XSF Discussion - 2013-05-31


  1. MattJ has left
  2. Lance has left
  3. Lance has joined
  4. Kev has left
  5. Lance has left
  6. Lance has joined
  7. Lance has left
  8. Lance has left
  9. Lance has joined
  10. Lance has left
  11. Lance has joined
  12. Lance_ has joined
  13. Lance_ has left
  14. Lance_ has joined
  15. Lance has left
  16. Lance_ has left
  17. Lance has joined
  18. Alex has joined
  19. Alex has left
  20. Lance has left
  21. Lloyd has joined
  22. Lloyd has left
  23. Lloyd has joined
  24. Zash has joined
  25. Alex has left
  26. ralphm has left
  27. ralphm has left
  28. ralphm has left
  29. stpeter has joined
  30. Lloyd has joined
  31. Lance has joined
  32. stpeter has left
  33. stpeter has joined
  34. stpeter has left
  35. stpeter has joined
  36. stpeter has left
  37. stpeter has joined
  38. Lance has joined
  39. stpeter has left
  40. Lance has joined
  41. stpeter has joined
  42. ralphm has left
  43. Alex has joined
  44. Kev has left
  45. Lance has left
  46. Lance has joined
  47. Zash has left
  48. Alex has left
  49. Alex has joined
  50. Kev has left
  51. Zash has joined
  52. stpeter has left
  53. Zash Is it not common for bylaws to require qualified majority on multiple consequitive meetings for changing (parts of) the bylaws?
  54. Lance has joined
  55. Lance has joined
  56. Jef has joined
  57. Alex has left
  58. jabberjocke has left
  59. Lance has joined
  60. Lance has joined
  61. Jef has left
  62. Jef has joined
  63. Jef has left