XSF logo XSF Editor Team - 2017-09-23


  1. Guus has left
  2. Neustradamus has left
  3. Neustradamus has joined
  4. SamWhited has left
  5. SamWhited has left
  6. Guus has left
  7. Guus has left
  8. Guus has left
  9. SamWhited has left
  10. Guus has left
  11. Guus has left
  12. Guus has joined
  13. Guus has joined
  14. Guus has joined
  15. Guus has joined
  16. Guus has left
  17. Guus has joined
  18. Guus has left
  19. Link Mauve has left
  20. Flow has joined
  21. Guus has joined
  22. Guus has left
  23. Guus has joined
  24. Guus has left
  25. Guus has joined
  26. Guus has left
  27. Guus has joined
  28. jonasw should we run https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/517 by council?
  29. jonasw it only touches the schema and from what I can tell it fixes things (but I’m not very schema-literate)
  30. Guus has left
  31. Guus has joined
  32. Guus has left
  33. Guus has joined
  34. Guus has left
  35. Guus has joined
  36. Guus has left
  37. Guus has joined
  38. Flow jonasw: what worries me is that this is probably an error found in many schemas
  39. Flow and re 517: I wonder why the third xs:choice element is required, but i'm just a bit schema-literate and I didn't looked into it
  40. jonasw Flow, possibly. the submitter of the PR mentioned that they’ll be correcting schemas as they go along -- they plan to build a client doin gvalidation
  41. jonasw maybe join jdev, they’re around there
  42. Guus has left
  43. Flow i'm a jdev regular ;)
  44. jonasw see the discussion there, I also questioned what it does, they seem confident
  45. Guus has joined
  46. Guus has left
  47. Guus has joined
  48. Guus has left
  49. Guus has joined
  50. winfried has joined
  51. winfried has joined
  52. winfried has left
  53. winfried has joined
  54. Guus has left
  55. Guus has joined
  56. Guus has left
  57. Guus has joined
  58. Guus has left
  59. Guus has joined
  60. SamWhited Schemas are non normative, so it probably doesn't matter.
  61. SamWhited No need to go through council if you think it works, I mean.
  62. soul has left
  63. soul has joined
  64. jonasw has left
  65. Guus has left
  66. Guus has joined
  67. Guus has left
  68. Guus has joined
  69. Tobi has left
  70. winfried has left
  71. winfried has joined
  72. Guus has left
  73. Guus has joined
  74. winfried has left
  75. winfried has joined
  76. Tobi has joined
  77. winfried has joined
  78. winfried has left
  79. SamWhited FYI: I've been playing with a little XEP formatting / processing tool, while I wouldn't want to use it for anything serious yet (the output formatting is pretty broken), it just got its first useful feature: it will tell you what XEPs need to be deprecated:
  80. SamWhited https://bitbucket.org/mellium/xep/src
  81. SamWhited > xep defer -n xepsdir/
  82. SamWhited returns a bunch of stuff (though currently chokes on the README not having a valid number, I should probably make it less strict)
  83. SamWhited I say "first useful feature", the revision printer is pretty nice too, I use that a lot.
  84. SamWhited has left
  85. SamWhited I'm sorry… https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/518/files
  86. SamWhited I'll commit to processing this one since I'm the one that submitted it and it's going to be a pain.
  87. SamWhited I left out at least one thing that should be deferred, but we had a LC recently so I assumed that counted as "activity"
  88. Guus has left
  89. Flow has left
  90. Guus has joined
  91. SamWhited *sigh* and of course somehow literally none of those were correct. Please disregard, I was apparently on an ancient commit.
  92. Guus has left
  93. Guus has joined
  94. Guus has left
  95. Guus has joined
  96. Guus has left
  97. Guus has joined
  98. SamWhited has left
  99. SamWhited has left
  100. SamWhited has left
  101. SamWhited has left
  102. SamWhited has left
  103. SamWhited has left
  104. SamWhited has joined
  105. SamWhited has left
  106. winfried has joined