XSF logo XSF Discussion - 2014-03-03


  1. dezant has left
  2. dezant has joined
  3. Santiago26 has joined
  4. Santiago26 has left
  5. Santiago26 has joined
  6. Santiago26 has left
  7. dezant has left
  8. Santiago26 has joined
  9. Santiago26 has left
  10. Santiago26 has joined
  11. Santiago26 has left
  12. Santiago26 has joined
  13. Santiago26 has left
  14. Santiago26 has joined
  15. Santiago26 has left
  16. Santiago26 has joined
  17. Santiago26 has left
  18. Zash has joined
  19. Santiago26 has joined
  20. Santiago26 has left
  21. Santiago26 has joined
  22. Santiago26 has left
  23. Zash has left
  24. Alex has joined
  25. Santiago26 has joined
  26. Santiago26 has left
  27. Santiago26 has joined
  28. dezant has joined
  29. jabberjocke has left
  30. dwd has joined
  31. Kev has left
  32. Santiago26 has left
  33. Santiago26 has joined
  34. Santiago26 has left
  35. Santiago26 has joined
  36. Zash has joined
  37. Santiago26 has left
  38. Santiago26 has joined
  39. Santiago26 has left
  40. Ash has joined
  41. Santiago26 has joined
  42. Lloyd has joined
  43. simon has joined
  44. Santiago26 has left
  45. Zash has left
  46. Santiago26 has joined
  47. Santiago26 has left
  48. Santiago26 has joined
  49. Santiago26 has left
  50. Santiago26 has joined
  51. xnyhps has left
  52. Maranda has joined
  53. Kev has joined
  54. Santiago26 has left
  55. emcho has joined
  56. emcho has left
  57. Maranda has left
  58. xnyhps has left
  59. emcho has joined
  60. SM has joined
  61. emcho has left
  62. emcho has joined
  63. Santiago26 has joined
  64. Santiago26 has left
  65. Santiago26 has joined
  66. Kev What are people's plans for the meeting tomorrow?
  67. Kev I assume they mostly involve precis as well.
  68. Kev Which I thought was in the same room, but seems not to be.
  69. Lloyd Got an announcement regarding transport to the evening meetup going out by email today.
  70. Kev I mean the WG.
  71. Kev Although cool :)
  72. Lloyd (yeah just thought I'd update that bit too)
  73. simon has left
  74. simon has joined
  75. ralphm has left
  76. xnyhps has left
  77. emcho has left
  78. xnyhps has left
  79. emcho has joined
  80. emcho has left
  81. emcho has joined
  82. simon has left
  83. Laura has joined
  84. emcho has left
  85. dwd Lloyd, You seem to have mis-spelt "Ubber".
  86. dwd is virtually sitting in sipcore.
  87. fippo ugh
  88. dwd I have a horrible feeling our meetings sound this dull to an outsider.
  89. xnyhps has left
  90. fippo oh, go to AVTCORE or AVTEXT (-:
  91. Lloyd dwd: As they were providing transport I felt it wouldn't be fair. Florian is coming though so we can refer to it as 'ubber' all we want :)
  92. Santiago26 has left
  93. xnyhps has left
  94. Lloyd has left
  95. fippo "which lends itself to interoperability and federation thinking . things that are a bit less important these days" -- intraoperability is so much more cool, eh dwd? (guess where that is from)
  96. dwd Intra-operability is like masturbation for networked systems.
  97. Santiago26 has joined
  98. xnyhps has left
  99. Kev No-one has any plans for meeting prior to precis, then?
  100. Kev has left
  101. Santiago26 has left
  102. Laura has left
  103. Tobias has joined
  104. Santiago26 has joined
  105. ralphm fippo: link?
  106. dwd ralphm, That's from Tsahi's blog.
  107. Lance has joined
  108. Kev has joined
  109. emcho has joined
  110. emcho has left
  111. emcho has joined
  112. emcho has left
  113. emcho has joined
  114. ralphm oh man, does that ever stop?
  115. SM Did people give up on the federation angle?
  116. Tobias depends who you mean with people? :)
  117. SM Well, I do not even see StPeter here. So it would be the rest:)
  118. Tobias right..since he's a machine who's 24/7 online
  119. ralphm SM: wait what?
  120. SM Ralph, I wondered whetehr people (undefined) were still pushing for federation
  121. fippo ralphm: when tsahi says "federation" he talks about things like "sip federation" and rcs-e and joyn
  122. fippo which is a frequent misunderstand because we use federation for "run your own server and be part of the network. minimum requirements"
  123. ralphm SM: within the XSF? Mostly everybody.
  124. SM Ralph, the door is still open for doing some PR. It won't last for long
  125. ralphm SM: it's not like we can just pull open a can of PR people.
  126. SM I understand. Just mentioning it.
  127. ralphm SM: it's mostly stating the obvious, no offense. I wish I could find the time to write more, but I have been trying to keep up with Tweets mentioning XMPP and occasionally responding to falsehoods.
  128. ralphm Good writeups would be great.
  129. jabberjocke has joined
  130. emcho has left
  131. dezant has left
  132. SM has left
  133. Ge0rG are there XMPP-based services that generate large numbers of outgoing messages?
  134. ralphm superfeedr?
  135. ralphm Ge0rG: I can hook you up with julian if you want
  136. Ge0rG ralphm: I'm still pondering about xmpp spam prevention using proof-of-work
  137. Tobias has joined
  138. fippo https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/03/03/triplehandshake.html <-- ugh, this seems like it might affect xmpp, in particular s2s?
  139. Lance has joined
  140. Tobias " and protocols that depend on channel binding"
  141. fippo oh wait, we only use channel binding with scram plus and that is typically not used with client certs?
  142. Ge0rG I still wait for people to realize that client cert handshake is leaking big data
  143. fippo hah. xmpp beats email again ( @ security mailing list)
  144. Tobias what security ml?
  145. Tobias has left
  146. Lance has joined
  147. Tobias has joined
  148. fippo security@xmpp.org
  149. Tobias got into spam :(
  150. Ge0rG there is a security@ ml? wow!
  151. Tobias yeah...low traffic...because XMPP is soooo secure ^^
  152. fippo "[discuss-webrtc] How Do I know If Someon is Online To Take A WebRTC Call?" -- i am tempted to reply "use presence, it's the new dialtone"
  153. Santiago26 has left
  154. Santiago26 has joined
  155. Ash has left
  156. ralphm I hope intosi is reading that list, as he's been looking into dkim issues
  157. ralphm in general, though, gmail and others services don't really like independent mail servers sending out, you know, mai; to them
  158. ralphm mail even
  159. Alex has left
  160. xnyhps fippo: I think TLS resumptions is a requirement for that attack, and (I'd love to be corrected about this) I don't think anyone in the XMPP world uses that.
  161. xnyhps Because of StartTLS etc.
  162. dwd xnyhps, Actually, it's better than that. You need clients that don't validate certificates and just rely on channel binding.
  163. dwd xnyhps, BTW, if you've got a minute at some point, it'd be great to hear how STRINT went. But not now, because I'm old and need my sleep. :-)
  164. fippo dwd: I heard that strint was rather boring (-:
  165. Tobias has left
  166. Tobias has joined
  167. xnyhps dwd: Ah, I missed that when I read it.
  168. Ash has joined
  169. ralphm dwd, xnyhps: I think it would be pretty useful to blog this on xmpp.org
  170. Zash has joined
  171. xnyhps I happen to have a series of blog posts about HTTPS attacks and how they translate to XMPP. (Where the "series" is right now at 1 item)
  172. ralphm heh
  173. Lance has left
  174. Lance has joined
  175. Lance has left
  176. Lance has joined
  177. ralphm \-
  178. xnyhps has left
  179. Lance has left
  180. Lance has joined
  181. Lance has left
  182. Lance has joined