-
ralphm
Please select your menu for the XSF Dinner here: https://goo.gl/forms/hEtClRjLu7QqFkwS2
-
ralphm
No selection => no food for you.
-
Zash
Hmmm
-
debacle
Slightly OT: Does somebody have a list of XMPP related talks at FOSDEM? I found: Sunday 09:25 Goffi: XMPP Beyond Instant Messaging
-
debacle
Sunday 14:00 JS: Converse Sunday 16:05 pep.: Make XMPP sprint again✎ -
debacle
Sunday 14:00 JC: Converse Sunday 16:05 pep.: Make XMPP sprint again ✏
-
pep.
https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/FOSDEM_2019#Submitted_Talks
-
Link Mauve
Another from goffi in the afternoon.
-
pep.
There's even a wiki page :)
-
Seve/SouL
!!!!
-
debacle
too bad, goffis second talk conflicts with pep.s
-
pep.
It's fine you don't have to come to mine :-°
-
Guus
https://xmpp.igniterealtime.org:7483/httpfileupload/7fdbe383-caa3-45e1-b8eb-f7700e9c8718/lje8BEr_RxGdsKdiTZ-lFA.jpg
-
Guus
To lazy to type on mobile
-
ralphm
Very high tech
-
Guus
My dad taught me
-
Guus
To counter, I'm currently looking like this:
-
Guus
https://xmpp.igniterealtime.org:7483/httpfileupload/df4ff1ed-270e-4bcc-baa0-80f26c8542d2/pH71MZ2PQgih92C9YVUxoQ.jpg
-
ralphm
Woah
-
Zash
https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/track/real_time_communications_rtc/
-
Zash
The cyborgs are among us!
-
debacle
There is also a talk about OTR4
-
Link Mauve
:D
-
goffi
debacle: yes I know, and first one is really early when everybody will be partying the night before :-/
-
debacle
goffi, very good: people will party til 9, then they go to your talk and then they will sleep
-
debacle
and dream of SàT
-
goffi
ah ah
-
debacle
There are also some M.A.T.R.I.X. related talks: Saturday 14:00 Matrix in the French State Saturday 16:15 Displaying other Application data into a Wiki Sunday 10:40 Breaking the 100 bits per second barrier with Matrix
-
Link Mauve
100 bits per second? :|
-
debacle
Probably some kind of joke.
-
oli
100 bits per second, try that with XMPP ...
-
debacle
OT, again: Can somebody please make an XMPP enabled version of ConfClerk? It's nice that I mark the talks I like to see, but it would be much nicer, if I could share my selection with my colleagues, so that we can coordinate ourselves.
-
oli
debacle: not a joke
-
oli
"Matrix has always theoretically supported alternative transports, and we finally got an excuse to build one and push it to a ludicrous extreme - to try to operate usably over links as low as 100bps, as high as 4s latency, and up to 40% jitter"
-
debacle
oli, with XMPP it's: <bit role="mostsignificantbit">1</bit> etc.
-
Zash
https://isode.com/whitepapers/low-bandwidth-xmpp.html
-
Link Mauve
debacle, ITYM https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0239.html
-
oli
"Meet COI (Chat over IMAP) - a powerful contender for WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and other proprietary messengers."
-
oli
> “What about XMPP and Matrix.org?” – glad you asked! We love XMPP and Matrix.org because they provide a great solution – this only solves the problem in theory though. With XMPP and Matrix.org-based services you would still need to convince everyone to join your new network. Easy in theory, very complex in practice!
-
Zash
Chat over email also sounds nice in theory. But in practice... good luck.
-
Link Mauve
There was already DeltaChat which attempted something similar.
-
Link Mauve
A comrade of mine is a proponent of it, but I haven’t heard any sound argument so far.
-
oli
Zash: it's chat over imap, might be without the smtp stuff
-
oli
i don't know
-
oli
if this involves full blown email shit, good look in convincing people to install their own servers.
-
Zash
oli: then you're in extension hell. enjoy.
-
oli
email is hell
-
Zash
can you submit email over imap yet?
-
oli
Zash: yes and no, no standard for this
-
oli
but workarounds that work
-
Zash
Wasn't there an extension?
-
oli
maybe
-
Zash
And then there's the crowd trying to kill IMAP and replace it with JSON and HTTP
-
oli
jmap
-
Zash
yes
-
oli
it's quite cool
-
Zash
No
-
oli
anyway, the speaker's company is developing the dovecot imap server.
-
oli
Zash: JMAP has a better design than IMAP in my oppinion
-
oli
We should ask the fastmail guys how to do chat over it 😂
-
pep.
"debacle> There is also a talk about OTR4", probably similar to the one at CCC?
-
debacle
pep. Maybe - I wasn't there
-
Zash
debacle: https://media.ccc.de/v/35c3-9596-no_evidence_of_communication_and_morality_in_protocols_off-the-record_protocol_version_4
-
pep.
Basically they are now using the double ratchet thing, doing PFS (now?), but still only 1:1 (resource to resource)