XSF Discussion - 2013-05-13


  1. bear has left
  2. Jef has left
  3. Jef has joined
  4. Neustradamus has left
  5. Neustradamus has joined
  6. kevin has left
  7. Jef has left
  8. Jef has joined
  9. kevin has joined
  10. philip has joined
  11. philip has left
  12. Jef has left
  13. Alex has joined
  14. Lloyd Watkin has joined
  15. Alex has left
  16. Alex has joined
  17. Lloyd Watkin has left
  18. Lloyd Watkin has joined
  19. Jef has joined
  20. Jef has left
  21. Jef has joined
  22. jabberjocke has joined
  23. Jef has left
  24. MattJ has left
  25. MattJ has joined
  26. MattJ has left
  27. MattJ has joined
  28. jabberjocke has left
  29. Jef has joined
  30. Alex has left
  31. stpeter has joined
  32. kevin has left
  33. kevin has joined
  34. Jef has left
  35. kevin has left
  36. Lance has joined
  37. kevin has joined
  38. kevin has left
  39. stpeter has left
  40. kevin has joined
  41. stpeter has joined
  42. Lance has left
  43. kevin has left
  44. Lance has joined
  45. stpeter so I'm thinking about holding an XMPP hackathon in Berlin at the end of July, right before the IETF meeting
  46. stpeter focused on s2s, federation, DNSSEC, POSH, etc.
  47. stpeter and WebSocket maybe :-)
  48. Lance I won't be in Berlin, but yeah
  49. Lance I got stanza.io working directly with websockets, and even with jumping through the hoop of detecting the stream namespace prefix, it's very easy to get the websocket stuff running
  50. stpeter nice!
  51. stpeter we might need to recruit you to talk about the xmpp-over-websocket spec in Berlin :P
  52. Lance so i'm -1 on the discussion about needing some new stream start element. it's just too easy to make it work to justify changing the protocol
  53. stpeter nods
  54. stpeter that's good to hear
  55. Lloyd Watkin has left
  56. stpeter has left
  57. Jef has joined