XSF logo XSF Editor Team - 2019-10-23


  1. Kev has joined
  2. Kev has left
  3. Kev has joined
  4. Kev has left
  5. Kev has joined
  6. Kev has left
  7. Kev has joined
  8. Kev has left
  9. Kev has joined
  10. Kev has left
  11. Kev has joined
  12. Kev has left
  13. Kev has joined
  14. Kev has left
  15. Kev has joined
  16. Kev has left
  17. Kev has joined
  18. Kev has left
  19. Kev has joined
  20. Kev has left
  21. Kev has joined
  22. Tobi has joined
  23. Kev has left
  24. lnj has joined
  25. Kev has joined
  26. Kev has left
  27. Kev has joined
  28. Kev has left
  29. Kev has joined
  30. Kev has left
  31. Kev has joined
  32. Kev has left
  33. debacle has joined
  34. Kev has joined
  35. debacle has left
  36. Kev has left
  37. winfried has left
  38. winfried has joined
  39. winfried has left
  40. winfried has joined
  41. Kev has joined
  42. Kev has left
  43. winfried has left
  44. winfried has joined
  45. Kev has joined
  46. winfried has left
  47. winfried has joined
  48. Kev has left
  49. Kev has joined
  50. jonas’ am I correct that dwd still hasn’t voted?
  51. Kev I belive so.
  52. Kev +sp
  53. Kev Now he has.
  54. jonas’ pep., will issue the LC now
  55. winfried has left
  56. winfried has joined
  57. Kev has left
  58. stpeter has joined
  59. pep. Ol
  60. pep. Ok
  61. jonas’ (done already)
  62. jonas’ btw, pro tip: build the docker thing locally, it’s about two orders of magnitude faster
  63. pep. And then pish that to docker hub?
  64. jonas’ yes
  65. jonas’ docker build . --build-arg NCORES=9 -t xmppxsf/xeps:latest
  66. pep. And then push that to docker hub?
  67. winfried has left
  68. winfried has joined
  69. pep. An idea what takes the most time? Texlive/pdfs?
  70. jonas’ pdfs, yes
  71. jonas’ also, it runs with only a single thread in the CI
  72. jonas’ so the factor of 9 brings approximately one order of magnitude, pair that with an uncontested SSD storage, RAM and Cache and that probably explains the massive speedup compared to docker hub
  73. pep. :/
  74. pep. Maybe we could split the pdfs generation somehow? I'd say if fine if they come in later and HTML/XML get served first
  75. jonas’ that’d only work if we had incremental builds
  76. jonas’ or two separate docker containers and more complex nginx routing rules
  77. pep. For some definition of complex, it doesn't seem very much complex to me with nginx
  78. jonas’ I just said "more complex [compared to what we have currently]"
  79. pep. Sure
  80. stpeter has left
  81. stpeter has joined
  82. Kev has joined
  83. debacle has joined
  84. Guus On the CS last call, I noticed that XEP-0385 is mentioned both in section 1.1 "Changes since 2019", but also in section 3 "Future Development". That's confusing.
  85. Guus (and I wonder if it's an omission, which is why I'm raising this with the editors)
  86. Kev has left
  87. jonas’ Guus, the sections are both managed by the author
  88. jonas’ please raise it on-list
  89. debacle has left
  90. stpeter has left
  91. debacle has joined
  92. stpeter has joined
  93. soul has left
  94. lnj has left
  95. Kev has joined
  96. stpeter has left
  97. Tobi has left
  98. soul has joined
  99. stpeter has joined
  100. debacle has left