-
flow
MattJ, I think this is an accurate description and the conlusion that XMPP is not a good fit for that setup. I do believe however that things will get more capable, if some of them aren't already, to run XMPP on it. Think for example a smart wifi-enabled power outlet. I do believe that it could become an xmpp entity without the need of a manufacturer controled stack in between
-
flow
…good fit for *that* setup -is correct-
-
MattJ
flow, I agree, a wifi-connected outlet is a decent candidate. But... there is still the question of "why?"
-
MattJ
A wifi-connected outlet would generally need to connect to some sort of a server in order to be useful
-
MattJ
Typically today those servers are run by the manufacturer, who also provides an app that communicates with the outlet(s) through that same service
-
MattJ
You could say that this service could/should be an XMPP service, fair enough - but I don't know exactly what the benefit is over the many other existing solutions
-
MattJ
Is every user expected to run their own XMPP service?
-
MattJ
or will people hook up their outlets to public services?
-
MattJ
And this is still one narrow slice of the problem - I have specifically avoided wifi outlets due to things like this (I want everything to continue working without an internet connection, and I have achieved that)
-
flow
MattJ, I'd expect that primarly such device whould use manufacturer owned and operated xmpp services
-
flow
and yes, those device should continue being operational even if there if you don't have any internet connectivity. I could imagine that xmpp link-local could be used for that (with some extensions)
-
COM8
MattJ, I will answer tomorrow. I don't have time right now ;)
-
MattJ
No rush :)