Saturday, November 25, 2017
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
November
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
    1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
     
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:01:27] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:01:31] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[00:04:54] *** Zash has left the room
[00:07:44] *** Valerian has joined the room
[00:08:11] *** Zash has left the room
[00:08:16] *** Zash has joined the room
[00:09:38] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:09:38] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:09:48] *** sonny has joined the room
[00:11:39] *** arc has left the room
[00:11:40] *** arc has joined the room
[00:12:03] *** Valerian has left the room
[00:13:35] *** Zash shows as "online"
[00:13:37] *** Zash shows as "online"
[00:15:23] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:15:23] *** Arc shows as "online"
[00:20:36] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:21:02] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:22:28] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:22:28] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:23:22] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[00:23:27] *** arc has left the room
[00:23:28] *** arc has joined the room
[00:23:35] *** efrit has left the room
[00:24:43] *** Holger has left the room
[00:24:51] *** Holger shows as "online"
[00:24:53] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[00:26:00] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:26:34] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:27:22] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:27:22] *** Arc shows as "online"
[00:28:11] *** arc has left the room
[00:28:12] *** arc has joined the room
[00:28:29] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[00:28:59] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[00:29:03] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:30:59] *** Zash has left the room
[00:31:34] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:32:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:35:32] *** arc has left the room
[00:35:34] *** arc has joined the room
[00:37:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:38:06] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:38:48] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[00:51:36] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:51:36] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:53:12] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[00:53:12] *** Arc shows as "online"
[00:55:47] *** ralphm has left the room
[00:55:53] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[00:56:17] *** blabla has joined the room
[00:56:17] *** blabla shows as "online"
[00:58:10] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:58:13] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:00:13] *** blabla has left the room
[01:02:24] *** jjrh has left the room
[01:02:27] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:06:10] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[01:06:10] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[01:12:55] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[01:12:55] *** Arc shows as "online"
[01:58:16] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[01:59:20] *** lumi shows as "online"
[02:02:58] *** lumi has left the room
[02:18:38] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[02:18:38] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[02:18:44] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[02:18:44] *** Arc shows as "online"
[02:24:32] *** bra shows as "online"
[02:49:38] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[02:49:38] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[02:49:53] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[02:49:53] *** Arc shows as "online"
[02:52:14] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[02:52:29] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[02:52:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[03:07:54] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[03:18:31] *** sonny has joined the room
[03:24:52] *** jjrh has left the room
[03:25:38] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[03:25:44] *** jjrh has left the room
[03:25:53] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[03:28:01] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[03:28:10] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[03:28:18] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[03:42:33] *** jjrh has left the room
[03:43:06] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[03:50:38] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[03:52:12] *** uc has joined the room
[04:10:57] *** tux has left the room
[04:11:00] *** tux has joined the room
[04:13:52] *** jjrh has left the room
[04:14:09] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[04:14:09] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[04:17:18] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[04:22:39] *** jere has joined the room
[04:32:42] *** matlag has left the room
[04:33:09] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[04:33:09] *** Arc shows as "online"
[04:35:25] *** jjrh has left the room
[04:36:35] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[04:45:33] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[04:45:34] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[04:45:39] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[04:45:39] *** Arc shows as "online"
[04:47:26] *** Zash shows as "online"
[04:54:15] *** jjrh has left the room
[04:55:06] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[04:55:16] *** jjrh has left the room
[04:55:27] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[04:58:47] *** Zash has left the room
[05:06:19] *** jjrh has left the room
[05:07:22] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[05:16:17] *** jjrh has left the room
[05:16:41] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[05:17:41] *** arc has left the room
[05:17:42] *** arc has joined the room
[05:24:54] *** arc has left the room
[05:24:55] *** arc has joined the room
[05:48:25] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[05:48:25] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[05:49:22] *** mimi89999 has joined the room
[05:50:06] *** uc has left the room
[05:50:09] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[05:50:09] *** uc has joined the room
[05:53:34] *** matlag shows as "online"
[06:01:21] *** arc has left the room
[06:01:22] *** arc has joined the room
[06:03:55] *** Arc has left the room
[06:04:31] *** Arc has joined the room
[06:05:14] *** arc has left the room
[06:05:21] *** Zash has left the room
[06:10:07] *** arc has joined the room
[06:18:35] *** zinid has joined the room
[06:24:21] *** zinid has joined the room
[06:33:08] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[06:33:08] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[06:36:52] *** zinid shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto Status (idle)"
[06:38:50] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[06:38:50] *** Arc shows as "online"
[06:46:27] *** zinid shows as "online"
[06:48:25] *** goffi has joined the room
[06:59:49] *** jjrh has left the room
[07:00:08] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[07:00:49] *** jjrh has left the room
[07:01:06] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[07:03:37] *** Guus has left the room
[07:03:43] *** Guus shows as "online"
[07:06:01] *** arc has left the room
[07:06:02] *** arc has joined the room
[07:11:37] *** arc has left the room
[07:11:40] *** arc has joined the room
[07:13:40] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[07:24:03] *** Arc has left the room
[07:30:34] *** valo has left the room
[07:30:43] *** valo has joined the room
[07:36:54] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:36:57] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:37:29] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:37:35] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:37:38] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:38:09] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:46:48] *** arc has left the room
[07:46:49] *** arc has joined the room
[07:53:08] *** Arc has joined the room
[07:56:40] *** Syndace has left the room
[07:56:43] *** Syndace has joined the room
[08:02:49] *** zinid shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto Status (idle)"
[08:04:37] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[08:04:42] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[08:05:51] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[08:10:35] *** bra shows as "online"
[08:21:19] *** zinid shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto Status (idle)"
[08:23:07] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:23:21] <Syndace> So, starting off a topic that might be even worse than banning someone: Why is the discussion about omemo completely silent? I remember a few weeks (months?) ago someone wrote a mail asking about a technical change in the protocol to move from a signal-only technique to some wide-spread alternative and I was really hyped to contribute to this discussion but then nobody replied and the thread just died.

So what's the thing about omemo? Why is there no heated discussion? I see two pull requests in the xsf repo just gathering dust.
[08:29:07] *** McKael shows as "online"
[08:29:41] <Syndace> Oh I should add I have'nt read the chats in about two weeks, I may have missed something recently.
[08:31:06] <Flow> What Holger said. Besides Zinids choice of words, I did not notice him insulting someone.
[08:32:58] <Flow> Syndace, I guess there current OMEMO implementations are happy with they way they are
[08:33:09] <Flow> *the current
[08:35:45] <Flow> At least I have no incentive to work on an OMEMO-NEXT which just changes a crypto primitive for another one, when I think the current primitive is perfectly fine for all use cases.
[08:37:31] *** Arc has left the room
[08:38:54] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:40:33] <Steve Kille> I thought that Ralph made a good call here
[08:41:59] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:42:27] <Syndace> Huh, that answer is not satisfying. The current stadard just tells people to use lib signal without having any actual alternative or even knowing the insides of the protocol. I thought the goal was to move away from libsignal asap, as it is GPL3'd and not maintained by us. If we ever decide to change something about omemo that does not comply to the way lib signal currently works we have a lot of trouble.
[08:43:16] <Flow> Steve Kille, I think the ban was at least borderline. Asking someone to be polite, sure. But otherwhise people could just "/ignore Zinid"
[08:43:33] <ralphm> I don't understand. There's a difference between a protocol and a library in terms of licensing.
[08:43:54] <ralphm> Flow: FWIW, I already lifted the ban
[08:44:13] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[08:44:21] <Flow> Syndace, That is why we had Andy's PR which was an attempt to move away from "protobufs as libsignal does them" towards "those are the fields and this is how we put them into XML"
[08:44:23] <ralphm> If he keeps it up, though, I'll waste not so many words as yesterday.
[08:45:35] <Flow> ralphm, yeah, there is a difference between a protocol and a library in terms of license, but the fact that all libsignal impls are GPL'ed was brought up again and again
[08:46:14] <Flow> it was especially XEdDSA which is part of libsignal
[08:46:21] <ralphm> Sure. So either someone does a clean room implementation with a different license, or something new happens. This is nothing new?
[08:46:22] <Flow> IIRC
[08:46:50] <Flow> ralphm, yeah, but why make something new if XEdDSA is an open specification
[08:46:58] <ralphm> We've marked specifications as 'historical' instead of 'standard' before for reasons like that.
[08:47:28] <ralphm> Flow: I agree. But then the only obstacle is, well, doing something?
[08:47:48] <Flow> ralphm, I'm sorry, only had my first cup of coffee, I can't follow
[08:47:53] <Syndace> Flow, not something new but something that is included in 90% of all crypto-libraried you can find in the wil
[08:48:04] <Syndace> wild*
[08:48:26] <Syndace> instead of something that does the same and has just one single implementation out there
[08:48:49] <Flow> Syndace, there are multiple
[08:49:50] <ralphm> Flow: my point is that a library license is not necessarily interesting for defining a protocol. It might be for adoption, though. If someone cares enough, that problem goes away. If people just keep complaining instead, it doesn't.
[08:50:20] <Flow> ralphm, I think you are saying what I've been saying the whole time
[08:50:30] <ralphm> I happy to be in violent agreement.
[08:50:33] <ralphm> I'm
[08:51:23] <Syndace> Flow, are you sure it's not all just ports of the singal implementation? I'm having a hard time finding another one on google.
[08:51:47] <Flow> But unfortunately, the unwritten (?) "there can only be once experimental XEP for $foo" philosophy has stopped the effort to standardize OMEMO based on the open signal specifications
[08:52:13] <Flow> Syndace, it's still multiple implementations, no?
[08:52:56] <daniel> Syndace: do you have stakes in this? Do you maintain a client or something? If so implement something, spec something and propose this
[08:53:37] <daniel> In my experience change does come from discussing things to dead but from implementing and specing it out
[08:53:53] <daniel> *doesn't
[08:54:08] <Flow> "change does come from discussing things", hehe if that where true we had a long of change in XMPP-land ;)
[08:54:47] <Flow> yeah, but daniel is essentialy right, to many specs, and that includes MIX, make to much spec progress without an accompaning impl
[08:55:09] <daniel> *cough* OK
[08:55:13] <daniel> OX
[08:55:23] <daniel> Dann it i can't type. I need coffee
[08:55:44] <ralphm> Flow: I don't recall such a policy. We've had multiple competing experimentals at a time before.
[08:55:45] <Flow> daniel, hmm, well but I think the basics of OX are far less complex than e.g. MIX or OMEMO
[08:56:19] <Syndace> daniel, agreed, altough one of the pr's already includes the change I'm proposing.

So what do you all think:
If I publish a library which does omemo encryption without xeddsa first and THEN try to start the discussion again, will it change things and be more likely to actually move away from libsignal?
[08:56:33] <Flow> and there are at least two prototypcial impls I'm aware of
[08:56:38] <ralphm> in fact most of the current building blocks have had multiple different proposals. Disco (Browse, Agents), PubSub, Jingle (SI).
[08:56:48] <Flow> but yes, more OX impls for the greater good!
[08:57:10] <ralphm> Usually the driving force should be _running code_
[08:57:21] <Flow> ralphm, then we can continue working on what Andy proposed?
[08:57:52] <ralphm> I don't think anyone can (or would want to) block working on competing standards.
[08:58:19] <ralphm> For interop, though, eventually, one should prevail.
[08:58:40] <Flow> Cool, then we could also start work on a MIX competitor
[08:59:47] <daniel> > daniel, hmm, well but I think the basics of OX are far less complex than e.g. MIX or OMEMO
Sure. I just meant to say it's not implemented
[08:59:49] *Flow hands daniel a virtual cop of coffee while he gets a physical one for himself
[09:01:02] *** Kev has left the room
[09:01:15] <ralphm> You wouldn't be the first. The Erlang Solutions people have worked on MUC Light. I personally think that MIX is the way to go to eventually.
[09:01:52] <ralphm> MIX is of course comprehensive and there are a lot of moving parts before getting there.
[09:02:15] <ralphm> Making more focused protocols is always easier.
[09:02:19] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:04:07] <Flow> ralphm, yep, the MUC light situation come to my mind too. And I agree that ideally everyone would be working on the same thing. But for such a crucial building block as persisent groupchat, I wouldn't want to bet all my money on a single horse
[09:04:08] <ralphm> The thing I like about MIX most are a) relating occupants on bare JIDs, b) persistent occupancy, even if not online, c) extensible orthogonal streams
[09:04:16] <daniel> Flow, i'm personally came to believe that forward secrecy is totally unnecessary and kills UX and I would prefer something like OX actually. but I don't want to be the single driving force for something like this again. plus I lot of the change i'm trying to push with OMEMO (like proper access control on pubsub) will benefit OX as well.
[09:06:28] <ralphm> My pet peeve about, for example, Slack, is integrations messing up conversation in the same channel. With MIX an integration would be on a separate node, and a client can make choices on how to represent such streams in a different way.
[09:06:38] <Flow> daniel, good to hear that you would probably be interessted in OX for Conversations. I plan to do a OX sprint around march next year (our research project has an evaluation in january, so most people are panicing and there is a lots of stuff to do until then)
[09:07:11] <Flow> daniel, lovetux also wanted to improve they way keys are announced and stored
[09:07:24] <daniel> in OX?
[09:07:29] <Flow> yep
[09:07:34] <daniel> with a meta note?
[09:07:42] <Flow> so waiting after that has been spec'ed may be a good idea
[09:07:43] <Flow> yep
[09:07:47] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[09:07:49] *** daniel has left the room
[09:07:52] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:08:23] <Flow> (given we talk about the same meta node approach)
[09:08:41] <daniel> the real issue by the way is that we have to retrieve all pep notifications again and again on every login (instead of them landing in MAM for example) - meta or not that a lot of traffic
[09:09:04] <Flow> daniel, you can configure PubSub nodes to not do that
[09:09:20] <daniel> a login on my personal device with tens of people having avatars and omemo is really really expensive these days
[09:09:45] <Flow> (see my discussion in here with lovetux a few days ago)
[09:10:05] <daniel> Flow, will they be sent instead (and sent to mam) even if i'm offline?
[09:10:18] <daniel> because just not receiving updates at all doesn't solve the situation
[09:10:20] <ralphm> PEP is just a profile of PubSub with very specific use cases. If you want other behaviour for nodes-on-user-accounts, that's totally fine.
[09:10:47] <ralphm> And of course they can integrate just fine with MAM
[09:10:53] <daniel> ralphm, a) i know b) tell that to the prosody developers :)
[09:11:02] <ralphm> MattJ: ^
[09:11:05] <ralphm> :D
[09:11:18] <Flow> daniel, you want to search xep60 for pubsub#send_last_published_ite
[09:11:21] <Flow> m
[09:11:47] <Flow> daniel, I think so
[09:12:15] <Flow> (not sure about MAM, probably depends on the MAM service impl)
[09:12:28] *** jubalh has joined the room
[09:13:52] <daniel> in any case; making pep a proper pubsub child (in the implementations) and being able to configure something like access control and send_last_published_item and also storing them in MAM is some good preperation that OX, OMEMO and OMEMO-NEXT can all benefit from
[09:14:21] <daniel> thus far we haven't even managed to make publish_options work on all servers
[09:14:23] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[09:14:31] <daniel> at least we are getting there with ejabberd now
[09:14:43] <Flow> daniel, right but thats a spec vs impl thing
[09:15:13] <Flow> the only thing we can do from the spec side is to ensure that the required baseline profile is as minimalistic as possible
[09:15:18] <Flow> (looking at you MIX)
[09:15:59] <Flow> and that baseline should be ideally able to fullfil >85% of the use cases
[09:16:23] <daniel> Flow, yes sure. but I like to implement things in Conversations that will actually work so I need server side implementations
[09:17:31] <daniel> besides having access control would allow us to move bookmarks into pep and get other clients notified if one client changes things. imagine how great that would be if we could sync bookmarks across multiple devices in the year 2018
[09:17:49] <Flow> daniel, absolutely comprehensible
[09:18:18] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:18:44] *** Guus has left the room
[09:18:45] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:18:50] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[09:19:07] *Flow just noticed that at next Summit/FOSDEM, drumpf will be president for >1 y
[09:23:07] *** jubalh has left the room
[09:25:36] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:27:49] *** xnyhps has joined the room
[09:29:54] *** Guus has left the room
[09:31:42] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:31:46] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:31:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[09:34:47] *** zinid shows as "online"
[09:36:54] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:41:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[09:41:31] *** marc has joined the room
[09:41:42] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:41:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[09:44:22] *** marc shows as "online"
[09:44:45] *** daniel has left the room
[09:44:49] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:46:32] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:46:52] *** ralphm has left the room
[09:47:34] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[09:50:57] *** zinid shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto Status (idle)"
[09:55:30] *** zinid shows as "online"
[09:55:59] *** lumi has joined the room
[09:57:19] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[10:00:39] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:01:11] <zinid> > I think the ban was at least borderline
you cannot ban anyone in XMPP :)
[10:01:34] <zinid> and ignoring is not implemented, so, deal with it ;)
[10:05:04] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:07:13] *** Holger has left the room
[10:08:47] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[10:10:17] *** Holger shows as "online"
[10:10:19] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:10:44] <Flow> zinid, peozio supports /ignore (although I've never used it, and don't plan to do so)
[10:10:47] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[10:11:16] *** arc has left the room
[10:11:25] *** arc has joined the room
[10:11:40] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:11:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:13:50] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:14:07] *** daniel has left the room
[10:14:11] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:14:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:16:17] <zinid> Flow: nice
[10:17:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:21:22] *** daniel has left the room
[10:21:29] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:22:42] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:24:27] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:24:31] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:26:11] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[10:27:33] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[10:30:40] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[10:33:25] *** Alex has joined the room
[10:33:32] *** Alex shows as "online"
[10:33:58] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[10:35:16] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:37:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[10:40:12] *** Guus has left the room
[10:40:13] *** Guus shows as "online"
[10:43:08] *** zinid shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto Status (idle)"
[10:46:35] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[10:47:53] *** lumi shows as "online"
[10:50:05] *** zinid shows as "online"
[10:50:54] *** Guus has left the room
[10:52:28] *** Guus shows as "online"
[10:52:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:56:29] *** daniel has left the room
[10:56:36] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:03:30] <fippo> is there a new presence subscription spam wave?
[11:04:03] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:04:05] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[11:09:15] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:12:12] *** zinid shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto Status (idle)"
[11:12:43] <ralphm> I did get a bunch over last week
[11:12:53] <Ge0rG> fippo: ongoing right now
[11:14:00] <Alex> fippo: yes, denied already 20 subscriptions today
[11:14:15] <fippo> word + three digits as username... now sure if there is a pattern in the resource but i would not expect any
[11:14:20] <fippo> fun :-/
[11:14:26] <Alex> yes, same pattern here
[11:15:19] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[11:15:28] *** daniel has left the room
[11:15:31] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:19:19] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[11:19:50] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[11:19:57] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[11:21:27] <Guus> I appear to be on a different list then
[11:22:26] *** daniel has left the room
[11:22:35] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:22:39] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:22:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:26:25] *** blabla has joined the room
[11:26:26] *** blabla shows as "online"
[11:31:25] *** jere has joined the room
[11:32:11] *** zinid shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto Status (idle)"
[11:37:02] *** blabla has left the room
[11:52:29] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:53:13] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Hacking"
[11:54:05] *** Tobias has left the room
[11:56:55] *** daniel has left the room
[11:57:00] *** daniel shows as "online"
[12:02:06] *** goffi has left the room
[12:06:09] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[12:07:45] <MattJ> Ge0rG, master of all things XMPP 2.0, should headline/normal messages be archived?
[12:08:42] *** Zash has joined the room
[12:08:58] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:09:22] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[12:09:40] *** goffi has joined the room
[12:10:07] *** zinid shows as "online"
[12:12:15] *** tux shows as "online"
[12:12:30] *** jabberatdemo has joined the room
[12:12:41] <Ge0rG> MattJ: yes/no in my current opinion, but this is subject to other factors I haven't thought through yet
[12:13:01] <MattJ> Oh really
[12:13:12] <MattJ> I'd have thought yes/no if both would be different
[12:13:17] *** lumi shows as "online"
[12:13:32] <MattJ> headline is defined as transient, no offline storage, etc.
[12:13:47] <MattJ> *no/yes
[12:13:48] <Ge0rG> MattJ: right, no/yes
[12:13:49] <MattJ> ...
[12:14:00] <MattJ> Ok, we both made the same typo, that's ok then :)
[12:14:10] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:14:27] *** McKael shows as "online"
[12:14:28] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:14:32] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:14:39] <Ge0rG> MattJ: but it would make sense to decouple persistence from type
[12:15:48] <daniel> wouldn't the full jid / bare jid approach work as well?
[12:16:11] <Ge0rG> daniel: yes, it's my preferred approach
[12:16:24] <MattJ> Mine too
[12:16:32] <jonasw> Ge0rG, I heard you on council now ;-)
[12:16:47] <MattJ> But until we can find a sensible transition path to full/bare, I'm sadly living in reality
[12:17:04] <Ge0rG> I've also updated my slide deck with the rfc routing rules, as those are complex enough already
[12:17:19] <daniel> MattJ, if that's about 0313 i wouldn't touch the rules regarding headline
[12:17:31] <daniel> for now at least
[12:17:45] <jonasw> could we change 0313 to the full/bare thing sensibly after it moving to draft?
[12:17:54] <jonasw> it is based on message types currently, I think that could be considered as a breaking change
[12:17:56] <Ge0rG> MattJ: can we change the MAM response message type to headline please?
[12:18:23] <MattJ> But the MAM responses are sent to the full JID :)
[12:18:28] <Ge0rG> Yes
[12:18:54] <MattJ> jonasw, don't worry, I'm not planning on coding any rules into XEP-0313 (which is currently intentionally very light on rules)
[12:18:57] *** jabberatdemo has left the room
[12:19:08] <MattJ> other than I think we all agree that groupchat shouldn't be archived
[12:19:29] <Ge0rG> But there are servers in the reality you just mentioned that will reroute full JID normal messages
[12:19:52] <MattJ> which are those?
[12:20:05] *** Guus has left the room
[12:20:05] <MattJ> because I thought that was in the spec
[12:20:05] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:21:01] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:22:05] <Ge0rG> MattJ: ejabberd, because it broke message delivery for Gajim users
[12:22:28] <MattJ> 6120 says: "If the JID contained in the 'to' attribute is of the form <localpart@domainpart/resourcepart> and the user exists but there is no connected resource that exactly matches the full JID, the stanza SHOULD be processed as if the JID were of the form <localpart@domainpart>"
[12:22:40] <Ge0rG> I'm sure we are going to experience funny effects with MAM MUC queries on ejabberd
[12:23:27] <Ge0rG> Ge0rG [21:49]:
> So I've updated the "XMPP broken" presentation slides, including a screenshot. https://op-co.de/tmp/whats-wrong-with-xmpp-2017.pdf
MattJ: ^
[12:23:31] <MattJ> Ok, this section is more detailed: https://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6121.html#rules-localpart-fulljid
[12:23:46] <Ge0rG> There is a table of the relevant cases
[12:24:48] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[12:25:23] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[12:27:03] <MattJ> What's the case for MAM results having type="headline"?
[12:27:57] <Ge0rG> MattJ: the ejabberd inconsistency and also that headline messages are ephemeral
[12:28:47] <MattJ> I'm not updating the spec for an implementation bug
[12:29:09] <MattJ> and I agree that in hindsight, headline has cleaner semantics for these messages, but is it worth another namespace bump?
[12:30:15] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[12:30:22] <daniel> MattJ, are you going to accept my PR so jonasw can merge it before we are getting caught up in trying to fix $everything?
[12:30:33] <MattJ> daniel, yes, sure
[12:30:38] <jonasw> s/jonasw/$editor/
[12:31:02] <daniel> MattJ, Ge0rG maybe put the headline thing on a todo in case we will do another ns bump anyway for some other reason
[12:31:05] <MattJ> FWIW I started this conversation with an innocent question that is not at all related to updating XEP-0313
[12:31:21] <jonasw> what about todo lists in XML comments in the xep files themselves?
[12:31:31] <MattJ> I'm working on code at the moment
[12:31:51] <MattJ> jonasw, that happens to be what I do locally :)
[12:32:06] <jonasw> :)
[12:32:33] <daniel> regarding the headline thing; I would like to have a situation where pep publish notifitcation messages can go to mam but the resend on login messages don't
[12:32:53] *** Guus has left the room
[12:33:15] <daniel> i'm not sure if they are addressed to bare-jid / full-jid respectively
[12:33:18] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:33:44] *** tux shows as "online"
[12:38:03] <Ge0rG> MattJ, daniel: I'm not sure we really need a namespace bump for the type change. Most client implementations don't care about it anyway
[12:38:33] *** zinid has left the room
[12:38:36] <MattJ> Most? What about the ones that do? :)
[12:39:11] <Ge0rG> MattJ: those haven't implemented MAM anyway yet? 😁
[12:39:51] <Ge0rG> Okay, I have no idea which clients explicitly filter on message type.
[12:40:17] *** Alex has left the room
[12:40:46] *** xram has joined the room
[12:40:49] <Ge0rG> And you really don't want MAM responses to end up in offline storage, do you?
[12:41:13] <MattJ> No, but as I understand it, that will only happen on ejabberd due to a bug
[12:41:24] <MattJ> and even then, it's not the end of the world
[12:41:38] <MattJ> If the client uses queryid, it won't get confused, and will just ignore them
[12:41:47] <Ge0rG> MattJ: a server implementation can store incoming normal messages to offline as well
[12:41:57] <MattJ> That's not what your table says
[12:42:23] <MattJ> 6121: "For a message stanza of type "normal", "groupchat", or "headline", the server MUST either (a) silently ignore the stanza or (b) return an error stanza to the sender, which SHOULD be <service-unavailable/>. "
[12:42:48] <daniel> > regarding the headline thing; I would like to have a situation where pep publish notifitcation messages can go to mam but the resend on login messages don't
maybe that's more of an argument to make pubsub publish messages type=normal
maybe headline should never be stored anywhere. else we will loose the difference between normal and headline
[12:44:04] <Ge0rG> MattJ: what does prosody do?
[12:44:34] <Ge0rG> MattJ: oh, you are right
[12:44:52] <Ge0rG> I think we need a new message type 'system'...
[12:45:07] <MattJ> Ge0rG, let's not talk about Prosody :)
[12:45:18] <MattJ> (looks like it treats chat/normal the same here)
[12:45:23] <Ge0rG> Though I must admit it probably won't happen in this universe
[12:45:32] <MattJ> and in my head, they were equivalent, and only headline was not stored
[12:45:55] <Ge0rG> MattJ: I'm already glad I took the time to make this table
[12:45:57] <MattJ> But it's a trivial fix
[12:45:59] <MattJ> Me too
[12:46:13] <Ge0rG> MattJ: it will break users' expectations
[12:46:34] <MattJ> No, because no users use type=normal :)
[12:46:37] *** nyco has left the room
[12:46:46] <MattJ> and if they do, they have expectations of it breaking
[12:46:52] <Ge0rG> MattJ: you can ask Holger, he fixed it as well, and had to revert almost immediately
[12:47:13] <Ge0rG> MattJ: users have no idea about message type
[12:47:31] <Ge0rG> MattJ: all they care about is that suddenly prosody broke message delivery
[12:47:33] <MattJ> What clients other that Gajim and Psi allow you to send type=normal?
[12:47:46] <MattJ> *than
[12:48:02] *** nyco has joined the room
[12:48:14] <Ge0rG> MattJ: I have no idea
[12:48:47] <goffi> SàT allows it and use normal messages
[12:49:09] <MattJ> So three clients so far. How many of those will send type=normal to the full JID?
[12:49:16] <goffi> (haven't read the whole log, just the last few lines, so I'm not sure what this is about)
[12:49:35] <MattJ> goffi, the spec says that type=normal to a full JID should not be stored as an offline message
[12:49:42] <MattJ> if the resource is offline
[12:50:27] <goffi> it's technically possible to send to full jid from SàT using command line, but I don't think there is a reason why a user would do that.
[12:50:49] <Ge0rG> MattJ: gajim was accidentally sending normal to full JID.
[12:51:15] <goffi> but I though only headline message were not stored offline?
[12:51:18] <goffi> thought*
[12:51:19] <MattJ> goffi, "I don't think there is a reason why a user would do that" - https://xkcd.com/1172/
[12:51:30] <MattJ> goffi, I thought that too (and Prosody does that)
[12:51:35] <MattJ> But seems we were all wrong
[12:52:06] <MattJ> Ge0rG, ok, surely that must be in the case that the recipient is online?
[12:52:16] <MattJ> Ge0rG, don't tell me it sends to a full JID when they are offline
[12:52:30] <MattJ> -> I'm curious what Holger fixed, and how it was noticed so quickly
[12:52:33] <goffi> MattJ: forgot this one :D
[12:53:58] <goffi> for the record there is an experimental plugin in SàT which allows to send and read messages through an email client (MUA), and this is case message of type "normal" can be filtered to be only readable from email client.
[12:54:37] <Ge0rG> MattJ: it doesn't matter whether the user is offline at the time of sending because RACE CONDITIONS!!!1!
[12:55:15] <MattJ> Ge0rG, yes, but this race condition wouldn't happen that often
[12:58:54] <Ge0rG> MattJ: please ask Holger for the details, and maybe also lovetox
[13:03:46] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[13:03:48] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:04:41] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[13:06:15] <Ge0rG> MattJ: I know Holger linked to the revert commit in here, some weeks ago, but I'm on my mobile now, and haven't implemented search yet
[13:06:24] <MattJ> ok
[13:06:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:07:44] <Flow> why is it so important what MAM services store, isn't it more important what they return on a query?
[13:08:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:08:23] <MattJ> They can't return stuff they don't store
[13:08:35] <MattJ> and there is a cost to storing *everything*
[13:09:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:09:01] <Flow> I can see that groupchat messages should not be returned on normal client catch-up, but does that automatically mean xep313 must forbid services storing them?
[13:09:08] <MattJ> Given that nowadays we're into replicating everything to every client, the optimal path is that everything we want on every client is what is stored
[13:09:14] <MattJ> and what we don't want on every client is not stored
[13:09:23] *** Alex has joined the room
[13:09:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:09:52] <Flow> MattJ, of course there is a cost, but I want total freedom for MAM services regarding what to store
[13:10:29] <MattJ> Then what you're asking is for the MAM service to be able to store stuff that is "hidden" from a default query
[13:10:32] *** zinid has joined the room
[13:10:44] <MattJ> I think that would be fine
[13:10:46] <Ge0rG> Flow: that's exactly what I wrote to the ML yesterday
[13:11:00] <Flow> MattJ, not strictly, but yes
[13:11:25] <Flow> I believe the construction site should be the MAM query mechanism, not the archiving rules
[13:11:27] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[13:11:46] <Flow> Although I also don't like the current MAM version to require services to store groupchat messages
[13:11:50] <Ge0rG> I'm not sure if the wording in the XEP speaks about what's stored or what's returned, but there's some room for a xep that stores more and provides an extension to query for that
[13:12:55] <Ge0rG> Unless we can make MUC work on an account, kind of like MIX light, there is no way for account local MUC archives
[13:13:00] <MattJ> Flow, the current version doesn't require that
[13:13:35] <MattJ> Oh wait, it does
[13:13:43] <Flow> MattJ, A server SHOULD also include messages of type 'groupchat' that have a <body>
[13:13:51] <MattJ> Yeah, sorry, that's what we discussed on the list
[13:14:02] <MattJ> I'm still surprised at that text :)
[13:14:04] <Flow> MattJ, no worries, $stuff's complicated
[13:14:22] <MattJ> Daniel made a PR to fix it anyway
[13:14:34] <MattJ> so it'll be gone soon
[13:14:46] <Flow> MattJ, IIRC Daniel PR no requires MAM services to not store groupchat messages
[13:14:53] <Flow> which is also not good IMHO
[13:14:56] <MattJ> Heh
[13:15:04] <Flow> *now
[13:15:27] <Flow> But you should now best, because you just approved it ;)
[13:15:32] <Flow> *know
[13:15:42] <MattJ> I think what you want is sensible, but shouldn't be part of the default query
[13:16:05] <Flow> A server SHOULD NOT include messages of type 'groupchat' in a user archive
[13:16:12] <MattJ> so in a sense the spec should separate the idea of storing something, from returning it in a query
[13:16:20] <Flow> MattJ, exactly
[13:16:47] <MattJ> I'm totally fine with that, just figuring out how to cleanly word that will be tricky
[13:16:47] <Ge0rG> MattJ: yes please
[13:17:06] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:18:04] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:18:48] <MattJ> PRs welcome
[13:19:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:20:29] <MattJ> I'm currently working on restructuring Prosody's message delivery code to make XMPP 2.0 stuff easier (this is the ongoing side project that includes the rewrite of mod_smacks)
[13:20:34] *** lumi shows as "online"
[13:20:36] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:21:30] <MattJ> I'm fed up of missing messages from my wife because my phone battery was flat, and they got "successfully delivered" to poezio, which is online 24/7
[13:21:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:22:11] <marc> What's XMPP 2.0?
[13:22:25] <MattJ> Pretend I said something else
[13:22:26] <Ge0rG> MattJ: and this is why I'm using a separate account for my family communication for many years already
[13:22:38] <jonasw> marc, "Message Routing 2.0" is probably a more accurate term
[13:22:57] <jonasw> marc, there are a few issues with how XMPP message routing behaves with multiple clients online on the same account at different or the same times
[13:23:00] <MattJ> jonasw, but what a mouthful. We need a marketing term :)
[13:23:10] <jonasw> MattJ, sure, but we don’t need to market to marc, I think :)
[13:23:11] <marc> jonasw, ah okay, is this a XEP?
[13:23:14] <jonasw> marc, not yet
[13:23:21] <jonasw> marc, there’s some info on the wiki: https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/XMPP_2.0
[13:23:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:23:27] <jonasw> (which may be slightly outdated)
[13:23:32] <jonasw> and also a bunch of discussion on the mailinglist
[13:23:39] <Ge0rG> And my slide deck
[13:23:40] <MattJ> marc, most comprehensive source of information is: https://op-co.de/tmp/whats-wrong-with-xmpp-2017.pdf
[13:23:49] <Ge0rG> MattJ: thanks
[13:23:51] <marc> jonasw, MattJ thanks!
[13:26:26] <MattJ> marc, "XMPP 2.0" isn't anything formal, and doesn't exist. We're just doing some review of where we are, and where we are going, and what feasible changes we can make to the protocol to make everyone's lives easier
[13:27:17] <MattJ> Back when XMPP/Jabber began, most of the popular IM networks would disconnect you from one location if you logged on from a new location
[13:27:58] <MattJ> XMPP supported multiple connections long before everyone had smartphones, laptops, etc.
[13:28:48] <MattJ> and back then, it aimed to do clever things like figure out which device you wanted to receive messages on
[13:29:35] *** Arc has joined the room
[13:30:07] <zinid> Now this is not required and even detrimental
[13:30:34] <marc> MattJ, I understand and I'll read the slides etc. to be up-to-date, thanks :)
[13:30:47] <Flow> MattJ, I always wonder if that priority based routing was clever even 10 years ago
[13:31:06] <Flow> Or what that rationale for that back then was
[13:37:22] <Ge0rG> marc: ping me if you have questions about the slides. I gave them to a nerd friend recently and had to realize they are not meant for people without really deep understanding of XMPP
[13:38:07] <marc> Ge0rG, will do :)
[13:45:20] *** Alex has joined the room
[13:46:09] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:48:48] <ralphm> Flow: the idea back then didn't take into account ubiquitous mobile devices
[13:49:28] *** Kev has joined the room
[13:49:29] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Weekend"
[13:49:59] <ralphm> It was assumed that whole you might have multiple simultaneous connections, you'd always want messages to arrive in one of them, your 'current' one.
[13:50:17] <ralphm> (while)
[13:50:42] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:51:02] <Ge0rG> And thus "most avaliable non negative presence" was born.
[13:52:05] <ralphm> The assumption now is that you basically want chat-like messages to arrive on all devices, with history, and proper distributed read markers
[13:52:11] <jonasw> "and it was good" no wait
[13:52:28] <ralphm> So yeah priority is mostly useless now
[13:52:30] <Kev> I don't think the priority-based routing was actually a good idea, but I'm sure it seemed one at the time, a decade before that use case came about.
[13:52:59] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[13:53:09] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[13:53:33] <ralphm> I'm still not sure about aggregate availability / show presence.
[13:53:55] <Kev> In which way? I think that individual devices having a different status message is unhelpful for most use cases these days.
[13:54:02] <ralphm> I could imagine using priority for that exclusively
[13:54:17] <Kev> To the point that I'm sorely tempted we (non-formally) deprecate status messages, and just shove something in PEP.
[13:54:30] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:54:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:55:05] <ralphm> Sure, Slack has per account status and 'snooze'
[13:55:28] <ralphm> Making it explicit that way seems the way to go
[13:55:52] *** daniel has left the room
[13:55:59] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:56:13] <Kev> Aggregating status locally is easy enough, I think.
[13:56:15] <Kev> But messages are harder.
[13:56:39] <Kev> I don't think it's a hardship for a receiving client to see two auto-away, one available, so mark the contact as available.
[13:56:51] <Kev> (Although it's not how we'd design it if we were starting again)
[13:56:54] <daniel> > contracts shouldn't be able to choose what happens to my archive
Kev: I'm not really sure how this would look like. Even if we change to a full jid / bare jid approach it's ultimately up to the sender to make that decision
[13:57:21] <Ge0rG> I'm also in favor of aggregate presence status, but we don't need to throw everything over for that
[13:57:57] <Kev> daniel: I'd like to make a fuller response Monday, I just noticed the PR and wanted to leave a holding message to stop it getting merged until I'm working again after the weekend.
[13:58:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:58:26] <ralphm> I think we should be precise and not talk about 'presence'
[13:58:46] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[13:58:57] <Ge0rG> ralphm: feel free to provide a better glossary
[13:59:00] <ralphm> Rather about availability-presence, user status and such
[13:59:14] <Kev> But, basically, telling an archive server that someone sending me a message gets to override the rules of my server policy has to be obeyed isn't helpful in most cases. I'm happy with (more loosely than you're doing) excluding groupchat from default access, but the <store/> thing needs more care.
[13:59:19] <Kev> More Monday :)
[13:59:33] <ralphm> Availability still has use cases, even beyond chat
[14:00:10] <Kev> Ge0rG: I would still like to work with you on XEPpifying these thoughts (although I'll do it on my own if you're still not keen).
[14:00:10] *** lovetox has joined the room
[14:01:05] <ralphm> Slack status is much like user mood and user activity conflated
[14:01:10] <Ge0rG> Kev: I'm not opposed, I just still think it's too early
[14:01:26] <Kev> ralphm: And I think more matches what the typical use case needs.
[14:01:27] <ralphm> I.e. you pick an emoji and a status message to go with it
[14:01:34] <ralphm> Totally
[14:02:37] <Kev> But Slack still does presence.
[14:02:56] <Kev> (availability)
[14:03:21] <Ge0rG> There is a good case for dnd at least
[14:03:26] <Kev> I think in XMPP we could easily codify something here that makes slackishness work, along with other use cases, without needing to throw baby out with the bathwater.
[14:04:04] <ralphm> But do note that Slack also has binary availability (green or dark icon) as well as snooze indicator. The latter is per account, and I assume the former is simply a logical or.
[14:04:20] <Kev> I think <status/> is going to be a victim in this.
[14:04:34] <ralphm> Indeed, as well as show
[14:04:42] <Kev> I think we keep show.
[14:04:56] <Ge0rG> But but but but I want custom text status, or at least Emoji
[14:04:58] <Kev> But I think we codify some rules of how to do a trinary logical or on it.
[14:05:10] <ralphm> Ge0rG: please read again
[14:05:18] <Kev> Ge0rG: Yes, but I don't think <status/> is fit for that per-account use. I think we PEP that.
[14:05:23] <ralphm> We'd move this to a PEP nice
[14:05:26] <ralphm> Node
[14:05:49] <ralphm> Like User Mood and User Activity XEPs
[14:06:02] <Kev> And probably replacing both, if we're honest.
[14:06:07] <ralphm> Sure
[14:06:17] <Kev> Well, or combining both.
[14:06:27] <Ge0rG> Kev: persistent or ephemeral pep?
[14:06:27] <Kev> If we changed User Mood into an emoji :D
[14:06:31] <ralphm> Without predefined items
[14:06:36] <Kev> Ge0rG: persistent.
[14:06:55] <ralphm> Even though they are extensible
[14:07:21] *** blabla has joined the room
[14:07:21] *** blabla shows as "online"
[14:08:12] <Ge0rG> Kev: I think I still have some junk in my pep (different account) from a client that I tried some years ago
[14:08:21] <Kev> I've added to my list of things I need to cover in the xmpp2.0-not-called-xmpp2.0 Informational XEP.
[14:08:48] <Kev> My intention is to write a XEP summarising Ge0rG's slidedeck, together with our current best guess on how we'll approach solving it.
[14:09:05] <Kev> Mostly so that we have this tracked in some way that the XSF's process understands.
[14:10:06] <Kev> Right, I'm going back to hiding my XMPP and Mail clients again :)
[14:10:07] <Kev> o7
[14:10:10] <ralphm> I guess we can fill those summit days easily
[14:10:35] *** Valerian has joined the room
[14:10:45] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[14:10:52] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[14:14:26] *** efrit has joined the room
[14:15:09] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[14:25:12] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[14:29:07] *** Alex shows as "online"
[14:30:17] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[14:30:46] *** bra shows as "online"
[14:31:02] *** Syndace has left the room
[14:31:05] *** Syndace has joined the room
[14:31:18] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[14:32:47] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[14:33:17] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[14:34:06] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[14:35:37] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[14:36:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[14:36:40] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[14:39:34] *** sonny has joined the room
[14:40:21] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[14:40:29] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[14:40:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[14:40:54] *** marc has left the room
[14:41:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[14:43:16] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[14:44:10] *** lumi shows as "online"
[14:46:58] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Weekend"
[14:46:58] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Weekend"
[14:50:44] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:51:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[14:52:54] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[14:55:29] *** sonny has left the room
[14:55:32] *** sonny has joined the room
[14:56:28] *** efrit has left the room
[14:57:50] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:59:02] *** Kev has left the room
[15:00:44] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[15:04:18] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[15:04:23] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[15:06:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:06:36] *** bra shows as "online"
[15:07:47] *** Valerian has left the room
[15:10:34] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[15:18:05] *** Zash has left the room
[15:22:24] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:22:24] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:22:41] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:22:41] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:23:00] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:23:01] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:23:32] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:23:33] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:29:03] *** uc has left the room
[15:29:27] *** uc has joined the room
[15:31:24] *** Arc has left the room
[15:36:01] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[15:38:41] *** Valerian has joined the room
[15:38:47] *** blabla has left the room
[15:38:52] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[15:38:52] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[15:39:32] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[15:39:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[15:39:42] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[15:39:50] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:41:57] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[15:42:00] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:42:43] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:42:43] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:42:46] *** Alex has left the room
[15:43:18] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:43:19] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:43:19] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[15:45:10] *** Guus has left the room
[15:45:10] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:47:46] *** lumi shows as "online"
[15:48:53] *** bra shows as "online"
[15:50:25] *** uc has joined the room
[15:53:33] *** Tobias has joined the room
[15:56:49] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[15:56:49] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[15:56:52] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[15:56:53] *** Guus has left the room
[16:01:06] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:04:59] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:05:50] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:06:14] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[16:06:44] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:06:44] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:12:33] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:12:33] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:13:10] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:13:10] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:15:34] *** sonny has left the room
[16:15:38] *** sonny has joined the room
[16:15:46] *** SamWhited has left the room
[16:16:49] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:20:16] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:21:04] *** sonny shows as "online"
[16:21:05] *** sonny shows as "online"
[16:21:13] *** marc shows as "online"
[16:21:13] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:21:14] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:23:12] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:23:12] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:23:52] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:23:52] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:25:28] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:25:28] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:25:52] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:25:52] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:26:31] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:26:31] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:27:51] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:27:51] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:28:38] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:28:38] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:28:52] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:28:52] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:29:57] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:29:57] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:30:13] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:30:13] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:31:08] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[16:31:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[16:31:38] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[16:33:26] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:33:26] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:35:06] *** jere has joined the room
[16:37:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[16:46:17] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:48:17] *** Tobias has joined the room
[16:50:29] *** bra shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[16:50:34] *** nyco has left the room
[16:51:35] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:54] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:54] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:54] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:54] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:54] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:55] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:51:55] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:53:16] *** nyco has joined the room
[16:55:09] *** uc shows as "online"
[16:56:32] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:57:08] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[16:58:30] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[16:58:34] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[17:03:39] *** tux shows as "away" and his status message is "Out eating. Mmmm.. food."
[17:05:12] *** daniel has left the room
[17:05:22] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:10:29] *** bra shows as "xa" and his status message is "Автостатус (неактивен)"
[17:11:43] *** Zash has joined the room
[17:12:53] *** daniel has left the room
[17:13:06] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:14:30] *** Guus has left the room
[17:14:30] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:22:59] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[17:23:14] *** daniel has left the room
[17:23:15] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[17:23:22] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:23:22] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[17:23:25] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:26] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[17:23:27] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:27] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:27] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:27] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:29] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:29] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:43] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:44] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:46] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:47] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:47] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:23:47] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:26:35] *** uc has left the room
[17:29:53] *** Guus has left the room
[17:35:25] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[17:35:49] *** Valerian has left the room
[17:36:31] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:36:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:37:10] *** Tobias has joined the room
[17:38:21] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[17:39:10] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[17:40:17] *** Zash shows as "online"
[17:40:34] *** Zash has left the room
[17:41:59] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:43:19] *** Zash shows as "online"
[17:43:22] *** Zash shows as "online"
[17:43:23] *** Zash has left the room
[17:43:24] *** Zash shows as "online"
[17:43:25] *** Zash shows as "online"
[17:44:26] *** SamWhited has left the room
[17:44:27] *** lumi shows as "online"
[17:47:20] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:49:10] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[17:49:56] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:51:34] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[17:53:34] *** Valerian has joined the room
[17:54:32] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:58:09] *** Guus has left the room
[17:58:10] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:59:51] *** Valerian shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:00:19] *** jere has joined the room
[18:02:50] *** Valerian has left the room
[18:03:04] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[18:08:07] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[18:08:11] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:08:53] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:08:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:10:42] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:10:42] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:11:53] *** Guus has left the room
[18:13:42] *** Valerian has joined the room
[18:13:52] *** Valerian shows as "online"
[18:16:28] *** Tobias has joined the room
[18:22:48] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:22:53] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:22:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:23:10] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[18:23:25] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:23:33] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:23:53] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:23:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:24:01] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[18:24:08] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:24:08] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:24:19] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:24:19] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:25:44] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:25:44] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:26:06] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:26:12] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:26:26] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:26:37] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:26:37] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:26:50] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:26:58] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:27:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:29:00] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:29:01] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:29:20] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:30:28] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:30:50] *** tux shows as "away" and his status message is "Out eating. Mmmm.. food."
[18:31:04] <moparisthebest> Does anyone use haproxy for xep368 or anything using alpn?
[18:32:09] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:32:10] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:32:48] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[18:33:32] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:33:33] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:33:41] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:34:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:34:27] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:34:28] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:34:42] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:34:42] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:34:57] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:34:57] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:35:31] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:35:31] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:35:48] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:35:48] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:36:56] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:37:33] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:37:44] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:38:07] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:38:07] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:38:15] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:39:01] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:39:12] *** Zash has left the room
[18:40:14] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[18:40:37] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:40:39] <xram> moparisthebest: https://blog.onefellow.com/post/76702632637/haproxy-and-ejabberd
[18:40:43] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:40:54] <xram> without alpn though
[18:41:12] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:41:18] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:41:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:42:01] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[18:42:55] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:42:58] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:43:25] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:43:26] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:45:12] *** zinid shows as "dnd"
[18:45:15] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:45:23] *** xram has left the room
[18:45:41] *** zinid shows as "dnd"
[18:47:06] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:47:22] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:47:23] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:48:23] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:48:23] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:49:46] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:49:46] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:50:41] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:50:42] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:51:03] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:51:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:51:18] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:51:19] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:51:32] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:53:24] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[18:55:18] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:55:42] *** daniel has left the room
[18:55:47] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:56:11] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[18:56:43] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:56:44] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:56:44] *** daniel has left the room
[18:56:50] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:57:07] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:57:07] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:58:51] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:58:51] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:00:06] *** Valerian has left the room
[19:00:14] *** Valerian has joined the room
[19:00:50] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:00:50] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:00:53] *** Valerian has left the room
[19:02:45] <moparisthebest> Yea mainly wondering if it can multiplex on alpn without terminating TLS or not
[19:02:49] *** Guus has left the room
[19:02:50] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:03:03] <moparisthebest> Guy in conversations muc is trying to figure it out
[19:04:24] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[19:04:51] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[19:04:58] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[19:05:20] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[19:06:00] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[19:06:52] <zinid> not sure what the problem is, there is tons of info in google
[19:06:59] <zinid> for example: https://www.haproxy.com/documentation/aloha/7-0/haproxy/tls/
[19:07:45] *** daniel has left the room
[19:07:51] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:11:28] *** bra shows as "online"
[19:13:00] *** Valerian has joined the room
[19:13:59] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[19:14:43] *** tux shows as "online"
[19:14:53] *** Guus has left the room
[19:16:33] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[19:17:37] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:19:49] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:21:37] <moparisthebest> That's about terminating TLS though, he got it working doing that https://pastebin.ca/3939980
[19:21:48] <moparisthebest> It's just not necessary
[19:22:18] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[19:23:24] *** Tobias has joined the room
[19:23:36] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[19:23:41] *** Steve Kille shows as "online"
[19:24:55] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:25:12] *** Kev has left the room
[19:25:19] *** daniel has left the room
[19:25:30] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:28:03] *** daniel has left the room
[19:28:08] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:32:23] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:32:52] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[19:33:32] *** Guus has left the room
[19:33:33] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:38:09] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[19:41:14] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:41:24] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[19:45:02] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:45:42] *** SamWhited has left the room
[19:46:20] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:46:20] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:46:31] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:46:31] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:46:44] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:46:44] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:47:11] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:47:12] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:47:53] *** Guus has left the room
[19:49:03] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:49:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:49:12] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:49:12] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:50:05] *** jere has left the room
[19:50:13] *** jere has joined the room
[19:53:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:53:34] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:53:34] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:53:56] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:53:56] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:54:26] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:54:26] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:54:38] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:54:38] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:54:48] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:54:48] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:54:54] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:54:57] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:55:05] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:55:05] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:55:12] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:55:12] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:55:31] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:55:32] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:55:45] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:55:45] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:02:33] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:03:10] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[20:05:25] *** valo has joined the room
[20:06:36] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:06:37] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:07:43] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:08:06] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:08:06] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:09:04] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:09:05] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:11:14] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:11:15] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:11:38] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:11:38] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:11:42] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[20:12:40] *** Arc has joined the room
[20:12:43] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:12:51] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:13:44] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:13:44] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:15:36] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:15:37] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:16:36] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[20:16:37] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:16:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:17:10] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:17:10] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:17:28] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:17:28] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:17:53] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:17:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:18:14] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:18:15] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:19:07] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:19:08] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:19:44] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[20:21:01] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:21:01] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:21:25] *** Guus has left the room
[20:21:26] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:21:42] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:21:42] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:24:13] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:24:14] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:25:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:25:40] *** lskdjf has left the room
[20:25:40] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:25:47] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:27:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:28:50] *** zinid has left the room
[20:29:42] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[20:30:25] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[20:31:11] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:31:16] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[20:32:45] *** daniel has left the room
[20:32:52] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:32:53] *** Guus has left the room
[20:33:34] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:36:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:36:26] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:36:31] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:39:10] *** Valerian has left the room
[20:40:06] *** McKael shows as "online"
[20:41:10] *** Valerian has joined the room
[20:41:27] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[20:42:42] *** jubalh has joined the room
[20:43:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:43:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[20:44:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:45:03] *** Holger has left the room
[20:45:28] *** Holger shows as "online"
[20:45:43] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[20:46:53] *** Alex has joined the room
[20:49:16] *** sonny shows as "online"
[20:49:18] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:50:30] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:50:55] *** jubalh has left the room
[20:53:21] *** daniel has left the room
[20:53:26] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:55:08] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:55:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:55:23] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:56:10] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[20:56:20] *** marc has left the room
[20:56:34] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:57:12] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[20:57:23] *** Holger has left the room
[20:57:29] *** Holger shows as "online"
[20:58:37] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:03:53] *** daniel has left the room
[21:03:58] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:04:06] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[21:07:03] *** SamWhited has left the room
[21:10:03] *** uc has joined the room
[21:10:30] *** Holger has left the room
[21:11:02] *** Holger shows as "online"
[21:15:17] *** sonny has left the room
[21:15:20] *** sonny shows as "online"
[21:18:59] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[21:20:26] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:20:53] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:21:33] *** sonny shows as "online"
[21:22:09] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[21:22:14] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[21:24:43] *** daniel has left the room
[21:24:53] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:25:31] *** Alex has left the room
[21:27:14] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[21:27:22] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[21:27:44] *** lumi shows as "online"
[21:30:17] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[21:30:17] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[21:31:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:33:16] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:34:20] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:35:14] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:37:22] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[21:38:30] *** lskdjf shows as "away"
[21:38:34] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[21:40:04] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[21:41:07] *** daniel has left the room
[21:41:15] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:42:00] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[21:42:27] *** Valerian has left the room
[21:42:43] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[21:43:04] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[21:43:07] *** jubalh has joined the room
[21:43:57] *** Valerian has joined the room
[21:45:19] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:45:21] *** Valerian has left the room
[21:45:29] *** Valerian has joined the room
[21:45:54] *** Valerian has left the room
[21:46:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:47:52] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:48:00] *** nyco has left the room
[21:48:16] *** nyco has joined the room
[21:48:58] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:50:39] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:54:50] *** Valerian has joined the room
[21:55:14] *** Valerian has left the room
[21:56:05] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[21:57:08] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[22:01:25] *** lskdjf has left the room
[22:05:28] *** Valerian has joined the room
[22:09:47] *** Valerian has left the room
[22:10:02] *** jere has joined the room
[22:11:13] *** Valerian has joined the room
[22:11:39] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:12:37] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:16:13] *** lovetox has left the room
[22:17:42] *** bra has left the room
[22:18:45] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[22:20:20] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[22:22:42] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[22:25:29] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[22:25:29] *** Arc shows as "online"
[22:26:08] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[22:29:48] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[22:31:00] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[22:33:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:35:22] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[22:35:56] *** daniel has left the room
[22:35:59] *** uc has joined the room
[22:36:02] *** daniel shows as "online"
[22:36:08] *** vanitasvitae shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[22:36:31] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[22:38:20] *** Valerian has left the room
[22:40:37] *** Guus has left the room
[22:40:37] *** Guus shows as "online"
[22:41:28] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[22:41:28] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[22:42:33] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:43:03] *** daniel has left the room
[22:43:17] *** daniel shows as "online"
[22:44:46] *** jubalh has joined the room
[22:44:51] *** daniel has left the room
[22:45:02] *** daniel shows as "online"
[22:45:39] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[22:47:37] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[22:48:34] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[22:53:53] *** Guus has left the room
[22:56:56] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[22:56:56] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[22:57:49] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:02:20] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[23:02:41] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[23:02:41] *** Arc shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm not here right now"
[23:06:14] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[23:15:16] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[23:16:53] *** arc has left the room
[23:16:54] *** arc has joined the room
[23:17:33] *** daniel has left the room
[23:24:00] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[23:24:32] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:24:45] *** Arc has left the room
[23:24:49] *** lovetox has joined the room
[23:25:42] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:25:42] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:26:28] *** McKael shows as "online"
[23:27:05] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[23:27:18] *** arc has left the room
[23:27:26] *** arc has joined the room
[23:28:05] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[23:30:43] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[23:32:05] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[23:32:06] *** arc has left the room
[23:34:14] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:34:14] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:34:32] *** uc has joined the room
[23:35:20] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:35:20] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:37:09] *** arc has joined the room
[23:41:29] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[23:42:03] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:42:03] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:42:30] *** lumi has joined the room
[23:42:36] *** goffi has left the room
[23:42:57] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:42:58] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:43:08] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:43:08] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:44:42] *** jubalh has left the room
[23:44:59] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[23:45:39] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[23:47:44] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[23:49:15] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[23:53:01] *** jubalh has joined the room
[23:53:47] *** jubalh has left the room
[23:53:50] *** jubalh has joined the room
[23:56:34] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:56:34] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:56:49] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:56:49] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:57:56] *** Arc has joined the room
[23:58:57] *** jubalh has left the room