XSF Discussion - 2012-03-14


  1. jef has joined
  2. luca tagliaferri has joined
  3. jef has left
  4. jef has joined
  5. jef has left
  6. jef has joined
  7. jef has left
  8. jef has joined
  9. jef has left
  10. Kev has joined
  11. luca tagliaferri has joined
  12. ralphm has joined
  13. Kev has left
  14. Kev has joined
  15. ralphm has left
  16. ralphm has joined
  17. Zash has joined
  18. Zash has left
  19. Zash has joined
  20. stpeter has joined
  21. Ashley has joined
  22. dwd has joined
  23. dwd Ashley, Afternoon.
  24. Ashley hey there!
  25. dwd Zash, Reading the history - yeah, I really need to find the time to post about that stuff in a sane way. Maybe even write a XEP or two for the easy bits.
  26. Zash k :)
  27. ralphm has left
  28. ralphm has joined
  29. Zash I'll look forward to that then
  30. dwd bear, About?
  31. Florian has joined
  32. Florian hello guys!
  33. Florian just got home in time :D
  34. dwd Florian, Hiya.
  35. dwd I think that counts us as quorate. But agenda-less - I've been on the road nearly constantly since last week's meeting, actually.
  36. Florian I think one topic is GSoC update ... which should be quite quick
  37. dwd Kev, Have you got anything to say on GSoC?
  38. MattJ has joined
  39. Kev We've applied.
  40. Kev We should keep improving the ideas list.
  41. Kev That's about it right now.
  42. dwd Any movement on that since last time?
  43. dwd (The ideas list, I mean)
  44. Kev We've got a number of ideas there.
  45. Kev Peter chased Gajim and got some ideas there (although one's inappropriate).
  46. Florian I chased the Tigase guys, but it looks like they won't have any spare ressources to take on mentees
  47. Kev The next step, if we're accepted, is to sort out teaser tasks.
  48. Kev Current community thought on this is that they're a jolly good thing.
  49. Kev (Swift used them last year, after nickingthe idea from other projects in previous years)
  50. dwd Should the XSF itself add anything? Like maybe use GSoC resource to make a start on the testing/conformance stuff we've talked about in years past?
  51. stpeter I'd be more comfortable with that idea if we had at least something to start from
  52. stpeter BTW, I could probably get ISOC funding for that project
  53. dwd Ah, that might be interesting. Is there anything else the XSF ought to be doing at this stage?
  54. Kev dwd: I don't think so.
  55. stpeter dwd: however, again, I'd want to make sure we could follow through on it
  56. Kev I don't think we should encourage new projects.
  57. dwd stpeter, Yes, quite.
  58. Kev If the XSF can't managed to get started on the project itself, it can't effectively mentor it, IMHO.
  59. dwd Kev, Seems reasonable.
  60. stpeter nods
  61. dwd OK, so I think that covers things for now.
  62. dwd Is there anything else people want to discuss?
  63. stpeter someone never posted the Brussels report :(
  64. dwd Yes, that's true.
  65. stpeter have we seen any follow-up on the web/xmpp integration stuff?
  66. dwd No, we haven't, and that is mostly my fault - I should write up my thoughts and kick things off.
  67. stpeter well, I was thining also of Simon, Sonny Piers on websocket, etc.
  68. stpeter I will have time to work on the websocket stuff in April
  69. dwd Yes, it's not exclusively my fault...
  70. stpeter but those aren't board topics, I suppose
  71. bear gets out of one meeting and....
  72. dwd In as much as they spawn from a more general failure to follow through on the SUmmit...
  73. stpeter I do think it would be great to get involved with ISOC for various reasons, so perhaps we can brainstorm on the members@ list about possible projects and how to make those happen instead of just talking about them :)
  74. dwd stpeter, Yes - how does their funding actually work?
  75. stpeter dwd: they have grants of some kind, I've basically been promised money if I can come up with a proposal
  76. Ashley has left
  77. dwd stpeter, Sounds promising, if a little vague. :-) I'm pretty sure there are things we could be usefully doing if we had the money to promote them.
  78. stpeter edits the FOSDEM 2012 report at xmpp.org
  79. Ashley has joined
  80. stpeter dwd: I can provide more details, but I think the gating factor is the lack of confidence that we can effectively manage such a project since we've not had great success with code projects in the past
  81. dwd This is true - solving that problem is probably not very easy as long as we're trying some very grand ideas.
  82. dwd (Like an interop test suite that does everything)
  83. stpeter nod
  84. Kev Or anything.
  85. stpeter or something :)
  86. dwd Maybe a good first step would be to take that server list code that's been kicked about, and gradually add some tests to that.
  87. stpeter another thing for me to think about in my Post-IESG Life™
  88. stpeter what is the server list code?
  89. dwd I think it does some basic DNS/SRV tests as it is, and enhancing something is *much* more likely to happen than starting something from scratch.
  90. dwd stpeter, That one mentioned on operators@.
  91. stpeter ah right
  92. dwd But anyway, I think that's something we could discuss elsewhere - anything else we need to discuss here?
  93. stpeter I don't have anything else
  94. stpeter I need to send out the invoices and receipts, will do that tomorrow
  95. dwd OK, so in that case, motion to adjourn [etc].
  96. dwd And thanks to those present.
  97. Kev Now we see how many Board members are still awake :)
  98. Kev Or whether anyone notices if it's me that seconds.
  99. luca tagliaferri has left
  100. bear seconds
  101. Ashley thirds!
  102. Ashley :D
  103. stpeter finally writes that damn Brussels report
  104. stpeter but quickly, I have a lot to finish today before the IESG telechat tomorrow
  105. Zash http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2008-March/018186.html Sounds like you mostly just trade bandwith costs for code complexity and local storage costs.
  106. stpeter finally: http://xmpp.org/2012/03/fosdem-2012-report/
  107. Zash \o/
  108. Kev has left
  109. Ashley has left
  110. Vanaryon has joined
  111. Vanaryon has left
  112. Zash has left
  113. ralphm Zach: I think the thing is more that council wasn't convinced the gains would be big enough. Also, I think you'd need to have a tight schema for EXI to work efficiently.
  114. ralphm Zach: that seems problematic for general XMPP traffic
  115. ralphm oh
  116. stpeter heh
  117. ralphm Zach left
  118. stpeter Zash, that is, yes :)
  119. ralphm him too
  120. stpeter I've learned more recently that there are two forms of EXI
  121. stpeter heh
  122. ralphm oh
  123. stpeter one is called something like schema-strict
  124. stpeter where you need to know all the schemas ahead of time
  125. stpeter which could be a challenge with an extensible payload format :)
  126. jef has joined
  127. stpeter has left
  128. stpeter has joined
  129. stpeter has left
  130. stpeter has joined
  131. luca tagliaferri has joined
  132. Ashley has joined
  133. luca tagliaferri has left
  134. Ashley has left
  135. luca tagliaferri has joined
  136. luca tagliaferri has left
  137. luca tagliaferri has joined
  138. jef has left
  139. jef has joined
  140. Florian has left
  141. ralphm has left
  142. luca tagliaferri has left