XMPP Council - 2019-01-17


  1. jonas’

    oli, good idea

  2. jonas’

    Ge0rG, that speaks a lot for XMPP if you haven’t noticed your client swallowing messages with xml:lang in the body...

  3. jonas’

    Ge0rG, this is probably a bug in smack though, because *most* messages have an (implicit) xml:lang in the body anyways

  4. Ge0rG

    jonas’: probably yes, but I can't exclude that I'm calling the wrong API. Unfortunately, some of them are not very intuitive

  5. jonas’

    *mumble* that still should not make a difference *mumble*

  6. Ge0rG

    I'll report my findings, but rather in a different place

  7. jonas’

    seems sensible

  8. Ge0rG

    Secretary: !list

  9. Secretary

    Ge0rG, there are 4 open polls square brackets (due in 2 weeks, on 2019-01-30) Accept "Some dummy XEP" to Experimental: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/dummy-recommendations.html (due in 2 weeks, on 2019-01-30) Accept "Cryptographic Hash Function Recommendations for XMPP" to Experimental: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html (due in 2 weeks, on 2019-01-30) new: the opposite of old (due in 2 weeks, on 2019-01-30)

  10. pep.

    Secretary, !list

  11. jonas’

    pep., it ignores non council members

  12. pep.

    Yeah I know, I was wondering if list could be public maybe

  13. jonas’

    although it probably should not for listing commands maybe

  14. jonas’

    pep., file an issue at https://github.com/horazont/councilbot

  15. pep.

    I was going to say "or just members of the room", but there's no members, we're almost all randoms here

  16. jonas’

    dwd, we managed to miss https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/733 in our last meeting, didn’t we?

  17. dwd

    After all that effort, too.

  18. Kev

    !addagenda https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues/733

  19. Kev

    ;)

  20. Secretary

    Kev, sorry, I did not understand that.