compliance suites supposed to be for marketing or certification?
[19:56:40] <pep.> daniel, that is sad :/
[19:56:46] <daniel> Zash: they can if you want them to
[19:57:01] <daniel> I have a course you can let your employer pay for
[19:57:01] <pep.> But yes that makes sense for marketing etc.
[19:57:11] <daniel> That makes you a certified xmpp developer
[19:57:33] <pep.> You give them a medal? :P
[19:57:42] <daniel> Certificate
[19:57:48] <pep.> Same
[19:58:09] <daniel> People love certificates. HR loves certificates
[19:59:00] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:59:19] <daniel> Everyone has a masters degree these days. But a certificate will set you apart
[19:59:33] <pep.> I don't, and most at work here don't
[19:59:57] <pep.> Still I think we're doing ok
[20:00:16] <pep.> But yes sadly I get that's how it is
[20:01:09] <moparisthebest> I'm positive it's not universal at all, but I've worked with 2 devs that had masters degrees and both were the worst devs I've ever worked with 😛
[20:01:22] *** genofire shows as "online"
[20:01:25] <moparisthebest> compared to the rest of the devs I work with with only bachelors degrees or no degrees
[20:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:02:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:03:29] *** Syndace has left the room
[20:03:35] *** Syndace has joined the room
[20:04:07] <daniel> But in all seriousness: most normale developers (normal as in outside the xsf) believe xmpp an unnavigateable jungle of XEPs. Telling them here are the 8 xeps you should implement if you want your product to be compatible is really useful. And has nothing to do with just marketing
[20:04:39] <pep.> daniel, don't get me wrong, I know compliance suites are useful
[20:04:43] <daniel> You can't assume that the average developer will know 400 xeps or do the research into what xeps are implemented by other clients
[20:04:49] <pep.> daniel, don't get me wrong, I also think compliance suites are useful
[20:05:57] <pep.> I would hope developers would aim for some interoperability with other clients and servers
[20:06:08] <pep.> If their product is out in the open
[20:06:22] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:06:48] <moparisthebest> but also used for marketing I think is good, but can also go wrong, dino.im mentions it's compliant with 2016 suites, which to everyone not in XSF makes it look 2 years behind
[20:07:12] <pep.> They could say "the latest compliance suite"
[20:07:19] <pep.> That already looks better
[20:07:29] <moparisthebest> but then where would it link? and it might not always be true 🙂
[20:07:45] <pep.> Yes people have to keep up-to-date, it's a fact
[20:08:09] <pep.> They can change the text if it's not true anymore, or change the link to point to the newer versoin
[20:08:13] <pep.> They can change the text if it's not true anymore, or change the link to point to the newer version
[20:08:28] *** Dave has left the room
[20:08:31] *** Dave shows as "online"
[20:09:12] <pep.> Or they can keep "2016" if they don't care about people thinking what you said above
[20:09:49] *** ralphm has joined the room
[20:11:41] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[20:14:30] *** genofire shows as "online"
[20:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:23:48] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:27:19] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[20:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:33:10] *** daniel has left the room
[20:33:48] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[20:34:30] *** daniel has joined the room
[20:35:39] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[20:36:28] *** genofire shows as "online"
[20:36:41] *** Zash has left the room
[20:41:30] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:42:08] *** genofire shows as "online"
[20:44:34] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:47:07] *** Kev shows as "online"
[20:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:48:43] <Kev> Scrolling backwards a bit, I don't have a Masters. That makes me great, right?
[20:50:00] *** daniel has left the room
[20:50:58] <Tobias> No wizard hat?
[20:51:23] *** ralphm has joined the room
[20:51:45] *** Dave has left the room
[20:51:50] *** Dave shows as "online"
[20:52:19] *** Dave has left the room
[20:52:27] *** Dave shows as "online"
[20:52:46] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:53:09] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:57:22] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[20:58:12] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[20:58:35] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[20:59:00] *** Zash has joined the room
[20:59:09] *** Zash shows as "online"
[20:59:36] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[21:02:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[21:02:46] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[21:10:32] *** ralphm has joined the room
[21:13:29] *** Kev has left the room
[21:15:29] *** daniel has left the room
[21:15:38] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:16:24] *** Tobias has left the room
[21:16:45] *** Tobias has joined the room
[21:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[21:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[21:17:55] *** daniel has left the room
[21:18:02] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[21:18:06] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:18:52] *** daniel has left the room
[21:20:24] *** Dave has left the room
[21:20:28] *** Dave shows as "online"
[21:20:58] *** Dave has left the room
[21:21:07] *** Dave shows as "online"
[21:22:59] *** SamWhited has left the room
[21:23:39] *** Dave has left the room
[21:23:42] *** Dave shows as "online"
[21:24:14] *** Dave has left the room
[21:24:23] *** Dave shows as "online"
[21:31:49] *** Kev shows as "online"
[21:31:49] *** Kev shows as "online"
[21:32:09] <Kev> I had a floppy hat, which is better.
[21:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[21:32:22] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[21:34:16] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[21:37:03] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[21:43:02] *** Kev shows as "away"
[21:44:00] *** pep. shows as "online"
[21:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[21:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[21:50:13] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[21:51:23] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[21:53:55] *** Dave has left the room
[21:53:59] *** Dave shows as "online"
[21:54:35] *** Dave has left the room
[21:54:47] *** Dave shows as "online"
[21:57:33] *** ralphm has joined the room
[22:01:19] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[22:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[22:02:24] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[22:02:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[22:02:45] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[22:07:59] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[22:12:23] *** Kev shows as "online"
[22:12:27] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[22:13:38] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[22:16:14] *** ralphm has left the room
[22:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[22:17:21] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[22:18:19] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[22:21:07] *** ralphm has joined the room
[22:25:05] *** Dave has left the room
[22:25:07] *** Dave shows as "online"
[22:26:18] *** genofire shows as "online"
[22:27:07] *** Kev shows as "away"
[22:28:40] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[22:29:51] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[22:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[22:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[22:32:54] *** SouL shows as "online"
[22:33:03] *** SouL shows as "online"
[22:35:29] *** Zash has left the room
[22:35:47] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[22:37:17] *** Zash has joined the room
[22:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[22:47:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[22:54:56] *** Dave has left the room
[22:55:01] *** Dave shows as "online"
[22:55:31] *** Dave has left the room
[22:55:38] *** Dave shows as "online"
[22:59:30] *** Dave has left the room
[22:59:33] *** Dave shows as "online"
[23:02:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[23:02:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[23:17:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[23:17:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[23:22:21] *** ralphm has left the room
[23:23:06] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[23:25:03] *** ralphm has joined the room
[23:29:26] *** Dave has left the room
[23:29:29] *** Dave shows as "online"
[23:30:10] *** Dave has left the room
[23:30:24] *** Dave shows as "online"
[23:32:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[23:32:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[23:47:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[23:47:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[23:53:11] *** Holger shows as "online"
[23:56:27] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"