XSF logo jdev - 2020-01-26


  1. bhaveshsgupta has left
  2. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  3. Neustradamus has left
  4. Neustradamus has joined
  5. Neustradamus has left
  6. bhaveshsgupta has left
  7. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  8. Neustradamus has joined
  9. Neustradamus has left
  10. paul has left
  11. debacle has left
  12. paul has joined
  13. sonny has joined
  14. sonny has left
  15. sonny has joined
  16. sonny has left
  17. sonny has joined
  18. paul has left
  19. bhaveshsgupta has left
  20. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  21. bhaveshsgupta has left
  22. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  23. bhaveshsgupta has left
  24. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  25. bhaveshsgupta has left
  26. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  27. sonny has left
  28. sonny has joined
  29. bhaveshsgupta has left
  30. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  31. bhaveshsgupta has left
  32. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  33. bhaveshsgupta has left
  34. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  35. bhaveshsgupta has left
  36. kikuchiyo has left
  37. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  38. kikuchiyo has joined
  39. lovetox has joined
  40. paul has joined
  41. bhaveshsgupta has left
  42. lovetox has left
  43. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  44. lovetox has joined
  45. serge90 has left
  46. serge90 has joined
  47. asterix has joined
  48. lovetox has left
  49. pulkomandy has left
  50. asterix has left
  51. asterix has joined
  52. pulkomandy has joined
  53. pulkomandy has left
  54. asterix has left
  55. asterix has joined
  56. asterix has left
  57. asterix has joined
  58. pulkomandy has joined
  59. bhaveshsgupta has left
  60. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  61. pulkomandy has left
  62. pulkomandy has joined
  63. bhaveshsgupta has left
  64. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  65. Link Mauve xmppnoob, you may also be interested in starting from an existing client, rather than writing everything from scratch.
  66. Link Mauve Also on mobile.
  67. asterix has left
  68. asterix has joined
  69. asterix has left
  70. asterix has joined
  71. asterix has left
  72. asterix has joined
  73. pulkomandy has left
  74. pulkomandy has joined
  75. SouL has left
  76. pulkomandy has left
  77. pulkomandy has joined
  78. goffi has joined
  79. debacle has joined
  80. aj has joined
  81. larma has left
  82. strar has left
  83. larma has joined
  84. strar has joined
  85. asterix has left
  86. bhaveshsgupta has left
  87. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  88. strar has left
  89. strar has joined
  90. pulkomandy has left
  91. pulkomandy has joined
  92. SouL has joined
  93. lovetox has joined
  94. aj has left
  95. debacle has left
  96. pulkomandy has left
  97. sonny has left
  98. sonny has joined
  99. sonny has left
  100. pulkomandy has joined
  101. bhaveshsgupta has left
  102. pulkomandy has left
  103. paul has left
  104. paul has joined
  105. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  106. pulkomandy has joined
  107. bhaveshsgupta has left
  108. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  109. bhaveshsgupta has left
  110. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  111. Neustradamus has joined
  112. asterix has joined
  113. SouL has left
  114. SouL has joined
  115. SouL has left
  116. SouL has joined
  117. sonny has joined
  118. rion has left
  119. rion has joined
  120. sonny has left
  121. bhaveshsgupta has left
  122. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  123. rion Which sides sends ibb open for a jingle transport? A session initiator or a transport creator? They are not always the same
  124. rion It can be also content creator. So one of three
  125. pulkomandy has left
  126. pulkomandy has joined
  127. rion Seems like it's always session initiator according to the diagram in the xep. So doesn't matter which side added the content or replaced the transport. Is it so?
  128. lovetox has left
  129. bhaveshsgupta has left
  130. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  131. lovetox has joined
  132. pulkomandy has left
  133. pulkomandy has joined
  134. pulkomandy has left
  135. pulkomandy has joined
  136. sonny has joined
  137. serge90 has left
  138. serge90 has joined
  139. bhaveshsgupta has left
  140. kikuchiyo has left
  141. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  142. asterix has left
  143. asterix has joined
  144. sonny has left
  145. aj has joined
  146. asterix has left
  147. asterix has joined
  148. bhaveshsgupta has left
  149. aj has left
  150. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  151. asterix has left
  152. asterix has joined
  153. asterix has left
  154. asterix has joined
  155. kikuchiyo has joined
  156. bhaveshsgupta has left
  157. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  158. debacle has joined
  159. bhaveshsgupta has left
  160. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  161. sonny has joined
  162. bhaveshsgupta has left
  163. sonny has left
  164. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  165. pulkomandy has left
  166. pulkomandy has joined
  167. strar has left
  168. strar has joined
  169. bhaveshsgupta has left
  170. strar has left
  171. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  172. strar has joined
  173. strar has left
  174. pulkomandy has left
  175. pulkomandy has joined
  176. strar has joined
  177. bhaveshsgupta has left
  178. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  179. pulkomandy has left
  180. kikuchiyo has left
  181. kikuchiyo has joined
  182. bhaveshsgupta has left
  183. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  184. pulkomandy has joined
  185. flow lovetox, I just invited someone to a members only room via gajim. It would be great if gajim would asked if I want to make the bare jid a member prior inviting. Do you want me to create a feature request (if there is none already)?
  186. pulkomandy has left
  187. lovetox does that question make sense?
  188. lovetox there is no choice there
  189. jonas’ I think it should simply always do that if it can, and use mediated + warning if it can’t
  190. flow well I could be unware that it's a members only room, but fair point
  191. lovetox of course the whole topic is a bit of a mess
  192. lovetox and one of the topics in xmpp that you cant do right in all circumstances
  193. sonny has joined
  194. pulkomandy has joined
  195. lovetox this definitly deserves a wiki entry
  196. lovetox i will soon touch that code in Gajim then i will look into it
  197. lovetox first question to me would be if servers show muc#roomconfig_allowinvites in disco info
  198. lovetox or if i need to pull the config, which is impossible as non admin
  199. lovetox if servers dont expose that, i would simple disallow any non admin to invite people into a member-only room
  200. lovetox and as an admin, i would use a mediated invite, and hope the server implements adding the invitee automatically
  201. MattJ I think prosody exposes that in disco
  202. lovetox really the whole room config should be exposed, i see no sense in hiding it
  203. kikuchiyo has left
  204. sonny has left
  205. MattJ Password and all :)
  206. lovetox ok you found one :
  207. lovetox ok you found one :D
  208. pulkomandy has left
  209. pulkomandy has joined
  210. bhaveshsgupta has left
  211. sonny has joined
  212. pulkomandy has left
  213. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  214. kikuchiyo has joined
  215. sonny has left
  216. bhaveshsgupta has left
  217. pulkomandy has joined
  218. debacle has left
  219. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  220. jonas’ lovetox, some room config may also be anti-abuse, and those options should typically be hidden
  221. bhaveshsgupta has left
  222. sonny has joined
  223. lovetox has left
  224. sonny has left
  225. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  226. lovetox has joined
  227. bhaveshsgupta has left
  228. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  229. lovetox hm i read the RFC and for me its clear, but just to be sure i ask
  230. lovetox a roster push item, is never a diff
  231. sonny has joined
  232. lovetox means i can fill all attributes that are not in the item
  233. lovetox with default values
  234. jonas’ it replaces the previous item for that JID, except if it’s set to "delete", then it removes that item
  235. jonas’ essentially
  236. lovetox yeah i meant when i receive the push
  237. lovetox but i guess its the same
  238. lovetox ok then i dont know why i added that weird code i found
  239. lovetox especially the question is about "name" attr
  240. lovetox say a roster item has a name="Romeo"
  241. lovetox and i change this roster item, but modify only the groups
  242. lovetox the server must always include name=Romeo, in the following pushes
  243. lovetox or not?
  244. lovetox even if the update didnt modify the name attr
  245. MattJ lovetox: the push contains the full entry
  246. lovetox yeah thanks thats what i was looking for
  247. lovetox you formulated with one sentence what i tried to describe with 10 :d
  248. MattJ So if name existed and is missing in the push, that means it was removed
  249. Neustradamus has left
  250. sonny has left
  251. kikuchiyo has left
  252. bhaveshsgupta has left
  253. lovetox has left
  254. kikuchiyo has joined
  255. lovetox has joined
  256. strar has left
  257. strar has joined
  258. strar has left
  259. strar has joined
  260. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  261. asterix has left
  262. asterix has joined
  263. asterix has left
  264. asterix has joined
  265. asterix has left
  266. paul has left
  267. kikuchiyo has left
  268. kikuchiyo has joined
  269. pulkomandy has left
  270. pulkomandy has joined
  271. goffi has left
  272. bhaveshsgupta has left
  273. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  274. bhaveshsgupta has left
  275. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  276. lovetox has left
  277. Alex has left
  278. Alex has joined
  279. bhaveshsgupta has left
  280. bhaveshsgupta has joined
  281. sonny has joined
  282. debacle has joined