Friday, November 24, 2017
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
November
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
    1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:01:52] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[00:03:11] *** zinid has left the room
[00:10:29] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:10:33] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[00:10:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:11:24] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[00:12:11] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:12:17] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[00:16:25] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[00:16:35] *** efrit has left the room
[00:23:29] *** Holger has left the room
[00:23:34] *** Holger shows as "online"
[00:24:58] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[00:25:02] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[00:29:41] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[00:29:58] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[00:31:22] *** nyco has left the room
[00:31:26] *** nyco has joined the room
[00:33:49] *** uc has joined the room
[00:38:08] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[00:38:12] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[00:46:36] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:46:41] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[00:47:11] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[01:01:26] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[01:01:39] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[01:01:43] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[01:15:04] *** Tobias has joined the room
[01:25:00] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[01:28:27] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[01:33:19] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[01:33:22] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[01:35:10] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[01:46:10] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[01:51:45] *** daniel has left the room
[01:51:49] *** daniel has joined the room
[01:57:01] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[01:59:26] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[02:09:22] *** Valerian has left the room
[02:09:42] *** Valerian has joined the room
[02:22:03] *** bra shows as "online"
[02:24:53] *** Zash has left the room
[02:37:53] *** Valerian has left the room
[02:37:58] *** Valerian has joined the room
[02:41:08] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[02:48:57] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[02:51:56] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[02:52:15] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[02:52:20] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[02:54:48] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[02:58:20] *** Valerian has left the room
[03:09:44] <Link Mauve> Ge0rG, and everyone else, https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/index.php?title=Easy_Group_Chats&curid=12&diff=9796&oldid=18
[03:14:44] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[03:14:46] *** bra shows as "xa" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[03:21:19] *** SamWhited has left the room
[03:21:26] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[03:23:08] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[03:33:58] *** Zash shows as "online"
[03:35:28] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[03:53:26] *** Zash has left the room
[04:08:16] *** tux has left the room
[04:08:19] *** tux has joined the room
[04:32:49] *** daniel has left the room
[04:33:06] *** daniel has joined the room
[04:34:13] *** uc has joined the room
[04:40:22] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[04:40:30] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[04:41:09] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[04:41:15] *** Syndace has joined the room
[04:41:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[04:42:02] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[05:16:01] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[05:16:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:17:04] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:17:30] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:18:34] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:18:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:22:16] *** uc has joined the room
[05:26:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:27:26] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:30:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:30:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:33:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:33:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:36:34] *** uc has joined the room
[05:41:22] *** uc has left the room
[05:41:33] *** uc has joined the room
[05:45:27] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:45:40] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:51:38] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[05:51:38] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[05:52:31] <zinid> MattJ: nobody has stolen your approach, you don't have it implemented
[05:52:40] *** mimi89999 has joined the room
[05:52:51] *** uc has joined the room
[05:53:20] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[05:53:37] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:54:07] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:55:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:56:40] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:01:57] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:02:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:03:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:03:53] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:04:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:06:06] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:12:35] *** goffi has joined the room
[06:16:29] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[06:23:19] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:23:35] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:24:35] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:29:52] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:30:16] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:30:20] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:31:19] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:32:18] *** zinid shows as "dnd"
[06:33:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:34:36] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:35:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:35:49] *** uc has joined the room
[06:39:08] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:40:27] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:44:11] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:56:35] *** intosi has joined the room
[06:57:28] *** blabla has joined the room
[06:57:28] *** blabla shows as "online"
[06:59:39] *** uc has left the room
[06:59:51] *** uc has joined the room
[07:00:50] *** edhelas shows as "online"
[07:01:55] *** edhelas has left the room
[07:10:50] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[07:16:04] *** jcbrand has joined the room
[07:20:45] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:26:54] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[07:30:33] <jonasw> Link Mauve, +1
[07:30:33] *** arc has left the room
[07:31:11] <jonasw> I still have no good idea how to glue all the layers together in my client to actaully be able to implement that chain of fallbacks :/
[07:31:54] *** arc has joined the room
[07:33:59] <zinid> my thoughts exactly when I try to implement new cool xmpp things: calling hooks in unexpected places is annoying
[07:34:27] <zinid> for example, dealing with messages forks and carbons is a nightmare
[07:34:46] <jonasw> zinid, you should involve yourself in the Message Routing 2.0 discussion, if you aren’t already
[07:34:52] <jonasw> things might in fact get simpler
[07:35:07] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:35:21] <jonasw> I always wonder whether this perceived complexity is from my inexperience with 1Mloc+ projects or if this is specific to the IM domain or if this is specific to the XMPP domain
[07:36:39] *** Kev has joined the room
[07:36:42] <zinid> I think that's because of paradigms change
[07:36:47] *** Kev shows as "online"
[07:36:56] *** Kev shows as "away"
[07:36:57] <jonasw> you mean existing code having hardship with adapting to the new situations?
[07:36:59] <zinid> we used to have simple chatting where you don't need to *synchronize*
[07:37:07] <zinid> no, I mean IM paradigm
[07:37:29] <zinid> now we face the problem which is in fact data *synchronization*
[07:37:43] <zinid> take a look at mam and carbons
[07:37:50] <zinid> those are clearly replica transfers
[07:37:55] <jonasw> sure
[07:38:11] <zinid> so I would suggest to implement this replica layer first
[07:38:22] <zinid> but I have no idea how to make the transition :/
[07:41:02] <zinid> I also think XML is not the best way to exchange replicas, lol
[07:41:34] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[07:43:12] <zinid> anyway, we can invent new and shiny IM 2.0, but how to make the transition?
[07:43:25] <zinid> that's why I virtually don't discuss the topic
[07:43:30] <zinid> I have no ideas
[07:43:32] <jonasw> zinid, there have been very concrete proposals
[07:43:57] <zinid> jonasw: I didn't find the solution with ancient servers
[07:44:09] <zinid> I mean I didn't see such proposal
[07:44:28] <jonasw> (using Bind 2.0 as a signal for "use IM 2.0 rules" and some s2s protocol to make serves negotiate that between them, PLUS and here’s where your ancient servers come into play, fallback to the existing Hints for Carbons and MAM by writing them explicitly into the messages when transferring to IM 1.0 domains)
[07:45:05] <zinid> fuck yeah, much easier :D
[07:45:18] <jonasw> much easier than what?
[07:45:31] <zinid> [10:26:12] <jonasw> things might in fact get simpler
[07:45:36] <zinid> what did you mean here? :)
[07:45:57] <zinid> I see only more complexity, it looks for me new servers need to maintain old and new behaviour
[07:46:01] <jonasw> zinid, inside the IM 2.0 domain, you’d see much simpler rules for archiving and carbons than what we currently have
[07:47:29] <zinid> probably, but those rules still suck in the sense of replica synchronization
[07:47:37] <jonasw> do they?
[07:47:41] <zinid> for example eventual consistency is not guaranteed at all
[07:47:45] <jonasw> isn’t its
[07:47:47] <jonasw> isn’t it?
[07:47:49] <zinid> you can lose messages easily
[07:47:51] <jonasw> how?
[07:47:55] <zinid> via s2s failures?
[07:48:08] <jonasw> stream management?
[07:48:17] <zinid> it doesn't solve all the problems
[07:48:21] <jonasw> sure, but many
[07:48:26] <zinid> no
[07:48:38] <zinid> it doesn't solve a problem with server outage for significant time
[07:48:40] <jonasw> and also, the current discussion is mostly about different clients on the same account
[07:48:46] <jonasw> do you think it should be extended to different accounts?
[07:48:47] <zinid> typically the message is buffered for 5 minutes
[07:49:04] <jonasw> on server outage with significant time I’d expect message loss, it’s as simple as that
[07:49:07] <zinid> yes, I know what about the current discussion ;)
[07:49:20] <jonasw> the sender would get an error back, it’s a rather clear situation?
[07:49:44] <zinid> jonasw: well, I have quite some experiences in database design and I would say consistency should be guaranteed even with huge outage
[07:50:10] <zinid> jonasw: yes, it will receive error back, then what? the recipient loses the message forever
[07:50:42] <jonasw> it is clear to the sender that the recipient has never seen the message
[07:50:55] <jonasw> or that the message was never even sent
[07:51:02] <zinid> yeah, that's not how eventual consistency works ;)
[07:51:03] <jonasw> I find it consistent.
[07:51:03] *** SamWhited has left the room
[07:51:19] <jonasw> both nodes end up to "know" the "message was not sent" state
[07:51:21] <zinid> you face inconsistent state and you need to resolve it *eventually*
[07:51:30] <jonasw> (the sender explicitly by seeing the error, the recipient implicitly by not seeing the message)
[07:51:47] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:51:51] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:51:52] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:51:55] <zinid> no, recipient node might know jack shit
[07:52:17] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:52:23] <zinid> due to unexpected failures
[07:52:27] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:52:31] <zinid> this is acceptable in p2p computing for example
[07:52:40] <zinid> and is tolerated
[07:52:43] <zinid> but not in xmpp ;)
[07:52:48] *** SamWhited has joined the room
[07:53:07] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:53:27] *** bra shows as "online"
[07:53:45] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:55:27] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:56:55] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:58:00] <zinid> distributed databases even have anti-entropy technics to deal with rotten bits (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_rot), but let's say we don't need this in xmpp (at least so far)
[07:58:18] *** daniel has left the room
[07:58:24] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:59:12] *** arc has left the room
[07:59:14] *** arc has joined the room
[08:00:19] <zinid> I find matrix approach very decent in this regard, however their use of http polling and json is annoying
[08:02:51] *** Syndace has left the room
[08:02:54] *** Syndace has joined the room
[08:03:19] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:04:01] *** nyco has left the room
[08:04:19] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:04:25] *** Guus has left the room
[08:04:26] *** Guus shows as "online"
[08:05:25] <Holger> Exactly.
[08:06:50] <zinid> yeah, the idea is great, implementation is shit
[08:07:24] <zinid> I still think servers should not replicate, it should be done peer-to-peer
[08:07:46] <zinid> servers could maintain replicas, but this is not required
[08:08:21] *** nyco has joined the room
[08:11:07] <Holger> The replicas are just caches in Matrix I think. At least I don't see why servers couldn't just ditch and later re-fetch them.
[08:11:36] <zinid> probably, I don't know all the details
[08:11:55] *** Guus has left the room
[08:14:23] <zinid> but look, this is much easier to fetch replicas p2p: when you become available you ask for replicas of your contacts (possessing the last seen message id)
[08:14:32] <zinid> you don't even need stream management queues for this
[08:14:57] <jonasw> except that you wouldn’t want your phone to drain its battery on syncing other peoples messages
[08:15:30] <zinid> jonasw: yes, so replication servers are needed, so they can reply to such replica requests by themselves (without client involvement)
[08:15:55] <jonasw> at which point you’re ditching the p2p approach and we’re kind-of back to "ask for MAM on your server"
[08:16:05] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:16:06] *** daniel has left the room
[08:16:14] <zinid> no, I can disable this feature on my server
[08:16:47] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:17:15] <zinid> but this can be implemented via MAM, yes
[08:17:30] <zinid> we already have this for groupchats
[08:17:38] <zinid> why contacts are different?
[08:17:52] <jonasw> see above?
[08:18:03] *** daniel has left the room
[08:18:07] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:18:15] <zinid> what exactly do you mean? MAM should be considered as just another replica or cache
[08:18:24] <jonasw> I mean the power consumption issue.
[08:18:26] <zinid> of course there can be tons of replicas, so?
[08:18:48] <zinid> what issue if you ask your server to maintain replicas?
[08:18:49] <jonasw> I don’t see how that would work, discovery and security-wise.
[08:19:01] <jonasw> I don’t have any issue with that, it is simply MAM
[08:19:13] <zinid> I don't find it less secure than current approach
[08:19:20] <jonasw> anyways, gotta go, I already typed too much today (hand injury) :(
[08:19:44] <zinid> jonasw: this is kinda "enchanced" mam :)
[08:21:43] *** marc has joined the room
[08:22:00] *** daniel has left the room
[08:22:05] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:22:07] *** blabla has left the room
[08:24:21] *** marc shows as "online"
[08:24:21] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[08:25:45] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:30:58] *** Tobias has left the room
[08:31:08] *** Tobias has joined the room
[08:35:09] *** ralphm has left the room
[08:40:34] *** Holger has left the room
[08:40:41] *** Holger shows as "online"
[08:44:20] *** bra shows as "xa" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[08:44:58] *** jubalh has joined the room
[08:45:34] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:46:11] *** daniel has left the room
[08:46:14] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:46:29] *** sonny has left the room
[08:46:33] *** sonny has joined the room
[08:50:23] *** tux shows as "online"
[08:53:36] *** edhelas has left the room
[08:53:42] *** edhelas has joined the room
[08:53:57] *** Alex has joined the room
[08:54:54] *** Alex shows as "online"
[08:55:21] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[08:56:11] *** daniel has left the room
[08:56:17] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:57:54] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:59:01] *** ralphm has left the room
[08:59:51] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[09:01:18] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[09:01:19] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:01:58] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:02:01] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[09:02:29] *** Guus has left the room
[09:08:35] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[09:09:35] *** uc has left the room
[09:09:37] *** arc has left the room
[09:09:48] *** uc has joined the room
[09:11:41] *** arc has joined the room
[09:16:48] *** ralphm has left the room
[09:22:15] *** jubalh has left the room
[09:24:46] *** daniel has left the room
[09:25:22] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:25:57] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:28:31] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[09:32:43] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:32:43] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[09:33:43] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:37:41] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[09:38:45] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:38:45] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[09:39:59] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[09:41:10] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:44:47] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:44:47] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[09:47:11] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:52:47] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[09:53:04] *** jubalh has left the room
[09:53:31] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[09:56:18] *** nyco has left the room
[09:58:19] *** nyco has joined the room
[09:58:59] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[10:01:10] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:01:20] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:04:03] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[10:07:03] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:12:10] *** uc has left the room
[10:12:27] *** uc has joined the room
[10:14:02] *** daniel has left the room
[10:14:07] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:19:17] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[10:19:18] *** uc has left the room
[10:20:37] *** uc has joined the room
[10:26:53] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[10:32:40] *** Holger has left the room
[10:33:02] *** uc has left the room
[10:33:09] *** Holger shows as "online"
[10:33:17] *** uc has joined the room
[10:36:22] *** intosi has left the room
[10:36:22] *** intosi has joined the room
[10:38:35] *** daniel has left the room
[10:38:45] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:39:15] *** Zash shows as "online"
[10:39:17] *** Zash shows as "online"
[10:40:21] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:45:13] *** Guus shows as "online"
[10:45:19] *** jubalh has joined the room
[10:47:38] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:50:47] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Leave"
[10:50:49] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Leave"
[10:51:00] *** jcbrand has left the room
[10:52:06] *** Kev has left the room
[10:57:16] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[10:58:49] *** @Alacer has left the room
[10:58:49] *** waqas has left the room
[11:03:05] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[11:03:54] *** Alex has left the room
[11:09:28] *** iiro.laiho has joined the room
[11:13:05] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[11:15:18] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[11:15:24] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[11:17:43] <Link Mauve> “07:54:06 jonasw> on server outage with significant time I’d expect message loss, it’s as simple as that”, people coming from email would be sad to hear that, it’s been a solved problem for a long time there.
[11:17:58] *** iiro.laiho shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:18:08] <jonasw> Link Mauve, when you have a long outage, emails will bounce just like IM messages do
[11:18:27] <jonasw> the term "long" is relative and may be different for IM and Email
[11:19:50] <Zash> It's *Instant* Messaging after all
[11:21:08] *** iiro.laiho shows as "online"
[11:23:10] <zinid> Zash: nah, it's data replication now, that's the problem
[11:23:25] <Zash> Yeah :(
[11:23:26] <zinid> and we're trying to solve this replication problem via IM
[11:23:46] *** daniel has left the room
[11:23:50] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:23:51] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[11:25:01] <Link Mauve> Hence the huge whiteboard I’ve been promised for years. :(
[11:25:18] <jonasw> FOSDEM?
[11:25:35] <Zash> Yes! Brussels 2018 - The Whiteboardening
[11:25:36] *** intosi shows as "online"
[11:25:41] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[11:25:48] <jonasw> sounds like I really need to sort that out
[11:26:10] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[11:26:10] *** intosi has left the room
[11:27:19] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:28:18] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:34:08] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[11:34:45] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:34:51] *** daniel has left the room
[11:34:55] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:35:10] *** Tobias has left the room
[11:35:21] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[11:36:29] *** iiro.laiho shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:39:21] *** blabla has joined the room
[11:39:22] *** blabla shows as "online"
[11:43:30] *** blabla has left the room
[11:44:37] *** daniel has left the room
[11:44:47] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:45:42] *** jere has joined the room
[11:46:28] *** iiro.laiho shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[11:46:38] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[11:46:51] *** pep. has left the room
[11:46:52] *** pep. has left the room
[11:47:40] *** pep. has joined the room
[11:48:04] *** pep. shows as "online"
[11:48:11] *** daniel has left the room
[11:48:17] *** jcbrand has joined the room
[11:48:20] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:49:46] *** sonny has left the room
[11:49:50] *** sonny has joined the room
[11:51:38] *** Alex has joined the room
[11:51:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:51:56] *** Alex shows as "online"
[11:54:41] *** Zash has left the room
[11:55:48] *** Zash shows as "online"
[11:55:48] *** pep. has left the room
[11:56:29] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:58:13] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[12:02:01] *** pep. has left the room
[12:06:29] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[12:11:10] *** lumi has joined the room
[12:13:14] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:14:41] <Link Mauve> Let’s use Markdown! https://statuscode.ch/2017/11/from-markdown-to-rce-in-atom/
[12:17:05] *** Holger has left the room
[12:17:35] *** Holger shows as "online"
[12:17:35] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[12:17:37] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[12:18:34] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:19:01] *** Alex has left the room
[12:19:16] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[12:21:29] <jonasw> ah, they failed to sanitize HTML :)
[12:21:45] <jonasw> the HTML support in the markdown component is left enabled intentionally
[12:22:14] *** intosi has joined the room
[12:22:33] <zinid> html inside markdown looks like a really insane idea ;)
[12:22:44] <jonasw> zinid, markdown is specified as an HTML superset, IIRC
[12:22:45] <Zash> markdown is defined as a html superset
[12:22:54] <Zash> too slow
[12:23:14] <zinid> wat?
[12:23:22] <zinid> a html superset?
[12:23:26] <jonasw> yup
[12:23:31] <zinid> what does that mean?
[12:23:39] <jonasw> every valid HTML document is a valid markdown document
[12:23:53] <zinid> oh shi~
[12:24:00] <jonasw> (even though I’m not sure that’s actually true, there are probably some corner casesr
[12:24:04] <jonasw> (even though I’m not sure that’s actually true, there are probably some corner cases)
[12:24:07] <jonasw> but it’s intended to be that way
[12:24:37] <zinid> actually, every text is a valid markdown document, no?
[12:24:42] <jonasw> yes
[12:24:53] <zinid> so markdown is a text superset, okay
[12:25:02] <jonasw> but the semantics of a valid html document interpreted as markdown are the same of the html docmuent interpreted as html
[12:25:53] *** daniel has left the room
[12:25:59] *** daniel shows as "online"
[12:26:53] *** daniel has left the room
[12:27:10] *** Alex has joined the room
[12:28:56] <zinid> nevertheless, the article is interesting
[12:29:32] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:33:41] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[12:35:31] *** pep. has joined the room
[12:38:14] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[12:39:32] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:40:13] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:40:37] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[12:45:03] *** jcbrand has left the room
[12:45:58] *** jubalh has joined the room
[12:50:13] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:58:11] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:07:39] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:16:16] *** lumi has left the room
[13:16:17] *** lumi has joined the room
[13:16:20] *** lumi shows as "online"
[13:16:20] *** lumi shows as "online"
[13:17:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[13:18:10] <jonasw> I wonder what those german guys asking about XEP-0392 are about.
[13:18:20] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:18:21] *** jubalh has joined the room
[13:18:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[13:19:08] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:19:16] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[13:19:20] *** McKael has joined the room
[13:19:32] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[13:19:47] <daniel> jonasw, what do you mean? that's the jsxc developer
[13:20:03] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:20:04] *** Syndace has left the room
[13:20:05] <daniel> the client that is mostly known for its integration into nextcloud
[13:20:07] *** Syndace has joined the room
[13:20:43] <jonasw> daniel, and the other three?
[13:20:44] <jonasw> *two
[13:21:03] *** xnyhps has left the room
[13:21:04] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[13:21:10] <daniel> christian schudt is the babbler developer
[13:21:12] *** iiro.laiho shows as "online"
[13:21:16] <jonasw> (not saying that it’s a bad thing or something, I was just wondering why suddenly)
[13:21:20] <jonasw> you know people, it’s scary
[13:21:23] <daniel> and klaus herberth is i believe also jsxc
[13:21:33] *** xnyhps has left the room
[13:22:01] <jonasw> yeah, Klaus Herberth has jsxc in his mail adress, so I assumed you were talking about him when referring to "the jsxc developer"
[13:22:55] <daniel> I see. I was originially talking about marcel because that's the first email i saw
[13:23:05] <jonasw> ah ok
[13:23:15] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[13:23:35] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[13:24:44] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[13:25:04] *** valo has joined the room
[13:26:49] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[13:27:32] *** Syndace has left the room
[13:27:35] *** Syndace has joined the room
[13:28:13] <daniel> Fwiw I don't know any of these people. I just know of them. Babbler is super awesome.
[13:28:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:30:37] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[13:32:42] *** bra shows as "online"
[13:33:01] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[13:34:17] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[13:34:22] *** daniel has left the room
[13:36:07] *** @Alacer has left the room
[13:38:07] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[13:39:22] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[13:42:09] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[13:43:07] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[13:43:07] *** intosi has left the room
[13:43:39] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[13:44:03] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[13:44:59] *** Alex has left the room
[13:45:41] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[13:50:43] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[13:50:54] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[13:52:03] <pep.> jonasw, https://ppjet.bouah.net/poezio-colors.png one use case of why using the bare JID for colors is meh
[13:52:27] <pep.> nick would be better in that case. These are all IRC users, going through a bridge (Gluttony)
[13:52:35] <mathieui> pep., jonasw already said it on the list
[13:52:43] <pep.> Ah I have to catch up
[13:56:05] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[13:57:03] *** jubalh has joined the room
[13:58:47] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[14:03:00] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[14:03:20] <zinid> too many germans in jabber
[14:03:35] <mathieui> says the russian
[14:03:55] <Zash> too many humans
[14:05:21] <zinid> mathieui: russians in jabber can only write spam bots and talk shit, mostly ;)
[14:06:52] *** nyco has left the room
[14:07:02] *** nyco has joined the room
[14:19:13] *** iiro.laiho shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:19:38] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:19:41] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[14:19:58] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[14:20:25] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:20:28] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[14:20:51] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[14:23:58] *** stefandxm has left the room
[14:29:13] *** iiro.laiho shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:29:36] *** jubalh has joined the room
[14:37:57] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:38:43] *** jubalh has joined the room
[14:41:20] *** jere has joined the room
[14:42:22] *** Alex has joined the room
[14:43:25] *** intosi has joined the room
[14:43:26] *** intosi shows as "online"
[14:44:24] *** McKael shows as "online"
[14:47:57] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:49:47] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:49:52] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[14:51:09] *** lovetox has joined the room
[14:52:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[14:59:35] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[15:00:44] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:01:30] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[15:03:03] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:04:52] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[15:10:11] *** burrblurr has joined the room
[15:12:35] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:13:10] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:13:50] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[15:15:18] *** iiro.laiho shows as "online"
[15:19:26] *** lumi has joined the room
[15:20:11] *** jubalh has left the room
[15:22:35] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:28:43] *** jubalh has joined the room
[15:30:39] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[15:33:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:36:39] *** jubalh has left the room
[15:37:02] *** Valerian has joined the room
[15:37:54] *** Holger has left the room
[15:38:03] *** Holger shows as "online"
[15:41:58] *** @Alacer has left the room
[15:45:03] *** jubalh has joined the room
[15:45:48] *** jubalh has left the room
[15:46:39] *** Alex has left the room
[15:47:38] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[15:47:40] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[15:47:47] *** jubalh has joined the room
[15:48:21] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:49:49] *** iiro.laiho has left the room
[15:49:54] *** iiro.laiho has joined the room
[15:49:57] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[15:50:03] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:50:17] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[15:50:20] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:50:40] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:50:47] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[15:50:47] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:50:47] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:50:54] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[15:50:54] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:50:55] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:50:57] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[15:50:59] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:51:00] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[15:51:02] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:52:55] *** jere has joined the room
[15:53:57] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:54:26] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:54:32] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:54:51] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[15:55:20] *** Tobias has left the room
[15:56:10] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[15:56:18] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[15:59:47] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:59:51] *** ralphm has left the room
[16:01:49] *** ralphm has left the room
[16:02:11] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[16:02:27] *** Valerian has left the room
[16:03:13] *** jubalh has left the room
[16:03:39] *** stefandxm has left the room
[16:04:12] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:04:30] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:04:52] *** Valerian has joined the room
[16:05:58] *** zinid has left the room
[16:05:58] *** zinid shows as "dnd"
[16:06:48] *** daniel has left the room
[16:07:00] *** daniel has joined the room
[16:08:12] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[16:08:13] *** iiro.laiho has left the room
[16:08:17] *** iiro.laiho has joined the room
[16:10:19] *** bra shows as "xa" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[16:10:20] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[16:13:43] *** Valerian has left the room
[16:14:30] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:15:24] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:22:10] *** intosi shows as "online"
[16:22:21] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[16:22:50] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[16:22:50] *** intosi has left the room
[16:23:59] *** iiro.laiho shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:25:01] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:25:33] *** Syndace has left the room
[16:25:36] *** Syndace has joined the room
[16:30:31] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[16:30:52] *** daniel has left the room
[16:31:52] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[16:32:18] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:33:59] *** iiro.laiho shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:35:11] *** waqas has joined the room
[16:40:38] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:42:33] *** Valerian has joined the room
[16:43:10] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[16:43:21] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:45:46] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[16:46:45] *** marc has left the room
[16:46:47] *** iiro.laiho shows as "online"
[16:47:47] *** daniel has left the room
[16:47:53] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:48:38] *** Zash has left the room
[16:49:09] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:49:49] *** Syndace has left the room
[16:49:53] *** Syndace has joined the room
[16:54:07] *** Zash has left the room
[16:54:33] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:54:41] *** Zash has joined the room
[16:58:40] *** Zash has left the room
[17:00:31] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[17:02:06] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:07:33] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[17:07:34] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[17:10:01] *** iiro.laiho shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:12:04] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:13:14] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:14:47] *** daniel has left the room
[17:14:52] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:18:37] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:20:00] *** iiro.laiho shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:23:08] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[17:23:31] *** pep. shows as "online"
[17:24:04] *** stefandxm has left the room
[17:24:10] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:25:57] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[17:28:03] *** jubalh has left the room
[17:31:20] *** Valerian has left the room
[17:31:39] *** McKael shows as "online"
[17:33:20] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[17:34:28] *** jubalh has joined the room
[17:35:01] *** Valerian has joined the room
[17:35:54] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[17:36:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:38:53] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:40:16] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:42:13] *** iiro.laiho shows as "online"
[17:44:01] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[17:47:01] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[17:47:02] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[17:49:15] *** iiro.laiho has left the room
[17:51:21] *** SamWhited has left the room
[17:51:55] *** lumi shows as "online"
[17:53:08] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:53:35] *** Zash has joined the room
[17:53:37] *** Zash shows as "online"
[17:55:36] *** burrblurr has joined the room
[17:57:25] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[17:58:32] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:59:01] *** nyco has left the room
[17:59:04] *** nyco has joined the room
[18:03:47] *** blabla has joined the room
[18:03:47] *** blabla shows as "online"
[18:05:30] *** blabla has left the room
[18:05:35] *** blabla has joined the room
[18:05:35] *** blabla shows as "online"
[18:10:15] <Flow> daniel, do you want a MAM namespace bump?
[18:10:45] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:10:49] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[18:11:12] <daniel> Flow: no?!
[18:11:30] <Flow> or, in other words, isn't a MAM namespace bump required for your proposed excluded-types?
[18:13:13] <Flow> or is the service required to return an error on unknown fields? which would be good I think
[18:14:03] <daniel> Flow, i think the additional filter thingy is off the table anyway
[18:14:23] <daniel> we just gonna adjust the rules
[18:14:38] <Flow> ohh :( I like the idea of additional flexible filters which are discoverable
[18:15:14] <daniel> Flow, custom filters are already part of the protocol
[18:15:18] <Flow> and not specified in xep313
[18:15:33] <Ge0rG> what about making MAM responses type=headline?
[18:15:36] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:15:51] <Ge0rG> Aaaand changing the default configuration to "N/A"
[18:15:56] <Flow> daniel, right, but there is currently no specification for message type filters
[18:16:28] <Flow> Ge0rG, I can't follow, but it's likely because it has been a long week
[18:17:02] <Flow> I believe that MAM archives should be allowed to also archive groupchat messages FWIW
[18:17:02] <daniel> if they were specified they wouldn't be custom, no?
[18:17:34] <Ge0rG> Flow: type=headline would better reflect the ephemeral status of MAM responses, and the rationale for "N/A" is in https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2017-November/033762.html (c)
[18:18:04] <Ge0rG> Flow: why do you believe that way?
[18:18:52] <Flow> daniel, probably, but does not matter, I want a mandatory set of filter mechanism which can be extended by discoverable additional filters, so that we can experiment which filters are a good idea and which are unnecessary
[18:18:57] <daniel> Ge0rG, am i reading this mail correctly you are planning to come to the summit?
[18:19:02] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[18:19:03] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[18:19:13] <Flow> Ge0rG, most for the same reasons that Kev said
[18:19:25] <Ge0rG> Flow: I disagree with Kev on that.
[18:19:50] <Ge0rG> daniel: I can't promise that.
[18:19:56] <Ge0rG> I really can't.
[18:21:12] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[18:21:16] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[18:21:20] <Flow> Ge0rG, My vision is to give MAM services maximal freedom regarding what to archive, and clients should be given the filtering mechanisms they need
[18:21:44] <Ge0rG> Flow: what about using a separate XEP for all of that?
[18:22:04] <Flow> Ge0rG, for the f
[18:22:12] <Flow> iltering mechs?
[18:22:29] <Flow> (the optinal filtering mechs)
[18:22:30] <Zash> What gets stored should be up to server policy. What gets can be described by a XEP
[18:22:32] <Ge0rG> Flow: no, for things that go beyond normal im client message archival.
[18:22:55] <Ge0rG> Zash: implementation defied!!!!
[18:22:56] <Flow> Ge0rG, wouldn't that be an MAM alternative?
[18:23:20] <Ge0rG> Flow: what about using the same backend storage but not return everything to normal MAM requests?
[18:23:40] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:23:52] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[18:24:07] <Flow> Ge0rG, if you still have the possiblity to return groupchat and probably all other types of messages, then that would be fine in my book
[18:24:28] <Flow> err, to return if the client asked for it
[18:24:46] <Ge0rG> Flow: the server is free to store anything it wants, as longs as it only returns what's written in MAM on a normal MAM query
[18:24:51] <daniel> Flow, it's not my XEP; i could live with the filtering on query proposal. (also I believe storing groupchat in the personal archive has downsides that make it not really fit for use). I believe existing implementations would ignore unknown form fields. thus introducing new ones could be done without a NS bump
[18:26:14] <daniel> so to answer you question no I'm not planning a NS bump. I'm not planning anything
[18:26:39] <Flow> daniel, guess my initial question was if you think that your proposal 2) would require a NS bump
[18:27:24] <Flow> I'm not sure if the service ignoring unknown fields means that you can avoid a namespace bump
[18:28:02] <Ge0rG> really, let's get rid of namespace bumps altogether.
[18:28:18] <daniel> i generally tend to be on the rather not bump if it doesn't cause issues with existing implementations faction
[18:28:39] <Flow> Yeah for unexpected behavior
[18:28:43] <Ge0rG> I'm sure it's possible to replace almost every ns bump with a feature.
[18:29:04] <Flow> Ge0rG, well then it's ok
[18:29:17] <Ge0rG> but in this specific case, I don't want to extend MAM.
[18:29:19] <daniel> but existing implementations need to change anway because they a) need to start actutally storing groupchats b) add a database field for the type to make the query efficent
[18:30:45] <Ge0rG> are there provisions in MAM to full-body-search for messages?
[18:30:50] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:31:17] <Flow> Ge0rG, I don't think so
[18:31:36] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[18:31:37] <Ge0rG> Flow: so what's your use case again?
[18:32:01] <Flow> And while at it, I want to point out that K9 did for years client local searches. It took a while until they implemented server side IMAP searches
[18:32:47] <Ge0rG> Flow: that's actually an argument against gc in mam
[18:34:18] <Flow> No, it's just an observation regarding the importance of a server side search feature
[18:34:32] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:34:37] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:37:53] <daniel> Flow, maybe make your argument for groupchat in the user archive on the list
[18:38:10] <Ge0rG> yes please
[18:38:13] <daniel> not sure if the relevant people are following this discussion
[18:38:19] <daniel> in here
[18:40:20] *** Valerian has left the room
[18:40:44] <zinid> seems like the list = this room
[18:40:49] <zinid> all the same people around
[18:40:59] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[18:40:59] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[18:41:27] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:41:31] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[18:41:33] <daniel> zinid, i'm not sure people read the backlog here. i certainly don't
[18:41:34] <Ge0rG> zinid: there is a formal difference.
[18:41:36] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:41:51] <Ge0rG> zinid: Council needs to catch up on standards@
[18:41:54] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[18:42:01] <zinid> daniel: I'm reading backlog when I have nothing to do ;)
[18:42:13] <zinid> daniel: actually I rant here only when I'm bored :)
[18:42:38] <Ge0rG> zinid: then it looks like you need a {boy,girl,other}friend
[18:44:17] <zinid> Ge0rG: nah thanks, I'm good with my wife and son
[18:44:55] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Hacking"
[18:46:23] *** jcbrand has joined the room
[18:49:34] *** blabla has left the room
[18:52:02] *** Valerian has joined the room
[18:53:20] *** Valerian has left the room
[18:53:29] *** Valerian has joined the room
[18:54:08] *** Valerian has left the room
[18:55:07] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:56:27] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:56:29] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[18:56:39] <Guus> when is that lottery drawing?
[18:56:55] <Guus> which was it again
[18:56:59] <Guus> euro something?
[18:58:25] <Ge0rG> Guus: https://www.euro-millions.com/results
[18:58:37] <Guus> tx
[18:58:46] <Guus> no results yet
[18:59:01] <Zash> 41 minutes?
[18:59:15] <Guus> ah, 21 CET (that's in an hour)
[18:59:19] <Ge0rG> Now I wonder if somebody can hack that web page.
[18:59:57] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[19:00:26] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[19:01:28] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:03:01] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[19:03:29] <zinid> what the fuck is this?
[19:05:31] <Guus> zinid, could you be more specific and less explicit please?
[19:05:53] <Guus> crap, crying kid, afk
[19:06:16] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:07:21] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[19:08:39] <zinid> Guus: no
[19:08:48] <zinid> other questions?
[19:10:59] *** @Alacer has left the room
[19:10:59] *** waqas has left the room
[19:11:28] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:12:37] <Guus> It wasn't a question, it was a request: please act in a civil manner here - it makes for a better atmosphere, which helps us to achieve more.
[19:13:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:14:35] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:17:35] *** daniel has left the room
[19:17:39] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:18:31] *** daniel has left the room
[19:18:47] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:19:48] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[19:19:52] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:19:56] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[19:20:13] *** jcbrand has left the room
[19:22:06] *** Valerian has joined the room
[19:26:43] *** Zash has left the room
[19:27:20] <zinid> Guus: I act as I want, stop teaching me, I really don't care how you think one should act
[19:32:12] <Guus> zinid: I'm sorry to hear that.
[19:32:17] *** Zash has joined the room
[19:33:06] <zinid> Yeah, people have different views, deal with it 😀
[19:34:09] *** marc shows as "online"
[19:34:23] *** sonny has joined the room
[19:35:04] <zinid> Really, if you cannot tolerate words like crap or shit you're better off not using internet
[19:36:34] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:38:38] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[19:39:27] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[19:40:58] *** Zash shows as "online"
[19:41:02] *** Zash shows as "online"
[19:41:08] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:41:14] *** Zash has left the room
[19:41:15] *** Zash shows as "online"
[19:41:16] *** Zash shows as "online"
[19:41:44] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:45:37] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:47:07] *** jubalh has joined the room
[19:48:19] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:49:52] <Ge0rG> zinid: this place is not made for your crap and shit, but for constructive discussions in the context of XMPP. There are plenty of other places on the internet where you can behave like an a*hole and make friends that way...
[19:50:24] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[19:51:19] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:51:21] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[19:52:28] <zinid> Ge0rG: oh, I started to think you will not chime in 😂
[19:52:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[19:53:01] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:53:46] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[19:53:46] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[19:53:47] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:53:52] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[19:54:52] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:54:57] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[20:01:26] <Ge0rG> zinid: I've got a decade worth of channel operator experience in Germany's worst IRCNet channel, I have a sixth sense for trolling time... 😜
[20:02:55] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[20:03:13] <Guus> In other news: the Euro-millions draw is in progress!
[20:03:17] <Guus> animated gifs and all!
[20:03:50] <Guus> I'll give calculation a shot, but it'd be good to have someone else verify my results.
[20:04:08] <Guus> (although technically, Alex will probably sign-off anyway?)
[20:04:11] <zinid> Ge0rG: so euro millions is a constructive discussion?
[20:04:45] *** daniel has left the room
[20:04:51] <zinid> "in the context of XMPP"
[20:05:01] <Guus> zinid: ah, that's were you were getting at earlier. Yes, it is, actually.
[20:05:24] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:05:33] <Guus> the board member vote were in a tie. The tie-breaker is a procedure that takes the outcome off this euro millions draw.
[20:06:17] <zinid> I didn't get anything
[20:06:36] <zinid> tie, producer, draw, wtf
[20:07:08] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:07:50] <zinid> ah, procedure
[20:07:53] *** daniel has left the room
[20:08:01] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:08:31] <Guus> "that's where you were getting at" <-- I now understand the confusion.
[20:08:48] <zinid> I'm so excited, much wow
[20:09:11] <Guus> most background is here: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/2017-November/008695.html
[20:11:04] <zinid> not interested, I don't care about your policy and your invented rules
[20:11:27] <zinid> I'm interested in standards
[20:11:37] *** daniel has left the room
[20:11:47] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:12:12] <Guus> suit yourself. We can definately use your help with the standards!
[20:12:14] <zinid> whoever you will elect, jabber will continue degrading, I'm 99% sure
[20:13:13] <zinid> Guus: I don't write documents, too much effort, 95% of time I will spend with english-russian dictionary
[20:13:31] <zinid> or russian-english, whatever ;)
[20:15:16] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[20:15:51] <Guus> Don't worry, there are lots of ways you can help out with the standards that don't require writing stuff down.
[20:16:36] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[20:18:18] *** burrblurr has joined the room
[20:22:20] <zinid> this looks like a sect
[20:24:28] <Ge0rG> zinid: people are having fun with technical protocols to ensure fairness of an election. If you compare that to elections in the USA, where districts are rebuilt to optimize vote results, or your country, where the president gets elected with 115%, it's a really great process... 😝
[20:24:46] <Guus> Nah. We're all friends. Here, have a sip of my kool-aid.
[20:26:37] <zinid> Ge0rG: not sure what technical protocols you mean. like your election bot, lol?
[20:26:53] <Ge0rG> Guus: that's what Jim Jones said...
[20:27:13] *** daniel has left the room
[20:27:34] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[20:28:12] <Ge0rG> zinid: if you weren't so busy cursing, you'd already know
[20:28:44] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:29:24] <zinid> yeah, if I was interested
[20:29:42] <zinid> but I don't give a shit, luckily ;)
[20:30:51] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[20:31:40] <Ge0rG> zinid: you are bored anyway, give it a try
[20:34:06] <Guus> Results are in! By my calcultion: 19 - 24 - 28 - 30 - 50 -> 19.24.28.30.50./ -> f2507b627edc74d540e7cb747138ed7ee8e19d4458f9db5bfd3a92b5c97a9541 -> Nÿco
[20:34:32] *** daniel has left the room
[20:34:38] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:35:51] *** lovetox has left the room
[20:37:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:39:04] *** daniel has left the room
[20:39:09] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:41:07] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[20:43:06] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:46:00] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[20:47:08] *** lumi shows as "online"
[20:49:32] *** McKael shows as "online"
[20:50:53] *** Valerian has left the room
[20:51:00] *** Valerian has joined the room
[20:51:39] *** Valerian has left the room
[20:56:14] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:56:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:57:20] *** Valerian has joined the room
[21:05:07] *** lskdjf has left the room
[21:05:22] *** Alex has joined the room
[21:05:54] *** Alex has left the room
[21:05:57] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[21:07:04] *** McKael shows as "online"
[21:12:01] *** goffi has left the room
[21:15:46] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[21:17:37] *** arc has left the room
[21:17:38] *** arc has joined the room
[21:18:16] *** arc has left the room
[21:18:25] *** arc has joined the room
[21:22:06] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[21:26:32] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:27:23] *** pep. shows as "online"
[21:27:38] *** Valerian has left the room
[21:30:39] *** valo has left the room
[21:30:44] *** valo has joined the room
[21:37:49] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:39:21] *** tim@boese-ban.de has left the room
[21:39:21] *** arc has left the room
[21:40:51] *** Valerian has joined the room
[21:42:26] *** daniel has left the room
[21:42:33] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:43:10] *** arc has joined the room
[21:46:30] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:46:32] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[21:50:20] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:52:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:52:47] *** sonny has joined the room
[21:52:57] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[21:56:46] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[21:57:14] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[21:57:43] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:58:50] *** marc has left the room
[21:58:58] *** jubalh has joined the room
[21:59:08] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[22:00:18] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:00:23] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[22:00:23] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[22:02:25] *** Zash has left the room
[22:02:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:02:53] <ralphm> zinid: if you can't be bothered to behave like a normal person, please leave. I'm serious.
[22:03:37] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:04:24] <zinid> ralphm: who are you?
[22:04:51] <ralphm> I'm the XSF Chair
[22:05:02] <zinid> wow
[22:06:08] <zinid> what if I tell no?
[22:06:09] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:07:01] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[22:08:35] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:09:11] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[22:09:40] <ralphm> I'm not sure what your thing is, but I've been getting complaints. We like this community to be inclusive and I don't appreciate our hospitality to be abused. By asking such a question, it appears that you don't care. If I'm wrong about this, please let me know.
[22:10:11] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:10:56] <zinid> yeah, I already understood that you build only the community you like, people who you like to see, without any technical merits
[22:11:03] *** marc has left the room
[22:11:13] <zinid> so how far did this policy bring you?
[22:11:28] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[22:11:28] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[22:11:32] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:11:35] <zinid> xmpp is a degrading protocol which is nobody want to implement and even here about
[22:11:44] *** Syndace has joined the room
[22:11:45] <ralphm> Feel free to leave if you think we are doomed
[22:11:52] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[22:11:54] <zinid> nah, I like here
[22:12:13] *** arc has left the room
[22:12:15] *** arc has joined the room
[22:12:42] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:13:09] *** arc has left the room
[22:13:48] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:13:51] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[22:15:53] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[22:17:22] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:18:19] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:18:24] *** arc has joined the room
[22:19:57] <ralphm> Well, good. We welcome discussions on technical matters, in a civilized matter. It may all be funny for you to repeat how bad you think the protocol, our procedures, or the people in our community are. I don't find it acceptable. If you insist on keeping that up, I will simply remove you from the XSF maintained venues like this room.
[22:22:01] <zinid> ralphm: why don't you remove yourself? I don't even know you, what did you do for xmpp? I don't remember you discussing the protocol. Why do you have power to remove developers from this room?
[22:22:48] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:23:28] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[22:25:09] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[22:26:18] <ralphm> I'd you can't be bothered to even look that up, that's on you. This room is hosted by the XMPP Standards Foundation. I'm its Chairman. It's pretty much similar to how I would throw out a guest in my house if he starts bothering the other guests.
[22:27:20] <zinid> ralphm: ah, so you're a boss here
[22:27:53] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[22:27:54] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[22:28:00] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[22:28:14] <ralphm> If you need that kind of confirmation, yes.
[22:29:11] <zinid> ralphm: so your task is to ban developers you don't like, boss?
[22:30:29] <ralphm> zinid: yes. Bye.
[22:32:00] *** ralphm has left the room
[22:32:08] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:33:41] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:34:00] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:34:11] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:37:12] <Steve Kille> ralphm: good job!
[22:37:22] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[22:37:54] <ralphm> I had one job, I guess.
[22:38:18] <Steve Kille> some things the world can do without
[22:39:31] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[22:39:44] <ralphm> I can only hope he fairs better in other settings, so banning him from the world seemed excessive. For now.
[22:40:17] *** valo has joined the room
[22:40:57] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:41:00] <ralphm> Fares, even. Yay auto-correct.
[22:42:31] <Guus> To bad it came to this. Always feels like a loss to me.
[22:43:25] <Guus> Not sure what the provocation was about.
[22:44:15] <SamWhited> It doesn't take much provocation to make him try to insult you. It would be more of a loss if new people see that kind of abuse and don't get involved because he'll just call them an idiot.
[22:46:02] <ralphm> I've had multiple complaints, and I'd like to think I'm a reasonable and generally nice guy. I also read back some previous discussions. Before, other people asked nicely. I did a final attempt. He keeps on trolling. Fine.
[22:48:21] <ralphm> I've suggested improvements to other people before, and those people have changed their ways. I can sometimes be annoyed, but this is simply intentionally riling up people, and I don't think we need to tolerate this.
[22:48:48] <Guus> Oh, I didn't want to to imply you were unreasonable.
[22:49:19] <ralphm> Good. You are actually close-by.
[22:50:01] <Guus> Close-by?
[22:50:22] <ralphm> Physically close. As in within a few kilometers.
[22:51:03] <ralphm> Sorry I didn't come by last weekend. How was t-dose?
[22:51:39] <Guus> ralphm: uneventful, sadly.
[22:52:08] *** jjrh has left the room
[22:52:13] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[22:52:57] <ralphm> Right. They have never seemed to live up to their goal of being a bit like FOSDEM-in-the-fall. Too bad.
[22:55:32] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:55:55] *** Arc has joined the room
[22:57:32] *** Valerian has left the room
[22:57:44] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[22:57:56] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[22:59:34] *** lumi shows as "online"
[23:00:05] *** jjrh has left the room
[23:00:18] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[23:00:57] *** Valerian has joined the room
[23:08:03] <Holger> Ugh, WTF.
[23:08:26] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[23:08:59] <Holger> I don't think "what the fuck is this?" was even remotely meant to be a provocation.
[23:10:19] *** jere has joined the room
[23:10:30] <Holger> I mean I can't speak for zinid but this quite obviously reads like "what on earth is this Euro-millions thing?" to me.
[23:11:10] <Holger> And I'm not sure he called an individual an idiot.
[23:11:18] <ralphm> If it was just that, it would be just fine. I say things like that all the time
[23:11:56] <SamWhited> He's called multiple people idiots and been asked to stop, though he might not have used those words this time.
[23:12:13] <Holger> Aha.
[23:12:57] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[23:12:57] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[23:13:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[23:16:45] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[23:16:45] *** Arc shows as "online"
[23:17:14] <Guus> Holger: I only asked him to be civil, and stopped when he made clear he had no intention.
[23:19:44] <Guus> I've made a point of not escalate things. Sadly, that did not work.
[23:21:10] <Holger> I see him using flippant slang. As for the substance, I see him ranting against how this community does things. I totally understand how he won't make friends that way.
[23:22:03] <Guus> I'm perfectly fine with arguments and dont mind expletives at all - but I do think it's important to have civil discourse.
[23:22:05] <Holger> But I won't agree with this as a reason for a ban.
[23:24:02] <SamWhited> He was asked to stop multiple times by different people including Guus, me, George, and probably others and only responded with abuse. Then someone who actually has authority politely warned him and he still didn't listen, I'm not sure what else there is to do besides a ban.
[23:24:12] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[23:25:08] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[23:25:22] <SamWhited> If he tells a new person that their spec or ideas are garbage they're not likely to come back; no community needs that kind of toxic behavior, no matter how smart the person is.
[23:27:06] <ralphm> Holger: just read back the logs for a few days. He's more than welcome if he can behave like a normal person.
[23:27:30] <ralphm> I'm going for some sleep now.
[23:29:23] *** nyco has joined the room
[23:29:56] <Guus> Goodnight
[23:41:10] *** jere has joined the room
[23:44:51] <Holger> SamWhited: Yes, different people use different tone, and asking them to change it tends to not work that well in my experience.
[23:45:54] <Holger> How many days of backlog am I supposed to read to find the reason for the ban? I skimmed through November now. I found some purely technical comments on various details, some ranting on MIX, EXI, Twitter, Java, the XSF membership/council election process, and our priorities. I guess I overlooked something.
[23:46:52] <Holger> Whatever, this is your show, I'm not even a member. I'll shut up.
[23:47:57] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[23:47:57] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[23:57:07] *** jjrh has left the room
[23:57:11] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[23:58:54] *** Zash shows as "online"
[23:59:08] *** Valerian has left the room
[23:59:16] *** Valerian has joined the room
[23:59:18] *** Valerian has left the room