Thursday, March 06, 2014
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
March
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
          1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 29 30
31            
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:01:19] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[00:21:41] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[00:43:44] *** Zash has left the room
[02:03:26] *** Ash has left the room
[03:12:03] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[03:12:04] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[03:17:07] *** Tobias has left the room
[04:39:57] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:07:01] *** Alex has joined the room
[06:16:59] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[06:19:18] *** Alex shows as "online"
[07:11:42] *** intosi has joined the room
[07:33:35] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[07:36:31] *** intosi shows as "online"
[07:43:11] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[07:44:37] *** intosi shows as "online"
[07:50:04] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[07:54:09] *** dwd shows as "online"
[07:54:57] *** emcho has joined the room
[07:59:45] *** intosi has left the room
[08:06:20] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[08:13:42] *** Alex shows as "online"
[08:33:32] *** intosi has joined the room
[08:33:35] *** Kev shows as "online"
[08:35:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:36:10] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:45:15] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[08:46:10] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[08:56:55] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[08:58:19] *** emcho has left the room
[09:00:20] *** m&m has joined the room
[09:02:08] *** dwd shows as "online"
[09:06:00] *** m&m has left the room
[09:07:36] *** emcho has joined the room
[09:07:46] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:08:48] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[09:09:53] *** intosi shows as "online"
[09:10:53] *** emcho has left the room
[09:12:18] *** emcho has joined the room
[09:13:10] *** dwd shows as "online"
[09:13:14] *** emcho has left the room
[09:13:20] *** Zash has joined the room
[09:13:20] *** Zash shows as "online"
[09:13:24] *** Zash shows as "online" and his status message is "DANE WG"
[09:13:35] *** emcho has joined the room
[09:16:57] *** Ash has joined the room
[09:31:52] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[09:32:43] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[09:35:43] *** Lloyd has joined the room
[09:44:43] *** Alex shows as "online"
[09:45:18] *** m&m has joined the room
[09:48:45] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com has joined the room
[09:50:56] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[09:52:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[09:53:48] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[09:57:28] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[09:57:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[09:58:06] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[09:58:12] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[09:58:32] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[09:59:32] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:01:08] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:01:35] *** intosi shows as "online"
[10:04:11] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:04:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:08:52] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:08:57] *** Zash shows as "online" and his status message is "DANE WG"
[10:09:00] <fippo> "There is a lesson here. Standards are there to make your life easier." -- http://www.chriskranky.com/amazon-mayday-maybe-using-webrtc-cares/
[10:09:04] *** Zash shows as "online" and his status message is "DANE WG"
[10:09:46] <m&m> I thought standards are there to prove I'm right, for all values of "right"
[10:11:21] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:12:01] <fippo> they're terribly useful for that, too
[10:12:54] *** dwd shows as "online"
[10:14:20] *** simon has joined the room
[10:18:41] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:21:01] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:21:20] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:21:56] <ralphm> https://twitter.com/MaciejMusialik/statuses/441515074063466496
[10:22:25] <m&m> sadly too true
[10:23:05] <ralphm> but fippo is fixing that, right fippo, right????
[10:24:55] <fippo> later today (-:
[10:25:10] <fippo> after talky finally has its turn servers
[10:25:22] <ralphm> awesome
[10:28:22] <m&m> btw: there is a TRAM working group that is improving TURN
[10:28:30] *** dwd shows as "online"
[10:28:31] <m&m> if you're not already paying attention there, I think we should
[10:28:42] <m&m> (TRAM working group at the IETF)
[10:29:16] <fippo> i'm paying attention
[10:29:49] <fippo> but my need for turn is mostly satisfied by draft-uberti-behave-turn-rest ;-)
[10:30:53] *** emcho has left the room
[10:30:57] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[10:31:05] <Zash> And there's a TRAM session later today
[10:33:34] <dwd> Oh, I forgot about DANE.
[10:34:02] <Zash> And that's now :)
[10:34:04] <m&m> is TRAM today?
[10:34:05] <fippo> https://twitter.com/danyork/status/441503787560493056 <-- there was no space left
[10:34:06] <m&m> oi
[10:34:13] <m&m> too many conflicts
[10:34:14] <dwd> Zash, Indeed. Is it interesting?
[10:34:18] *** emcho has joined the room
[10:34:35] <dwd> I think, looking at the agenda, I've missed everything I meant to listen in on anyway.
[10:36:11] <Zash> m&m: or .. I might have been looking at yesterday
[10:36:17] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:36:24] <Zash> so nm
[10:36:50] <Zash> dwd: Interesting. But now it's semantics ^^
[10:36:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:36:58] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:37:01] *** Tobias has left the room
[10:37:16] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:37:18] *** Tobias has left the room
[10:37:21] <ralphm> dwd: way to go
[10:37:42] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:37:44] *** Tobias has left the room
[10:37:55] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:38:03] <dwd> In my defence, I've been quite preoccupied recently. :-)
[10:38:38] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:38:40] *** Tobias has left the room
[10:38:47] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:38:48] *** Tobias has left the room
[10:39:28] *** emcho has left the room
[10:39:29] <Kev> I'm vaguely regretting only turning up for Tuesday.
[10:39:55] <dwd> If timing had been different, I'd have thoroughly enjoyed turning up for the week.
[10:40:10] <Kev> This week wasn't convenient for me, I had to be home yesterday.
[10:40:25] <dwd> I'll just have to go to Hawai'i instead.
[10:40:34] <Zash> Haha
[10:40:49] <dwd> Zash, Someone's got to do the hard jobs, you know.
[10:40:55] <m&m> you clearly weren't at the admin plenary; Hawai'i is a terrible burden to go to
[10:42:00] *** emcho has joined the room
[10:42:01] <fippo> but all the important decisions will be made there
[10:42:13] <dwd> fippo, Put your expense claim in early.
[10:42:17] <fippo> so like it or not, you have to go
[10:42:59] <Kev> Right. Certificates for XMPP servers. Do folks still use startcom?
[10:43:25] <Zash> Folks do, yes.
[10:43:28] <dwd> I went for a Comodo cheap-but-not-free cert.
[10:43:30] <m&m> there's quite a few
[10:44:15] <Kev> How cheap is cheap, and why is it better than free? :)
[10:44:15] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:44:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:44:34] <dwd> I think my two certs were somewhere around £15.
[10:44:51] <dwd> StartCom are free, but revokation costs about £50, whereas it's free with me.
[10:44:57] *** intosi has left the room
[10:44:58] *** intosi has joined the room
[10:45:03] <m&m> that is a good point
[10:45:18] <m&m> you want revocation to be cheap, in case you get compromised
[10:45:24] <dwd> So to some extent, I'm paying for a brand I trust to know what they're doing, and paying an insurance premium.
[10:45:43] <dwd> m&m, Right, I don't want to get compromised and *then* stung for a hefty fee.
[10:45:44] <Kev> "Starting from £41.95 per year"
[10:45:54] <Kev> This sound like significantly more than £15.
[10:46:17] <m&m> I think Startcom is free if you paid for a premium cert
[10:47:36] *** Zash shows as "online" and his status message is "DANE WG"
[10:47:41] *** Zash shows as "online" and his status message is "DANE WG"
[10:47:52] <dwd> https://www.namecheap.com/security/ssl-certificates/domain-validation.aspx
[10:49:48] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:49:59] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:50:26] <Kev> dwd: The text on https://www.namecheap.com/security/ssl-certificates/comodo/essentialssl.aspx, which is the £15ish one, seems to suggest it's single-domain-only (i.e. no MUC child). Sound about right?
[10:51:20] <dwd> Ah, yes. My two are single domain. But dave.cridland.net was covered, unlike StartCom.
[10:51:39] <dwd> FWIW, I think mine are the top one on that page.
[10:52:03] <dwd> I have one for cridland.im and one for dave.cridland.net
[10:52:10] <Kev> Ah, the £6/year ones?
[10:52:16] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:52:25] <dwd> Right. I think. :-) It was a while ago.
[10:52:44] <Kev> It's entirely unclear to me what the difference between PositiveSSL and EssentialSSL is :)
[10:53:44] <dwd> Ah, that one has unlimited reissues. Let me dig through and see what I have.
[10:56:14] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:57:27] <Kev> Murky.
[10:57:27] <dwd> Ah, so I have EssentialSSL certificates. I have a feeling they were on offer when I bought them.
[10:58:53] <dwd> So these have a "site seal", which I don't bother with, "mobile browser support", which I don't think means much, and unlimited reissues (ie, for compromise or whatever).
[10:59:01] <Kev> Getting two or three EssentialSSL certs seems a tad expensive.
[10:59:36] <Kev> £43/year or whatever. Almost worth going with a filthy wildcard at that price.
[10:59:46] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:00:52] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:01:14] <Tobias> startcoms wildcards are $60 a year it seems
[11:01:22] <Tobias> startcoms wildcards are $60 for two years it seems
[11:01:23] <dwd> Hmmm. We could always see if we could persuade a CA or two to give XMPP folk a discount because we're so lovely.
[11:02:39] <Kev> Temptation to just get a couple of these £5/year certs is fairly strong. Although I don't see anything about the reissues on the pages.
[11:03:02] <dwd> Right, I think on compromsie you pay again.
[11:03:51] *** Zash shows as "online" and his status message is "DANE WG"
[11:03:52] *** Zash shows as "online" and his status message is "DANE WG"
[11:03:57] <dwd> But they have a "live chat" thing which has people who're knowledgeable about these things.
[11:04:28] <dwd> By which I mean they'll be able to tell you about revokation etc, not that they can tell you much of note about odd X.509 features.
[11:05:05] <dwd> Kev, Benefits of working for Isode - discover you now know more about X.509 than most CA employees purely by osmosis.
[11:05:19] <Zash> Hahaha
[11:05:43] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:05:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:06:05] <simon> you can get free wildcard certs for opensouce projects from Globalsign.
[11:06:08] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:06:09] <Tobias> and startcom charges for all revocations, except for their EV certs http://www.startssl.com/?app=25#72
[11:06:13] <m&m> dwd: you almost say that like it's a good thing
[11:06:33] <simon> https://www.globalsign.com/ssl/ssl-open-source/
[11:07:02] <dwd> m&m, If only it was.
[11:07:06] <m&m> Tobias: right. "premium" (-:
[11:07:22] <Kev> simon: Ta. This is for my own server, rather than an OSS project.
[11:07:23] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:09:13] *** m&m has left the room
[11:09:46] *** m&m has joined the room
[11:11:02] <simon> Kev: with a free cert from startcom you would be able to cover muc.<domain> and <domain> since they always fill out the altname too
[11:12:47] <Kev> Right. That was how this conversation started :)
[11:13:07] <Kev> Although if I wanted to bring channels.doomsong back to life, I'd need a third domain :)
[11:13:24] <Tobias> or an additional cert just for that
[11:14:03] *** m&m has left the room
[11:14:05] <simon> Tobais: I don't think that would work - at least not from startcom - they notice that you are trying to get another free one for the same domain.
[11:14:29] *** Zash has left the room
[11:14:46] <Tobias> simon, i didn't mean from startcom...right..they'd probably notice :)
[11:15:19] <intosi> You can certainly request foo.domain.tld and bar.domain.tld at StartCom.
[11:16:05] <dwd> simon, What's actually in a StartCom cert these days?
[11:16:52] <simon> no matter what you put in your generated cert, they remove it all and put <domainname> and a hostname portion that you can select.
[11:17:18] <dwd> Right, I remember that, but what's in the Subject, and what SANs are in it?
[11:18:38] <intosi> for one of my keys, I have roughly this:
[11:18:39] <intosi> Subject: description=7u4x3xy29u755HYu, C=NL, CN=owncloud.ik.nu/emailAddress=hostmaster@ik.nu
[11:19:00] <intosi> X509v3 extensions:
X509v3 Basic Constraints:
CA:FALSE
X509v3 Key Usage:
Digital Signature, Key Encipherment, Key Agreement
X509v3 Extended Key Usage:
TLS Web Server Authentication
X509v3 Subject Key Identifier:
72:CE:E6:0C:5F:D5:EA:54:BB:F9:A8:42:28:AF:F9:DE:60:DA:9F:F5
X509v3 Authority Key Identifier:
keyid:EB:42:34:D0:98:B0:AB:9F:F4:1B:6B:08:F7:CC:64:2E:EF:0E:2C:45

X509v3 Subject Alternative Name:
DNS:owncloud.ik.nu, DNS:ik.nu
X509v3 Certificate Policies:
Policy: 2.23.140.1.2.1
Policy: 1.3.6.1.4.1.23223.1.2.3
[11:19:18] <intosi> That's a regular one, not one I requested for XMPP.
[11:20:08] *dwd notes intosi has now learnt all the right terms by osmosis, and probably knows what the two-attribute RDN in the subject is called by now.
[11:20:22] <intosi> Those have othername fields in the SAN
[11:21:02] <dwd> intosi, Right, Sodium will tell you what those are, mind. There's a tool I miss having around.
[11:21:43] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:21:50] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:21:55] <Kev> dwd: I think if you'd seen the 16.3 MLC (which doesn't exist yet, but we know what's coming), you'd miss having that around as well :)
[11:22:12] <Kev> 16.2 MLC is really rather good, mind. What was the last version you saw?
[11:22:13] <intosi> Kev, dwd: :D
[11:22:42] <dwd> Kev, A R15.X, which was certainly getting there.
[11:22:51] <Kev> Ah. Worlds apart :)
[11:23:02] <simon> What was the deal with special XMPP certificates a few years ago? What was different about them?
[11:23:12] <Kev> simon: They had the right SANs in.
[11:23:18] <simon> ah
[11:23:36] <dwd> simon, As I recall, they listed SANs, but had some funnies around the sRVName SANs they used.
[11:23:51] <Kev> dwd: I think the XSF certs were correct, IIRC.
[11:24:01] <Kev> Back when we had an ICA.
[11:24:20] <simon> Why would a normal alt-name not work?
[11:24:44] <Kev> simon: It's not 'not work', it's just that certs should be specialised for the service they're protecting.
[11:24:51] <dwd> simon, It would, but older servers were fairly restrictive in what SANs they used.
[11:25:13] <dwd> simon, ALso, there's no such thing as a "normal alt-name". :-P
[11:26:03] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[11:26:55] <dwd> simon, The Subject is a DN, originally meant to be your entry in the global X.500 directory. The Subject could have alternative names (added in v3), which are all typed. dNSName is the hostname type, and otherName is an extendable type where both sRVName and xmppName live.
[11:27:53] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:28:57] <intosi> Which openssl conveniently refuses to display ;)
[11:29:49] <simon> dwd: you really need to start a CA
[11:31:32] <intosi> simon: we somewhat jokingly discussed this a feww years ago, but I think the rough consensus was that running it would be entering a world of pain.
[11:31:51] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:32:12] <Kev> In practical terms, yes. Although in technical terms, Sodium CA makes all this rather easy.
[11:32:20] <dwd> simon, I've also contemplated a CA based around leap-of-faith verification before.
[11:32:24] <Kev> I do have my own CA I use 'internally'.
[11:32:41] <dwd> Kev, Technically, yes; I think the objections were more political ones.
[11:32:51] <Kev> Right.
[11:32:52] <intosi> Running your own CA isn't the world-of-pain part. Getting your CA accepted as a trust anchor in major browsers is.
[11:33:00] <Tobias> the pain of getting it in the major OSes and browsers
[11:33:17] <Kev> If it was a CA for XMPP, you don't need to do that.
[11:33:46] <Tobias> you'd need to provide guides for all XMPP servers how to add your CA to the trusted ones
[11:33:49] <dwd> Kev, That's true, in some respects. Though you need to get it in all the XMPP implementations.
[11:34:11] *** emcho has left the room
[11:34:14] *Tobias still failed to add CAcert as trusted on my bsd system....but i haven't spend more than half an hour on that yet
[11:36:02] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is "Not available as a result of being idle"
[11:37:32] <simon> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647959
[11:37:32] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:38:37] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:40:23] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:40:24] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:44:55] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[11:47:26] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[11:49:15] *** Kev shows as "away"
[11:51:23] *** Kev shows as "online"
[11:57:25] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[11:59:02] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:59:14] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:03:06] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:03:31] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:05:08] *** Alex shows as "online"
[12:15:17] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:15:19] *** intosi shows as "online"
[12:16:08] *** Kev shows as "away"
[12:16:54] *** Kev shows as "online"
[12:17:52] *** Tobias has joined the room
[12:17:55] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[12:20:44] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[12:25:45] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[12:28:20] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[12:29:18] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:29:34] *** Alex shows as "online"
[12:29:49] *** Kev shows as "away"
[12:31:09] *** dwd shows as "online"
[12:33:34] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[12:33:49] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:33:49] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[12:34:45] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:35:14] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:35:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:35:57] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:36:04] *** Kev shows as "online"
[12:36:08] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[12:36:26] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:36:42] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:39:27] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:40:09] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[12:40:13] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:44:40] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:51:09] *** Alex shows as "online"
[13:01:37] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[13:01:38] *** Tobias has left the room
[13:02:26] *** m&m has joined the room
[13:05:49] *** m&m shows as "dnd" and his status message is "ietf89 - saag"
[13:10:16] *** Zash has joined the room
[13:10:17] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:10:37] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[13:11:01] *** intosi shows as "online"
[13:12:28] *** m&m has left the room
[13:12:32] *** m&m has joined the room
[13:31:47] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:32:08] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:32:37] *** emcho has joined the room
[13:36:22] <ralphm> I got an Ubuntu update pushed today that removes CACert as a CA
[13:36:43] <Zash> saywat
[13:36:55] <Tobias> ubuntu only or did debian get rid of it too?
[13:37:03] <ralphm> dunno
[13:37:16] <Zash> ralphm: What Ubuntu version?
[13:37:26] <ralphm> 13.10
[13:39:06] <ralphm> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates/+bug/1258286
[13:39:42] <intosi> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/c/ca-certificates/ca-certificates_20130906ubuntu2/changelog
[13:42:01] <ralphm> looking at the full change list of that ticket reveals it was backported to lucid, precise, quantal, raring
[13:45:55] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:45:57] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:47:09] *** Zash has left the room
[13:47:34] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:47:35] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:47:45] *** Ash has joined the room
[13:48:20] <Zash> I don't see that update in precise
[13:49:02] <ralphm> -proposed
[13:49:04] <ralphm> ?
[13:49:49] <Zash> Aha
[13:51:58] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:52:37] <Zash> Are they actually really removing it completely?
[13:53:35] <Zash> As opposed to not having it enabled by default.
[13:53:43] *** Kev shows as "away"
[13:54:22] <intosi> "No longer ship" seems to suggest they have removed it completely.
[13:54:35] <intosi> ralphm should be able to confirm.
[13:55:12] <ralphm> ralphm@waar:/etc/ssl/certs$ ls | grep -i cacert
spi-cacert-2008.pem
[13:55:25] <intosi> http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/all/ca-certificates/filelist
[13:55:36] <intosi> It doesn't list /usr/share/ca-certificates/cacert.org anymore.
[13:56:03] <ralphm> right
[13:57:19] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[13:57:19] *** Tobias has left the room
[13:58:51] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[13:58:52] *** Tobias has left the room
[13:59:02] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:59:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:59:22] <MattJ> Fun
[14:00:05] <Zash> organizationName: Software in the Public Interest
[14:00:05] <Zash> :(
[14:00:05] *** Zash has left the room
[14:00:09] *** Zash shows as "online"
[14:00:10] *** Zash shows as "online"
[14:01:13] *** Kev shows as "online"
[14:02:56] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[14:05:32] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[14:05:32] *** Tobias has left the room
[14:08:02] <MattJ> where?
[14:08:08] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:08:13] <Zash> Where what?
[14:08:31] <MattJ> > 13:57:29 Zash> organizationName: Software in the Public Interest
[14:08:35] <Zash> Sooooo much lag on the IETF wifi
[14:08:51] <Zash> That was re: ralphm> spi-cacert-2008.pem
[14:11:18] *** Kev shows as "away"
[14:11:45] <simon> Seems like Fedora, Redhat and Suse are also not too keen on CACert inclusion
[14:11:49] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:12:57] *** Kev shows as "online"
[14:14:24] <Zash> It's likely that it's only in Ubuntu because it's in Debian
[14:16:52] <intosi> Hardly anybody was keen on that, mostly because it didn't pass the audit. Of course, recently the found vulnerability and subsequent lack of revocation of the ca key did not improve that. http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1qj1tz/http_20_to_be_https_only/cddfmz0?context=1 (fourth para)
[14:17:27] <Zash> I think CAcert.org themselves aborted auditing while waiting for some changes to be made.
[14:19:19] *** dwd shows as "online"
[14:23:02] <simon> intosi: great paragraph / nice background.
[14:25:13] *** Zash has left the room
[14:29:40] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[14:32:04] *** Tobias has left the room
[14:33:29] *** Zash has joined the room
[14:33:30] *** Zash shows as "online"
[14:36:02] *** m&m has left the room
[14:37:56] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:43:07] *** Zash has left the room
[14:43:09] *** Zash has joined the room
[14:43:10] *** Zash shows as "online"
[14:45:25] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[14:45:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[14:49:50] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[14:52:08] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:53:54] *** emcho has left the room
[14:55:02] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[14:55:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[14:56:23] *** Zash has left the room
[14:56:25] *** Zash has joined the room
[14:56:26] *** Zash shows as "online"
[14:59:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[15:00:39] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:01:25] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:01:25] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[15:02:24] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[15:02:50] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[15:03:52] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:04:18] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:04:34] *** Ash has left the room
[15:06:43] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:06:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[15:07:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[15:08:43] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:09:49] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:09:49] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[15:16:44] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[15:21:47] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:23:26] *** emcho has joined the room
[15:25:52] *** m&m has joined the room
[15:26:25] *** emcho has left the room
[15:26:44] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is "Not available as a result of being idle"
[15:26:46] <m&m> scribing to http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/notes-ietf-89-kitten?useMonospaceFont=true
[15:27:36] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:28:16] <Lloyd> BTW thanks for everyone who came to XMPPUK on tuesday. Hope everyone had a good time/got something out of the evening.
[15:28:46] <ralphm> Lloyd: even though I wasn't there, thanks for doing that!
[15:29:50] <m&m> yes, thank you!
[15:31:34] <intosi> Indeed. It was a very good meetup, thanks!
[15:31:47] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:33:18] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[15:34:17] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:37:23] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[15:39:54] *** Alex shows as "online"
[15:41:05] *** Lloyd has left the room
[15:41:28] *** Lloyd has joined the room
[15:41:36] <Kev> Lloyd: Yes, thanks. And plenty of pizza :D
[15:43:26] <Kev> Well, golly. They're asking for a CSR. I guess I should work out what to put in it.
[15:43:43] <Kev> dwd: Any idea if they pay any attention to what you put in it, or if they're just going to trample over and I don't need to bother?
[15:44:36] *** Tobias has joined the room
[15:44:39] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:44:46] <intosi> Most CAs will replace it with the information they have on record anyway, because that's the only info they verified.
[15:45:14] <intosi> It's either that, or requiring you to send proof of identity with each CSR.
[15:48:28] <Kev> https://www.dropbox.com/s/et86sczq4h76r4u/Screenshot%202014-03-06%2015.45.44.png whaaaaaaaaat?
[15:49:17] <intosi> They want to hold your hand installing the signed cert?
[15:49:20] <Kev> I assume it's to deliver it in an appropriate format, but I still found it slightly surprising.
[15:49:27] <Kev> Oh, or that possibly, yes.
[15:52:49] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:53:26] <simon> Kev - which register is that and which register do I need to avoid?
[15:53:38] <simon> Some of those products are ancient!
[15:53:49] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:53:50] <Kev> Comodo, via Namecheap.
[15:53:50] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:53:59] <Kev> But it seems to be to guide you to installation instructions, so it's fine.
[15:54:09] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:14:34] *** dwd shows as "online"
[16:17:02] <dwd> Kev, I don't think they used anything but the public key.
[16:17:44] <Zash> And there, prototype s2sin DANE.
[16:18:16] <simon> Zash: excellent. Looking forward to a new weekend project.
[16:18:32] <Zash> But I'm back to it being a race condition :|
[16:21:12] *** m&m has left the room
[16:21:16] *** m&m has joined the room
[16:24:22] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[16:33:18] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:52:18] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[16:53:40] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:55:04] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:55:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:58:16] *** m&m has left the room
[16:58:55] <Zash> so, https://www.zash.se/dane-s2s-client.html
[17:01:35] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:01:38] *** dwd shows as "online"
[17:01:52] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[17:02:01] <fippo> zash: the "no port" problem sounds familiar....
[17:02:18] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is "Not available as a result of being idle"
[17:02:36] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:03:21] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[17:03:24] <dwd> Right, SRV-like is how (IIRC) dane-esmtp works, isn't it?
[17:04:22] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:04:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:06:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:07:00] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:07:45] *** m&m has joined the room
[17:07:58] *** m&m has left the room
[17:08:02] *** m&m has joined the room
[17:08:09] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:08:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:09:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:10:09] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:10:12] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:10:50] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:10:50] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:13:02] *** Lloyd has left the room
[17:15:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:16:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:17:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:18:23] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:19:20] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:19:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:20:59] *** xnyhps has left the room
[17:23:25] *** m&m shows as "online"
[17:23:34] *** m&m shows as "dnd" and his status message is "ietf89 - jose"
[17:23:44] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is "Away as a result of being idle"
[17:25:52] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:26:17] *** Bunneh has joined the room
[17:26:18] <Zash> -draft dane-smtp
[17:26:18] <Bunneh> Zash: "SMTP security via opportunistic DANE TLS", Viktor Dukhovni, Wesley Hardaker, 2014-02-14,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane-07.txt
[17:26:21] <Zash> That one?
[17:27:16] <Zash> dwd: I spent yesterday searching for anything existing on s2s client auth, found only this thread: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg05110.html
[17:28:47] <MattJ> I really disagree with "the stream is not an XML document" viewpoint
[17:29:07] <Kev> It's not, as a whole.
[17:29:11] <MattJ> Yes, it is
[17:29:18] <MattJ> It has an opening tag and an ending tag
[17:29:26] <Kev> It has multiple opening tags, and one ending tag.
[17:29:30] <MattJ> No, it doesn't
[17:29:35] <MattJ> One opening, one closing
[17:29:51] <MattJ> You are confusing it with the other unfinished streams that went before
[17:29:52] <Kev> Throwing away the state each time you restart is not elegant from the XML PoV.
[17:29:54] <intosi> Except that you restart writing out the document without closing it.
[17:30:01] <Zash> dwd: But dane-smtp and dane-srv are meant to be in harmony.
[17:30:04] <Kev> MattJ: No, you're confusing my use of 'stream'.
[17:30:14] <MattJ> So what? Any XML parsing lib lets you throw the parser away and start another
[17:30:19] <MattJ> Kev, then say "connection"
[17:30:25] <Kev> That's...actually very not true :)
[17:30:57] <MattJ> Kev, e.g. ?
[17:31:08] *** m&m has left the room
[17:31:24] <Kev> The number of libraries I had to go through in Java before I found one that let me work on an incomplete stream without waiting for the end was depressing.
[17:31:41] <Kev> But this is orthogonal to the stream restart stuff.
[17:31:47] <MattJ> That's not quite the same thing
[17:31:56] <MattJ> Such libs are clearly not applicable to XMPP :)
[17:33:43] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is "Not available as a result of being idle"
[17:33:45] <Zash> So you need a SAX parser, we knew that already.
[17:34:25] <Kev> That alone is not enough :)
[17:34:50] *** Kev has left the room
[17:34:56] *** Kev has joined the room
[17:34:57] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:35:07] <Kev> Although this is more a comment on the sad state of Java XML parsers.
[17:35:53] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:36:24] *** Kev has left the room
[17:37:44] *** Kev has joined the room
[17:37:44] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:38:34] *** dwd shows as "online"
[17:39:27] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:39:27] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:45:55] *** Zash has left the room
[17:46:14] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:46:15] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[17:46:20] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:50:00] <Kev> And doomsong.co.uk finally has an A in the observatory. How nice.
[17:50:07] <Kev> (Just so long as no-one looks at the subdomains)
[17:52:38] <MattJ> Let's talk about export ciphers
[17:52:41] *** intosi has left the room
[17:53:16] <Kev> MattJ: They're disabled.
[17:53:22] <simon> Welcome to the club Kev.
[17:53:35] <MattJ> Kev, on jabber.org?
[17:53:41] <Kev> Oh, no.
[17:53:42] <Kev> Not there :)
[17:53:44] <MattJ> Right
[17:54:21] <MattJ> To continue Tuesday evening's discussion...
[17:54:54] <MattJ> Is the suggestion that jabber.org would be breaking the law to disable them? (seems ridiculous to me)
[17:55:21] <MattJ> or is the argument that people might be using software that only supports them, and we must allow that?
[17:55:28] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:55:33] <simon> I heard Intosi claiming the latter.
[17:56:15] <MattJ> From what Kev has said in the past I assume the latter is the case, so I don't know how legality came up in conversation
[17:56:31] <MattJ> Well, I suppose xnyhps making a US-centric statement :)
[17:57:07] <simon> I can imagine that those old clients using old ciphers are probably unused / installed at one point and sitting in a windows95 taskbar sucking the odd cpu cycle.
[17:57:39] <simon> kill the zombies.
[17:58:07] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[17:58:45] <MattJ> Indeed, I honestly think that providing people using such software with insecure service is doing nobody any good
[17:59:13] <simon> +1
[17:59:31] <Kev> MattJ: The claim was made that the old export cypher laws were no longer relevant. This isn't true.
[17:59:41] <MattJ> Agreed
[17:59:47] *** Tobias has joined the room
[17:59:48] <Kev> This isn't related to j.org's choice of suites.
[17:59:51] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[17:59:52] <MattJ> Ok, fine
[18:00:06] <MattJ> (and good)
[18:01:19] <simon> Did Jabber.org take part in the last test-day?
[18:01:23] <Kev> Yes.
[18:01:36] <simon> How did it work out?
[18:02:12] <Kev> Number of S2S dropped a lot, I think, but I didn't check.
[18:02:24] <Kev> The main complaints were Google-hosted domains.
[18:05:29] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:06:13] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[18:06:15] *** Alex shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[18:07:12] <simon> I'm quite encouraged - we started with 2% forced encryption on s2s traffic - that's almost up to 15% now.
[18:07:30] <Kev> ?
[18:07:55] <simon> https://xmpp.net/reports.php#starttls
[18:08:27] <simon> sorry - been a long day. Tried to kill -9 <file> a few moments ago.
[18:10:26] *** Jef has joined the room
[18:11:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:11:59] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:14:52] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[18:15:01] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[18:16:16] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[18:24:14] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[18:27:58] *** ralphm has left the room
[18:28:23] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[18:28:41] *** simon has left the room
[18:29:57] *** Jef shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:30:00] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[18:34:35] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[18:37:20] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:37:21] *** Jef shows as "online"
[18:38:10] *** Kev shows as "away"
[18:38:20] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:38:36] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:38:37] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:46:07] *** Jef shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:46:26] *** simon has joined the room
[18:48:27] *** Kev shows as "online"
[18:49:53] *** Jef shows as "online"
[18:50:35] <xnyhps> MattJ: Now I already made it obvious I don't know much about these laws, but don't they cover only exporting software *itself*?
[18:50:41] <xnyhps> So not offering a service?
[18:51:28] <MattJ> xnyhps, correct
[18:51:41] <MattJ> Also not applicable to open-source software (i.e. OpenSSL, GnuTLS)
[18:51:58] <MattJ> I would presume bundling such software with commercial software may be problematic though
[18:52:34] <xnyhps> (I did try to read the Wassenaar agreements a week or two ago, but couldn't get further than a couple of lines with all the legalese.)
[18:52:37] *** Alex shows as "online"
[18:55:00] <simon> Presumably any site offering an HTTPS connection with strong ciphers would be in breech of whatever agreement.
[18:55:57] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[18:58:41] *** Kev shows as "away"
[19:03:22] *** dwd shows as "online"
[19:04:53] *** Santiago26 has joined the room
[19:05:29] <MattJ> Well they are all outdated, and don't really match up with the way software, services and the internet work nowadays
[19:07:47] *** intosi has joined the room
[19:07:48] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[19:08:24] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:08:41] <intosi> Kev: well done.
[19:08:59] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:09:43] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[19:11:39] *** Santiago26 has left the room
[19:12:10] *** Santiago26 has joined the room
[19:12:17] *** Santiago26 shows as "online"
[19:14:20] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:18:59] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:20:39] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:23:26] *** Jef shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:25:24] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:25:24] *** intosi has left the room
[19:28:31] *** Santiago26 has left the room
[19:29:43] *** Alex shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[19:33:26] *** Jef shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:33:41] *** dwd shows as "online"
[19:36:08] <dwd> The cipher export laws in the UK only affect stuff for which the source code is not available (ie, non-open-source), and they're an implementation of EU directives.
[19:36:40] <dwd> The problem isn't so much the EU directive, but the fact they're enforced by a bunch of civil servants who're out of their depth.
[19:43:36] *** Alex shows as "online"
[19:43:53] <xnyhps> Well, if the directive still technically forbids the export of >56 bit symmetric and >512 bit asymmetric encryption, then I'd say it is a problem.
[19:45:58] <MattJ> Time to lobby our MPs? :)
[19:47:41] <xnyhps> But jabber.org has ciphers enabled that are even weaker than this laws would allow.
[19:48:11] <xnyhps> *this law
[19:49:06] <dwd> xnyhps, The way it's implemented in the UK is that exported software must have the means to disable "non-export" ciphers, and that those ciphers are off by default. Basically, Isode's licensing keys are largely about implementing this requirement.
[19:49:06] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[19:50:00] <MattJ> dwd, meaning it's fine to ship the software with a way to turn strong ciphers on?
[19:50:12] <MattJ> (YANAL, I know :) )
[19:50:23] <dwd> The interesting grey area is that it's the use of encryption, and not the implementation thereof, so even using platform crypto is possibly problematic.
[19:50:32] <dwd> MattJ, Right, that's what Isode do.
[19:51:20] *** Kev shows as "online"
[19:51:40] *** Jef shows as "online"
[19:53:08] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:53:12] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:58:06] <Kev> If anyone cares about this stuff, https://www.gov.uk/export-of-cryptographic-items
[20:02:44] *** Ash has joined the room
[20:08:05] <xnyhps> Now I'm curious which of the conditions in the Cryptographic Note Isode's stuff doesn't satisfy.
[20:09:40] <MattJ> Which ones do you think it does?
[20:11:05] <xnyhps> Sold without restrictions sounds likely. Not easy to change is somewhat inherent to it being crypto. Designed to be installed by the user without support, I don't know. Providing details on request, why not?
[20:11:29] <MattJ> #1 is arguable, #2... do config files count? I'd say so. #3... my guess is that Isode selling software without support is unlikely and #4 can be complied with by anyone
[20:11:43] *** Santiago26 has joined the room
[20:11:45] *** Santiago26 shows as "online"
[20:12:20] <Kev> MattJ: You can't replace the Isode crypto by changing config files.
[20:12:32] <xnyhps> MattJ: ‘The cryptographic functionality cannot easily be changed by the user’ means that the manufacturer has taken reasonable steps to ensure that the cryptographic functionality in the product can only be used according to their specification.

That suggests that if they define the config files as the specification, they're fine.
[20:14:08] *** Santiago26 has left the room
[20:14:16] <MattJ> Fine
[20:14:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:14:52] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[20:15:51] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[20:18:56] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[20:18:57] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:19:09] <dwd> xnyhps, "cannot easily be changed by the user" implies config files are not fine.
[20:20:14] *simon doesn't let his users change config files :)
[20:20:25] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[20:20:41] <Kev> <!--This is an automatically generated configuration file and must not be
manually edited.-->
[20:20:46] <Kev> (From an M-Link config file)
[20:20:53] <Kev> simon: Does that count as not letting users edit it? :)
[20:20:53] <MattJ> :P
[20:21:05] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:21:34] <dwd> In any case, it looks like I wasn't right; open source would be fine, Isode's stuff would need a license, but you could probably manage to ship a simple closed-source XMPP server under the rules too.
[20:21:35] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:22:08] *** dwd has left the room
[20:24:47] <xnyhps> Well, it probably won't fly to just specify "users can do EVERYTHING with this", but it suggests that you can.
[20:32:16] *** xnyhps has left the room
[20:34:52] *** Alex shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[20:34:57] *** intosi has joined the room
[20:35:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:37:57] *** Maranda has joined the room
[20:46:07] *** Ash has left the room
[20:54:04] *** Ash has joined the room
[20:59:37] *** Ash has left the room
[21:03:31] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:04:31] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:05:14] *** xnyhps has left the room
[21:05:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:06:07] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:06:39] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:07:09] *** Tobias has joined the room
[21:07:21] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[21:08:18] *** Tobias has left the room
[21:10:01] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:10:40] *** Tobias has joined the room
[21:10:42] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[21:14:28] *** Tobias shows as "online" and his status message is "“Ooh Aah... Just a Little Bit”"
[21:16:25] *** Ash has joined the room
[21:16:44] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:20:40] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:20:40] *** intosi has left the room
[21:26:40] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:28:07] *** Ash has left the room
[21:28:07] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:29:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:31:10] *** Maranda shows as "away" and his status message is "Logs diving"
[21:31:33] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:32:41] *** Ash has joined the room
[21:33:00] *** Alex shows as "online"
[21:33:01] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[21:33:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:35:04] *** Alex has left the room
[21:37:43] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:38:58] *** Neustradamus shows as "away"
[21:39:37] *** Neustradamus has left the room
[21:57:10] *** Ash shows as "online"
[22:01:52] *** Tobias has left the room
[22:10:35] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[22:11:59] *** Ash shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:14:40] *** Ash shows as "online"
[22:15:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:16:29] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:17:18] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:17:18] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:17:46] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[22:19:15] *** Kev shows as "away"
[22:19:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:20:16] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:22:05] *** xnyhps has left the room
[22:27:17] *** Tobias has joined the room
[22:27:19] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[22:27:47] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[22:28:49] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[22:29:00] *** Ash shows as "online"
[22:29:06] *** Ash has left the room
[22:30:04] *** Jef shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[22:31:16] *** Jef shows as "online"
[22:38:17] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com shows as "online"
[22:41:20] *** martin.hewitt@surevine.com has left the room
[22:45:22] *** Jef shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[22:46:36] *** Ash has left the room
[22:49:05] *** Lloyd has joined the room
[22:52:02] *** intosi has joined the room
[22:55:22] *** Jef shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[22:57:41] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:08:42] *** intosi has left the room
[23:14:33] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:15:18] *** dwd has joined the room
[23:21:01] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[23:21:31] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:21:39] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[23:23:09] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[23:25:15] *** xnyhps has left the room
[23:25:15] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[23:27:04] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:28:04] *** Jef shows as "online"
[23:29:35] *** Tobias shows as "online" and his status message is "“Ooh Aah... Just a Little Bit”"
[23:29:36] *** Tobias shows as "online" and his status message is "“Ooh Aah... Just a Little Bit”"
[23:36:49] *** Lloyd has left the room
[23:44:03] *** dwd shows as "online"
[23:49:18] *** Ash has joined the room
[23:54:13] *** dezant has left the room