XSF Discussion - 2014-01-10


  1. Lance has left
  2. waqas has left
  3. tato has left
  4. tato has joined
  5. waqas has joined
  6. waqas has left
  7. waqas has joined
  8. bear has left
  9. tato has left
  10. waqas has left
  11. Alex has joined
  12. dwd has joined
  13. bear has joined
  14. fippo https://twitter.com/xnyhps/status/421402249357574144 -- is there an isoc press release somewhere?
  15. fippo ah... http://isoc.nl/innovatieaward/
  16. bear that is the first I've heard of it
  17. bear has left
  18. bear has joined
  19. Neustradamus has left
  20. dwd has left
  21. bear has left
  22. bear has joined
  23. bear has left
  24. bear has joined
  25. Zash has joined
  26. ralphm By the way, the EPP Keyrelay has won that award.
  27. Lloyd has joined
  28. Zash has left
  29. dwd has joined
  30. emcho has left
  31. emcho has joined
  32. bear has left
  33. Zash has joined
  34. Zash has left
  35. emcho has left
  36. emcho has joined
  37. emcho has left
  38. dwd Alex, Sorry for the disruptive suggestion, I should probably have approached you quietly with that idea.
  39. Kev I don't, FWIW, think it'd be useful to hold a member's meeting at the summit.
  40. Kev (And given that it's cheduled two days before the summit, I'm not sure many people are likely to be travelling to the summit on Tuesday night)
  41. ralphm Working in Inkscape for the beanbag design. 140x180 is pretty damn big.
  42. intosi To my father's house kwam net langs.
  43. intosi Random iTunes is best leuk ;)
  44. ralphm intosi: wrong window. But yeah.
  45. intosi Excellent ;)
  46. ralphm Hm, maybe logo's of 40x40 are a bit BIG
  47. ralphm (cm)
  48. dwd has left
  49. intosi A little, perhaps.
  50. dwd has joined
  51. ralphm I am also wondering about the background colour.
  52. intosi Which ones are you considering?
  53. Kev 50 shades of pink.
  54. intosi Don't you mean sheds?
  55. Kev 50 shades of sheds.
  56. Alex dwd: no problem at all
  57. Alex one of my good attentions for 2014 is to be more strict with the deadlines and timing ;-)
  58. dwd Kev, I think it'd be interesting to discuss the XSF's role at the Summit anyway, and having the formal meeting then could act as a useful focus.
  59. dwd Kev, Also, we could formally vote on what pizza to buy in again.
  60. ralphm intosi: basically white for the ones with the Jabber and XMPP logos, dark blue for the realtime logo one
  61. Kev So, 1) I don't think it needs to be a formal meeting to have discussions 2) If you want a formal meetings so we can vote on things we discuss, I think this excludes absent members from usefully contributing.
  62. intosi ralphm: are the covers washable? White might need that after one FOSDEM.
  63. dwd Kev, (1) No, it doesn't, but I think it would help focus and visibility. I do want a discussion, and if it's a formal meeting, this forces it to be announced, minuted, and so on, and avoids it being squeezed out by other items. (2) Yes, I wasn't serious about voting on pizza, but if a decision needs to be made, we would actually have quorum to make it (and we could vote on whether we *should* make it as well).
  64. ralphm yes, there's a zipper and a inner bag with the EPS
  65. dwd ralphm, I would have thought white for Jabber, possibly, but black for XSF. I'm not convinced we should have a Realtime one (or at least, not sure we should be funding it).
  66. intosi ralphm: good.
  67. ralphm intosi: the outer shell is made of 100% polyester with PU coating
  68. Kev dwd: Yes, I'm opposed to the possibility of voting happening at an in-person meeting based on discussions that happen at that meeting, effectively excluding from the meeting those people not present who will have voted on scheduled items by proxy.
  69. ralphm dwd: good point, I was thinking keeping the Realtime brand alive, with it being named Realtime Lounge and all.
  70. Kev I'd be much happier with just having the meeting in the normal format, and having a chat at the summit that whoever wants the discussion to happen (presumably you), minuting it and posting to the members list for wider discussion.
  71. ralphm dwd: i.e. not make it all about XMPP/Jabber per sé
  72. Kev ralphm: The XSF kinda is all about XMPP.
  73. ralphm Kev: wat!
  74. ralphm Kev: Couldn't you have told me before?
  75. Kev I didn't want to spoil the surprise.
  76. Kev Spoilers!
  77. dwd Kev, OK, you're welcome to be opposed to it, but the only way to actually prevent that possibility is to change the bylaws which allow it. If there's something special about an in-person meeting you find different in this respect, I'd be curious to know what it is.
  78. dwd (The bylaws actually *explicitly* allow it).
  79. dwd ralphm, I thought the XSF was all about mail. Why are we here anyway?
  80. ralphm Look, we have been doing a Realtime Lounge for getting other realtime technologies in the spotlight along with Jabber/XMPP. Things like IoT and WebRTC are only partially about XMPP and that's fine.
  81. ralphm We could also have it been called the Jabber Lounge.
  82. intosi dwd: for the last few days, XSF /was/ all about mail for me ;)
  83. Kev dwd: No, we prevent the possibility of voting happening at a meeting at the summit by not having a meeting at the summit.
  84. Kev There's no reason to go hyperbolic on this.
  85. ralphm We could also go to Delaware
  86. Kev And the thing I find different about an in-person meeting and the usual meetings is accessibility.
  87. ralphm Kidding aside, I don't see any value in having an in-person meeting for the stuff we usually do by proxy: voting new members in.
  88. Kev We could do an in-person meeting supplemented by viable vvoip or such, and that reduces the barrier -but I'm not sure we have the technology.
  89. dwd ralphm, But yes. I'm far from being against the realtime brand, just not convinced the XSF should be funding it in this way.
  90. Kev FWIW: Re: Realtime, if we want a Realtime brand as a way of bringing people into the XMPP fold, or of raising awareness for XMPP, that doesn't seem stupid. Although it doesn't seem like a clear-cut win either, to me.
  91. dwd ralphm, But your argument also holds for not having meetings at all.
  92. emcho has joined
  93. emcho has left
  94. emcho has joined
  95. emcho has left
  96. dwd Kev, Thanks, that (Realtime) argument was better expressed than mine.
  97. ralphm dwd: I think voting by proxy and meeting in a MUC to confirm is basically the farthest we can stretch our By Laws to *avoid* having in-person meetings.
  98. ralphm dwd: a good thing IMO
  99. ralphm Kev: agreed, I cannot quantify the usefulness
  100. Kev I think naming it the realtime lounge makes it more interesting, though - but once people are there, being clear that XMPP is all about the realtime seems fine.
  101. Kev With infinite resources I'd consider a banner The Realtime Lounge powered by XMPP or something, but we don't have vast amounts of cash to throw around on such things.
  102. ralphm https://twitter.com/PubNub/status/421326157837893632
  103. ralphm is part of why for me
  104. dwd Kev, I think we'd have about 14 XSF members at the meeting, maybe a couple more. It's possible to ensure there's proactive inclusion, for want of a better prhase, for those in the MUC. (In fact, we could stipulate that any voting occurs exclusively through the MUC). I have no plans to force a vote, but our bylaws allow for this.
  105. ralphm although pubnub isn't really XMPP, it does support it
  106. ralphm Kev: agreed about the banner. I was thinking that if we have three bean bags, XMPP/Jabber/Realtime, this is already giving that signal
  107. Kev dwd: My concern isn't so much about the vote itself, that's easy to get into the MUC.
  108. dwd ralphm, Yes, more inclusion is better, certainly.
  109. Kev dwd: But if we're voting based on a discussion that happens, that discussion should be inclusive.
  110. ralphm And I think we should make sure we have a number of projectors to go instead of the banner to make it more obvious
  111. dwd Kev, Do you mean inclusive, or accessible?
  112. Kev ralphm: I'm not opposed to a beanbag with Realtime on (not that it matters if I am or not). I just don't see a beanbag with just Realtime on it as having a strong message to it, whereas "Realtime powered by XMPP" does. But...*shrug*...this is not my area of expertise.
  113. Kev dwd: Yes.
  114. ralphm Kev, dwd: I also wonder how we could take entities like PubNub and probably &yet itself on their offers to help out doing this event.
  115. Kev dwd: In as much as stuff that happens on the mailing list is both inclusive and accessible.
  116. ralphm have them sponsor in kind, money, resources?
  117. Kev I don't think it harms to have people who're using XMPP have a banner or something behind, FWIW.
  118. dwd Kev, I ask because "inclusive" would imply "having as many people contribute as possible" to me, whereas "accessible" implies "having as many people potentially contribute as possible". My thought was that an in-person meeting would help the former, and the latter we'd have to be careful to avoid it suffering.
  119. Kev I don't like the XMPP T-Shirts having &yet on them, but having a poster that says "&yet support XMPP" is fine/good.
  120. emcho has joined
  121. Kev dwd: I'm proposing that we have in-person discussions, which are high-bandwidth and likely to have significant contribution, and that these are summarised on-list where all members will hear the arguments (inclusive) and have the opportunity to contribute (accessible).
  122. ralphm I want to note again that posters are not going to be a thing with the physical properties of the walls surrounding the lounge, but yes
  123. Kev ralphm: Right. I mean the idea in general.
  124. ralphm Kev: right
  125. Kev We've shared the stand with companies who make use of XMPP before, and will presumably do so again this year.
  126. Kev OK, idea.
  127. Kev A slideshow cycling through people who use XMPP and a summary of what they do and why.
  128. emcho has left
  129. ralphm Kev: right
  130. emcho has joined
  131. fippo kev: +1
  132. ralphm Possible designs for the beanbags. Comments welcome! http://mag.ik.nu/~ralphm/tmp/beanbags/
  133. ralphm (I like viewing them on 1:1 scale)
  134. intosi I need a bigger monitor.
  135. ralphm haha
  136. intosi The SVG and PDF versions show with a white background in my browser. I assume this is intentional?
  137. ralphm PDF doesn't seem to support background colors and I'm not sure why inkscape doesn't save them to SVG
  138. ralphm or, it does, but doesn't show this in normal renderings or something
  139. dwd ralphm, For Inkscape, I tended to add in a background rectangle for working.
  140. dwd ralphm, Mostly because SVG doesn't have a background colour for the whole thing. The page stuff is all Inkscape extensions.
  141. ralphm Last time I did this for a t-shirt, the printer didn't care
  142. ralphm I've also submitted these designs for review with the company
  143. dwd ralphm, As long as you give the printer the PNG as a guide, should be fine.
  144. ralphm and asked them if they have other-colored materials they print on
  145. ralphm I mean, if they have a nice darkblue fabric, that's better than having it printed such, I think
  146. dwd Oh. Yes, sorry, I assumed the fabric colour was choosable.
  147. ralphm I specifically asked them if light on dark can be done (I assume that's fine)
  148. intosi That's why I assumed you left out the background colour.
  149. admin has joined
  150. ralphm hey admin, do you have an update for us?
  151. admin they're looking into pricing
  152. ralphm they love us, so I hope that's quite fine
  153. emcho has left
  154. intosi ralphm: they probably love anyone who 1) pays for their rooms, and 2) do not trash them.
  155. emcho has joined
  156. ralphm intosi: consider they usually get EU-related people in
  157. emcho has left
  158. emcho has joined
  159. ralphm dwd: anyway, looking good otherwise?
  160. dwd Yes, looks great otherwise.
  161. intosi ralphm: nice job
  162. intosi IANAD, so apply a grain of salt to my rating ;)
  163. dwd intosi, Oh, designing is easy. Just make it look pretty, and then write a paragraph or two referring to your "consistent design language", and your use of "intuitive metaphor".
  164. dwd When I was young, "design language" was called "style", or, sometimes, "look and feel".
  165. intosi A lot has changed since the 1880s ;-)
  166. waqas has joined
  167. fsteinel has joined
  168. Lloyd has left
  169. fsteinel has left
  170. Ashley Ward has joined
  171. Ashley Ward has left
  172. Ashley Ward has joined
  173. Ashley Ward has left
  174. Ash has joined
  175. dwd has left
  176. Ash has left
  177. admin has left
  178. emcho has left
  179. admin has joined
  180. admin has left
  181. admin has joined
  182. admin has left
  183. Neustradamus has joined
  184. bear has joined
  185. Lance has joined
  186. dwd has joined
  187. Simon has joined
  188. stpeter has joined
  189. Lance has joined
  190. Lance has joined
  191. Simon has left
  192. stpeter has left
  193. tato has joined
  194. Alex has left
  195. Simon has left
  196. Simon has joined