Monday, December 04, 2017
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
December
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
        1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:06:13] *** Tobias has joined the room
[00:09:18] *** ThurahT has joined the room
[00:10:26] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[00:10:26] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[00:11:10] *** Alex has left the room
[00:17:01] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[00:17:01] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[00:18:14] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Weekend"
[00:18:14] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Weekend"
[00:29:34] *** Kev has left the room
[00:32:29] *** goffi has left the room
[00:33:45] *** sonny shows as "online"
[00:36:23] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[00:36:24] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[00:39:59] *** jere has joined the room
[00:53:57] *** stefandxm has left the room
[01:01:25] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[01:16:08] *** Zash has joined the room
[01:21:56] *** ralphm has left the room
[01:22:00] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[01:30:32] *** nyco has left the room
[01:30:40] *** nyco has joined the room
[01:41:10] *** Tobias has joined the room
[01:50:41] *** jjrh has left the room
[01:50:43] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:52:27] *** jere has left the room
[01:52:34] *** jere has joined the room
[02:05:17] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[02:05:21] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[02:07:28] *** sonny has left the room
[02:07:31] *** sonny has joined the room
[02:14:00] *** daniel has left the room
[02:14:02] *** daniel has joined the room
[02:24:08] *** Lance has joined the room
[02:24:08] *** Lance shows as "online"
[02:24:29] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[02:24:30] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[02:25:12] *** Lance has left the room
[02:32:53] *** sonny shows as "online"
[02:32:53] *** sonny shows as "online"
[02:41:05] *** stefandxm has left the room
[02:48:10] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[02:50:21] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[02:50:24] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[02:50:40] *** tux has left the room
[02:50:44] *** tux has joined the room
[02:53:44] *** efrit has left the room
[02:54:51] *** jere has joined the room
[03:02:04] *** daniel has left the room
[03:02:06] *** daniel has joined the room
[03:15:07] *** daniel has left the room
[03:16:47] *** daniel has joined the room
[03:33:31] *** sonny shows as "online"
[03:33:32] *** sonny shows as "online"
[03:43:18] *** jjrh has left the room
[03:43:20] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[03:52:55] *** uc has joined the room
[03:54:29] *** jjrh has left the room
[03:54:32] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[04:00:23] *** uc shows as "online"
[04:04:52] *** tux has left the room
[04:04:54] *** tux has joined the room
[04:16:20] *** jjrh has left the room
[04:16:23] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[04:36:04] *** arc has left the room
[04:36:05] *** arc has joined the room
[04:46:37] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[04:46:38] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[04:58:34] *** arc has left the room
[04:58:42] *** arc has joined the room
[05:06:28] *** arc has left the room
[05:06:42] *** arc has joined the room
[05:16:44] *** arc has left the room
[05:21:13] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[05:21:16] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:21:24] *** arc has joined the room
[05:23:50] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[05:25:26] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[05:27:01] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:30:37] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:32:14] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[05:34:26] *** sonny shows as "online"
[05:34:40] *** sonny shows as "online"
[05:34:43] *** daniel has left the room
[05:34:48] *** daniel has joined the room
[05:35:09] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:35:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:36:46] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[05:40:07] *** daniel has left the room
[05:40:14] *** daniel has joined the room
[05:44:43] *** daniel has left the room
[05:44:49] *** daniel has joined the room
[05:48:26] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[05:49:59] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:54:53] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:55:05] *** jonasw has left the room
[05:55:05] *** jonasw has joined the room
[05:55:09] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[05:55:09] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[05:58:34] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[06:01:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:01:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:03:43] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[06:11:02] *** daniel has left the room
[06:12:14] *** Neustradamus has left the room
[06:16:08] *** daniel has joined the room
[06:17:30] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:17:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:19:41] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[06:24:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:24:38] *** zinid has joined the room
[06:25:02] *** ralphm has left the room
[06:25:05] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:33:10] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:35:10] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:35:12] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:37:06] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:39:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:43:06] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:43:41] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:44:03] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:48:41] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:49:13] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:50:04] *** tux has left the room
[06:50:05] *** tux has joined the room
[06:51:20] *** blabla has joined the room
[06:51:21] *** blabla shows as "online"
[06:51:55] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[06:55:22] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:55:29] *** blabla has left the room
[06:55:36] *** blabla has joined the room
[06:55:37] *** blabla shows as "online"
[06:56:39] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:57:49] *** Zash shows as "online"
[06:57:52] *** Zash shows as "online"
[06:59:35] *** valo has left the room
[06:59:40] *** valo has joined the room
[07:04:34] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[07:06:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:15:00] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[07:15:30] *** ralphm has left the room
[07:16:46] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:19:38] *** Guus has left the room
[07:19:40] *** Guus has joined the room
[07:29:59] *** daniel has left the room
[07:30:34] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:32:02] *** Guus has left the room
[07:35:37] *** blabla has joined the room
[07:35:37] *** blabla shows as "online"
[07:35:57] *** sonny shows as "online"
[07:35:57] *** sonny shows as "online"
[07:38:47] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:42:27] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:44:39] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:45:53] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[07:45:57] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[07:46:10] *** Tobias has left the room
[07:48:32] <Ge0rG> I wonder if it would be a bad idea to ban html-only mails on standards@. It breaks display of quoting badly on text-only MUAs
[07:49:44] <jonasw> markup discussions \o/
[07:49:50] <jonasw> we haven’t had any for over a week
[07:49:58] <Ge0rG> meta-markup.
[07:49:58] <Ge0rG> or markup-meta?
[07:50:18] <Ge0rG> I'm actually catching up the Styling thread from three weeks ago.
[07:51:48] <jonasw> ah, so maybe using html-only there was an act of irony? :)
[07:52:43] <Ge0rG> So far, the html-only mails I've read didn't contribute anything positive to the discussion. If it wasn't for my Council hat, I'd have blacklisted them already.
[07:52:58] *** marc has joined the room
[07:55:11] <Ge0rG> I'm actually glad that we are getting XEPs that define the visual format of things.
[07:55:48] *** daniel has left the room
[07:55:50] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:55:55] *** Tobias has joined the room
[07:57:19] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[07:59:47] *** ThurahT has left the room
[07:59:55] *** Guus has joined the room
[08:00:11] *** ThurahT has joined the room
[08:00:31] *** sonny shows as "online"
[08:00:31] *** sonny shows as "online"
[08:05:13] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[08:05:33] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:05:41] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:08:05] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[08:08:51] <zinid> yeah, this is very important now, when basic things are borked
[08:09:13] *** intosi has joined the room
[08:09:58] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:09:58] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:10:21] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[08:10:26] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[08:11:56] <Tobias> jonasw, using the Nickname as source of coloring would have other issues, like when somebody else joins a room with the same nick they'll get the same color, suggesting to the user that they are the same
[08:13:19] *** zinid has left the room
[08:13:23] *** zinid has joined the room
[08:16:08] <Ge0rG> hey marc, any news from your XEP?
[08:17:03] <Ge0rG> zinid: why don't you volunteer some time and actually improve the protocols, then? :P
[08:17:26] <zinid> Ge0rG, typical open-source nerd detected 🙂 If you don't have the feature: write it!
[08:17:50] <jonasw> Tobias, we have that problem with anonymous MUCs in any case
[08:17:55] <zinid> while you can act like this (many do) you will end up with no users of your standards eventually
[08:18:19] <Tobias> true..so maybe in that case they should be all colored the same?
[08:18:28] <jonasw> Tobias, that’s what is specified now
[08:18:33] <Tobias> great
[08:19:18] <daniel> zinid: I didn't think much about any namespace issues with the retry element. I guess I can move it around.
[08:19:30] *** Guus shows as "online"
[08:20:10] <Guus> https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/595zg5/sopranica-jmp-wom-cell-network-diy-anonymous seems to be xmpp based.
[08:20:11] <zinid> daniel, I'm concerned because ejabberd has validation mode now, and I don't know how to validate unknown elements or attributes
[08:20:43] <zinid> the mode is optional
[08:22:04] <daniel> zinid: yes I'll add it beneath the iq then. I just didn't think about validation. In fact this can probably cause issues in other implementations as well. (just due to a lack of a getExtension method for the error class)
[08:22:23] <zinid> right
[08:23:13] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[08:26:12] <Ge0rG> "the web address in your Jabber ID will be different—for example, motherboard@jabber.ccc.de or motherboard@xmpp.jp." That made my eyes bleed.
[08:27:17] <marc> Ge0rG: no not yet (XEP)
[08:27:38] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:28:05] <Ge0rG> marc: I'd really like to tear it apa.. eh.. I mean.. provide some constructive feedback
[08:29:29] <marc> Ge0rG: let me check if I have Git access at the moment
[08:29:52] <Ge0rG> Guus: that's an interesting article about an interesting tech. I remember there was an announcement of the JMP service on one of our MLs two months ago or so
[08:29:53] <Ge0rG> But I didn't realize it's more than just a VoIP bridging service.
[08:30:30] <Guus> Ge0rG: I kind of had the same experience
[08:31:03] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[08:31:06] <Guus> also: be nice to marc.
[08:31:12] <Ge0rG> I'm interested in adhoc 3G infrastructure for a completely different project, but now I forgot the MUC JID :(
[08:31:37] <Guus> bookmarks! :D
[08:31:39] *** tux has joined the room
[08:32:10] <Ge0rG> Guus: I've stored it in PEP, but then it was gone after a server upgrade!!!!1!
[08:32:36] <Guus> oh no! you did a _server upgrade_ ?!
[08:32:43] <jonasw> s/upgrade/restart/?
[08:32:51] <Ge0rG> Guus: I did a _server_ _upgrade_!
[08:32:51] <jonasw> Guus, we’ll be nice to marc :)
[08:33:09] *** daniel has left the room
[08:33:19] *** daniel has joined the room
[08:33:25] <Guus> I see we're back to the markup fun :)
[08:33:28] <Guus> thanks Jonas :)
[08:33:32] *** goffi has joined the room
[08:33:45] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:33:57] <Ge0rG> jonasw: I'm not sure whom you mean by "we"
[08:34:27] *Guus takes out his trusty smelly trout and eyes Ge0rG...
[08:35:28] <Guus> (mIRC references are one step down from bash.org quotes, right? :) )
[08:35:30] <Ge0rG> Guus: you may only swing the trout from mIRC32.exe
[08:35:58] <Ge0rG> Guus: unless you have screenshots of connecting to this MUC from mIRC, I won't take any damage.
[08:37:00] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:37:01] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:37:13] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[08:37:44] <Guus> Ge0rG: although that does sound like fun, I really should stop procrastinating :)
[08:38:04] *** waqas has left the room
[08:38:09] *** waqas has joined the room
[08:38:23] <Ge0rG> So I found some references to jmp.chat on the archives, but only from Denver's "signature"
[08:38:50] *** waqas has left the room
[08:40:26] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[08:43:15] <daniel> > https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/595zg5/sopranica-jmp-wom-cell-network-diy-anonymous seems to be xmpp based.
Are the Americans reinventing freifunk?
[08:44:54] <Ge0rG> daniel: it rather looks like SIP and picocells
[08:45:32] <SouL> You can join discuss@conference.soprani.ca if interested on that
[08:45:41] *** marc shows as "online"
[08:45:46] <daniel> picocells as in 4G? are you allowed to run those in the US?
[08:46:27] <marc> Ge0rG, https://git.zapb.de/xeps.git/log/?h=user_invite_public
[08:46:44] <marc> Ge0rG, as I said, just the protocol examples
[08:47:01] *** Guus has left the room
[08:47:02] *** Guus shows as "online"
[08:47:47] <Ge0rG> daniel: if you are a telco and have the frequencies, then yes.
[08:49:19] *** sonny shows as "online"
[08:49:22] <daniel> ok. i'll put it into my not gonna happen box
[08:49:23] *** sonny shows as "online"
[08:50:35] <Guus> Is anyone going to the Paris Open Source Summit this week? https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/POSS_2017
[08:52:53] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[08:53:15] <Ge0rG> SouL: that's what I was looking for, thanks
[08:53:15] <Ge0rG> > fatal: unable to access 'https://git.zapb.de/xeps.git/': server certificate verification failed.
Meh.
[08:53:57] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[08:54:33] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:54:39] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:54:44] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:55:08] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:55:39] <jonasw> Ge0rG, pluralis majestatis
[08:55:44] <jonasw> or so? ;-)
[08:56:16] <Ge0rG> jonasw: I didn't dare to suggest that. But it's probably better than personality disorder.
[08:56:33] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:56:37] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:56:40] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:56:43] <jonasw> :P
[08:56:48] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[08:56:49] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:56:53] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:56:56] <jonasw> no, you’ll also be nice to marc *waves hand*
[08:57:24] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[08:57:47] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:57:47] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:57:55] <marc> Ge0rG: it works, it uses LE
[08:58:00] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[08:58:00] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[08:58:18] <marc> Must be a problem on your side ;)
[08:59:02] *** Guus has left the room
[08:59:54] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:00:43] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:01:05] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:01:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:02:00] *** ralphm has left the room
[09:02:48] <Ge0rG> marc: did you forget to add the cross-signed "root" cert to the chain?
[09:03:11] <Ge0rG> Chain of trust NOT ok (chain incomplete)
[09:04:31] <marc> Ge0rG: not that I'm aware of. It works on all clients for me
[09:05:18] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Work work …"
[09:05:24] <Ge0rG> marc: it's apparently not in the Root CA list on my old-ish Debian box
[09:05:39] *** arc has left the room
[09:05:41] *** arc has joined the room
[09:07:11] <marc> Ge0rG: oh you're right 😬
[09:07:30] <marc> Remove the 's' for now then ;)
[09:07:36] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[09:08:10] <Ge0rG> marc: https://git.zapb.de/xep.git/? 😀
[09:08:21] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:08:22] <Ge0rG> marc: I'm not removing the _other_ s.
[09:08:34] <marc> 😀
[09:09:25] <marc> You have to wait with your "feedback" then ;)
[09:11:18] *** Alex has joined the room
[09:12:10] <Ge0rG> jonasw: I consider it nice to think through what another person suggests and to make constructive feedback. I also consider it nice to not steal people's time by adding large amounts of boilerplate text that simulates politeness, instead just jumping to the point. For reasons beyond my comprehension, people call me blunt and negativistic.
[09:12:54] <SouL> Haha
[09:12:59] *** Zash has left the room
[09:12:59] *** Zash has left the room
[09:13:10] *** Zash has joined the room
[09:13:10] *** Zash shows as "online"
[09:13:33] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[09:13:56] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[09:14:05] <Ge0rG> marc: the git:// URL is also a lie :(
[09:14:51] *** Guus has left the room
[09:14:52] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:15:48] <Ge0rG> daniel: oh, no 3G... "WOM is XMPP over chibiArduino (thin messaging on IEEE 802.15.4)"
[09:16:32] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:16:43] <marc> Ge0rG: fixed
[09:16:47] <marc> Sorry
[09:17:08] <Ge0rG> marc: thanks very much :)
[09:17:59] *** arc has left the room
[09:18:54] *** arc has joined the room
[09:19:29] *** jcbrand has joined the room
[09:19:38] *** arc has left the room
[09:19:41] *** arc has joined the room
[09:22:56] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[09:23:10] *** arc has left the room
[09:23:12] *** arc has joined the room
[09:25:26] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Spending the morning coding"
[09:28:41] *** arc has left the room
[09:28:42] *** arc has joined the room
[09:29:02] *** Guus has left the room
[09:33:23] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[09:35:13] *** sonny shows as "online"
[09:35:13] *** sonny shows as "online"
[09:35:38] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[09:37:51] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:39:28] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[09:40:35] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:40:50] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[09:43:22] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:46:49] <Ge0rG> Meh. How do you build html from an xeps/inbox/ file?
[09:47:24] <jonasw> Ge0rG, make build/inbox/foo.html
[09:47:29] <jonasw> or make inbox-html to build them all
[09:47:56] <Ge0rG> jonasw: ah, thanks. That actually makes sense
[09:48:30] *** daniel has left the room
[09:49:08] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:53:50] *** Guus has left the room
[09:53:51] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:58:09] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:00:21] <Ge0rG> And once again, I forgot to sql-extract from my backup phone the self-messages I wrote on MIX. :sad:
[10:00:55] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:01:33] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[10:04:11] *** lumi has joined the room
[10:08:02] *** Guus has left the room
[10:10:50] *** sonny shows as "online"
[10:10:50] *** sonny shows as "online"
[10:11:00] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[10:12:23] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:14:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:15:47] *** Guus shows as "online"
[10:24:13] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[10:24:13] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[10:24:26] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:25:04] *** daniel has left the room
[10:25:37] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:31:46] *** efrit has joined the room
[10:33:25] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[10:33:46] *** sonny shows as "away"
[10:34:08] *** sonny shows as "online"
[10:39:56] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[10:43:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:45:39] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:47:28] *** mathieui shows as "away"
[10:48:14] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:55:11] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[10:55:59] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[10:56:48] *** dwd shows as "online"
[10:59:09] *** daniel has left the room
[10:59:17] *** Kev shows as "away"
[10:59:18] *** Kev shows as "away"
[10:59:59] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:00:10] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[11:01:34] *** jubalh has joined the room
[11:02:31] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[11:03:33] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[11:08:31] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:12:52] *** Alex shows as "online"
[11:14:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[11:18:31] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[11:19:49] *** jere has joined the room
[11:21:58] *** jere has left the room
[11:22:08] *** jere has joined the room
[11:23:58] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[11:25:38] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[11:26:54] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[11:27:23] *** Syndace has left the room
[11:27:47] *** jcbrand shows as "online"
[11:29:26] *** jcbrand has left the room
[11:32:24] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[11:33:49] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[11:33:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[11:34:45] *** jere has left the room
[11:34:53] *** jere has joined the room
[11:36:54] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Nicht verfügbar wegen Untätigkeit seit mehr als 15 Minuten)"
[11:41:00] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[11:42:36] <jonasw> zinid, FWIW, RFC 6120 schemas are incorrect, so I wonder how much pain you’ll be having with validation.
[11:42:55] <jonasw> at least afaict, the schemas do not allow for application-defined-condition in the error element, despite the text explicitly allowing that
[11:43:11] <jonasw> also, the text allows for the use of the "code" attribute for compatibility, but the schema does not
[11:45:03] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:47:40] <zinid> jonasw, I can leave with this and fix the validator accordingly
[11:47:47] <zinid> what I don't want is doing this constantly
[11:47:56] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:49:02] <jonasw> you may also be in violation of RFC 6120, because servers must simply route traffic addressed to clients (independent of their understanding), but I don’t have a quote for that right now
[11:49:37] <zinid> yeah, and in another place the RFC says you MAY validate, go figure
[11:50:18] <jonasw> I understand your general concern, but ignoring undefined attributes and elements is essentially how extensibility in XMPP works.
[11:50:41] *** Guus has left the room
[11:50:42] *** Guus shows as "online"
[11:51:50] *** dwd shows as "online"
[11:51:56] <zinid> no
[11:52:32] <zinid> this is not how it should work, because there simply can be tag names collisions if we allow adding whatever anyone wants
[11:52:41] <jonasw> no, that’s why we have namespaces
[11:52:52] <jonasw> a namespace is defined in a single document
[11:53:02] <jonasw> (roughly)
[11:53:23] <Guus> for what it's worth, people in here repeatedly repeat that "schema's in XEPs are not normative" - Best beware to depend on them to much.
[11:53:23] <zinid> what's the point in this namespace if anyone can extend it?
[11:53:35] <jonasw> zinid, define "anyone"
[11:53:41] <Zash> Pretty sure our equivalent to the robustness principle is "ignore what you don't understand"
[11:53:43] <jonasw> the author and maintainer of the namespace can.
[11:53:44] *** nyco has left the room
[11:54:16] <zinid> jonasw, you or me for example, can I use <foo xmlns='jabber:client'> for my extension?
[11:54:28] <jonasw> no
[11:54:35] <jonasw> well, you can, but that’d be stupid and asking for trouble
[11:54:39] <zinid> and <retry xmlns='http:upload:0'>?
[11:54:41] <jonasw> and nobody would approve of that
[11:54:42] <jonasw> same
[11:54:50] <jonasw> unless you’re doing this in context of a XEP-0363 update
[11:54:50] <zinid> but you can?
[11:55:03] <zinid> you = XSF
[11:55:15] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:55:21] <daniel> owning the samespace you must
[11:55:36] <daniel> owning the namespace you must
[11:55:39] <jonasw> I don’t think that the XSF would approve of a XEP update to any XEP *but* XEP-0363 which extends the http:upload:0 namespace
[11:55:59] <intosi> Only the IETF can introduce elements and attributes in the jabber:client xmlns through a replacement RFC, I think.
[11:56:12] <zinid> so, that means XSF can add whatever they want, but not others?
[11:56:34] <jonasw> zinid, sure, the XSF "owns" the urn:xmpp namespace. that’s the whole point of having a standards organization?
[11:56:50] <Zash> It's all in our heads anyways
[11:57:13] <zinid> well, of course it's up to you, but I won't change ejabberd validation style
[11:57:17] <zinid> as I disagree
[11:57:23] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[11:57:29] <daniel> Zash, namespaces exists only because people believe in them?
[11:57:30] <jonasw> zinid, what would you prefer?
[11:57:41] <zinid> bumping namespace obviously
[11:57:45] <daniel> and if people stop believe the whole system will collapse?
[11:57:54] <Zash> daniel: pretty much
[11:58:02] <jonasw> zinid, that’s insanity.
[11:58:05] <jonasw> bumping the namespace is a major breakage
[11:58:19] <jonasw> also, this is an experimental XEP
[11:58:20] <zinid> jonasw, then wait for major breakage and add it in that revision
[11:58:24] <jonasw> don’t expect any type of stability in there
[11:58:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:58:38] <zinid> if this is an experimental xep I don't see a problem in bumping at all
[11:59:21] <jonasw> unnecssary namespace bumps are a bunch of the reason why "basic" things like MAM are troublesome.
[12:00:20] <zinid> but what do you expect from experimental xep?
[12:01:03] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[12:02:02] *** Guus has left the room
[12:03:52] *** Kev has left the room
[12:05:57] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[12:05:59] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[12:06:29] <Flow> what I expect from any XEP: no namespace bumps for backwards compatible changes
[12:06:49] <zinid> what I expect: the protocol should be formally verified
[12:06:59] <zinid> we can debate to death, really
[12:07:34] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[12:08:08] *** lumi shows as "online"
[12:10:09] *** intosi shows as "online"
[12:10:16] <Guus> This touches on a comment made by Jonasw on list - it's probably not the best of ideas to apply a change when the XEP is in last-call.
[12:10:19] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[12:10:43] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[12:11:34] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[12:11:45] *** daniel has left the room
[12:11:48] <Flow> Then we should write down that rule in xep1
[12:11:50] *** daniel shows as "online"
[12:12:22] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[12:12:41] <zinid> yes, the rules are:
1) schemas are meaningless
2) the protocol cannot be formally verified
3) only XSF can add new elements within the same namespace
[12:12:57] <zinid> now, implement!
[12:13:31] *** daniel has left the room
[12:13:36] *** daniel shows as "online"
[12:13:55] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[12:15:50] <Guus> Flow: I don't mind clarifying that in XEP-0001, but perhaps we can also simply try to avoid this from occurring, and save the red tape.
[12:17:31] <Guus> As the author of the XEP is also on Council, I'm interested in how this plays out though :)
[12:18:02] <daniel> zinid: I don't understand why you would want to add new elements with the official namespace. Just use your own
[12:18:25] *** arc has left the room
[12:18:30] *** arc has joined the room
[12:18:48] <zinid> daniel, not me, but I see this quite frequently among customer's code
[12:19:26] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:19:30] <daniel> Is there anything stopping them from using their own namespace besides lack of knowledge (that they should do this)
[12:20:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:20:41] <zinid> because they don't want to create a namespace with a single element, I think that's their logic
[12:22:26] <daniel> i see
[12:22:46] <daniel> but you can hardly blame the system or the xsf for that
[12:23:04] <zinid> I can use validator to prevent such behaviour among customers
[12:23:18] <zinid> which works ideally, they don't even create tickets 😛
[12:24:03] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[12:24:03] *** Alex has left the room
[12:28:01] *** daniel has left the room
[12:28:10] *** valo has left the room
[12:28:10] *** daniel shows as "online"
[12:29:36] *** daniel has left the room
[12:29:43] *** daniel shows as "online"
[12:29:47] *** tim@boese-ban.de has left the room
[12:30:28] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[12:31:07] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[12:33:21] *** lskdjf has left the room
[12:33:24] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[12:36:12] *** Alex has joined the room
[12:36:12] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[12:36:21] *** Alex shows as "online"
[12:36:49] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[12:37:00] *** intosi shows as "online"
[12:37:47] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:39:14] *** Alex shows as "online"
[12:42:39] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:47:57] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[12:49:25] *** daniel has left the room
[12:50:15] *** Alex has left the room
[12:52:37] *** Alex shows as "online"
[12:54:00] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:55:56] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[13:00:43] *** nyco has joined the room
[13:02:43] *** sonny shows as "away"
[13:04:00] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[13:04:02] *** Alex has left the room
[13:06:12] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:07:57] *** jere has joined the room
[13:08:23] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[13:09:23] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:14:48] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[13:19:23] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[13:22:24] *** Kev shows as "online"
[13:22:37] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:23:45] *** jere has left the room
[13:23:53] *** jere has joined the room
[13:24:39] *** daniel has left the room
[13:25:00] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:25:26] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[13:26:26] *** daniel has left the room
[13:26:30] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:27:13] *** McKael shows as "online"
[13:28:25] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:31:07] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[13:31:08] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[13:32:07] *** daniel has left the room
[13:32:09] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:35:49] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[13:36:43] *** Kev shows as "away"
[13:36:46] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:37:26] *** sonny shows as "away"
[13:37:26] *** sonny shows as "away"
[13:37:49] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[13:38:18] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[13:40:20] *** Alex has left the room
[13:41:48] *** dwd shows as "online"
[13:41:57] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:42:36] *** sonny shows as "online"
[13:44:02] *** nyco has left the room
[13:44:29] *** nyco has joined the room
[13:44:52] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[13:49:25] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:51:57] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[13:53:51] *** valo has joined the room
[13:53:51] *** sonny shows as "away"
[13:55:43] *** sonny shows as "online"
[13:56:50] *** lumi shows as "online"
[13:56:55] *** Syndace has joined the room
[13:57:38] *** zinid shows as "online"
[13:58:41] *** Syndace has left the room
[13:58:44] *** Syndace has joined the room
[14:01:38] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[14:04:30] *** efrit has left the room
[14:07:17] *** Kev shows as "online"
[14:09:09] *** zinid has left the room
[14:09:11] *** zinid shows as "online"
[14:13:49] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[14:18:07] *** jabberatdemo has joined the room
[14:20:51] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:21:42] *** marc has left the room
[14:24:11] *** nyco has left the room
[14:24:16] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:24:22] *** dwd shows as "online"
[14:24:28] *** daniel has left the room
[14:25:50] *** Guus has left the room
[14:25:50] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:26:16] *** Alex has joined the room
[14:26:59] *** marc has left the room
[14:27:03] *** daniel shows as "online"
[14:27:42] *** Kev shows as "away"
[14:27:43] *** Kev shows as "away"
[14:29:09] *** nyco has joined the room
[14:30:23] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[14:30:24] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[14:30:29] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[14:32:00] *** jabberatdemo has left the room
[14:34:13] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[14:34:24] *** Kev shows as "away"
[14:34:54] *** lovetox has joined the room
[14:35:53] *** jubalh shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:38:02] *** waqas has joined the room
[14:39:02] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[14:39:37] *** zinid has left the room
[14:40:38] *** nyco has left the room
[14:41:02] *** Guus has left the room
[14:44:05] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:48:36] *** daniel has left the room
[14:49:11] *** nyco has joined the room
[14:51:10] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:54:21] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[14:54:46] *** daniel shows as "online"
[14:54:55] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[14:58:36] *** sonny shows as "away"
[14:58:36] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[14:58:40] <Kev> It's only worth bumping the namespace when interop that wouldn't work without it will work with it.
[14:59:45] *** marc has joined the room
[15:00:46] *** sonny shows as "online"
[15:01:46] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[15:02:16] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[15:04:43] *** nyco has left the room
[15:05:03] *** nyco has joined the room
[15:07:25] *** jcbrand has left the room
[15:08:35] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:08:37] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:08:40] *** Guus has left the room
[15:08:41] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:10:44] <dwd> I think it comes down to whether you see XML and XMLNS as a pragmatic solution to permissionless innovation, or as a stick with which to beat people.
[15:10:53] <dwd> Not that I'm biased here of course. ;-)
[15:11:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:12:03] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:12:03] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:14:35] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:14:37] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:15:03] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:15:11] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:16:46] *** Guus has left the room
[15:18:29] *** sonny shows as "away"
[15:19:58] <daniel> MattJ, jonasw: would you feel more comfortable if retry is a direct child of the iq?
[15:20:04] <jonasw> daniel, NO
[15:20:09] <jonasw> that violates RFC 6120
[15:20:09] <MattJ> iq can only have one child
[15:20:14] <jonasw> please don’t do that
[15:20:23] <jonasw> what you’re doing now is fine with RFC 6120, albeit weird usage of the "condition"
[15:20:25] <MattJ> daniel, do you have an objection to just using the error type for this information?
[15:20:45] <daniel> MattJ: yes. I want to know _when_ I can retry
[15:20:54] <daniel> This could be seconds or hours
[15:20:58] <jonasw> daniel, hm, how would the server know when the client can retry?
[15:20:59] <daniel> Depending on implementation
[15:21:09] <jonasw> quota cleanup cronjob something?
[15:21:17] <dwd> MattJ, Well. Errors can have two, actually. Sort of.
[15:21:23] <Zash> Could this not be in a custom element next to the error?
[15:21:24] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[15:21:29] <MattJ> dwd, ?
[15:21:42] <daniel> jonasw: we are taking about quotas like only x MiB an hour
[15:21:43] <dwd> MattJ, Error + original request.
[15:21:48] <jonasw> daniel, well, actually, you could in fact make this a child of <iq/>, but I would consider that abuse. normally an error IQ only returns the original data, if anything
[15:21:53] <Zash> I haven't looked at whatever this <retry> thing is closely enough yet
[15:22:17] <daniel> Jabber.at is doing this
[15:23:02] *** Guus has left the room
[15:23:05] *** SamWhited has left the room
[15:23:32] <Zash> a "application-specific condition element" ala retry-after t=x
[15:24:06] *** Guus has joined the room
[15:24:35] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:24:58] <jonasw> daniel, FWIW, I’m fine-ish with this being a child of <error/>. I find it a bit weird, though. Maybe wrap it in a <quota-exceeded xmlns="http-upload"/> thing first? Then there would be an actual condition, with additional information on when to re-try. It also allows to re-use the <retry/> for other possible conditions (like <ebusy/> or so)
[15:27:22] <daniel> then i have to define every possible error condition instead of relying on normal errors + text
[15:27:24] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[15:27:42] <jonasw> daniel, good point
[15:27:55] <MattJ> It seems like this is a specific case though, not something that could be combined with every other error
[15:28:00] <pep.> I'm curious what's wrong with defining errors and not just dumping text
[15:28:17] <jonasw> pep., you need to foresee every possible condition
[15:28:24] <pep.> Can you not extent it later?
[15:28:29] <daniel> pep., we already have a huge bunch of 'predefined' errors
[15:29:12] <jonasw> pep., maybe first read up on the context; in this case, it’s about annotating errors with a time at which the client may re-try
[15:29:21] <pep.> jonasw, yeah I need to read stuff
[15:29:23] *** intosi shows as "online"
[15:29:35] <daniel> jonasw, if anything i could wrap it in something like <temporal-error><retry/></temporal-error> (working title)
[15:29:36] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[15:29:38] <jonasw> daniel, as I said, I’m fine-ish with <retry/> as child of error. it feels weird, but I’m fine-ish with that.
[15:29:56] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[15:30:00] *** intosi shows as "online"
[15:30:01] <jonasw> well, that’s not usefull at all, leave it as child of <retry/> in that case, because that’s realyl just saying "this is *really* a type='wait' error, no kidding" :)
[15:30:26] <jonasw> I have a larger problem with making substantial changes after last call begun :/
[15:30:36] <Zash> <error type='wait'><resource-constraint/><text>You exceeded the quota, try again in an hour or so</text><retry-after stamp="YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ"/></error> ?
[15:30:50] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[15:31:06] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:32:00] *** jere has left the room
[15:32:10] *** jere has joined the room
[15:32:47] <daniel> i disagree with that being a substantial change
[15:33:14] <jonasw> daniel, in hindsight, it probably was. see the amount o fdiscussion it caused.
[15:33:38] <jonasw> I also probably meant "non-editorial changes" instead of "substantial changes"
[15:34:36] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:34:42] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:36:57] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:37:08] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:37:14] *** Zash shows as "online"
[15:37:27] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:38:23] *** marc has left the room
[15:39:26] *** stefandxm has left the room
[15:41:20] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[15:41:22] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[15:42:30] <pep.> hmm, https://xmpp.org/community/mailing-lists.html, there's a members@ somewhere?
[15:43:29] <pep.> Also https://xmpp.org/about/xsf/members.html doesn't seem up-to-date, anybody knows since when? So I can PR (if I find out who's been accepted and who hasn't)
[15:43:36] <mathieui> you’re automatically subscribed if you become a member afaik
[15:43:48] *** sonny shows as "online"
[15:44:52] <pep.> Ok. Can you give me a header I can filter on? I usually use List-ID
[15:46:46] *** Guus has left the room
[15:46:47] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:47:38] <jonasw> pep., haven’t you been subscribed already?
[15:47:47] <jonasw> List-Id: XSF Members <members.xmpp.org>
[15:48:01] <jonasw> or wait, your election is still upcoming? I don’t konw
[15:48:49] <pep.> I have no email coming from members@
[15:49:02] <pep.> Maybe it's still not done yet, we'll see
[15:49:33] <mathieui> pep., it’s not done yet
[15:49:40] <pep.> cool
[15:49:42] <mathieui> it’s finalized on the 7th I think
[15:49:58] <jonasw> 2017-12-06 is the meeting
[15:50:20] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:50:30] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:51:03] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[15:51:08] *** Alex shows as "online"
[15:55:13] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[15:55:49] *** sonny shows as "away"
[15:57:14] *** Guus has left the room
[15:58:58] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[15:59:11] *** sonny shows as "online"
[16:00:28] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:01:08] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[16:01:16] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:01:37] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:01:38] *** dwd shows as "online"
[16:02:13] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[16:07:14] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[16:11:33] *** daniel has left the room
[16:11:39] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:12:15] *** ralphm has left the room
[16:12:51] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:14:29] *** sonny shows as "away"
[16:15:01] *** Kev shows as "online"
[16:15:47] *** daniel has left the room
[16:15:55] *** daniel shows as "online"
[16:21:08] *** Alex shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[16:21:23] *** Alex has left the room
[16:23:28] *** marc has joined the room
[16:24:55] *** Neustradamus has joined the room
[16:25:15] *** Guus has left the room
[16:25:16] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:26:48] *** marc shows as "online"
[16:26:56] *** sonny shows as "online"
[16:27:13] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[16:27:59] *** pep. has left the room
[16:28:14] *** pep. shows as "online"
[16:28:58] *** pep. has left the room
[16:30:42] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[16:35:13] *** pep. shows as "online"
[16:35:23] *** Alex has joined the room
[16:36:14] *** Guus has left the room
[16:37:57] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:38:39] <edhelas> daniel would it be possible to see if we can figure out the usage of SIMS in Conversations https://github.com/siacs/Conversations/issues/2637 ?
[16:39:56] <daniel> What particular feature do you need edhelas?
[16:40:31] <edhelas> basically that when Conversations upload a file it embed it using SIMS to the message, and not only OOB
[16:40:55] <edhelas> this allow other clients like Movim to have a bit more metadata about the file and create a nice thumbnail
[16:41:37] <SamWhited> I think I've asked like three times (sorry, I promise to write it down this time) but what was lacking from SIMS that OOB has that conversations uses?
[16:42:41] *** Kev has left the room
[16:44:09] <lovetox> nothing
[16:44:17] <lovetox> it was just there before
[16:44:26] <daniel> edhelas, mind giving me an full example of a message stanza you want me to create?
[16:44:50] <Zash> Is this going to be another one of those times where the better solution dies because an okayish method already existed?
[16:44:50] <lovetox> edhelas, i would also implement this in gajim
[16:45:01] <edhelas> that would be awesome
[16:45:49] <pep.> Zash: first come first served
[16:45:49] <lovetox> but only for httpupload in short term
[16:46:04] <edhelas> daniel I can if you want, maybe tonight, but basically everything is done here in Movim https://github.com/movim/moxl/blob/master/src/Moxl/Stanza/Message.php#L101
[16:46:48] <SamWhited> OOB/SIMS is on my list of "things to deprecate one of", so if everyone wants to go implement SIMS that would make things much easier…
[16:47:19] <edhelas> I'm doing SIMS and OOB when publishing and only SIMS when receiving
[16:48:03] <daniel> edhelas, so you put the url in the body and then set no begin and end attributes in the reference?
[16:48:28] <daniel> and you ignore the XEP MUST implement Jingle File Transfer (XEP-0234)?
[16:49:16] <edhelas> that's true, I'll put this begin and end tags
[16:50:14] <lovetox> daniel
[16:50:15] <pep.> Jingle-FT in movim when? :-°
[16:50:23] <lovetox> i think the xep means OR
[16:50:38] <lovetox> i dont see a reason why we have to implement jingle AND httpupload
[16:51:11] <edhelas> > This XEP delegates actual transport of the media data to one of the existing file-transfer XEPs. Thus a client supporting this XEP MUST implement Jingle File Transfer (XEP-0234) [2] and HTTP File Upload (XEP-0363) [4].
[16:51:13] <daniel> lovetox, are you sure? the <file> element is even in the jingle namespace
[16:51:16] <daniel> for what ever reason
[16:52:11] <edhelas> so how does it work if I want to embed a file that was just uploaded by HTTP Upload ?
[16:52:23] <edhelas> the file is not in my machine, I just have some metadata and a URL
[16:52:30] <daniel> edhelas, you tell me. you wanted me to implement the XEP :-)
[16:52:56] <lovetox> ah i think the xep just builds up on jingle file transfer negotiation
[16:53:04] <lovetox> so you have to implement the negotiation part
[16:53:15] <SamWhited> That whole section doesn't make much sense to me, I think it just needs to be reworded.
[16:53:18] <lovetox> but do not have to offer the actual jingle transport
[16:53:27] <lovetox> instead you put in httpupload
[16:53:30] <edhelas> daniel that's all valid questions :) thanks for raising them
[16:53:42] <daniel> you also need bob for thumbnails which i find very weird
[16:53:48] <daniel> i'm not gonna implement bob
[16:54:13] <edhelas> so we need to upaded SIMS, do HTTP Upload AND/OR Jingle FT
[16:54:15] <daniel> has *anyone* ever implemented bob?
[16:54:20] <edhelas> I do
[16:54:26] *** sonny shows as "away"
[16:54:38] <daniel> weird
[16:54:42] <lovetox> no edhelas this xep builds up on jingle FT
[16:54:42] <edhelas> to do stickers sharing, the files are small enough to be shared using base64
[16:55:05] <lovetox> that does not mean you have to provide a jingle transport like socks5 or whatever
[16:55:11] <daniel> well yes. but the counterpart has to be online
[16:55:24] <daniel> which doesn't go well with the 'stateless' premise of the xep
[16:56:00] <pep.> I know a few people were talking of a jingle component (so server-side), any discussion started on this already?
[16:56:21] <edhelas> so we have to tackle again this "file sharing" discussion
[16:56:21] <daniel> edhelas, i mean I can totally implement what you are doing in that PHP script you linked earlier. that's like 10 minutes work
[16:56:36] <daniel> but i'm really not sure that has anything to do with implementing the XEP
[16:56:45] <edhelas> yeah I understand
[16:57:16] <edhelas> to br frank I'm using SIMS to pass the metadata of HTTP File Upload to the other JID, that's mostly it
[16:58:01] <daniel> edhelas, what meta data are you interested in? mime type and size mostly i would assume?
[16:58:05] <daniel> maybe file name
[17:01:01] *** Guus has left the room
[17:01:01] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[17:01:02] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:01:19] <daniel> by the way I personally also regard resolution (width * height) as a nice to have because that would could allow me to allocate space for this in the UI. which this XEP is not doing.
[17:01:24] <edhelas> yup, mime and size as well, I'm not trusting them 100% but they tells me if I need to resolve the HTTP HEADER if I'm interested to build an attachement block to the message
[17:02:08] *** sonny shows as "online"
[17:02:34] <daniel> so for me SIMS is just not doing the right thing. because i would ignore vast parts of the XEP and couldn't even but some information in there I want to put in there
[17:02:45] <daniel> *put
[17:03:15] <lovetox> sims is just not trying to be a better OOB
[17:03:30] <daniel> Sure.
[17:03:34] <lovetox> thats why it reuses jingle stuff
[17:03:41] <daniel> It's doing something completely different
[17:03:55] <edhelas> if we are improving OOB to add those tags I'd be happy
[17:04:18] <lovetox> i dont think so edhelas
[17:05:01] <lovetox> or at least i dont know how easy we can extend a xep years long in draft
[17:05:06] <lovetox> and if its good
[17:05:13] <SamWhited> I don't understand what SIMS is trying to be if not a better OOB; I agree that the XEPs focus seems a bit off, but that's fixable
[17:05:24] <lovetox> oob has a clear use case, and does it well, you can communicated a uri with a description
[17:05:55] <lovetox> really SamWhited ?
[17:06:09] <lovetox> you dont see what it trys to do beside adding metadata?
[17:06:30] <SamWhited> No, as far as I can tell it's a better OOB except that it focuses on file transfer for some reason
[17:06:49] <lovetox> you can share a file with multiple connection points for the receiver
[17:07:01] <lovetox> he can choose if he wants to request it via jingle
[17:07:04] <lovetox> or httpupload
[17:07:13] <SamWhited> Right, and that's all just sharing some metadata about the file
[17:07:15] <lovetox> or any other FT method invented in the future
[17:07:15] *** Tobias has joined the room
[17:07:21] <SamWhited> And basically what OOB does except in a more general way
[17:07:50] <SamWhited> It's OOB but with arbitrary URIs and some other random metadata
[17:07:51] <lovetox> what is the argument? you can add a shittone of stuff to OOB xep then its the same?
[17:08:27] <SamWhited> Can you? I don't see definitions for anything like eg. different resolutions of the same file or other things SIMS has
[17:08:35] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[17:09:02] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:09:19] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:09:55] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[17:10:09] <lovetox> i think we going in circles
[17:10:25] <lovetox> frist you tell that you dont understand what sims trys to do
[17:10:40] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:10:40] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:10:41] <lovetox> now you tell me oob does not have definitions about file resolutions
[17:11:11] <daniel> neither has sims though?
[17:11:13] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:11:18] <SamWhited> It doesn't, and I don't see how these two things are related; you said that SIMS doesn't do the same thing as OOB, and if that's true I don't understand what it does differently. To me it seems like it's just an improved OOB.
[17:11:29] <lovetox> daniel i think you can just add more file tags
[17:11:40] <lovetox> with different images
[17:11:41] <SamWhited> I thought SIMS specifically had that? Maybe I need to read it again
[17:11:45] <daniel> within the same reference?
[17:11:57] <daniel> how do i match a source and a file then?
[17:12:12] <lovetox> nah i think im confusing this
[17:12:21] <lovetox> this was 0084 with different avatar sizes or
[17:12:35] <SamWhited> Ah yah, this one is just thumbnail. Regardless, it was just an example. "more metadata than OOB" was the point.
[17:12:56] <lovetox> yeah ok, but whats bad about this?!
[17:13:17] <Zash> It's a pointer.
[17:13:18] <lovetox> it tries to be more general and have more info then oob
[17:13:26] <lovetox> not just a bit more, WAY more
[17:13:47] <SamWhited> I don't really care if we have more or less metadata, I just think we don't need two XEPs that do more or less the same thing
[17:14:06] <lovetox> so thats what i asked you 4 minutes ago
[17:14:16] <lovetox> 18:07:50] ‎lovetox‎: what is the argument? you can add a shittone of stuff to OOB xep then its the same?
[17:14:43] *** tux has left the room
[17:15:14] *** Guus has left the room
[17:15:22] <Zash> SamWhited: You are giving me the impression that we can never improve on things that already exist, since that would require overlaping protocols for some time.
[17:15:57] <lovetox> oob is a easy small xep that lets you share a description and a uri
[17:16:00] <lovetox> let it be what it is
[17:16:01] *** Holger has left the room
[17:16:09] *** Holger shows as "online"
[17:16:10] *** Holger shows as "online"
[17:17:02] <daniel> yes. wouldn't touch oob. if anything we would create a new XEP that is a more streamlined 'here is an uri and here is some meta data'
[17:17:14] <daniel> or SIMS can move into that direction
[17:17:29] <jonasw> I’d prefer the latter
[17:17:33] <jonasw> SIMS seems like nice framework to extend
[17:17:35] <SamWhited> I agree
[17:17:38] <jonasw> the MUST support Jingle-FT is weird though
[17:17:53] <jonasw> I didn’t know about that, maybe ask Tobias what that is about?
[17:17:54] <Zash> jonasw: Why is that weird?
[17:17:55] <daniel> and the bob thumbnails are even more weird
[17:18:07] <jonasw> Zash, Jingle-FT is a rather complex beast, isn’t it?
[17:18:10] <Zash> jonasw: If it's basically a pointer to a thing available over Jingle-FT?
[17:18:26] <jonasw> it’s not necessarily Jingle-FT, or doesn’t necessarily need to be Jingle-FT
[17:18:48] <SamWhited> Jingle-FT and SIMS are completely orthogonal; SIMS isn't a pointer to a Jingle URI, it also lets you have a pointer to an HTTP Upload API, and as far as I can tell could also provide a pointer to "my proprietary thing" URI.
[17:19:00] <jonasw> or BOB
[17:19:10] <daniel> expect that it says must support jingle ft
[17:19:26] *** nyco has left the room
[17:19:40] <daniel> and it's at least unclear how to do thumbnails without bob
[17:19:41] <SamWhited> That seems like it either means "must support using the Jingle FT metadata XML" or "must usupport Jingle FT *or* something else" and it was just poorly worded, but I guess we'd have to ask Tobias
[17:19:59] <jonasw> maybe post that to the list, daniel?
[17:20:19] <SamWhited> That and the paragraph after it confuse me though, so I suspect we just need section 5.1 reworded for clarity.
[17:20:52] <lovetox> im sure tobias just wanted to reuse already definied tags in another xep
[17:21:01] <lovetox> instead of reinventing the same tags under a new namespace
[17:22:02] <daniel> jonasw, no. i have bigger fish to fry to be honest. things I actually need for Conversations. not saying that i won't implement SIMS but let other people figure out the details
[17:22:06] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[17:22:14] <lovetox> either way i think its no problem to make this jingle agnostic
[17:22:26] <jonasw> daniel, but spark the discussion maybe?
[17:22:49] <daniel> jonasw, that's gonna get ignored anyway
[17:22:56] <jonasw> gotta love your optimism
[17:23:08] <daniel> like the one about MAM or the problems I raised with jingle-ft
[17:23:08] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[17:23:24] <daniel> and those are things i actually care about
[17:23:31] <SamWhited> MAM is being addressed isn't it? I thought Kev and Matthew responded to that and said they'd get a revision out
[17:23:53] <Kev> Hmm? Not reading context, but a MAM update is <> close to the top of my stack.
[17:24:35] <daniel> 👍
[17:24:35] *** Holger has left the room
[17:24:42] *** Holger shows as "online"
[17:25:58] *** nyco has joined the room
[17:25:59] <lovetox> i will post the questions to the list :)
[17:26:03] <lovetox> i care about sims :)
[17:26:09] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[17:26:24] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[17:26:58] *** jubalh has left the room
[17:28:02] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:28:37] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:28:40] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:29:58] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:30:33] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:31:29] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[17:31:40] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:31:54] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:32:05] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:32:55] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:32:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:34:29] <lovetox> do we really need thumbnails?
[17:34:38] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm away"
[17:34:43] <edhelas> what I'd also like to see is a way to embed URLs in general to messages
[17:34:51] <lovetox> with the metadata i can display some placeholder
[17:34:53] <edhelas> like many other messaging solutions are doing now
[17:35:25] <edhelas> having a littke thumbnail, description, title (the client will have to resolve thoses)
[17:35:30] <daniel> edhelas, isn't that what references is doing?
[17:35:54] <lovetox> edhelas thats what the end and begin is for
[17:36:00] <lovetox> so you can embed it in a message
[17:36:26] <edhelas> let me rephrase that :)
[17:36:46] *** Alex has left the room
[17:36:53] *** Alex has joined the room
[17:36:55] <edhelas> XEP-0372: reference just gives a pointer to an URI, without metadata
[17:37:25] <edhelas> XEP-0066: OOB gives a pointer to a URL with just a description
[17:37:32] *** intosi shows as "online"
[17:37:37] <lovetox> no, it also tells you where in the text the reference is to be places
[17:37:40] <lovetox> no, it also tells you where in the text the reference is to be placed
[17:37:44] <lovetox> with beginn and end
[17:37:45] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[17:37:46] *** Alex shows as "online"
[17:38:02] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:38:04] <edhelas> XEP-0385: gives all the metadata, but doesn'yt fit well with my usage (URL only)
[17:38:06] <daniel> gf
[17:38:23] <daniel> you probably need a og extension to references
[17:38:32] <daniel> like sims but with og data
[17:38:37] <edhelas> og ?
[17:38:52] <daniel> http://ogp.me/
[17:39:14] <daniel> which if you have that you don't need sims anymore to cover your usecase
[17:39:28] <daniel> because you can put all that into og
[17:39:36] <edhelas> kind of yes
[17:40:31] <edhelas> also if I could have one generic way to attach thoses things to XMPP messages and/or Pubsub publications (that are actually Atom items as well) that would be nice
[17:40:35] <pep.> rrr heroku apps and their lack of tls :(
[17:40:58] <pep.> Or people failing to set it up correctly
[17:41:04] *** arc has left the room
[17:41:04] *** arc has joined the room
[17:42:16] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[17:42:22] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:42:59] <edhelas> daniel is it something that you'd like to have in Conversations ? URL/file embeding ?
[17:43:17] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:43:29] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:43:34] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:43:48] <daniel> what do you mean?
[17:43:58] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:44:34] <edhelas> https://a.slack-edge.com/66f9/img/api/cnn_embed.png
[17:44:38] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[17:45:38] <daniel> isn't that exatcly would you would og and references for?
[17:46:02] <daniel> you'd have a reference that spans the entire url in this case
[17:46:13] <daniel> and the og:tile, og:description and og:image
[17:46:52] <edhelas> yup, but would you like to implement it in Conversations as well ?
[17:47:39] <daniel> in general yes. but i have the blocker not having stanza content encryption
[17:47:51] <daniel> and that's not going to be resolved any time soon tbh
[17:48:07] <daniel> it's easier for me at this point to generate that information on the receiving end
[17:48:10] <daniel> (opt in)
[17:50:23] <edhelas> yes I understand
[17:51:29] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:51:44] <daniel> also ironically - generating the content on might have some privacy related down sides; but to properly circumvent this you'd have to mirror the image on the sender or else you will be at least leaking the image url
[17:51:46] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[17:52:00] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:52:03] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:52:09] *** Lance has joined the room
[17:52:09] *** Lance shows as "online"
[17:55:17] *** Alex has left the room
[17:57:00] *** dwd shows as "online"
[17:57:11] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[18:00:44] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:02:30] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[18:03:22] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:03:48] *** Lance has left the room
[18:06:39] *** nyco has left the room
[18:07:20] *** jubalh has joined the room
[18:08:08] *** lumi shows as "online"
[18:09:17] *** nyco has joined the room
[18:09:29] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[18:09:37] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:09:42] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:13:22] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:13:26] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:14:31] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:14:52] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:16:18] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:16:21] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:16:32] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:17:27] *** arc has left the room
[18:17:28] *** arc has joined the room
[18:18:20] *** dwd shows as "online"
[18:19:04] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:19:27] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:21:04] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:21:05] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:21:15] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:21:15] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:21:52] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:21:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:23:38] *** ralphm has left the room
[18:23:57] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:23:58] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:24:17] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:24:18] *** arc has left the room
[18:26:14] *** arc has joined the room
[18:27:54] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:29:21] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:29:21] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:33:35] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:33:35] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:34:17] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:34:18] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:34:55] *** Kev shows as "away"
[18:35:13] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:39:41] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[18:41:42] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:42:10] *** jubalh has joined the room
[18:42:22] *** jubalh has left the room
[18:42:25] *** jubalh has joined the room
[18:43:04] *** sonny shows as "online"
[18:43:05] *** sonny shows as "online"
[18:44:02] *** daniel has left the room
[18:44:08] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:44:23] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:46:02] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:46:02] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:47:51] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[18:47:55] *** Alex shows as "online"
[18:48:17] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:48:20] *** ralphm has left the room
[18:48:25] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[18:50:44] *** zinid shows as "online"
[18:51:42] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:52:43] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:52:43] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:53:55] *** lskdjf has left the room
[18:53:56] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[18:54:54] *** dwd shows as "online"
[18:57:01] *** zinid has left the room
[18:58:21] *** sonny shows as "away"
[18:58:29] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[19:00:00] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:00:18] *** sonny shows as "online"
[19:07:58] *** dwd shows as "online"
[19:10:27] *** daniel has left the room
[19:10:31] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:11:50] *** marc has left the room
[19:12:50] *** jere has joined the room
[19:13:39] *** daniel has left the room
[19:13:47] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:14:30] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[19:14:51] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:14:53] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:16:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:19:51] *** sonny shows as "away"
[19:21:21] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[19:23:32] *** zinid shows as "online"
[19:24:36] *** uc has left the room
[19:26:14] *** sonny shows as "online"
[19:36:12] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:36:13] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:41:25] *** Holger has left the room
[19:42:00] *** Holger shows as "online"
[19:43:24] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[19:43:55] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[19:44:21] *** sonny shows as "away"
[19:45:40] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:45:40] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:47:20] *** lskdjf has left the room
[19:47:20] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:47:23] *** daniel has left the room
[19:47:51] *** sonny shows as "online"
[19:52:56] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:56:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:58:42] *** sonny shows as "away"
[20:01:52] *** daniel has left the room
[20:01:57] *** daniel has joined the room
[20:02:44] *** arc has left the room
[20:02:44] *** marc shows as "online"
[20:02:44] *** arc has joined the room
[20:04:20] *** Guus has left the room
[20:04:21] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:08:21] *** sonny shows as "online"
[20:11:15] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[20:11:15] *** intosi has left the room
[20:13:14] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:13:26] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:14:04] *** daniel has left the room
[20:14:26] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:14:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:15:03] *** zinid has left the room
[20:15:14] *** Guus has left the room
[20:15:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:16:43] *** ralphm has left the room
[20:17:50] *** nyco has left the room
[20:19:14] *** nyco has joined the room
[20:21:48] *** daniel has joined the room
[20:24:26] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[20:27:57] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[20:28:35] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:30:47] *** jere has left the room
[20:30:52] *** jere has joined the room
[20:31:14] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[20:35:00] *** sonny shows as "away"
[20:35:08] *** sonny shows as "online"
[20:36:55] *** nyco has left the room
[20:39:10] *** nyco has joined the room
[20:39:11] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:45:00] *** jere has left the room
[20:45:08] *** jere has joined the room
[20:45:42] *** ralphm has left the room
[20:52:42] *** marc has left the room
[20:54:59] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[20:58:32] *** Alex has left the room
[20:58:52] *** dwd shows as "online"
[20:58:56] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[21:00:04] *** arc has left the room
[21:00:05] *** arc has joined the room
[21:00:34] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:01:07] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:03:47] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:03:53] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:06:20] *** Zash has left the room
[21:07:01] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:07:57] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:09:12] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[21:09:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:13:10] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[21:14:06] *** jabberatdemo has joined the room
[21:14:48] *** jabberatdemo has left the room
[21:16:34] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:17:20] *** sonny shows as "away"
[21:19:22] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[21:19:57] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:20:16] *** arc has left the room
[21:20:18] *** lskdjf has left the room
[21:20:27] *** arc has joined the room
[21:20:43] *** sonny shows as "online"
[21:21:04] *** arc has left the room
[21:21:06] *** arc has joined the room
[21:21:28] *** arc has left the room
[21:21:36] *** arc has joined the room
[21:21:59] *** arc has left the room
[21:21:59] *** arc has joined the room
[21:25:18] *** dwd shows as "online"
[21:29:58] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[21:37:48] *** jubalh has joined the room
[21:37:49] *** arc has left the room
[21:39:28] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[21:39:58] *** Guus shows as "online"
[21:40:45] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:41:57] *** arc has joined the room
[21:43:13] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[21:43:15] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[21:46:35] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:49:28] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[22:01:52] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[22:02:47] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:03:34] *** zinid shows as "online"
[22:06:50] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:07:02] *** marc shows as "online"
[22:07:06] *** zinid has left the room
[22:07:26] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:20:45] *** blabla has joined the room
[22:20:45] *** blabla shows as "online"
[22:22:24] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:26:37] <edhelas> what is the standard URI format fur Pubsub nodes and items ?
[22:28:26] *** sonny shows as "away"
[22:29:09] *** lovetox has left the room
[22:31:14] *** zinid has left the room
[22:33:06] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[22:35:22] *** zinid has joined the room
[22:41:40] *** marc has left the room
[22:42:12] *** sonny shows as "online"
[22:43:11] *** sonny has left the room
[22:43:27] *** sonny shows as "online"
[22:45:42] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[22:46:00] *** sonny shows as "online"
[22:46:26] *** Kev shows as "online"
[22:49:33] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:55:51] *** SamWhited has left the room
[22:56:21] *** ralphm has left the room
[22:56:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:57:17] *** marc has left the room
[22:57:40] *** jubalh has joined the room
[22:58:50] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:58:52] *** jubalh has joined the room
[23:05:06] *** valo has left the room
[23:07:13] *** daniel has left the room
[23:07:31] *** daniel shows as "online"
[23:09:52] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[23:10:45] *** jere has joined the room
[23:14:43] *** Neustradamus shows as "away"
[23:14:47] *** Neustradamus has left the room
[23:15:28] *** jubalh has left the room
[23:15:32] *** jubalh has joined the room
[23:28:50] *** zinid has left the room
[23:30:05] *** Tobias has joined the room
[23:31:17] *** daniel has left the room
[23:32:54] *** Kev shows as "away"