jdev - 2019-12-31


  1. Lance has left
  2. Lance has joined
  3. Lance has left
  4. kikuchiyo has left
  5. kikuchiyo has joined
  6. kikuchiyo has left
  7. kikuchiyo has joined
  8. kikuchiyo has left
  9. larma has left
  10. larma has joined
  11. kikuchiyo has joined
  12. kikuchiyo has left
  13. paul has left
  14. kikuchiyo has joined
  15. strar has left
  16. strar has joined
  17. debacle has left
  18. wurstsalat has left
  19. kikuchiyo has left
  20. kikuchiyo has joined
  21. moparisthebest has left
  22. moparisthebest has joined
  23. kikuchiyo has left
  24. dendang has joined
  25. kikuchiyo has joined
  26. dendang has left
  27. dendang has joined
  28. kikuchiyo has left
  29. paul has joined
  30. dendang has left
  31. jhon has joined
  32. jhon Hey
  33. jhon can anyone tell me is this good or not ?
  34. jhon has left
  35. jonas’ probably not
  36. asterix has joined
  37. kikuchiyo has joined
  38. kikuchiyo has left
  39. asterix has left
  40. asterix has joined
  41. asterix has left
  42. asterix has joined
  43. asterix has left
  44. asterix has joined
  45. asterix has left
  46. asterix has joined
  47. asterix has left
  48. asterix has joined
  49. asterix has left
  50. asterix has joined
  51. kikuchiyo has joined
  52. lovetox has joined
  53. goffi has joined
  54. asterix has left
  55. asterix has joined
  56. asterix has left
  57. asterix has joined
  58. kikuchiyo has left
  59. asterix has left
  60. asterix has joined
  61. pulkomandy has left
  62. pulkomandy has joined
  63. wurstsalat has joined
  64. larma has left
  65. larma has joined
  66. pulkomandy has left
  67. kikuchiyo has joined
  68. paul has left
  69. skyfar has left
  70. skyfar has joined
  71. pulkomandy has joined
  72. paul has joined
  73. goffi has left
  74. asterix has left
  75. asterix has joined
  76. kikuchiyo has left
  77. pulkomandy has left
  78. pulkomandy has joined
  79. Wojtek has joined
  80. debacle has joined
  81. pulkomandy has left
  82. pulkomandy has joined
  83. kikuchiyo has joined
  84. pulkomandy has left
  85. pulkomandy has joined
  86. asterix has left
  87. asterix has joined
  88. pulkomandy has left
  89. pulkomandy has joined
  90. goffi has joined
  91. debacle has left
  92. pulkomandy has left
  93. Guus has joined
  94. Guus has left
  95. pulkomandy has joined
  96. asterix has left
  97. asterix has joined
  98. asterix has left
  99. asterix has joined
  100. pulkomandy has left
  101. asterix has left
  102. asterix has joined
  103. pulkomandy has joined
  104. debacle has joined
  105. asterix has left
  106. asterix has joined
  107. asterix has left
  108. asterix has joined
  109. strar has left
  110. strar has joined
  111. asterix has left
  112. asterix has joined
  113. asterix has left
  114. asterix has joined
  115. asterix has left
  116. asterix has joined
  117. asterix has left
  118. asterix has joined
  119. pulkomandy has left
  120. lovetox has left
  121. pulkomandy has joined
  122. asterix has left
  123. asterix has joined
  124. pulkomandy has left
  125. lovetox has joined
  126. asterix has left
  127. asterix has joined
  128. asterix has left
  129. asterix has joined
  130. pulkomandy has joined
  131. strar has left
  132. strar has joined
  133. pulkomandy has left
  134. pulkomandy has joined
  135. pulkomandy has left
  136. pulkomandy has joined
  137. debacle What's the best way to return some read-only values from an ad-hoc command? I use a form with some fields of type text-single, but I wonder whether this is the best way. Opinions? Ideas? TIA!
  138. rion has joined
  139. strar has left
  140. strar has joined
  141. Ge0rG has left
  142. strar has left
  143. strar has joined
  144. Ge0rG has joined
  145. strar has left
  146. strar has joined
  147. Zash debacle, forms and ad-hoc commands go hand in hand, so that's probably what I'd do.
  148. debacle Zash, yes, so it was not entirely wrong :-)
  149. debacle I wonder, whether I can make the fields read-only?
  150. Zash You can make the form a result form
  151. debacle In fact, because of something completely unrelated, I will change things, Zash :-)
  152. debacle slixmpp doesn't support ad-hoc command handling with Python async, but I need everything "async". So I will send a message to the user instead. Ugly as hell, but should work. Hopefully.
  153. wurstsalat has left
  154. wurstsalat has joined
  155. Wojtek has left
  156. Lance has joined
  157. debacle has left
  158. tsk has joined
  159. lovetox has left
  160. lovetox has joined
  161. tsk has left
  162. skyfar has left
  163. skyfar has joined
  164. pulkomandy has left
  165. goffi has left
  166. lovetox has left
  167. Neustradamus has left
  168. pulkomandy has joined
  169. Lance has left
  170. pulkomandy has left
  171. pulkomandy has joined
  172. pulkomandy has left
  173. pulkomandy has joined
  174. pulkomandy has left
  175. pulkomandy has joined
  176. dendang has joined