Tuesday, September 26, 2017
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
September
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
 
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:08:58] *** daniel has left the room
[00:09:21] *** SamWhited has left the room
[00:10:23] *** waqas has left the room
[00:15:05] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:18:03] *** tim@boese-ban.de has left the room
[00:18:07] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[00:18:23] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:19:07] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:19:10] *** jjrh has joined the room
[00:19:48] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:19:50] *** jjrh has joined the room
[00:20:29] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[00:24:47] *** daniel has joined the room
[00:25:04] *** Zash has left the room
[00:25:14] *** Zash has joined the room
[00:32:35] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:37:28] <moparisthebest> I think the reason good ux goes against security is because those are generally different developers
[00:37:35] <moparisthebest> Especially for web
[00:40:01] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:42:30] *** daniel has left the room
[00:50:25] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:00:11] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[01:04:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:10:05] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:12:03] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:19:13] *** daniel has joined the room
[01:20:38] *** sonny has joined the room
[01:29:31] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:33:53] *** tux has left the room
[01:33:56] *** tux has joined the room
[01:39:17] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[01:42:34] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:49:33] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:59:33] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[02:07:02] *** Alex has left the room
[02:15:19] *** Yagiza has joined the room
[02:15:31] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Я вернулсо!"
[02:22:02] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[02:33:24] *** daniel has left the room
[02:33:25] *** daniel has joined the room
[02:40:17] *** stefandxm has left the room
[03:02:12] *** Wiktor has left the room
[03:03:06] *** Wiktor has joined the room
[03:08:36] *** daniel has left the room
[03:08:40] *** daniel has joined the room
[03:42:30] *** daniel has left the room
[03:42:31] *** daniel has joined the room
[03:45:43] *** uc has joined the room
[03:47:25] *** uc shows as "online"
[03:59:20] *** Guus has left the room
[03:59:22] *** Guus shows as "online"
[04:20:31] *** daniel has left the room
[04:20:36] *** daniel has joined the room
[04:21:05] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[04:21:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:21:35] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[04:25:35] *** waqas has joined the room
[04:27:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:28:13] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:30:32] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:32:11] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:32:30] *** xnyhps has left the room
[04:32:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:32:42] *** daniel has left the room
[04:33:15] *** daniel has joined the room
[04:38:33] *** Zash shows as "online"
[04:38:37] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:39:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[04:48:16] *** jere has left the room
[04:50:43] *** SamWhited has left the room
[04:59:35] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:01:13] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:04:37] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:07:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:19:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:23:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:26:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:28:39] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:30:09] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[05:30:17] *** emxp has joined the room
[05:31:24] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[05:32:04] *** zinid shows as "dnd"
[05:39:44] *** dwd shows as "online"
[05:44:31] *** daniel has left the room
[05:44:35] *** daniel has joined the room
[05:52:55] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[05:57:16] *** Kev shows as "away"
[05:57:17] *** Kev shows as "away"
[05:58:15] *** Kev shows as "away"
[05:58:16] *** Kev shows as "away"
[05:59:24] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[06:00:33] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:01:18] *** Guus has left the room
[06:04:04] *** Guus shows as "online"
[06:04:32] *** daniel has left the room
[06:04:36] *** daniel has joined the room
[06:07:28] *** Kev has left the room
[06:07:28] *** Kev has left the room
[06:09:24] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[06:13:46] *** SouL has left the room
[06:14:56] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[06:14:58] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[06:20:54] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:26:25] *** Tobias has left the room
[06:28:07] *** ralphm has left the room
[06:29:07] *** Guus has left the room
[06:30:05] *** Guus shows as "online"
[06:30:58] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:32:59] *** tim@boese-ban.de has left the room
[06:33:04] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:33:50] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[06:35:07] <emxp> moparisthebest: i just remember how Constanze Kurz from CCC said something like: 'we need to bring students from other disciplines in contact with IT - even so art students'
[06:35:33] <jonasw> FLOSS needs more designers indeed
[06:36:09] *** daniel has left the room
[06:36:11] *** daniel has joined the room
[06:36:44] *** waqas has left the room
[06:37:06] <mimi89999> 👍
[06:37:28] <emxp> and as a tech student say so too. why am i 'locked' into a pure technological based university? so we need the other way round too
[06:37:47] <edhelas> yup I agree
[06:42:35] *** Kev shows as "online"
[06:43:21] *** daniel has left the room
[06:43:32] *** daniel has joined the room
[06:45:22] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[06:47:37] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[06:47:46] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[06:47:49] <zinid> art can be learnt actually (especially graphics design, where you basically only need to pick right colors and shapes), but nobody wants to do this
[06:48:05] *** Guus has left the room
[06:48:38] <jonasw> I doubt that "nobody" wants to do this, there are quite a few graphic designers out there.
[06:48:54] <zinid> jonasw: ok, I mean a typical developer
[06:49:05] <jonasw> I just think it’s pointless to force yourself to do something you don’t like if you could be doing something you *do* like (and possibly even are already good at).
[06:49:15] <jonasw> better get an interested graphics designer involved
[06:49:22] <zinid> how?
[06:49:30] <zinid> how will s/he join xmpp?
[06:49:33] <zinid> via photoshop?
[06:49:45] <jonasw> zinid, they don’t need to join XMPP to contribute.
[06:49:49] <jonasw> (whatever joining XMPP means)
[06:50:17] <zinid> can you please describe the working flow of such designer?
[06:50:36] <jonasw> I have no idea of designer workflows?
[06:51:57] <zinid> I have :) I hired some back in the time
[06:52:10] *** Guus shows as "online"
[06:52:13] <jonasw> then you can shed some light on it :)
[06:53:31] <zinid> what I meant is that there should be incentive for a designer: money or interest
[06:53:51] <zinid> since s/he's not joined XMPP (not interested) only money left
[06:53:52] <Zash> Everyone have their motivation sources
[06:54:20] <jonasw> zinid, I don’t think that "isn’t part of XMPP" (still, whatever that means) implies "not interested" for sure
[06:54:27] <zinid> in 15+ years of xmpp development I can barely remember as single designer
[06:54:34] <jonasw> it can also imply "doesn’t know the key point which leads to interest yet" or "doesn’t know about XMPP at all yet
[06:54:36] <jonasw> it can also imply "doesn’t know the key point which leads to interest yet" or "doesn’t know about XMPP at all yet"
[06:54:47] <uc> #Opensourcedesign on Freenet
[06:54:48] <zinid> *a
[06:54:59] <jonasw> zinid, that’s maybe because most of XMPP development takes place in the FLOSS community, where there are generally only few designers abound
[06:55:12] <jonasw> (and what doesn’t take place in FLOSS often doesn’t announce XMPP that loudly)
[06:55:19] <uc> Freenode**
[06:55:23] *** winfried shows as "online"
[06:55:26] <Zash> Have there been any studies on the general lack of designers in FLOSS?
[06:56:14] <jonasw> Zash, either there is a general lack, or they are mostly horrible ;-)
[06:57:05] <Zash> 90% of everything is horrible
[06:57:59] *** daniel has left the room
[06:58:09] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[06:58:25] *** winfried shows as "online"
[06:58:27] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[06:58:30] *** daniel has joined the room
[06:59:01] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:59:21] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[06:59:22] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[07:00:33] *** Flow has joined the room
[07:03:46] *** dwd shows as "online"
[07:04:13] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:08:35] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:09:24] <emxp> jonasw, zinid: I think in first hand it is important for devs and designers to get an understand of each focuses and how they think. thus the designer and devs can adapt their work or workflows to bring them together. that why I said combine the studies or at least let them get in contact. i think both sides are interested in each other. but there is no need for each side to do others work if they dont want to. so just get an understanding. what makes good UX, what makes good security? (e.g less is probably more!) and so on. there are lots of (mainly) non tech people in the CCC for example
[07:10:27] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:10:28] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:10:28] *** Zash has left the room
[07:10:28] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:10:28] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:10:31] <jonasw> +1 emxp
[07:10:41] <Zash> eh
[07:11:02] *** Zash has left the room
[07:11:02] *** Zash has left the room
[07:11:20] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:11:28] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:12:45] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:13:27] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:14:34] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:14:34] *** Zash has left the room
[07:14:54] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:15:04] *** daniel has left the room
[07:15:07] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:16:11] *** Zash has left the room
[07:16:56] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[07:17:03] *** tux has joined the room
[07:18:03] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:18:03] *** Zash has left the room
[07:18:03] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:18:05] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:18:05] *** Zash has left the room
[07:18:07] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:18:07] *** Zash has left the room
[07:18:08] *** Zash has left the room
[07:20:10] *** Yagiza has left the room
[07:20:27] *** Yagiza has joined the room
[07:20:36] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Я вернулсо!"
[07:21:28] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[07:22:45] *** Flow shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[07:23:05] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:23:51] *** Flow shows as "online"
[07:24:38] *** daniel shows as "online"
[07:28:08] <Ge0rG> So we need to acquire some designers...
[07:28:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:28:48] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:31:36] *** emxp has joined the room
[07:32:22] *** dwd shows as "online"
[07:32:56] <emxp> actually, whats the puropose of XSF? Do you collect money, too? For example, to pay people for specific programming/design tasks?
[07:32:56] *** Kev shows as "away"
[07:33:38] *** Kev shows as "online"
[07:33:53] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:34:21] <SouL> I would say XSF cares about XMPP, the protocol.
[07:34:24] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:34:28] <SouL> Software is a thing for developers.
[07:35:05] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:35:25] <zinid> probably collecting money and hire designers is not that bad idea
[07:35:47] <emxp> SouL: maybe there should be an extended foundation or so. in principle like Google Summer of Code. but only for xmpp purposes
[07:35:54] <emxp> i would donate money
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash has left the room
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash has left the room
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:16] *** Zash has left the room
[07:36:16] *** Zash has left the room
[07:36:16] *** Zash has left the room
[07:36:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:36:34] <emxp> This foundation furthermore could spend money on other things which supports xmpp too
[07:36:50] <zinid> emxp: I think XSF has donations already
[07:37:24] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:37:29] <Guus> exmp: The XMPP Standards Foundation (also known as the XSF and formerly the Jabber Software Foundation) is an independent, nonprofit standards development organisation whose primary mission is to define open protocols for presence, instant messaging, and real-time communication and collaboration on top of the IETF’s Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP).

[07:37:32] <Guus> copy/pasted that :)
[07:38:43] <Guus> as for sponsorship - that's obviously very welcome. There's a sponsorship programme defined here: https://xmpp.org/community/sponsorship.html On top of that, we occasionally ask for sponsorship regarding individual events (mostly the XSF Summits)
[07:39:49] *** lskdjf has left the room
[07:39:56] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[07:40:15] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:40:18] *** lumi has joined the room
[07:41:09] *** tux shows as "away"
[07:41:16] *** Yagiza has left the room
[07:41:17] *** Yagiza has joined the room
[07:41:26] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Я вернулсо!"
[07:41:35] <zinid> I think what we really need is more full-time developers, 95% of xmpp projects are maintained in spare time, most of the projects can barely survive 10-year period (I can count only a few)
[07:41:41] <Guus> arguably a very good way to support the XSF, besides donating money, is to be actively involved in the activities that we undertake. There's a lot of things that we do, from defining protocols, to providing internal support (to our website, this chat, preparing for conferences, etc)
[07:42:20] <zinid> Guus: donating to XSF will not help xmpp in my opinion
[07:42:23] <Guus> zinid: I don't think that's something that should be initiated by the XSF. The XSF is there to develop the protocol, not the implementations.
[07:42:37] <zinid> Guus: I don't say XSF should do that
[07:43:08] <Guus> Well, there are plenty of open source, but also commercial organisations, that do development on XMPP
[07:43:24] <Guus> I'm sure that many of these will gladly accept help
[07:44:39] *** Zash has left the room
[07:44:58] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:45:33] *** Zash shows as "online"
[07:45:51] *** daniel has left the room
[07:46:01] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[07:46:12] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:47:24] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[07:47:32] <Guus> By the way: most of the servers listed on our website are older than 10 years. There definately is a solid foundation there.
[07:48:03] <MattJ> Prosody is 9
[07:48:12] <zinid> I almost always talk about clients when I say "xmpp software" :)
[07:48:42] *** sonny has joined the room
[07:48:48] <MattJ> Client software is harder - platforms and UIs change
[07:48:56] *** jubalh has joined the room
[07:49:02] *** jubalh has left the room
[07:49:04] <zinid> no surprise we have some servers with commercial support, because it's easier to build bussiness model with them
[07:49:15] <MattJ> All the 10-year clients around, people now call them ugly
[07:49:25] <zinid> MattJ: exactly
[07:49:45] <Guus> zinid: so, open up an IDE and start typing :)
[07:49:47] <Zash> Wrong shade of grey
[07:50:00] <Guus> there's a good deal of libraries available that you can (re)use to create new stuff
[07:50:18] <Guus> but you're absolutely right - we could really use more nice clients.
[07:51:02] <zinid> Guus: I cannot do everything myself, obviously, I'm a server dev
[07:51:23] <Ge0rG> I think that the XSF urgently needs to widen its scope from "protocol" to "software", so it can provide UX guidelines etc.
[07:51:40] <Zash> back to*
[07:51:44] <Ge0rG> yaxim is only eight years so.
[07:51:50] <Ge0rG> yaxim is only eight years old :(
[07:51:59] *** daniel shows as "online"
[07:52:07] <Guus> I'm not sure if I agree, Ge0rG.
[07:52:32] <Zash> Recreate the Jabber Software Foundation as a separate entity
[07:52:35] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:52:43] <Ge0rG> Zash: I've been pondering about that.
[07:53:03] *** goffi has joined the room
[07:53:09] <Guus> On first thought, I'd prefer that. Will have to give it more thought though.
[07:53:24] <Ge0rG> Zash: but the main issue I see is: it will be run by a subset of the same people as the XSF, and those are already short on time.
[07:53:27] <emxp> Guus, zinid, Ge0rG: Yes, its good that XSF is focusing on the protocol. so my suggestion was to focus with another on implementations and full time payments
[07:53:30] <emxp> for devs
[07:53:43] <emxp> or part-time in the beginning
[07:53:55] <Zash> Where'd the money come from?
[07:54:07] <Ge0rG> Besides, I'm convinced that "protocol" also includes defining certain user-facing elements. Like how to call entity addresses for that protocol.
[07:54:23] <Guus> emxp: again, I'm not arguing that it's a bad idea. I don't think you'd need a separate organization for that though, as existing ones will be very happy to accept your help.
[07:54:33] *** goffi has left the room
[07:54:33] <zinid> emxp: there is an initiative to collect money for Jingle support in conversations, it ended up with 500$ or so ;)
[07:54:44] <Ge0rG> emxp: you need a dozen developers and a year of time to make a well-polished XMPP client. So if you have a million dollars, let me know.
[07:54:58] *** goffi has joined the room
[07:54:59] <zinid> nobody wants to donate
[07:56:44] <Zash> Sure there are people who want to donate, but you aren't going to get full time developer pay from donations
[07:57:02] <zinid> take a look at Matrix, they have funding problems and started fundrasing, the result is 2800$ : https://www.patreon.com/matrixdotorg
[07:57:10] <zinid> and Matrix is quite hyped at the moment
[07:58:13] <Guus> zinid: arguably, they _now_ have funding problems, because they started off as a fully funded project (which suddenly lost its sole sponsor).
[07:58:17] <zinid> and Matrix has 11 developers, lol :)
[07:58:26] <Zash> -do 2800 / 11
[07:58:26] <Bunneh> Zash: 254.54545454545
[07:58:46] <zinid> what a bunch of money!
[07:59:00] <Guus> zinid, what do you propose?
[07:59:11] <daniel> for their london office this pays for the oyster card they need to get to work
[07:59:25] <zinid> Guus: I would propose something if I knew, I see no solution
[08:00:21] <Zash> Somehow attract people willing to spend their free time on making things better.
[08:00:34] <zinid> or somehow attract their money
[08:00:56] <MattJ> Charge users $1/year for using your app
[08:02:24] <zinid> MattJ: that didn't work, whatsapp was still unprofitable before the acquirement :D
[08:02:34] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[08:03:09] <Zash> Sell your soul to Facegoogle.
[08:03:18] <Zash> And your users data.
[08:03:39] <zinid> I have neither soul nor users data :(
[08:04:20] <Zash> Raise money for a marketing campain in order to raise money for writing a client.
[08:04:31] <Zash> Marketing marketing marketing!!
[08:04:34] <SouL> Uh, what do you want to do with me?
[08:04:45] <Guus> Sell you, obviously.
[08:04:46] <mathieui> SouL, sell you
[08:04:51] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[08:05:10] <Zash> One SouL, in mint condition, do I hear any bids?
[08:05:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:05:18] <SouL> Nooo
[08:05:21] *SouL runs away!
[08:05:50] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:07:54] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[08:07:58] <mathieui> 09:45:39 zinid> I think what we really need is more full-time developers, 95% of xmpp projects are maintained in spare time, most of the projects can barely survive 10-year period → I lightly updated the jabberfr wiki yesterday, it is full of clients dead in the last 10 years
[08:08:52] <Zash> Projects dying isn't necessarily a bad thing tho. Something something Darwinism.
[08:09:47] <mathieui> yeah
[08:10:06] <mathieui> but it’s bad because I’m the only one who updated the wiki after 2011
[08:10:36] <mathieui> so, "popular mobile clients" had J2ME and "popular clients" had coccinella
[08:10:52] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:10:55] <Guus> If we can't manage to update a wiki, I fear for development projects...
[08:11:36] <mathieui> Guus, that’s mostly because we had a very motivated guy doing it before then
[08:11:45] <Guus> Which, coincidentally, why I've started to help out with maintaining the stuff that we do have, as XSF.
[08:12:50] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:13:03] <Guus> mathieui: perhaps removing outdated data is better than keeping it unmaintained. Nothing puts people off as much as seeing information that's clearly incorrect.
[08:13:50] <Guus> I'm positive that things like that have a negative impact on people that consider contributing. I'm afraid we're loosing people, before they even started.
[08:13:59] <Ge0rG> Are the json files used for client list generation hosted on xmpp.org as well?
[08:14:11] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[08:14:24] <Ge0rG> We are losing people everywhere!
[08:14:25] <Guus> Ge0rG: referring to the software listing? Yes, used for all software
[08:14:46] <Ge0rG> Guus: not "used" but "hosted". The actual JSON files. So that external services could use them.
[08:15:12] <Guus> Ge0rG: that's my fear. The good news is that improving our data can be done by anyone. It's an easy PR away.
[08:15:14] <mathieui> Ge0rG, that’s why I started that
[08:15:24] <mathieui> that and adding conversations, chatsecure, xabber
[08:15:27] <mathieui> Guus*
[08:15:38] <Guus> Ge0rG: Ah, unsure. Well, you could always refer to the stuff in Github, but I don't think it was intended that way.
[08:15:49] <Guus> mathieui: thanks :)
[08:15:59] <Zash> Did we update the Prosody file?
[08:16:11] <Guus> "the Prosody file" ?
[08:16:39] <Guus> Prosody is listed on https://xmpp.org/software/servers.html, if that's what you mena.
[08:16:41] <emxp> zinid: i siggest first lets ask, how many money can we collect. and how can we spend it. what needs to happen to increase donations
[08:17:14] *** Wiktor shows as "online"
[08:17:18] <zinid> emxp: where/whom to ask?
[08:17:23] <Zash> Oh, https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/commit/600d7f4d484c69ef3d631f40b7d65d9258015291
[08:17:30] <emxp> If XSF is okay to do task expanding the Protocol thats nice. but so far I didnt saw that they are not interestet
[08:17:40] <emxp> zinid: ask generally
[08:18:11] <Ge0rG> emxp: the XSF doesn't seem interested to do things beyond protocol development. And that's hard already.
[08:18:41] <Zash> > Do one thing, do it well.
[08:18:54] <Zash> And separation of concern.
[08:18:55] <Guus> especially because we're already having a hard time with that, I don't think the XSF should be taking on more.
[08:19:02] <SouL> Well, that would imply that XSF favours specific clients and such, if I understand correctly.
[08:19:43] <Ge0rG> SouL: not at all.
[08:20:01] <Ge0rG> There is plenty of possible improvement between "the XMPP protocol" and "Make Jabber Great Again"
[08:20:05] <SouL> Ge0rG, emxp would like to collect money for devs, or not?
[08:20:23] <Ge0rG> SouL: right, collecting money for developers would be rather hard.
[08:20:38] <Guus> But, again, if anyone wants to support clients: give the existing organizations your support. You really don't need the XSF for that.
[08:20:54] <Ge0rG> Either the XSF would create "the reference client" from that money, competing with XSF members, or it would have to devise a biased way to give money out.
[08:21:10] <Ge0rG> Guus: the existing client developers?
[08:21:23] <MattJ> XSF + reference client -> bad idea
[08:21:32] <Kev> Anyone + reference client -> bad idea, I think.
[08:21:40] <Kev> Not just the XSF.
[08:21:48] <Guus> Ge0rG: https://xmpp.org/software/clients.html
[08:22:03] <Zash> How long have people said "the xsf should do a reference test suite"? :)
[08:22:11] <zinid> reference server is a good idea! I have one to suggest :D
[08:22:19] <MattJ> Me too
[08:22:32] <zinid> 2 reference servers is even better
[08:22:48] <Ge0rG> Guus: I know that page. My question was, whether you imply "client devs" by "existing orgs"
[08:23:09] <Ge0rG> Zash: a reference test suite would actually be something where I can see the XSF paying for development.
[08:23:25] <Ge0rG> Except that Daniel now almost implemented one.
[08:23:27] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:23:36] <Zash> Orly?
[08:23:39] <Guus> Ge0rG: I'm desperately trying to avoid naming names (as I'm personally involved in one of them) - but various clients have OSS organisations behind them that would gladly accept support.
[08:23:56] <zinid> what will the suite test?
[08:23:59] <zinid> servers?
[08:24:06] <zinid> because I don't know how to test clients
[08:24:14] <zinid> do we have shitty servers? no, we have shitty clients
[08:24:19] <Ge0rG> Guus: I'm not asking for names, but for clarification of your statement :)
[08:24:44] <Ge0rG> zinid: that's a blatant lie! We have shitty servers AND shitty clients.
[08:24:57] <zinid> no way
[08:24:59] <Ge0rG> zinid: you don't happen to be Evgeny from the ML?
[08:25:11] <Zash> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law
[08:25:11] <Guus> Ge0rG: find the organization of the client that you want to see improved, then support them (either by joining as a dev, a community member, or by donating resources)
[08:25:20] <zinid> Ge0rG: that's me yes
[08:25:31] <emxp> Guus, SouL, Ge0rG: Yes, XSF shouldnt do an additional task. a new foundations may collect more money, because it is maybe more obvious where the money goes. if you can see projects
[08:25:33] <emxp> directly
[08:26:07] <Ge0rG> zinid: nice to meet you, and welcome to the XSF MUCs, where all the "inactive" members hang around :D
[08:26:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:27:03] <SouL> :)
[08:28:20] <Guus> Ge0rG: It's not just the developer that needs supporting, it's the entire organization (formal or informal) around the development effort. Some of our most valuable members write no code at all.
[08:29:12] <Guus> (That's where my distinction between Dev and Org originates)
[08:29:40] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:29:52] <Ge0rG> Guus: that's probably true. Still, sponsoring individual devs/dev-orgs is out of scope for the XSF, and rightly so.
[08:30:03] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[08:31:06] <Guus> ge0rG: I agree completely. I've been stressing that the XSF does not need to be involved, but instead, people could reach out to those dev-orgs directly.
[08:31:23] <zinid> yes, XSF should not collect donations
[08:31:45] <zinid> it's pointless, they need to share them somehow between projects, that's hard
[08:31:49] <Ge0rG> Guus: except there are no people who want to contribute significant amounts of money.
[08:31:53] <Guus> Sure it should. But not to sponsor one particular implementation.
[08:32:07] *** jubalh has joined the room
[08:32:45] <zinid> Guus: and how to share between the projects? on what basis? equally?
[08:32:48] <Guus> Ge0rG: All I'm saying is that the XSF need not be involved if someone wants to do sponsoring of individual projects :)
[08:33:22] <Guus> zinid: you do not share at all. You use it for the activities that the XSF does itself.
[08:33:24] <Ge0rG> Guus: yes. But the more important question is: how can the XSF contribute to a future where we do have non-shitty clients and servers?
[08:33:34] <zinid> Guus: ah, ok
[08:33:56] <Ge0rG> zinid: the XSF can still pay for Summit Dinners and XMPP stickers.
[08:34:03] <Ge0rG> I wish we had Jabber stickers.
[08:34:24] *** dwd shows as "online"
[08:34:28] <Guus> Ge0rG: facilitate development by having an up-to-date library of information (the XEPs, the Wiki, the webpage) and provide avenues for discussion (like this MUC - that still could use a web frontend - the mailinglists, and perhaps others).
[08:35:05] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:35:10] <Ge0rG> a web frontend for this MUC would require developing a web client.
[08:35:14] <zinid> regarding jabber tickers, isn't this XSF responsibility?
[08:35:19] <zinid> *stickers
[08:35:21] <Guus> Ge0rG: it further can host or be present at gatherings (like FOSDEM) and spread the love. Have meetings with stakeholders (even informal ones, like the Summit Dinner).
[08:35:26] <zinid> how to post stickers?
[08:35:57] <Guus> yes, the SCAM workgroup has stickers and leaflets and stuff, to be used in XSF activies like I described above.
[08:36:11] <Ge0rG> Guus: the XSF is doing that for 15 years, and we still have shitty clients and servers ;)
[08:36:12] <Guus> SCAM will (and has) happily send those out to people that are hosting such events.
[08:37:34] <Guus> Ge0rG: There is much that the XSF can (and is in process of) improve: the XEPs were completely outdating up until recently, the Obsevatory is still gone, the wiki and webpage have shown outdated information for a very long time, etc etc.
[08:38:20] <Guus> Ge0rG: getting that in order won't magically fix things, but it will surely facilitate - and it is stuff that we can do _now_, without needing to discuss what other activities we might want to spin up.
[08:38:42] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:40:01] <Guus> We're already stretched - adding more work won't improve things.
[08:40:56] <Ge0rG> Guus: indeed, you are right.
[08:42:57] <Guus> as a side-note: perhaps we should rename the 'experimental' status of a XEP. One of the recurring criticisms that I read is "Pretty-standard-feature XYZ has a XEP that is only "experimental"!
[08:43:17] <SouL> Yes, that's true.
[08:43:18] <Guus> it's just window dressing, but sometimes, that makes a difference.
[08:43:41] <Ge0rG> "draft" isn't much better either.
[08:43:50] <Ge0rG> Some XEPs live their whole life in "draft"
[08:43:50] *** nyco has joined the room
[08:43:53] <mathieui> Guus, what we need to do is either make the XEP status reflect real world perception, or add another status that does
[08:44:17] <mathieui> Ge0rG, did I mention that 0059 is still draft?
[08:44:23] <Guus> mathieui: I agree.
[08:44:52] <Ge0rG> 0045 is fifteen years now, and still in Draft.
[08:45:09] <Ge0rG> There are probably XEP-0045 implementing developers younger than that.
[08:45:13] <Flow> That's why I think we should find a better name for Draft before thinking about what to do with experimental
[08:45:18] <Zash> "Work in progress", "Almost done", "Done" ? :)
[08:45:37] <Ge0rG> "Broken", "Stale" and "Rusty".
[08:45:38] <Flow> Zash: Doesn't actually sound that bad
[08:45:52] <Ge0rG> Zash: replace the last one with "Carved in Stone"
[08:46:02] <Zash> FINAL wait that's what it's called
[08:46:10] <MattJ> Skip that, jump to "Obsolete"
[08:46:14] <Zash> Hah
[08:46:35] <Zash> "Living document" -> "Dead document"
[08:46:39] <MattJ> +1
[08:46:47] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[08:46:50] <MattJ> Welcome to the internet
[08:46:59] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[08:47:05] <Zash> "Request For Comments"
[08:47:17] <zinid> what I personally would like to see is how many implementations support the XEP, and probably range the XEPs in this order
[08:47:40] <zinid> this is only what makes sense, because even Final can be implemented nowhere
[08:47:45] <Zash> zinid: Define support. Which leads back to the whole test suite thing.
[08:47:48] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:48:00] <zinid> Zash: claiming support is ok, even partial
[08:48:11] <Zash> Pretty sure Final requires two implementation.
[08:48:14] <Zash> s
[08:48:25] <Ge0rG> Zash: also goat blood sacrifices
[08:48:26] *** Tobias has left the room
[08:48:31] <Zash> Or was it Draft?
[08:48:33] <Zash> I forget
[08:49:13] <zinid> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0009.html
[08:49:15] *** Guus has left the room
[08:49:16] <zinid> this is final
[08:49:19] <zinid> where is it implemented?
[08:50:05] <Zash> Version 2.0 (2002-12-09)
Per a vote of the Jabber Council, changed status to Final. (psa)
[08:50:39] <SouL> Could 'Subject to changes' be used for 'experimental', for example?
[08:50:56] <SouL> Or we should use just a word?
[08:51:00] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:51:03] <zinid> SouL: I think every XEP should be "subject to changes", we have namespace bumps
[08:51:10] <zinid> the only difference is probability
[08:52:07] <zinid> so "in development" and "more or less stable" is enough
[08:52:13] <zinid> dunno why there so many gradations
[08:52:27] <Zash> Experimental = "In active development"
[08:53:20] <zinid> still says nothing for me, I need to see where it's implemented
[08:53:22] <Zash> When it stops being in *active* development it goes into deferred
[08:55:09] <Zash> Similar to how IETF drafts expire after some months.
[08:55:20] *** Guus shows as "online"
[08:56:07] *** emxp has joined the room
[08:56:22] <Zash> Should the XSF try to keep track of implementation status?
[08:56:30] <zinid> why not?
[08:56:42] <zinid> I don't think this is a lot of work
[08:56:49] <zinid> only creating some form
[08:57:08] <zinid> where everyone can submit
[08:57:14] <Zash> Periodic calls for experience?
[08:57:36] <zinid> no matter, something that would work without tons of pain
[08:57:38] *** lumi has left the room
[08:58:01] <Ge0rG> What about a "compliance badge" that can be assigned after completing the compliance suite.
[08:58:12] *** sonny has joined the room
[08:58:13] <Zash> Maybe when things go deferred, send out a survey thing asking if anyone has been working on an implementation?
[08:58:16] <Ge0rG> This client fulfills [Jabber Gold Premium]
[08:58:47] *** sonny has joined the room
[08:59:37] <Guus> I've just posted on standards@ about the XEP status name change. I'm interested to see what others think of this
[08:59:54] <Guus> with that, I'm disappearing into the world of managers, deadlines and stale coffee.
[09:00:34] <MattJ> Don't do it!
[09:01:00] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:03:55] <zinid> Zash: "send out a survey" <-- where to send it?
[09:04:07] <Ge0rG> Mandatory JIDs everywhere!
[09:04:08] <Zash> The standards list
[09:04:11] <zinid> I think not so many people are in active conversation with XSF (list, chatroom, etc)
[09:04:37] <zinid> I almost never see Gajim devs in the list
[09:04:41] <zinid> maybe they are here?
[09:04:54] <Zash> Actually, I think the core of the proposal is to send out a call for experience along with the deferred message.
[09:05:31] <zinid> nah, I was suggesting to track the number of implementation right in front of XEP title or so
[09:05:50] <Ge0rG> Sounds like a task for a web service.
[09:06:16] <Zash> Figuring out if a XEP became inactive because everyone already implemented it or because nobody implemented it would probably be good.
[09:06:45] <Ge0rG> Zash: isn't that what "Final" vs. "Obsolete" is for?
[09:07:07] <Zash> Ge0rG: It's "Which direction should this Experimental XEP go?"
[09:07:13] <goffi> didn't follow the whole discussion, but about deferred, we may have nothing to add to a XEP, but waiting for implementation or something else before asking for move to draft. It would be nice to be able to do an update without modification, just to show it's not abandonned at all.
[09:07:19] <zinid> Ge0rG: a really simple submitting form is enough, which will put numbers in the database for displaying, I don't think this is brutally hard
[09:07:50] <Zash> There exists survey tools, if someone wants to automate it that way.
[09:08:17] <Ge0rG> zinid: web forms will be immediately overrun by spammers.
[09:08:19] <zinid> well, using existing tools is preferable of course
[09:08:59] *** Guus has left the room
[09:09:05] <zinid> sigh
[09:09:16] <zinid> how others do this, cannot imagine
[09:10:28] <Wiktor> for the record, tracking progress for OMEMO is one github repository: https://omemo.top/
[09:10:33] <Zash> Could be as simple as adding "Have you implemented this? Send comments plz." on https://github.com/xsf/xsf-tools/blob/7628fe8610e3d7f2247e5e7634bbf6c754c2d033/xeputils/mail.py#L114-L125
[09:12:55] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:13:49] *** sonny has left the room
[09:13:52] *** sonny has joined the room
[09:14:04] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:14:53] *** Guus has left the room
[09:15:23] *** edhelas has left the room
[09:15:50] *** edhelas has joined the room
[09:19:26] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:20:23] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[09:20:24] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:20:46] *** efrit has joined the room
[09:21:46] *** sonny has joined the room
[09:22:13] <mathieui> zinid, gajim devs are not in there, no
[09:22:55] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[09:23:13] <zinid> that's pitty because this is one of the most popular desktop client (although not everyone like it)
[09:23:24] <zinid> and we don't hear their opinion
[09:23:56] <Guus> so, get them in here :)
[09:24:10] <goffi> mathieui: Asterix is writing from time to time on @standard
[09:24:24] <zinid> we cannot force every developer joining this room or the list
[09:25:21] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[09:25:45] <Guus> Make them an offer they cannot refuse ;)
[09:26:23] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:28:43] <mathieui> the issue with gajim devs is that they really are busy (it’s mostly lovetox these days, with asterix showing up from time to time)
[09:28:45] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:28:46] <zinid> what I want to say is that we shouldn't expect lots of responses from developers and drawing conclusions based on received responses
[09:30:12] <Ge0rG> zinid: do you have a better proposal?
[09:30:54] <zinid> Ge0rG: tracking existing implementations is a good start in making some decision (such as deferring for example)
[09:31:20] <edhelas> maybe we could first track what XEPs are implemented in which clients
[09:31:25] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:31:28] <Ge0rG> zinid: but how?
[09:31:39] <edhelas> it's not that hard https://nl.movim.eu/?about#caps_widget_tab
[09:31:42] <zinid> Ge0rG: are we going circles? :) submitting form?
[09:32:11] <zinid> the point is everyone can submit
[09:32:34] <zinid> so even if developers are busy their users can submit
[09:33:07] *** goffi shows as "online"
[09:33:32] <zinid> another advantage is of course everyone can decide about XEP popularity by implementations number
[09:33:54] <zinid> instead of experimental/draft/etc nonsense
[09:36:02] <Zash> Everyone implementing something doesn't make it good.
[09:36:31] <Zash> Good things don't usually win popularity contests in my experience.
[09:36:35] *** goffi has left the room
[09:37:36] <zinid> really? in the context of standards?
[09:37:43] <zinid> which means the standard is crap? :)
[09:38:04] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[09:38:21] <zinid> do you remember such situation in xmpp?
[09:38:27] <mathieui> edhelas, caps widget is not enough
[09:38:41] *** goffi shows as "online"
[09:39:07] <Zash> Good enough combined with timeing on the other hand.
[09:39:09] <Zash> Or marketing.
[09:39:37] <edhelas> the issue is, more than asking dev to be aware of new XEPs, is also to push them to deprecate or remove old ones
[09:39:54] <edhelas> mam:tmp, vcard_temp, Private XML…
[09:40:43] <Zash> vcard-temp and private xml are good enough, but not really that good
[09:41:18] <Zash> Multiple versions of the same XEP is a somewhat different issue.
[09:41:25] *** Flow shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:42:02] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:42:27] *** lumi has joined the room
[09:43:31] <jonasw> back
[09:44:19] <jonasw> goffi, if a XEP doesn’t have implementations, moving it to Deferred is a sane thing. There must be something wrong with it: either it has issues deterring implementors or it is not needed at all. Void updates are not going to make any of this go away.
[09:44:44] <jonasw> zinid, if users submit on behalf of their software, we’ll be getting incomplete and inaccurate data, that’s worse than no data.
[09:45:01] <jonasw> (e.g. "does this client support Jingle File Transfer?" "well yes of course, I can send files", but in fact the file transfer is using HTTP Upload)
[09:45:45] *** Wiktor shows as "online"
[09:45:46] <zinid> jonasw: why would we have inaccurate data?
[09:45:57] <zinid> I don't say it would be 100% accurate
[09:46:01] <Ge0rG> zinid: because users are clueless.
[09:46:09] <jonasw> what Ge0rG says
[09:46:25] <Ge0rG> zinid: it would be 40% accurate and there would be multiple submissions.
[09:46:25] <zinid> Ge0rG: a clueless user who knows what xsf and xep is?
[09:46:30] <Zash> https://www.zash.se/xmpp-clients.html inaccurate!
[09:46:33] <jonasw> zinid, sure
[09:46:36] <Ge0rG> User often already fail at spelling a client name correctly.
[09:46:44] *** dwd shows as "online"
[09:46:50] *** daniel has left the room
[09:46:57] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:47:05] <Zash> If clients put XEPs into their marketing, then users will be somewhat aware of them.
[09:47:08] <jonasw> Guus, regarding donating money to client organizations: there are enough clients out there which do not have an umbrella organization
[09:47:12] <zinid> then what makes you think a developer is responding on your last calls?
[09:47:17] <jonasw> some of which are doing great work in the UX department (I heard dino is nice)
[09:47:24] <jonasw> accepting donations is tricky
[09:47:24] <Ge0rG> I'm working on a system for people with technical background, and they fail to properly spell their own name.
[09:47:30] <zinid> maybe that's a clueless user responding
[09:47:46] <jonasw> zinid, you got me thinking that we sohlud probably issue CFE and LC to the developers list too
[09:48:05] <zinid> jonasw: you need to find developers there first :)
[09:48:18] <Ge0rG> zinid: I think you just volunteered to create a web form, collect data from users, developers or goats, and to process it in a way that's suitable and useful to the XSF, thanks!
[09:48:27] <jonasw> khekhe
[09:48:41] <zinid> Ge0rG: sure, and you go develop ejabberd
[09:48:46] <mathieui> fair trade
[09:48:52] <jonasw> tough choice
[09:48:56] <jonasw> erlang vs. web development
[09:49:10] <goffi> jonasw: deferred != no implementation. I'm author of XEP-0355 and XEP-0356, they have 2 implementations (at least), and just didn't need to update them
[09:49:17] <Ge0rG> zinid: sorry, I've got my own client to develop, and I'm submitting issues for a bunch of others.
[09:49:20] <goffi> and they are deferred
[09:49:30] <goffi> anyway I now need to update them so it's not a big deal.
[09:49:32] <jonasw> goffi, if there are two implementations, you should ask for advancement to Draft.
[09:49:38] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:49:44] <goffi> jonasw: now, because I need more tests
[09:49:48] <goffi> too early for that
[09:49:50] <Ge0rG> zinid: but while you are here, you can solve my ejabber MUC bug: all MSN clients are kicked when one of the MSN clients sends an error to the MUC.
[09:50:14] <goffi> s/now/no/
[09:50:20] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:50:28] <Guus> jonasw: clients without organiations typically have one developer. Donating then often is done in the form of temporary commisions ("can I hire you to build this-and-this in the client"). Nothing dangerous about that.
[09:50:49] <jonasw> Guus, it is massively tricky if you are employed elsewhere
[09:51:21] *** Guus has left the room
[09:51:22] <jonasw> I am kind-of glad that we didn’t get into the Prototype Fund, because I didn’t want the headache of coordinating with my employer and insurance etc.
[09:51:29] <jonasw> (maybe that’s only a german thing that these things are complicated)
[09:51:47] <zinid> Ge0rG: I cannot drop my tasks and fix your issue, create a github issue maybe? if there is a bug it will be fixed quite fast
[09:52:03] <Ge0rG> zinid: I'm not the server operator, so I don't have logs.
[09:52:16] <Guus> jonas: true, that can be tricky. For me personally, it's not been a problem, as when I was employed, I've always made sure to have a clause in my contract that allowed for it. Now that I'm self-employed, things are even easier. But yes, it does require some planning.
[09:52:41] <jonasw> Guus, I don’t even know how such a clause would need to look like, really.
[09:52:42] <Guus> perhaps we could facilitate that planning in some way, shape, or form - simply by letting people interested get in contact with people with experience.
[09:52:44] <zinid> Ge0rG: I can only say I will check if I don't forget (like always)
[09:52:46] <Ge0rG> zinid: also you seem to have enough time to make proposals here and on standards@ .P
[09:52:55] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:53:05] <zinid> Ge0rG: nice try :)
[09:53:58] <Ge0rG> zinid: you know, I've once waited multiple years on an ejabberd ticket. Then I gave up and switched to prosody.
[09:54:12] <Guus> jonasw: from exprience, every employment contract that I signed (which have been 4) had a non-compete. When discussing the contract, I'd mention: "but i do work on ... which I'd like to continue doing" after which we had some back-and-forth, and a clause was added.
[09:54:23] <Guus> I might've been lucky, unsure, but it always worked out.
[09:54:31] <zinid> Ge0rG: and now waiting years on prosody tickets, ok
[09:54:44] <Guus> (and it has the added bonus of having HR work out the details of the clause :P )
[09:55:09] <jonasw> Guus, right, will take that into account when I get my employment contract soon-ish
[09:55:24] <mathieui> Guus, my employment contract has a "all your personal work belong to us, even outside of work time", and I ignore it because it’s illegal, but meh
[09:55:31] <jonasw> mathieui, wtf
[09:56:32] <SouL> I thought they would do that only in the USA
[09:57:18] <Ge0rG> zinid: EJAB-532 took four years for a community workaround. I've got two more years to go with prosody before reaching that timeout.
[09:57:24] <Guus> mathieui: I don't recommend knowingly accept a contract and disobey it, even if it's an invalid contract.
[09:57:50] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:57:59] <Ge0rG> Guus: sometimes that's better than not having an income.
[09:58:08] <Guus> i've always had my feedback on a contract draft addressed by HR - but again, that might be lucky.
[09:58:31] *** Wiktor shows as "online"
[09:58:33] <zinid> Ge0rG: so what is your conclusion? every ticket takes years to resolve? this is not true of course, you can check dynamics on github
[09:59:06] <Guus> Ge0rG: I was assuming that it wasn't even discussed before signing it.
[09:59:16] *** lumi has left the room
[09:59:31] <Guus> Ge0rG: if it *was* discussed (but still disallowed), then I'd more so advice against breaking it!
[09:59:48] <Ge0rG> Guus: I've had a talk to my now-boss regarding illegal parts of the contract, and he said "we've got that in all contracts, we won't make an exception", so I shrugged it off.
[10:00:20] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:00:32] <Guus> Ge0rG: I might have been lucky with my employers then. Might be a cultural thingy difference between the types of organisations we work for.
[10:01:08] <daniel> And this is what happens if you don't have unions
[10:02:03] *** jjrh has left the room
[10:02:04] <jonasw> daniel, does conversations.im already have a union? :)
[10:03:09] <Guus> the boss wouldn't allow it! ;)
[10:03:12] *Guus ducks, runs
[10:03:48] <Ge0rG> daniel: don't go Set Theory on us!
[10:03:52] <mimi89999> What?
[10:04:00] *** jjrh has joined the room
[10:04:27] <Ge0rG> unions, intersections, etc.
[10:04:40] *** dwd shows as "online"
[10:05:27] <jonasw> now we’re at traffic managment!
[10:05:49] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:05:50] *mathieui bangs the on-topic gavel
[10:05:57] *jonasw moves out to xmpp@
[10:08:29] *** daniel has left the room
[10:08:36] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:11:37] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Work work …"
[10:12:22] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:14:11] *** Lance has joined the room
[10:14:11] *** Lance shows as "online"
[10:16:10] *** dwd shows as "online"
[10:17:14] *** daniel has left the room
[10:17:31] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:18:19] <Guus> who can give SCAM-wg access to the XSF twitter account?
[10:20:20] *** Lance has left the room
[10:20:50] *** jubalh shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:22:20] <goffi> mathieui: for my last job in France, I've made the company bosses sign a paper saying they knew that I was working on my project on my free time, and wouldn't claim any right on it.
[10:22:42] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[10:22:55] <goffi> mathieui: anyway, I don't think they have any right on what you're doing on your freetime, whatever the contract is saying (but I'm not a lawyer of course)
[10:24:21] *** efrit has left the room
[10:31:32] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:34:43] *** Tobias has left the room
[10:34:59] *** Tobias has joined the room
[10:36:40] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:40:15] *** efrit has joined the room
[10:41:01] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[10:42:16] *** jere has joined the room
[10:45:20] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[10:45:20] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[10:46:40] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:51:28] *** Yagiza has left the room
[10:51:43] *** Alex has joined the room
[10:58:27] *** Alex has left the room
[10:59:48] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[11:00:04] *** Kev shows as "away"
[11:02:03] *** daniel has left the room
[11:02:06] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:02:43] *** daniel has left the room
[11:02:49] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:03:02] <pep.> Zash> If clients put XEPs into their marketing, then users will be somewhat aware of them. < I'm thinking more and more users shouldn't be aware of the impl. details (i.e., XMPP). But maybe it was sarcastic and I didn't catch it
[11:06:18] *** efrit has left the room
[11:06:29] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:07:47] *** efrit has left the room
[11:07:56] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:08:39] *** efrit has left the room
[11:10:47] *** uc shows as "online"
[11:11:12] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:11:42] *** efrit has left the room
[11:11:54] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:13:17] *** sonny has joined the room
[11:13:41] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[11:15:15] *** goffi has left the room
[11:15:19] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[11:15:53] <zinid> pep.: true
[11:16:52] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[11:17:21] *** efrit has left the room
[11:17:22] <edhelas> well depends to who you're doing "marketing"
[11:17:32] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:18:11] <edhelas> when I'm doing release notes I can go into lots of XMPP details but I prefer most of the time to stay with "upload files feature" with a reference to the XEP than explaining the whole stack
[11:18:16] <pep.> edhelas, sure
[11:18:45] <Zash> Go to various clients web pages, search for XEP, count matches.
[11:18:58] <pep.> I'm not talking about devs, nor poezio (console client) users
[11:19:33] <Ge0rG> I think there was recently a proposal for a formal client description language, including XEPs.
[11:19:55] <jonasw> indeed
[11:20:05] <jonasw> that’d also work for gathering implementation stats by the way
[11:20:30] *** daniel has left the room
[11:20:38] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:21:05] <edhelas> jonasw are you talking about https://github.com/movim/moxl#xmpp-support or https://github.com/dino/dino/wiki/Supported-XEPs ?
[11:21:06] *** daniel has left the room
[11:21:16] *** daniel has joined the room
[11:21:41] <jonasw> neither I think
[11:21:49] <jonasw> let me get you a link
[11:22:04] <jonasw> edhelas, https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2017-August/033123.html
[11:23:52] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:23:56] *** Alex has joined the room
[11:24:04] <edhelas> okay :)
[11:27:48] *** daniel has left the room
[11:27:49] *** efrit has left the room
[11:27:51] <jonasw> goffi, care to reply to daves email on standards@ with your example?
[11:27:56] <jonasw> I think it’s relevant to the discussion
[11:28:01] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:30:31] *** daniel has left the room
[11:34:02] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[11:36:37] *** lovetox has joined the room
[11:45:18] *** tux shows as "away"
[11:51:39] *** Yagiza has joined the room
[11:51:49] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Online"
[11:51:58] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[11:54:28] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[11:56:39] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[11:57:42] *** jere has left the room
[11:57:59] *** jere has joined the room
[11:58:36] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[11:59:35] *** Alex has left the room
[11:59:57] <goffi> jonasw: sure
[12:00:08] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[12:00:43] <dwd> goffi, '355/356? If they "don't need updating", then they're surely ready for advancement?
[12:01:09] *** Guus has left the room
[12:02:17] *** Flow shows as "online"
[12:03:11] <mathieui> dwd, "I now need to update them"
[12:03:41] <goffi> dwd: I have now updates to put. The thing it take time to have implementation, and it take time to implementation to mature. For instance in the case of 355 I've realized that disco items were not handled correctly in my Pubsub service, and this need a slight change in the XEP. I'm using this Pubsub service with XEP-0355 for more than one year, but I've just realized this was missing a couple of weeks ago, and I wanted to test implementation before modifying the XEP.
[12:05:02] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:06:00] <dwd> Either the XEP *is* expected to change in an unstable manner, or else it's ready for advancement. If it's expected to change in an unstable manner but isn't being actively edited, then it gets deferred after a year. Which part of this are you objecting to?
[12:06:01] *** Guus has left the room
[12:07:32] *** Alex has joined the room
[12:07:58] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[12:08:21] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[12:08:55] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[12:11:53] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[12:13:00] <goffi> dwd: I'm not objecting to anything, I just say that the XEPs are deferred but not abandonned, just on hold. I'm writing an email on standard@ to explain that.
[12:13:52] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[12:14:06] *** Alex has left the room
[12:14:21] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[12:14:53] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:14:53] *** Guus has left the room
[12:15:04] *** dwd shows as "online"
[12:16:02] *** daniel has left the room
[12:16:08] *** daniel has joined the room
[12:18:05] *** SouL shows as "online"
[12:18:55] *** Flow shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[12:20:40] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:21:51] *** Kev shows as "online"
[12:22:06] *** waqas has joined the room
[12:23:06] *** Guus has left the room
[12:24:42] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[12:29:51] *** Flow shows as "online"
[12:30:14] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[12:31:39] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:32:20] *** Guus has left the room
[12:33:13] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[12:34:21] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:34:36] *** sonny has left the room
[12:34:39] *** sonny has joined the room
[12:34:42] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[12:35:24] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[12:44:36] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:49:33] *** Alex has joined the room
[12:51:53] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[12:51:58] *** Yagiza shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус из-за бездействия более чем 10 минут"
[12:52:18] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[12:53:01] *** ralphm has left the room
[12:53:04] *** daniel has left the room
[12:53:12] *** daniel has joined the room
[12:54:34] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:56:32] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Online"
[12:57:26] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[12:57:30] *** Alex shows as "online"
[12:58:06] *** Alex has left the room
[12:58:46] *** daniel has left the room
[12:58:58] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:00:04] *** Alex shows as "online"
[13:00:52] *** Guus shows as "online"
[13:01:37] *** Guus has left the room
[13:02:44] *** Guus shows as "online"
[13:07:59] *** jubalh has joined the room
[13:09:51] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[13:10:57] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:14:10] *** Flow shows as "online"
[13:15:03] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:15:06] *** Alex has left the room
[13:16:37] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[13:19:37] *** Guus has left the room
[13:21:33] *** Guus shows as "online"
[13:23:04] *** tim@boese-ban.de has left the room
[13:23:09] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[13:25:46] *** dwd shows as "online"
[13:27:10] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[13:29:51] *** Alex shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[13:30:13] *** xnyhps has left the room
[13:30:19] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:30:29] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:30:29] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:31:00] *** xnyhps has left the room
[13:31:07] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:32:37] *** Alex has left the room
[13:37:11] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[13:38:22] *** jcbrand has joined the room
[13:38:38] *** Valerian has joined the room
[13:40:13] *** Ge0rG has joined the room
[13:40:35] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[13:40:40] *** Yagiza shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус из-за бездействия более чем 10 минут"
[13:40:56] *** Guus has left the room
[13:42:41] *** Guus shows as "online"
[13:42:43] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:42:51] *** Guus has left the room
[13:44:12] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:45:19] *** fp-tester has joined the room
[13:45:59] *** Flow shows as "online"
[13:47:14] *** goffi has left the room
[13:49:44] *** dwd shows as "online"
[13:49:57] *** efrit has joined the room
[13:50:09] *** waqas has left the room
[13:51:01] *** SamWhited has joined the room
[13:51:20] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[13:53:39] *** Wiktor shows as "online"
[13:54:34] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:54:34] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:54:36] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[13:55:05] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[13:55:26] <SamWhited> > I don't think this is a lot of work

Yes it is. No matter what the thing is, if someone says those words they're wrong or they would have done it already.
[13:55:43] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[13:56:05] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:56:36] *** Flow shows as "online"
[13:56:39] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[13:58:08] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[13:58:29] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Online"
[14:00:22] *** uc shows as "online"
[14:00:45] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm away"
[14:00:45] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[14:02:47] *** efrit has left the room
[14:02:56] *** efrit has joined the room
[14:05:30] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[14:06:15] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:07:44] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:07:48] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:08:10] *** Flow shows as "online"
[14:10:05] *** jubalh shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:10:44] *** Wiktor shows as "online"
[14:11:14] *** uc shows as "online"
[14:13:56] *** Guus has left the room
[14:14:44] <dwd> SamWhited, I don't even know what you['re quoting, and I agree.
[14:15:20] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:15:23] <SamWhited> dwd: Yah, those words were said earlier (about something that I suspect editors would end up having to do).
[14:15:56] <SamWhited> It made me cringe. I still think our process is too complicated and that we've already forgotten about it again because we have new editors that are rosie eyed and not burnt out yet so work is getting done and we'll ignore the problem until they get burnt out and we get new editors again.
[14:16:51] <SamWhited> But it applies in general too.
[14:17:22] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:17:31] *** daniel has left the room
[14:17:34] <dwd> SamWhited, I think our process has acrued a lot of cruft and assumptions and special cases that it shouldn't have (and isn't even documented to have).
[14:17:56] <SamWhited> dwd: Indeed, it needs some love.
[14:17:59] *** Guus has left the room
[14:18:47] <dwd> SamWhited, I think understanding what it was meant to be would be useful. The fact people think we need a stage before Experimental suggests to me that it's very poorly understood.
[14:19:16] *** lskdjf has left the room
[14:19:16] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[14:21:40] *** uc shows as "online"
[14:22:47] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:24:34] *** Flow shows as "online"
[14:25:54] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[14:26:02] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:26:28] <SamWhited> dwd: I agree
[14:27:28] <jonasw> dwd, the question is whether that lack of understanding comes from lack of documentation, lack of active education or something else
[14:27:49] <jonasw> in any case, if newcomers or people taking only a quick look don’t understand it, it’s a PR problem we should fix. and that often has to do with naming
[14:29:45] *** Wiktor shows as "online"
[14:29:47] *** Wiktor shows as "online"
[14:30:34] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:30:51] <dwd> jonasw, I don't think it's well documented, and I don't think people read that document very closely. In addition, this problem has become acute because we've lost a chunk of our institutional knowledge - lots of long-term (ie, decades not months) community people have drifted away over the past year or two.
[14:31:43] <dwd> jonasw, There's other problems with our process too, like no (real) IPR policy, and no appeals process. Both block us from being "Open Standards" in the openstand.org sense.
[14:31:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:31:54] *** jjrh has joined the room
[14:31:54] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[14:32:02] *** Wiktor has left the room
[14:32:08] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[14:32:25] <SamWhited> Actually, I agree and disagree. I agree that "draft" is poorly misunderstood and think that we should rename it (it doesn't "sound like" the name implies "you should implement this, it's done"). I think experimental is fine and people probably do understand it (it's experimental and you should only implement it if you're comfortable implementing things that might change). The problem with experimental isn't one of naming, it's that we leave things in experimental too long.
[14:32:39] *** Guus has left the room
[14:33:16] <Kev> "it's experimental and you should only implement it if you're comfortable implementing things that might change"
The same is true of Draft - they *might* change, we just try not to.
[14:33:28] <Kev> (Actually, that's not true, we try not to in ways that are backward incompatible)
[14:33:28] <dwd> SamWhited, I agree with you. But that doesn't explain people who want us to have a stage before Experimental, or who want XEPs to meet certain quality gates before Experimental, and so on.
[14:33:34] <SamWhited> s/that might/that are likely to/
[14:34:12] <SamWhited> dwd: Ah yah, fair. I do think that's misguided. I do think a basic quality gate is fine though, it should at least be possible for me to implement it before it goes to experimental.
[14:34:22] <dwd> Kev, We generally don't change Experimental in ways that aren't backwards compatible - we're just (more) open to abandoning the namespace and minting a new one with namespace versioning.
[14:34:45] <Kev> I think 'Not obviously stupid and not duplicating existing stuff with no clear differentiator' is the check I used to do for +1ing Experimental.
[14:34:46] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[14:35:07] <Kev> dwd: Changing the required namespace is about as backwards incompatible as you can get.
[14:35:22] <Kev> When talking about compatibility of the document, not of a particular namespace within it.
[14:35:34] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:35:51] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[14:35:53] <dwd> Kev, Well, sorta. The old namespace still works, nothing is broken. But yes, it's a clean break rather than maintaining interop.
[14:36:01] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[14:36:08] *** goffi has joined the room
[14:36:16] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:36:31] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[14:37:27] *** Guus has left the room
[14:39:26] *** blabla shows as "online"
[14:40:35] *** Flow shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:40:42] *** Yagiza shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус из-за бездействия более чем 10 минут"
[14:40:46] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:40:52] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:40:53] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:41:38] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[14:42:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[14:42:59] *** lovetox has left the room
[14:43:17] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:43:28] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Online"
[14:43:28] *** daniel shows as "online"
[14:43:33] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:43:36] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:43:37] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:44:25] *** Flow shows as "online"
[14:44:45] <SamWhited> Added a card for board to discuss the rename.
[14:45:10] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:45:23] <SamWhited> And one on council to make a recommendation.
[14:45:29] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:45:30] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:45:34] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:46:17] <Guus> renaming draft to stable and striving to not keep things in 'experimental' for to long would be big wins, I think.
[14:46:48] <jonasw> I agree
[14:46:49] <Guus> if, on top of that, we can apply structural simplifications to the entire process, even better. Suggestions?
[14:46:59] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[14:47:08] *** sonny has joined the room
[14:47:25] <jonasw> I’m currently fine with the XEP editing process, mostly because I automated the parts which can be automated (and which I had contact with, there’s some stuff I haven’t done yet, like Last Call)
[14:47:35] *** lovetox has joined the room
[14:47:51] <Guus> jonasw: but you fall in Sams 'new-and-not-yet-burned-out' category :)
[14:48:10] <jonasw> maybe
[14:48:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:48:15] *** fippo has joined the room
[14:48:19] <jonasw> the level of automation helps against burning out though
[14:48:26] <jonasw> needs moar autmoation though
[14:48:37] <Zash> Always moar automation
[14:48:37] <jonasw> I need to figure out how to make a github bot which can post metadata of all touched XEPs in a PR
[14:48:43] <Guus> absolutely, but automation needs maintenance too.
[14:48:56] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[14:48:57] <jonasw> it is annoying to have to look up the status and authors of a XEP manually inside a diff
[14:49:40] <Guus> I'm heading out again, but I'd be very interested in hearing practical improvements that we can make to the process.
[14:50:08] <jonasw> something which detects when a namespace bump must happen would be amazing
[14:50:10] <jonasw> but I doubt that’s possible
[14:50:16] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[14:50:16] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:50:22] *** jjrh has joined the room
[14:50:32] <jonasw> (maybe something which warns when RFC 2119 words are touched)
[14:50:55] *** lskdjf has left the room
[14:50:55] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[14:50:56] <Kev> Which doesn't imply that it needs a namespace bump.
[14:51:01] <jonasw> I know
[14:51:08] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:51:08] <jonasw> but it’s still something good to see quickly when processing a PR
[14:51:10] *** jjrh has joined the room
[14:51:16] <jonasw> I’m bad at reading diffs
[14:51:46] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:51:47] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:52:00] *** jjrh has joined the room
[14:52:27] <Zash> jonasw: Any diffs or XEP XML diffs in particular?
[14:52:32] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:52:35] *** jjrh has joined the room
[14:52:39] <jonasw> Zash, XEP diffs are especially bad because of long lines
[14:52:44] <SamWhited> I can read diffs fine. I can barely read XEP XML when it's not a diff.
[14:52:48] <jonasw> or alternatively, because of line-broken text
[14:52:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[14:53:26] <Zash> Anyone wanna continue my work on turning xeps into text/markdown for simpler diffs?
[14:53:34] *** Alex has joined the room
[14:53:38] <jonasw> Zash, dump the code somewhere, I may take a look
[14:53:47] <jonasw> doesn’t help much when viewing diffs on the repository online though
[14:55:04] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:55:20] <SamWhited> Jokes aside, as much as I like the idea I don't think we need more tooling, more things to maintain, more stuff to break, or more things you have to know about and learn to use.
[14:55:34] <SamWhited> Which is a long way of saying what jonasw just said
[14:55:48] *jonasw blinks
[14:55:52] <jonasw> I’m not sure how I said that
[14:55:58] <SamWhited> > doesn’t help much when viewing diffs on the repository online though
[14:56:02] <jonasw> ah
[14:56:17] <jonasw> well, actually, in the back of my head I mentally added it to the list to integrate in a possible github app for which I have an idea
[14:56:49] <jonasw> I need to take a look at the effort involved. Something which is geared towards XEP PRs and can do a great deal of the initial triaging process automatically and/or simplify the triaging by putting all relevant information in once place would be amazing.
[14:58:46] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[14:58:54] <Zash> jonasw: https://gist.github.com/Zash/372591d4c61b6af70d810a78bd1af12d
[14:59:25] *** Flow shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:59:26] <jonasw> Zash, can you dump a quick list of todos below that?
[15:01:07] <Zash> jonasw: I think the main blocker for me is that I don't know how to proceed, or what to do with it.
[15:01:35] *** Flow shows as "online"
[15:01:36] <jonasw> from what I can tell it converts xep-xml to markdown, right?
[15:01:46] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:02:52] *** lumi has joined the room
[15:03:23] *** jjrh has left the room
[15:03:29] *** jjrh has joined the room
[15:04:17] <Zash> The Lua thing does that, yes. One shell script to normalize its input and one that picks two versions of a file out of git and compares them with the previous scripts.
[15:05:29] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[15:07:02] <Guus> SamWhited, so what _does_ help?
[15:08:02] <SamWhited> Guus: What does what help?
[15:09:09] <Guus> You earlier referred to a benefit of making 'the process' less complex. I agree with pretty much everything that you wrote, but I'm still not sure what a pragmatic improvement would be.
[15:09:56] <SamWhited> Guus: I wrote a long email about this actually, I will forward it to you if I can find it. There's also a trello where I put a few of the potential improvements
[15:10:07] <SamWhited> Some of them have been done, it's definitely a bit nicer now
[15:10:39] <Guus> if there are sensible improvements left, by all means, lets implement them.
[15:10:44] *** dwd shows as "online"
[15:10:49] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[15:11:57] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[15:12:07] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:12:10] <Guus> let's put things on the radar of those that are to decide on things.
[15:12:20] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[15:12:52] <SamWhited> The only two things left that I think we could reasonably do are automating email (sounds like jonasw is working on that a bit, we'd just have to integrate it with the build) and automating archival of XEPs as part of the build (I still have no idea if we have an attic or how it works in the new docker land, so if that still needs to be fixed it might end up being a lot more work)
[15:13:36] <Guus> ah, okay, that's automation. I though you were referring to procedural changes (eg: make XEP-0001 less complex, or something in that nature).
[15:13:36] <Zash> A thing that I've wondered about is, is there a good way to XEP versions to commits?
[15:13:50] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:13:50] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:13:54] <SamWhited> Oh I see, sorry
[15:14:03] <Zash> A thing that I've wondered about is, is there a good way to map* XEP versions to commits?
[15:14:13] <Guus> not to say that the automation bit wouldn't be wildly helpful.
[15:15:28] <SamWhited> Zash: not really; I was going to suggest some git foo, but apparently some XEPs have multiple revisions with the same version or where a version ended up going backwards somehow.
[15:15:49] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:16:01] *** Valerian has left the room
[15:16:03] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:16:07] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:16:16] <SamWhited> So maybe we need to improve CI as well
[15:16:58] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:17:02] *** dwd shows as "online"
[15:18:00] <Guus> SamWhited: maybe it's worth manually revamping those XEPs, for the greater good?
[15:18:35] *** daniel has left the room
[15:18:48] *** jjrh has left the room
[15:18:50] <SamWhited> Guus: Yah, I'll do it for the one I noticed and add a task to add a CI step to find any others (and then fix those if there are any more)
[15:19:11] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:19:31] *** waqas has joined the room
[15:19:40] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[15:20:54] *** Alex shows as "online"
[15:21:06] *** Alex has left the room
[15:21:24] <jonasw> SamWhited, yes, there’s a workin gattic
[15:21:28] <jonasw> SamWhited, yes, there’s a working attic
[15:21:38] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[15:21:40] <jonasw> I forgot to mention that there’s a script to copy changed XEPs into the attic, again based on xeplist.xml
[15:21:50] *** McKael shows as "online"
[15:22:08] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:22:29] <Guus> awesome! So only the email bit remains an issue for now?
[15:22:33] <jonasw> not really
[15:22:48] <jonasw> I just want to test the tooling a bit more on real-world cases
[15:23:00] <jonasw> then it can easily be integrated into the deploy step on the server
[15:23:04] *** Martin has joined the room
[15:23:15] <jonasw> at least I think I fulfilled the wishlist I was given by Kev to make that happen easily
[15:23:33] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:23:37] <Guus> so, you're saying that both issues are well under way to being fixed?
[15:23:43] <jonasw> indeed
[15:24:01] <SamWhited> Fantastic :)
[15:24:04] <Guus> more awesome!
[15:24:40] <Guus> Sam, I think you need to come up with a new list of things that aught to be improved :)
[15:24:45] <Guus> I'm going to pick up the kids
[15:24:46] <Guus> ttyl
[15:27:26] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:27:29] *** blabla has left the room
[15:27:42] *** efrit has left the room
[15:28:01] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:28:26] *** dwd shows as "online"
[15:29:04] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[15:29:05] *** daniel has left the room
[15:30:18] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:30:26] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[15:30:56] *** Valerian has joined the room
[15:32:42] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[15:33:03] *** jere has left the room
[15:33:11] *** jere has joined the room
[15:34:59] *** daniel has left the room
[15:37:04] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:37:51] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[15:38:01] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[15:38:32] *** daniel has left the room
[15:38:38] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:42:08] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:43:33] *** Yagiza shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус из-за бездействия более чем 10 минут"
[15:43:45] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[15:44:55] *** edhelas shows as "online"
[15:45:44] *** daniel has left the room
[15:46:01] *** nyco has left the room
[15:46:02] *** nyco has joined the room
[15:46:40] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[15:47:45] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[15:47:46] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[15:50:06] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Online"
[15:51:03] *** fp-tester has joined the room
[15:51:54] *** dwd shows as "online"
[15:52:43] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:53:48] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[15:53:49] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[15:53:55] *** jjrh has joined the room
[15:55:43] *** ThurahT has left the room
[15:57:00] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:57:00] *** Guus has left the room
[15:57:17] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:57:48] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:00:19] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:00:21] *** jjrh has joined the room
[16:00:49] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[16:01:26] *** McKael shows as "online"
[16:01:45] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:03:53] *** Lance has joined the room
[16:03:54] *** Lance shows as "online"
[16:04:05] *** fp-tester shows as "online"
[16:05:39] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:06:25] <zinid> Ge0rG: https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/e1efd291568aae29ac06f507c8b0bbf60b65d91a
[16:06:45] *** daniel has left the room
[16:07:00] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:07:44] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:07:45] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm away"
[16:08:21] *** daniel has left the room
[16:08:27] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:08:27] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:08:29] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[16:08:37] *** jjrh has joined the room
[16:09:43] *** lumi has left the room
[16:09:57] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:10:01] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:10:18] <zinid> Ge0rG: there is another MSN-related bug reported by edhelas, hehe: https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/issues/2007
[16:11:40] <edhelas> I'm keeping the ejabberd team busy these days
[16:11:59] <zinid> :D
[16:12:35] <zinid> edhelas: your bug is surprisingly harder to fix, unlike Ge0rG's one
[16:12:53] <zinid> due to shitty code of mod_muc
[16:12:59] <edhelas> :p
[16:13:52] <Ge0rG> zinid: thanks very much.
[16:14:10] <Ge0rG> Holger: time to git-pull conversations.im! ;) ^ https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/e1efd291568aae29ac06f507c8b0bbf60b65d91a
[16:14:15] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:14:16] *** daniel has left the room
[16:14:28] <zinid> Ge0rG: Holger is working on this
[16:14:37] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:14:52] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:15:00] <zinid> he's busy porting his patches to this new ejabberd version (17.x is a lot different)
[16:15:06] <edhelas> zinid I never report easy bugs, I prefer the tricky ones :p
[16:15:14] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:17:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:17:25] *** daniel has left the room
[16:17:31] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:17:40] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:17:52] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:17:55] *** jjrh has joined the room
[16:18:07] *** Valerian has left the room
[16:18:11] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:18:17] *** Valerian has joined the room
[16:18:59] *** jjrh has joined the room
[16:20:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:20:30] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:20:59] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:22:09] *** daniel has left the room
[16:22:46] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:23:32] *** ThurahT has joined the room
[16:23:47] *** jubalh has left the room
[16:24:24] *** daniel has left the room
[16:24:30] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:24:46] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:25:40] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[16:25:44] *** Yagiza has left the room
[16:26:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:27:18] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:27:29] *** stefandxm has left the room
[16:27:36] *** goffi has left the room
[16:28:26] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:28:32] *** goffi has joined the room
[16:29:22] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:29:39] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:29:51] *** blabla shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:31:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:32:19] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[16:32:22] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[16:32:23] *** daniel has left the room
[16:32:29] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:32:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:34:11] *** jcbrand has left the room
[16:34:20] *** daniel has left the room
[16:34:26] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:35:36] *** Valerian has left the room
[16:36:26] *** blabla shows as "online"
[16:36:53] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:37:33] *** Guus has left the room
[16:38:25] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[16:38:36] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[16:39:51] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:40:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:40:58] *** Martin has left the room
[16:42:08] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:44:06] *** blabla has left the room
[16:44:35] *** Valerian has joined the room
[16:45:38] <mimi89999> zinid: What else than the pubsub patch?
[16:46:10] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:46:27] <zinid> mimi89999: are you about Holger? Stuff regarding registration and so on
[16:47:09] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:47:34] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[16:48:04] <mimi89999> Ah, the things really specific to conversations.im
[16:48:11] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:48:14] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:48:59] <zinid> yep
[16:49:43] *** McKael shows as "online"
[16:50:08] *** jubalh has joined the room
[16:50:20] *** Guus has left the room
[16:50:35] *** fp-tester shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[16:51:14] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:53:28] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:55:00] *** Guus has left the room
[16:56:45] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:57:09] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:58:57] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:58:59] *** jjrh has joined the room
[16:59:01] *** Guus has left the room
[16:59:43] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[16:59:45] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[17:00:34] *** fp-tester shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[17:03:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:05:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:05:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:05:44] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[17:05:47] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[17:05:58] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[17:06:03] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:06:50] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[17:07:04] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:07:22] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:08:45] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:09:10] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:09:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[17:09:54] *** jjrh has joined the room
[17:10:21] *** lovetox shows as "online"
[17:10:28] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:10:32] *** jjrh has joined the room
[17:10:59] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:11:43] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:11:46] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:11:48] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:11:59] *** lumi has joined the room
[17:14:33] *** daniel has left the room
[17:14:35] *** lovetox has left the room
[17:16:03] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:16:15] *** tux has joined the room
[17:16:29] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:16:59] *** jubalh has left the room
[17:17:34] *** blabla has joined the room
[17:19:15] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:19:26] *** Kev shows as "away"
[17:21:26] *** McKael shows as "online"
[17:24:17] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:26:18] *** zinid has left the room
[17:26:43] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:27:45] *** Guus has left the room
[17:27:50] *** zinid shows as "online"
[17:28:13] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:28:52] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:30:43] *** blabla has joined the room
[17:34:17] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:34:24] *** Guus has left the room
[17:36:21] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[17:36:35] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[17:36:59] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:37:13] *** Alex has joined the room
[17:41:40] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:46:20] *** Valerian has left the room
[17:47:49] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[17:48:42] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[17:48:43] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[17:49:42] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:49:58] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:57:39] *** lskdjf has left the room
[17:59:30] *** Guus has left the room
[17:59:52] *** dwd shows as "online"
[18:00:20] *** fp-tester shows as "online"
[18:01:50] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:04:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:05:05] *** jere has left the room
[18:05:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:05:13] *** jere has joined the room
[18:05:34] *** stefandxm has left the room
[18:05:50] *** Guus has left the room
[18:06:14] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:06:50] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:07:11] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:07:47] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:07:50] *** jjrh has joined the room
[18:07:53] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:07:57] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:08:31] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:10:46] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:10:49] *** jjrh has joined the room
[18:11:50] *** Alex has left the room
[18:12:47] *** Guus has left the room
[18:14:20] *** Kev shows as "away"
[18:15:45] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:17:29] *** Kev shows as "online"
[18:17:41] *** daniel has left the room
[18:17:44] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:18:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:18:26] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:18:50] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:18:53] *** jjrh has joined the room
[18:23:24] *** Guus has left the room
[18:23:56] <Tobias> https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/
[18:24:26] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:24:48] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:25:58] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:27:10] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[18:28:21] <jonasw> hm
[18:28:28] <jonasw> nice, but not really applicable to XMPP, is it?
[18:28:52] <jonasw> you’d still need to figure out which server to ask and you’d still need some directory trusted for mapping some_identifier -> JID
[18:28:54] <Holger> Oh yay, zinid is the best.
[18:28:55] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[18:31:17] <Holger> mimi89999: Yes conversations.im-specific things ... and dirty hacks :-)
[18:31:53] *** Kev shows as "away"
[18:33:46] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:33:59] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:34:00] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:34:25] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:34:33] <SouL> We all love dirty hacks.
[18:35:31] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:35:43] <pep.> No we don't, but they stick around :(
[18:35:58] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:36:00] <pep.> No we don't, and they stick around :(
[18:36:40] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:37:09] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:38:45] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:41:36] *** fp-tester shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[18:41:43] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:41:43] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[18:42:50] *** daniel has left the room
[18:42:52] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:43:01] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:43:01] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:44:17] *** daniel has left the room
[18:44:21] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:46:46] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[18:46:46] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[18:51:36] *** fp-tester shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[18:52:16] *** Guus has left the room
[18:52:46] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:52:46] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[18:56:27] *** uc has left the room
[18:58:49] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:58:49] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[18:58:53] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[19:02:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:03:26] *** stefandxm has left the room
[19:04:45] *** goffi has left the room
[19:08:37] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:10:45] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[19:10:46] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[19:11:14] *** Alex has joined the room
[19:12:40] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:13:06] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:13:27] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[19:13:31] *** Guus has left the room
[19:15:11] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:15:54] *** pep. has left the room
[19:16:10] *** Guus has left the room
[19:16:10] *** pep. shows as "online"
[19:16:31] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:16:40] *** fp-tester shows as "online"
[19:17:22] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:17:35] *** Zash has left the room
[19:18:10] *** Guus has left the room
[19:18:17] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:23:41] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:24:38] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:24:42] *** Guus has left the room
[19:27:27] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:27:28] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:29:22] *** McKael shows as "online"
[19:30:27] *** Valerian has joined the room
[19:31:14] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:31:27] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[19:31:28] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[19:32:55] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:33:52] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[19:39:28] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:40:14] *** lovetox has left the room
[19:40:38] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:40:49] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:42:02] *** daniel has left the room
[19:42:07] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:42:10] *** Alex shows as "online"
[19:43:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:44:33] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[19:44:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:46:10] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:46:53] *** daniel has left the room
[19:46:56] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[19:47:01] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:47:24] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:47:34] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:48:58] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:49:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:49:58] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:50:34] *** jjrh has joined the room
[19:51:05] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:51:08] *** jjrh has joined the room
[19:51:13] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:51:45] *** jjrh has joined the room
[19:56:21] *** fp-tester has left the room
[19:58:55] *** daniel has left the room
[19:58:59] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:00:09] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:00:59] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:01:43] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:02:02] *** fp-tester shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:09:56] *** fp-tester shows as "online"
[20:10:16] *** daniel has left the room
[20:10:56] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:11:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:13:42] *** goffi has joined the room
[20:17:57] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:18:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:18:23] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[20:19:32] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[20:23:01] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[20:23:13] *** Alex shows as "online"
[20:25:07] *** Alex has left the room
[20:27:25] *** Alex has joined the room
[20:36:55] *** Guus has left the room
[20:37:12] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[20:38:32] *** zinid has left the room
[20:38:52] *** goffi has left the room
[20:39:40] *** Kev shows as "online"
[20:40:06] *** efrit has joined the room
[20:44:07] *** Alex has left the room
[20:44:38] *** McKael shows as "online"
[20:46:10] *** dwd shows as "online"
[20:47:38] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[20:47:41] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[20:50:46] *** fp-tester shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:51:10] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:53:28] *** fp-tester shows as "online"
[20:53:55] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[20:53:58] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[20:54:04] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:54:58] *** emxp has left the room
[20:55:54] *** Guus has left the room
[20:59:11] *** fp-tester shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:59:52] *** fp-tester shows as "online"
[21:01:09] *** Kev shows as "away"
[21:01:10] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[21:01:24] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[21:02:29] *** Guus shows as "online"
[21:06:14] *** emxp has joined the room
[21:07:43] *** Guus has left the room
[21:07:43] *** Guus has left the room
[21:08:06] *** daniel has left the room
[21:08:11] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:08:11] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[21:10:45] *** Guus has joined the room
[21:15:18] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[21:15:18] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[21:15:33] *** efrit has left the room
[21:15:38] *** daniel has left the room
[21:16:34] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:18:06] *** jcbrand has joined the room
[21:19:27] *** jubalh has joined the room
[21:20:35] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[21:21:17] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[21:21:20] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[21:24:11] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[21:26:33] *** nyco has left the room
[21:26:39] *** nyco has joined the room
[21:27:23] *** Valerian has left the room
[21:30:04] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:32:16] *** dwd shows as "online"
[21:33:56] *** Valerian has joined the room
[21:35:12] *** lumi has left the room
[21:35:13] *** lumi has joined the room
[21:35:15] *** lumi shows as "online"
[21:35:15] *** lumi shows as "online"
[21:36:42] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:38:41] *** jubalh has left the room
[21:39:45] *** daniel has left the room
[21:40:12] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[21:40:14] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:41:06] *** Guus has left the room
[21:44:19] *** Guus has joined the room
[21:46:32] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[21:51:11] *** Guus has left the room
[21:51:54] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:56:40] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[21:57:01] *** jere has left the room
[21:57:09] *** jere has joined the room
[21:58:27] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[21:58:27] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[22:01:08] *** Guus has joined the room
[22:01:15] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[22:03:49] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[22:04:17] *** jubalh has joined the room
[22:04:25] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[22:04:28] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[22:07:12] *** blabla has joined the room
[22:07:35] *** efrit has joined the room
[22:07:35] *** Guus has left the room
[22:11:00] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[22:11:59] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:12:06] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:15:26] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[22:16:36] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[22:18:26] *** Guus has joined the room
[22:18:43] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[22:21:00] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[22:22:03] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:24:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[22:25:18] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:25:20] *** jjrh has joined the room
[22:25:20] *** Guus has left the room
[22:27:19] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:27:25] *** jcbrand shows as "online"
[22:27:49] *** jcbrand has left the room
[22:28:31] *** jjrh has joined the room
[22:30:41] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:30:54] *** jjrh has joined the room
[22:32:36] *** Guus has joined the room
[22:33:12] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:33:15] *** jjrh has joined the room
[22:33:48] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:34:19] *** jjrh has joined the room
[22:34:42] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[22:37:58] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:37:59] *** Guus has left the room
[22:38:06] *** Guus has joined the room
[22:38:27] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:38:33] *** jjrh has joined the room
[22:43:28] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[22:43:29] *** jubalh has joined the room
[22:43:40] *** dwd shows as "online"
[22:47:37] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[22:48:42] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[22:50:20] *** lumi has left the room
[22:50:22] *** lumi has joined the room
[22:55:23] *** jcbrand has left the room
[22:56:48] *** SamWhited has left the room
[22:58:41] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[22:59:27] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[23:00:24] *** lumi has left the room
[23:00:45] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[23:13:35] *** Guus has left the room
[23:13:36] *** Guus has joined the room
[23:21:16] *** tux has left the room
[23:21:27] *** jjrh has left the room
[23:21:30] *** jjrh has joined the room
[23:22:39] *** fp-tester has joined the room
[23:39:08] *** Zash has left the room
[23:39:52] *** Zash has joined the room
[23:51:26] *** waqas has left the room
[23:55:06] *** efrit has left the room
[23:55:48] *** SamWhited has joined the room
[23:58:07] *** Valerian has left the room