XSF logo XSF Discussion - 2015-10-16


  1. dwd has left
  2. dwd has left
  3. dwd has left
  4. Valérian has joined
  5. Valérian has left
  6. dwd has left
  7. Tobias has joined
  8. dwd has left
  9. dwd has left
  10. dwd has left
  11. dwd has left
  12. dwd has left
  13. dwd has left
  14. dwd has left
  15. dwd has left
  16. dwd has left
  17. dwd has left
  18. dwd has left
  19. dwd has left
  20. dwd has left
  21. dwd has left
  22. Lance has joined
  23. dwd has left
  24. dwd has left
  25. dwd has left
  26. dwd has left
  27. dwd has left
  28. dwd has left
  29. dwd has left
  30. dwd has left
  31. Lance has joined
  32. dwd has left
  33. arune has left
  34. dwd has left
  35. dwd has left
  36. dwd has left
  37. dwd has left
  38. dwd has left
  39. dwd has left
  40. intosi has left
  41. intosi has joined
  42. dwd has left
  43. Valérian has joined
  44. intosi has left
  45. intosi has joined
  46. tim@boese-ban.de has joined
  47. tim@boese-ban.de has joined
  48. Kev has left
  49. dwd has left
  50. Valérian has left
  51. Valérian has joined
  52. Valérian has left
  53. Flow has joined
  54. dwd has left
  55. Flow has left
  56. dwd has left
  57. dwd has left
  58. dwd has left
  59. ralphm has left
  60. dwd has left
  61. ralphm has left
  62. dwd has left
  63. dwd has left
  64. Martin has joined
  65. ralphm has left
  66. ralphm has left
  67. ralphm has left
  68. ralphm has left
  69. ralphm has left
  70. ralphm has left
  71. Zash has joined
  72. Valérian has joined
  73. ralphm has left
  74. Martin has joined
  75. ralphm has left
  76. Zash Ge0rG: inline signing, s/in/on/ ?
  77. daniel has left
  78. daniel has joined
  79. dwd has left
  80. Zash Haven't seen inline before in this context, but it sounds like you mean online signing
  81. xnyhps Zash: Well the BIND feature really appears to be called "inline-signing"
  82. ralphm has left
  83. intosi has left
  84. intosi has joined
  85. ralphm has left
  86. Zash I think PowerDNS calls it online signing
  87. ralphm has left
  88. dwd Ge0rG, That blog post looks good. I might have to try it all out; there's a free DNSSEC anycast slave service run by a guy I know that I've been meaning to use.
  89. Kevish "I know a guy"
  90. dwd Exactly.
  91. intosi I have been using inline signing in BIND for quite a while now. Very useful.
  92. Zash I do offline signing, in which the signatures are embedded in the zone file. Almost like they are inlined. Imagine my confusion.
  93. dwd Kevish, Been thinking about PEP, MUC2/MIX, and MAM, BTW - I think we need a way to distinguish between ephemeral and whatever-the-opposite-of-that-is events. I think MAM currently distinguishes these purely on the basis of containing a <body/>, but I think the reality is more complex than that.
  94. Zash Not sure how you would use a slave server with online signing
  95. Zash dwd: Stanza profiles?
  96. dwd Possibly, but I think it might need per-event processing. If MUC2/MIX sends real message stanzas (as opposed to pubsub events) it's simpler, but otherwise non of those will be captured by MAM.
  97. Kevish dwd: Could be.
  98. Zash I kinda wanted to use type == chat or has body
  99. dwd Zash, I would prefer as simple a rule as possible, as well.
  100. Zash Currently enjoying my archive being 90% chat states
  101. ralphm hehe
  102. Kevish But isn't that useful?
  103. Kevish I'd have thought it'd be important to know that before they sent am essage, your contact started typing it.
  104. Kevish Useful detection that your contact isn't a bot, for example.
  105. Zash I'd like to say in the mam query 'only messages with a body, please'
  106. Kevish Zash: Nothing stops your server offering such a thing.
  107. Kevish Given the data forms.
  108. dwd Zash, Well, that's another issue - filtered MAM queries, since you want to have clients pull, say, geoloc events as well as chat.
  109. Kevish Yeah, we've got that already.
  110. Kevish Just shove whatever you want in a data form.
  111. Zash Kevish: my laziness and desire for a simple implementation does
  112. Kevish And then, if necessary, standardise the form fields.
  113. Will has joined
  114. dwd Kevish, I'm not claiming it's difficult to do.
  115. dwd Kevish, Just claiming that we'll need to address these things.
  116. Kevish Right, I was saying that we have addressed 'these things' as much as we need to generally.
  117. Kevish And it's just a case of speccing (or not) each individual thing that needs handling.
  118. ralphm what about things like pubsub notifications with body elements for clients dat don't support pubsub?
  119. ralphm I've seen useful applications of that, using type=chat, too, by the way.
  120. Kevish ralphm: I think that in this day and age that's a bad thing, because it's going to mess with so much.
  121. ralphm (I suppose I'm not opposed to MAMing pubsub, but hey, I wanted to bring it up)
  122. Kevish (Outside closed systems that can do whatever they want)
  123. Zash ralphm: PubSub has stuff for configuring that right ?
  124. ralphm Zash: the protocol might have. Implementations, I don't know.
  125. dwd There is, of course, the <no-store/> hint.
  126. Kev has joined
  127. xnyhps has left
  128. daniel has left
  129. daniel has joined
  130. daniel has left
  131. xnyhps has left
  132. Valérian has left
  133. Valérian has joined
  134. daniel has joined
  135. daniel has left
  136. daniel has joined
  137. Valérian has left
  138. Valérian has joined
  139. ralphm has left
  140. ralphm has left
  141. ralphm has left
  142. daniel has left
  143. daniel has joined
  144. daniel has left
  145. daniel has joined
  146. ralphm has left
  147. ralphm has left
  148. daniel has left
  149. daniel has joined
  150. ralphm has left
  151. daniel has left
  152. daniel has joined
  153. dwd has left
  154. Will has left
  155. arune has left
  156. ralphm has left
  157. daniel has left
  158. daniel has joined
  159. Alex has joined
  160. arune has left
  161. dwd has left
  162. dwd has left
  163. ralphm has left
  164. dwd has left
  165. daurnimator has joined
  166. arune has left
  167. Zash has left
  168. ralphm has left
  169. Valérian has left
  170. dwd has left
  171. Valérian has joined
  172. ralphm has left
  173. dwd has left
  174. Valérian has left
  175. ralphm has left
  176. ralphm has left
  177. intosi has left
  178. daurnimator has left
  179. daurnimator has joined
  180. Valérian has joined
  181. daurnimator has left
  182. daurnimator has joined
  183. daurnimator has left
  184. daurnimator has joined
  185. daurnimator has left
  186. daurnimator has joined
  187. daurnimator has left
  188. daurnimator has joined
  189. xnyhps has left
  190. Tobias has left
  191. Tobias has joined
  192. Valérian has left
  193. Martin has left
  194. daurnimator has left
  195. marcelo has joined
  196. marcelo has left
  197. Will has left
  198. Valérian has joined
  199. xnyhps has left
  200. Valérian has left
  201. xnyhps has joined
  202. xnyhps has left
  203. Will has left
  204. ralphm has left
  205. xnyhps has joined
  206. xnyhps has left
  207. ralphm has left
  208. xnyhps has left
  209. Valérian has joined
  210. ralphm has left
  211. daurnimator has joined
  212. dwd has left
  213. Tobias has left
  214. dwd has left
  215. dwd has left
  216. dwd has left
  217. daniel has left
  218. Zash has left
  219. daniel has joined
  220. stpeter has joined
  221. dwd has left
  222. xnyhps has left
  223. Valérian has left
  224. ralphm has left
  225. dwd has left
  226. intosi has left
  227. intosi has joined
  228. xnyhps has left
  229. Ge0rG Zash: re DNSSEC online/inline signing, you can also run a hidden primary that does the signing...
  230. daniel has joined
  231. daniel has joined
  232. Zash Ge0rG: I could, I have two slaves.
  233. ralphm has left
  234. Ge0rG Zash: sex slaves, I hope.
  235. Kevish Inappropriate.
  236. Zash I'm sorry. I'll guess it's my head when the robot revolution comes
  237. Ge0rG Kevish: sorry. I tried hard to come up with a good SJW argument and failed.
  238. ralphm has left
  239. Zash The menu on new.xmpp.org doesn't appear to work on my phone
  240. Lance has joined
  241. dwd has left
  242. ralphm has left
  243. Zash has left
  244. tim@boese-ban.de has left
  245. Ge0rG Dear HN sock puppets, ehrm... I mean, dear proponents of XMPP on HN, please contribute to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10400184 / http://op-co.de/blog/posts/yax_im_dnssec/
  246. intosi has joined
  247. Tobias has joined
  248. Lance has joined
  249. dwd has left
  250. ralphm has left
  251. Zash has joined
  252. SamWhited 'dat HN title...
  253. SamWhited has left
  254. Zash has joined
  255. Ge0rG SamWhited: it's the post title, and HN policy is not to edit titles.
  256. Tobias has joined
  257. SamWhited Is it? I feel like most HN posts have a descriptive title... interesting.
  258. daurnimator has left
  259. dwd has left
  260. Ge0rG SamWhited: probably because the original titles are descriptive as well.
  261. intosi Looks like people are playing techno buzz bingo on HN
  262. dwd has left
  263. Ge0rG intosi : yes they are.
  264. dwd has left
  265. dwd has left
  266. Lance has joined
  267. ralphm Given that the article has 'I' in there, who wrote it? Why isn't the author's name visible near the post?
  268. ralphm Ge0rG: (I assume it was you)
  269. Ge0rG ralphm: I did. It's on my personal blog, which is based on ikiwiki, which is rather arcane.
  270. ralphm Ge0rG: you can't get an author's name in there anywhere, but have funky titles with mixed markup?
  271. Ge0rG ralphm: there is no mixed markup in the title. the long version of the title is merely bold text.
  272. ralphm Oh, I thought the subtitle was a separate thing
  273. Tobias has joined
  274. Tobias has joined
  275. Lance has joined
  276. Tobias has joined
  277. Tobias has joined
  278. dwd has left
  279. Lance has joined
  280. dwd has left
  281. dwd has left
  282. Kevish has left
  283. Tobias has joined
  284. Tobias has joined
  285. arune has left
  286. SamWhited has left
  287. dwd has left
  288. Zash has joined
  289. SamWhited has left
  290. dwd has left
  291. dwd has left
  292. stpeter has left
  293. tim@boese-ban.de has joined
  294. dwd has left
  295. Tobias has joined
  296. Valérian has joined
  297. intosi has left
  298. intosi has joined
  299. Tobias has joined
  300. Tobias has joined
  301. Alex has left
  302. SamWhited has left
  303. dwd has left
  304. dwd has left
  305. dwd has left
  306. dwd has left
  307. Valérian has left
  308. Zash has joined
  309. dwd has left
  310. dwd has left
  311. SamWhited Just submitted a new protoxep for something at work; if anyone's an XML schema expert, would you mind reviewing? I just copy/pasted from another spec and changed the namespaces/element names; no clue if it's remotely correct: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/110
  312. SamWhited more direct link: https://github.com/hipchat/xeps/blob/attach_to/inbox/attachto.xml#L156
  313. SamWhited has left
  314. Kev Schemas for Experimental are optional.
  315. SamWhited Oh, that makes sense; shouldn't have bothered. Oh well.
  316. Kev Saves you time later.
  317. waqas has joined
  318. dwd has left
  319. ralphm has left
  320. dwd has left
  321. waqas has left
  322. waqas has joined
  323. dwd has left
  324. Tobias has joined
  325. daniel has joined
  326. daniel has joined
  327. Lance has joined
  328. daniel has left
  329. daniel has joined
  330. SamWhited has left
  331. dwd has left
  332. dwd has left
  333. SamWhited has left
  334. intosi has left
  335. Lance has joined
  336. dwd has left
  337. waqas has left
  338. tim@boese-ban.de has left
  339. Tobias has left
  340. dwd has left
  341. dwd has left
  342. Tobias has joined
  343. dwd has left
  344. dwd has left
  345. dwd has left
  346. tim@boese-ban.de has left
  347. tim@boese-ban.de has joined
  348. dwd has left
  349. dwd has left