dwdBTW, I'm assuming nothing for the agenda this afternoon, still. Hence no agenda, which is simple laziness on my part. Link Mauve, please check your outstanding votes.
KevGiven no agenda, I might well be absent.
dwdOK. Ge0rG is absent too, I believe. jonas’ Link Mauve, if either of you can't make it we'll declare a skip.
Ge0rGI might be less absent than anticipated.
jonas’I’ll be here, but possibly a few minutes late
jonas’I got caught up in a work meeting and can only start my commute home now
dwd1) Who's Here?
dwdI mean, apart from me.
Link MauveOh hi, just on time!
Link MauveRight, votes.
jonas’just fell into the door
jonas’just fell through the door into the flat
dwdAre you OK?
dwdAnyway, that's Three. So we have quorum.
dwd2) Agenda Bashing
jonas’(it’s a figure of speech (which apparently does not translate well) for when you come home exhausted)
dwdDespite some effort, there was nothing for the agenda, so I didn't bother writing that in an email.
dwdjonas’, I understood, I was merely being obtuse, sorry.
jonas’I’m afraid I’m too exhausted for that ;)
jonas’Editor Hat: I’m sorry that I didn’t get around to push updates to xeps, I had like four minutes between coming home and meeting start ;)
jonas’will take care of that after the meeting
dwdDid I miss anything for the agenda?
dwdOr do we really have nothing?
dwdOK, I'll assume nothing.
dwd3) Items for a vote (NULL)
dwd4) Outstanding Votes
dwdI think it's just Link Mauve for one.
dwdPR #758 - XEP-0060: Expose pubsub#access_model and pubsub#publish_model - https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/758
jonas’I think so too, but will double check wtih tedds mail to be sure
dwdLink Mauve, ^^
Link Mauve(I’m looking at it.)
Link MauveDidn’t we already vote on that?
Link MauveI quite remember having said +1 to it, or did something change that required a re-vote?
dwdWell, you're welcome to say "+1" again for the avoidance of doubt.
Link MauveI’m +1 on it anyway. ^^
dwdI think we re-voted.
Link MauveStill deploring the lack of specification for the various form values in this XEP and a few other ones.
Link MauveNone from me.
jonas’none from me
dwd6) Next Meeting
dwdThat's 2019-05-22 15:00Z I believe.
dwd7) Ite, Meeting Est
dwdjonas’, Looks like you have a load of Editor work now, sorry.
pep.Link Mauve, I think 758 was first vetoed and then it was brought back to life a few weeks after
jonas’will see to it in half an hour or so
Link Mauvepep., oh, thanks.
dwdLink Mauve, Yeah, I think Kev originally vetoed, and somebody changed his mind several weeks afterward.
pep.Does that not keep the original votes in this case? As in "I'm coming back on my decision" rather than "it's a new decision", it's not like 0060 has advanced or anything had changed with regard to it (or what judges would say "new evidence has come to light")
jonas’dwd, thanks for annotating the PRs
jonas’dwd, for the next agenda: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/690#issuecomment-463793958
Ge0rGOops. Sorry, looks like I missed the meeting.
jonas’I can see a conflict arising
jonas’https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/779 has passed the council vote, but the text there is not 100% compatible with the text proposed on the ML
jonas’https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/779 has passed the council vote, but the text there is not 100% compatible with the text proposed by Ge0rG on the ML for a proper fix
jonas’oh, it is
Ge0rGjonas’: that #690 comment is three months old, unless github is in another time bubble, right?
jonas’Ge0rG, yes, but we still haven’t talked about it
jonas’note that the PR is even from last council
jonas’dwd, also for next agenda: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/778 -- we need to re-discuss it after the changes Ge0rG made, it was vetoed by Kev before
dwdGe0rG, No worries about missing a null meeting.
Ge0rGjonas’: 778 has been voted on twice, the last vote was with the new changes.
jonas’are you sure?
jonas’ah I’m too stupid to read
jonas’I’m starting to question whether I should really be messing with xsf/xeps right now