XSF logo jdev - 2019-11-10


  1. Daniel has left
  2. Daniel has joined
  3. Daniel has left
  4. Daniel has joined
  5. skyfar has left
  6. Daniel has left
  7. Daniel has joined
  8. Daniel has left
  9. Daniel has joined
  10. Daniel has left
  11. Daniel has joined
  12. debacle has left
  13. Daniel has left
  14. Daniel has joined
  15. Daniel has left
  16. Daniel has joined
  17. Daniel has left
  18. Daniel has joined
  19. wurstsalat has left
  20. Daniel has left
  21. Daniel has joined
  22. Daniel has left
  23. Daniel has joined
  24. Daniel has left
  25. Daniel has joined
  26. lovetox has joined
  27. rion has left
  28. rion has joined
  29. Daniel has left
  30. Daniel has joined
  31. goffi has joined
  32. lovetox hm i have a server that answers to my stream initiation with a whitespace
  33. lovetox do i have to ignore that, or can i expect a stream initiation in return
  34. asterix has joined
  35. asterix has left
  36. asterix has joined
  37. skyfar has joined
  38. sonny has left
  39. sonny has joined
  40. zinid lovetox, what do you mean? just a single whitespace without the stream header?
  41. asterix has left
  42. asterix has joined
  43. asterix has left
  44. asterix has joined
  45. lovetox yes
  46. lovetox actually its a ejabberd, but its configured so the connection is proxied over nginx
  47. lovetox the user said he already asked in ejabberd support
  48. wurstsalat has joined
  49. lovetox technically whitespaces between xml elements should not be a problem, its just weird that on calling recv() i get only a whitespace
  50. lovetox i dont know what happens then because at that point Gajim aborts, because in stream initiation it expects the streamheader on the first recv()
  51. lovetox looks like that
  52. lovetox https://paste.gajim.org/view/d68787ba
  53. flow lovetox, IIRC the RFC explicitly states that you need to expect whitespaces
  54. flow https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6120#section-11.7
  55. Daniel has left
  56. Daniel has joined
  57. lovetox hm that says "between" xml elements
  58. Daniel has left
  59. lovetox could be argued that this does not count for the initial stream opening
  60. flow isn't it between elements
  61. flow because there is no preceeding element?
  62. lovetox yeah, its the response to my stream opening
  63. flow and it's the very first stream opening?
  64. lovetox yes
  65. lovetox see my paste
  66. Kev "Gajim aborts, because in stream initiation it expects the streamheader on the first recv()" That's certainly not valid, there's no guarantee that you'll receive the whole header at once.
  67. Kev Even without whitespace oddities.
  68. flow but anyhow I wouldn't be so pedantic in this case and simply take care of the whitespace
  69. lovetox yeah of course, its just weird, there is really no need to send only a whitespace
  70. flow and, as Kev correctly points out, you have to be able to reassemble the XML open tag (or later elements) from multiple recv calls
  71. flow yep, I am curious to hear the backstory behind that whitespace
  72. lovetox yeah thats no problem, if there is actually an open tag
  73. lovetox probably misconfigured stuff somewhere, but anyway i have to deal with it :/
  74. Kev Without checking the specs, I remember something about whitespace not being valid at the top level, but I might misremember.
  75. lovetox Kev, no should be valid at top level
  76. lovetox just not in tls and sasl negotiation
  77. Kev I'm certainly not in a position to argue with that :)
  78. lovetox i just read the section flow posted ^^
  79. Kev I missed that. It's still early :)
  80. Daniel has joined
  81. Daniel has left
  82. Daniel has joined
  83. Alex in the very old days some clients sent a whitespace after upgrade to tls, because some SSL libs were not upgrading to tls without a flush
  84. lovetox ok the backstory is a nginx that runs on 5222 and only support directls and expects SNI hostname set
  85. lovetox and if you connect plain there, it just sends you endless whitespace because it cant route the traffic to the xmpp server
  86. lovetox how needs srv set so a server only support directtls?
  87. lovetox only setting xmpps-client?
  88. Zash and _xmpp-client in srv 0 0 0 .
  89. Zash probably
  90. asterix has left
  91. Alex the spec sais that xmpps is the preference
  92. asterix has joined
  93. Alex ``` STARTTLS MUST NOT be used over direct TLS connections. ```
  94. skyfar has left
  95. zinid lovetox, there is no way to support directtls only I guess, because a client will fallback to A address with starttls anyways
  96. lovetox hm just not answering on port 5222 is a start i guess
  97. lovetox only answer on 5223 which should be a direct tls port
  98. zinid yes, this will work as long as a client supports directtls and _xmpps-client records
  99. Alex yes, many clients still don't support them
  100. Alex let's force them to upgrade 😜
  101. lovetox obviously this is not a generic public open server
  102. Link Mauve zinid, you shouldn’t fallback if your SRV points to . like Zash said.
  103. zinid ah
  104. asterix has left
  105. asterix has joined
  106. lovetox yeah Gajim also doesnt do a fallback
  107. lovetox only fallback is xmpps to xmpp
  108. lovetox and if no srv entrys are available whatsoever
  109. lovetox 5223 to 5222
  110. asterix has left
  111. asterix has joined
  112. larma has left
  113. larma has joined
  114. asterix has left
  115. asterix has joined
  116. asterix has left
  117. asterix has joined
  118. asterix has left
  119. asterix has joined
  120. asterix has left
  121. asterix has joined
  122. asterix has left
  123. asterix has joined
  124. Daniel has left
  125. Daniel has joined
  126. debacle has joined
  127. asterix has left
  128. asterix has joined
  129. asterix has left
  130. asterix has joined
  131. asterix has left
  132. asterix has joined
  133. asterix has left
  134. asterix has joined
  135. asterix has left
  136. asterix has joined
  137. Daniel has left
  138. Daniel has joined
  139. asterix has left
  140. asterix has joined
  141. lovetox has left
  142. lovetox has joined
  143. Daniel has left
  144. Daniel has joined
  145. asterix has left
  146. asterix has joined
  147. debacle has left
  148. asterix has left
  149. asterix has joined
  150. aj has joined
  151. aj has left
  152. Daniel has left
  153. Daniel has joined
  154. asterix has left
  155. asterix has joined
  156. wurstsalat has left
  157. wurstsalat has joined
  158. Daniel has left
  159. Daniel has joined
  160. sonny has left
  161. sonny has joined
  162. debacle has joined
  163. Syndace has left
  164. wurstsalat has left
  165. wurstsalat has joined
  166. larma has left
  167. larma has joined
  168. skyfar has joined
  169. asterix has left
  170. lovetox_ has joined
  171. lovetox_ has left
  172. lovetox has left
  173. wurstsalat has left
  174. Syndace has joined
  175. asterix has joined
  176. skyfar has left
  177. Daniel has left
  178. Daniel has joined
  179. asterix has left
  180. asterix has joined
  181. goffi has left
  182. asterix has left
  183. Daniel has left
  184. Daniel has joined
  185. Daniel has left
  186. Daniel has joined
  187. Daniel has left
  188. Daniel has joined