XSF logo XSF Editor Team - 2015-10-27


  1. SamWhited has left
  2. SamWhited has left
  3. SamWhited has left
  4. SamWhited has left
  5. SamWhited has joined
  6. SamWhited has left
  7. SamWhited has left
  8. SamWhited has left
  9. SamWhited has left
  10. SamWhited has left
  11. SamWhited has left
  12. SamWhited has left
  13. SamWhited has joined
  14. Ash has joined
  15. m&m has joined
  16. stpeter has joined
  17. m&m hola
  18. stpeter hey
  19. stpeter how goes it?
  20. m&m trucking along
  21. m&m preparing for Yokohama next week
  22. m&m so, we have PRs to cover!
  23. m&m I know there were items added to the council agenda, but I couldn't be present, and I haven't noticed minutes yet
  24. stpeter hmm
  25. stpeter yeah
  26. stpeter anyway, to the PRs?
  27. m&m PR 40 is waiting on authors
  28. m&m PR 41 is waiting on council, AFAIK
  29. stpeter I have some Yokohama prep to do too - not sure why, but I volunteered to help finish off the trickle-ICE spec (cf. XEP-0176) so I need to create a presentation for that
  30. stpeter and I have a few specs in AUTH48 ;-)
  31. m&m remote presentation? (-:
  32. m&m I think PR 82 is waiting on the submitter, but I'll ping the authors to be sure
  33. m&m wait, no, it's waiting on authors
  34. m&m PR 83 is waiting on … somebody (-:
  35. m&m I think Sam and Matt Wild have the ideas in their head, and haven't yet put them to digital pen
  36. stpeter nod
  37. stpeter I still haven't gotten to the XEP-0198 stuff as you can see :(
  38. m&m yeah
  39. m&m it happens
  40. m&m PR 95 — I'm not sure what the action here is
  41. m&m is it to council?
  42. stpeter I'm trying to finish this AUTH48 stuff and also update 2 Internet-Drafts for Monday....
  43. stpeter looks
  44. stpeter I think the action there is to ask sco0ter to remove the status 174 stuff and then we can merge the PR
  45. stpeter because all the other fixes were fine
  46. stpeter and then a point release IMHO
  47. m&m ok
  48. stpeter I can reply in that issue
  49. stpeter done
  50. m&m thanks
  51. m&m PR 97 is another XEP-0198 item
  52. stpeter yep
  53. m&m PR 99 — I might just accept this as-is … it would be nicer if I could see it run cross-platform, but that's more effort than I'm willing to put into it
  54. m&m there are conflicts that need to be resolved, though
  55. stpeter nod
  56. m&m PR 100 went to council, no?
  57. stpeter PR 100 - see http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2015-10-21/#15:07:32
  58. stpeter so basically it needs more list discussion
  59. m&m yep, see that
  60. stpeter it = XEP-0138 and the impact of attacks on application-layer compression in XMPP
  61. m&m right
  62. stpeter (not just this PR)
  63. m&m ok, so we'll need to get that going at some point
  64. m&m we == (XEP Editor, Kev)
  65. m&m someone in that set (-:
  66. stpeter we had a thread earlier this month about deprecating stream compression but it fizzled out
  67. stpeter I will reply to the last message from Thijs
  68. m&m yeah, I vaguely remember
  69. m&m PR 104 is still rippling through the list
  70. m&m Not sure if we should "call it" and let the council formally weigh in
  71. m&m I have a sense meaningful discussion is no longer happening
  72. stpeter nod
  73. stpeter I do think some guidance from the Council would be good there
  74. m&m better to wait for next council though
  75. stpeter true
  76. stpeter well, maybe
  77. stpeter doesn't necessarily matter, I guess :-)
  78. m&m I'd rather not be in the middle of a vote when a new council is elected … even if it's really ends up as the same council (-:
  79. stpeter good point
  80. stpeter PR 106 - I have not looked at that yet
  81. m&m I think we're waiting for someone to take it to the list
  82. stpeter says "Needs Author" too ;-)
  83. m&m very true (-:
  84. m&m that's kind of my default labels on Draft and Final docs
  85. m&m if something isn't clearly just editorial
  86. stpeter yeah
  87. stpeter good plan
  88. m&m ProtoXEP!
  89. m&m PR 111 I can get processed today
  90. m&m Same with PR 112
  91. stpeter ok super
  92. m&m And PR 113 is a simple editorial
  93. m&m I'll get those last three processed, and publish XEP-0320 as 1.9
  94. stpeter re #112 I've had some chats with Lance / @legastero about encrypted file transfer and I know someone else who's put a fair amount of thought into it, so I look forward to list discussion
  95. m&m er 1.0
  96. m&m (-:
  97. stpeter ;-)
  98. SamWhited RE 83: I'm going to just close it since it was deemed not the correct behavior. I really do need to sit down and do a new update.
  99. m&m ah, ok
  100. m&m thanks Sam
  101. stpeter hey Sam, OK
  102. m&m I think that's it
  103. stpeter anything needing attention in the issues? https://github.com/xsf/xeps/issues
  104. stpeter I'm on the hook for some PRs there
  105. m&m at this point, all the actions there are for someone to update or write a doc
  106. stpeter yes
  107. m&m non-trivial updates at that
  108. stpeter some of 'em, yeah
  109. stpeter I'll deal with active PRs first, methinks
  110. m&m right
  111. stpeter so we're done in half an hour!
  112. stpeter good job, team!
  113. m&m amazing (-:
  114. SamWhited Rebased 99 on master
  115. stpeter gold star for the day!
  116. stpeter I have yet to grok rebasing in fulness - I must dedicate some time to learning git more fully
  117. m&m thanks Sam
  118. SamWhited Git is actually an incredibly simple system, which makes it nice to learn, but also means that it's way easier to learn on a whiteboard than at a computer.
  119. SamWhited What happened to the attachto XEP I submitted? Looks like the council voted to accept as Experimental last wednesday. Did that fall through the cracks?
  120. SamWhited http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2015-10-21/#15:05:49
  121. m&m in so much as Kev hasn't pushed out minutes, and I could not attend the last Council meeting
  122. SamWhited Ah, no minutes. That'll do it.
  123. m&m well, there's minutes *now" *(-:
  124. m&m we'll get that published as 0.1 presently
  125. SamWhited Same with entity versioning actually, that was a while back. I think one or two people were to vote "on list" but it's probably been longer than the two weeks or whatever it is. I should go check on that.
  126. m&m oh, wait … can't yet … waiting on Dave
  127. Kev Sorry, just saw a highlight. What's up?
  128. m&m I have to poke Council again about entityversioning
  129. m&m I was just waiting on minutes
  130. m&m so issue resolved
  131. Kev Ah. Perfect timing, then.
  132. SamWhited Oh yah, there they are... good timing.
  133. m&m we do have some protoXEPs that might have fallen through the cracks … will gather up the list and let you know, Kev
  134. SamWhited Maybe council should file an issue after they have a vote so we can track the actual task of doing whatever the thing is alongside PR's and what not.
  135. SamWhited Vote in the MUC or on-list or in some non-third-party place, but track all work on GitHub.
  136. m&m that's a good idea, but something for the Editor team to do
  137. m&m technically the Editor is responsible for tracking votes
  138. SamWhited makes sense
  139. SamWhited I'll start just doing that if I'm watching a council meeting and a vote happens. See if the workflow feels good.
  140. Kev I suggest that Editors think about what they'd like, and talk to the new Council Chair about it when the guard changes.
  141. stpeter rightio
  142. stpeter I have, in the past for another board I was running, used GitHub for creating meeting agendas but not yet for tracking votes - I somewhat like the idea of having everything in one place (although the XEPs repo might not be that place, at least for Council business - setting up a separate Council repo could work, though) ... but, as Kev says, that's something for the next Council to ponder
  143. Kev If it was me, I'd be more inclined to use Trello for this, but whatever, it won't be me :)
  144. SamWhited I was thinking more tracking of the actual work. So council would vote in the normal way, but then file an issue to tell the editors "merge and mark this XEP as experimental" or whatever the task is.
  145. Kev I think that's traditionally been the Editor's job.
  146. SamWhited Yah, less benefit if the editors are doing it (because then if minutes are late or something there's a delay), but it doesn't really matter. Mainly just having a tracking issue which, if the editor who was going to do something goes on vacation, can be looked at by others so things don't fall through the cracks.
  147. SamWhited has left
  148. SamWhited has left
  149. SamWhited has left
  150. Kev has left
  151. SamWhited has left
  152. Ash has left
  153. Ash has left
  154. m&m has left
  155. stpeter has left
  156. stpeter has joined
  157. stpeter has left