Thursday, December 07, 2017
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
December
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
        1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:02:04] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[00:04:12] *** ralphm has joined the room
[00:06:49] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[00:14:38] *** efrit has left the room
[00:20:23] *** marc has left the room
[00:23:14] *** zinid has left the room
[00:37:52] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[00:37:56] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[00:43:37] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[00:45:35] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[00:45:39] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[00:49:04] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[00:49:10] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:01:32] *** jjrh has left the room
[01:01:35] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:02:19] *** jjrh has left the room
[01:02:22] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:04:48] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[01:05:35] *** 0000 has joined the room
[01:05:35] *** 0000 shows as "online"
[01:05:39] *** 0000 shows as "online"
[01:15:09] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[01:15:14] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:17:01] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[01:17:03] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:18:38] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[01:18:41] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[01:21:31] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[01:23:56] *** Guus has left the room
[01:24:04] *** Guus has joined the room
[01:29:25] *** tux has left the room
[01:29:26] *** tux has joined the room
[01:31:12] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[01:35:58] *** jjrh has left the room
[01:36:34] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:37:15] *** jjrh has left the room
[01:37:18] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:44:00] *** Lance has joined the room
[01:44:00] *** Lance shows as "online"
[01:45:37] *** Lance has left the room
[01:49:46] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[01:50:50] *** Tobias has joined the room
[01:50:59] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[01:50:59] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[01:57:01] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[01:57:01] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[02:11:20] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[02:11:20] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[02:26:29] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[02:26:40] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[02:28:06] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[02:28:06] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[02:33:57] *** arc has left the room
[02:33:58] *** arc has joined the room
[02:56:36] *** arc has left the room
[02:56:38] *** arc has joined the room
[03:00:13] *** arc has left the room
[03:00:15] *** arc has joined the room
[03:04:42] *** zinid has joined the room
[03:10:06] *** zinid has left the room
[03:18:37] *** ralphm has left the room
[03:18:38] *** arc has left the room
[03:18:43] *** ralphm has joined the room
[03:21:39] *** arc has joined the room
[03:36:46] *** zinid has joined the room
[03:42:47] *** zinid has left the room
[04:00:14] *** uc has joined the room
[04:03:43] *** @Alacer has left the room
[04:04:02] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[04:06:30] *** efrit has joined the room
[04:11:45] *** Syndace has left the room
[04:11:49] *** Syndace has joined the room
[04:27:28] *** @Alacer has left the room
[04:27:43] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[04:28:53] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[04:31:34] *** zinid has joined the room
[04:37:34] *** zinid has left the room
[04:49:52] *** efrit has left the room
[04:51:34] *** zinid has joined the room
[04:57:34] *** zinid has left the room
[05:21:51] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[05:21:57] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:22:56] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:23:03] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:26:42] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[05:26:42] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[05:26:47] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:27:18] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:33:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:34:47] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:55:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:55:46] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:56:15] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[05:56:59] *** mimi89999 has joined the room
[05:57:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:58:25] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[06:00:21] *** uc has joined the room
[06:01:57] *** arc has left the room
[06:02:00] *** arc has joined the room
[06:02:33] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:02:33] *** arc has left the room
[06:03:16] *** arc has joined the room
[06:06:00] *** zinid has joined the room
[06:07:42] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:07:45] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:07:55] *** zinid shows as "online"
[06:13:39] *** @Alacer has left the room
[06:13:42] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[06:25:25] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:30:26] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:30:42] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[06:33:24] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:36:16] *** @Alacer has left the room
[06:36:33] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:37:06] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:37:13] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[06:38:05] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:38:43] *** arc has left the room
[06:39:24] *** arc has joined the room
[06:46:17] *** ralphm has left the room
[07:02:43] *** jjrh has left the room
[07:03:33] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[07:04:26] *** ralphm has joined the room
[07:20:17] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[07:21:08] *** 0000 has left the room
[07:29:21] *** zinid has left the room
[07:29:26] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:32:53] *** Kev shows as "online"
[07:43:34] *** Kev shows as "away"
[07:46:15] *** McKael shows as "online"
[07:46:17] *** jjrh has left the room
[07:46:20] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[07:47:04] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[07:50:13] *** Kev shows as "online"
[07:53:28] *** valo has left the room
[07:53:33] *** valo has joined the room
[07:54:48] *** @Alacer has left the room
[07:58:48] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[07:59:12] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[08:01:28] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[08:05:31] *** daniel has left the room
[08:05:35] *** daniel has joined the room
[08:06:43] *** ralphm has joined the room
[08:07:33] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:08:29] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:12:58] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:13:31] *** sonny has left the room
[08:13:36] *** sonny has joined the room
[08:13:55] *** sonny has joined the room
[08:15:41] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[08:15:45] *** intosi shows as "online"
[08:16:42] *** @Alacer has left the room
[08:16:49] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[08:18:24] *** McKael shows as "online"
[08:27:05] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[08:29:37] *** marc has joined the room
[08:30:04] *** 0000 has joined the room
[08:31:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[08:32:25] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[08:35:05] *** sonny shows as "online"
[08:35:05] *** sonny shows as "online"
[08:36:12] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[08:38:41] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[08:41:38] <Kev> jonasw: I said previous that the motivation xep1 gave for reissuing LCs is for outgoing Council. I came up with some motivations of my own in response to your mail. I don't think that was inconsistent :)
[08:43:22] <jonasw> Kev, as I said (at least in one of my drafts), I think that is fine.
[08:43:42] <jonasw> I’m still not entirely sure how your original argument actually applies, but it doesn’t matter now, since I find your current argument fully convincing.
[08:44:42] <Kev> The point I'm making is that it wasn't my original argument, it's the one in xep1 and at that time I didn't bother coming up with any of my own (until you mail asked to)
[08:44:55] <Kev> I think my current arguments are stronger than the one xep1 makes, but I would.
[08:44:58] <jonasw> oh, I didn’t realise that the argument is literally from XEP1
[08:45:36] <jonasw> I was sure that I read something along the lines of (from you) "I think the original reasoning back then was ..."
[08:45:43] <Kev> "The motivation in xep1 is ..."
[08:45:48] <jonasw> damn
[08:45:50] <jonasw> sorry
[08:45:53] <jonasw> I didn’t have my coffee yet
[08:45:55] *** daniel has left the room
[08:45:59] <jonasw> (I can always make that excuse, I never drink coffee)
[08:46:06] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:46:11] <jonasw> but I also didn’t have my water yet, which is probably worse
[08:46:49] <Kev> But I would be amazed if anyone not on Council does the level of review that Council should do.
[08:46:50] <SouL> jonasw, same here haha
[08:47:08] <Kev> (Indeed, the questions that the Editors ask them to during LC don't come close)
[08:47:37] *** ralphm has joined the room
[08:48:00] <jonasw> I found your review of the compliance suite very thorough by the way, that’s way beyond what I as a developer would be doing.
[08:48:16] *** marc shows as "online"
[08:48:43] *** sonny shows as "away"
[08:49:00] *** sonny shows as "online"
[08:49:24] <Kev> That's roughly the point I'm making - I would expect, for a compliance suite review buy Council, them to have gone through everything in the suite and checked if it's sensible, checked if anything not in the list needs to be, and checked that the list is consistent. For non-compliance suites I'd expect Council to do much more review than that - for non trivial XEPs I expect Council are probably spending an hour+ per advancing XEP to review properly. I really wouldn't expect non-Council to be putting that sort of work in.
[08:49:26] <Ge0rG> Kev: can't we solve the bookmarks issue by requiring servers to transparently synchronize both storage formats?
[08:50:13] <jonasw> Ge0rG, that’s an interesting idea
[08:50:17] <Kev> Ge0rG: I think 'requiring' might be hard here, but we could add a server feature to 48 that does that, I think, yes. And I think we could do so without bumping namespaces or worrying about it being Draft, due to it being a new server-only feature for a XEP that previously wasn't server.
[08:50:19] *** daniel has left the room
[08:50:34] <edhelas> Bookmark need to be changed, first have atomic bookmarks
[08:50:43] <jonasw> if it’s announced by a feature, I don’t see any reason not to, draft or not, previously server side or not
[08:50:44] <Ge0rG> edhelas: no need to go nuclear!
[08:50:51] <edhelas> eheh
[08:51:01] <edhelas> no but we have PEP, and multi-items tags now
[08:51:11] <jonasw> edhelas, in spec, yes
[08:51:14] <edhelas> I'd like, in 2017, to be able to solve a bookmark in a PEP-Pubsub item
[08:51:14] <jonasw> in deployment mmmm
[08:51:23] <jonasw> edhelas, I have bad news for you.
[08:51:50] <Kev> Bookmarks are atomic at the moment, no?
[08:52:01] <edhelas> no they aren't
[08:52:03] <jonasw> Kev, but not very fine grained
[08:52:20] <Kev> Pretty sure they are. It's a single payload.
[08:52:22] <edhelas> you just save the whole list in an item, so you have race condition issues
[08:52:32] *** 0000 shows as "online"
[08:52:39] <Kev> Race condition issues doesn't make it non-atomic :)
[08:53:06] <jonasw> Kev, you know about the issues though, don’t you?
[08:53:16] <edhelas> I'd love to have a bookmark XEP that works like this one https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0330.html#usecases
[08:54:40] <jonasw> aioxmpp has a weird read-modify-write loop up to three times or until convergence, whicever happens first
[08:54:41] <Kev> edhelas: In the sense of one bookmark per item?
[08:54:50] <edhelas> Kev Yes!
[08:54:52] <jonasw> we’re not entirly sure it ever converges even if everybody does that algorithm, but it should.
[08:55:06] <Kev> I think that would be fairly sensible, in a world where bookmarks weren't based on iq:private primarily, yes.
[08:55:25] *** daniel has left the room
[08:55:31] *** daniel has joined the room
[08:55:36] <jonasw> yah, a server would have to implement that read-modify-write loop then :)
[08:55:54] <edhelas> Zash what is the status of multi-items in Pubsub/PEP nodes in Prosody
[08:56:11] <Ge0rG> See, XMPP is all about database update synchronization.
[08:56:12] <jonasw> edhelas, you should first ask what the status of private and persistent pep is ....
[08:56:27] *** McKael shows as "online"
[08:56:32] <Kev> I think that the publish-only-if-the-parent-state-is-right XEP would do the job too (for something not frequently changing).
[08:56:41] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:56:50] <edhelas> jonasw persistence is there in ejabberd and Prosody now afaik
[08:57:00] <jonasw> atomic compare-and-publish for pubsub, Kev? :)
[08:57:03] <intosi> jonasw: M-Link's is excellent as well ;)
[08:57:14] <jonasw> edhelas, is it though? I thought only with a community module.
[08:57:40] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:57:41] <jonasw> anyways, I wanted to go for errands like an hour ago. the XSF is eating my time!!k
[08:57:41] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:01:02] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[09:01:26] *** 0000 has left the room
[09:02:57] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[09:11:20] *** daniel has left the room
[09:11:24] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:11:28] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[09:13:00] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[09:13:44] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[09:15:07] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[09:15:07] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:15:11] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:15:38] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[09:17:49] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[09:19:06] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[09:19:37] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[09:23:35] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Work work …"
[09:24:14] *** intosi shows as "online"
[09:27:33] *** daniel has left the room
[09:27:38] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:29:28] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[09:35:12] *** daniel has left the room
[09:35:18] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:36:49] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[09:39:39] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[09:40:48] *** Martin has joined the room
[09:41:29] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[09:41:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[09:41:39] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[09:42:36] *** jere has left the room
[09:45:00] *** jere has joined the room
[09:45:46] *** daniel has left the room
[09:45:51] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:49:29] *** Martin has left the room
[09:50:05] *** sonny shows as "away"
[09:50:19] *** dwd shows as "online"
[09:51:46] *** sonny shows as "online"
[09:55:04] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[09:55:06] *** intosi shows as "online"
[09:59:48] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:04:20] *** daniel has left the room
[10:04:29] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:06:33] *** daniel has left the room
[10:06:40] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:11:06] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[10:11:40] *** sonny has left the room
[10:11:43] *** sonny shows as "online"
[10:12:00] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:20:21] *** lskdjf has left the room
[10:22:00] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:23:11] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[10:23:30] *** jubalh has joined the room
[10:26:39] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[10:28:17] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[10:31:14] *** ralphm has joined the room
[10:32:10] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:32:23] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[10:37:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[10:38:52] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:40:24] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[10:41:44] *** daniel has left the room
[10:43:16] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[10:46:05] *** daniel has left the room
[10:46:10] *** daniel has joined the room
[10:47:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[10:50:58] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[10:51:18] *** Zash shows as "online"
[10:51:20] *** Zash shows as "online"
[10:55:24] *** goffi has joined the room
[11:00:20] *** goffi shows as "online"
[11:01:00] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:01:04] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:04:55] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[11:06:16] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:06:23] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:11:22] <jonasw> SamWhited, what’s the status about the XEP-393 update? I’m still missing the opt-out and a formal grammar…
[11:11:54] <jonasw> (or opt-in, even better)
[11:13:00] *** sonny shows as "away"
[11:14:05] *** lumi has joined the room
[11:16:14] *** matlag has joined the room
[11:17:09] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[11:20:11] *** Zash has left the room
[11:20:11] *** Zash has left the room
[11:20:32] *** Zash has joined the room
[11:20:32] *** Zash shows as "online"
[11:22:12] *** sonny shows as "online"
[11:25:01] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:25:11] *** ralphm has left the room
[11:31:30] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[11:32:53] *** lumi shows as "online"
[11:37:28] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:37:35] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:40:13] *** zinid shows as "online"
[11:46:13] *** zinid has left the room
[11:47:39] *** ralphm has joined the room
[11:49:49] *** intosi shows as "online"
[11:52:55] *** zinid shows as "online"
[11:55:03] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[11:55:09] *** daniel has left the room
[11:55:14] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:56:49] *** daniel has left the room
[11:56:55] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:58:55] *** zinid has left the room
[12:00:53] *** daniel has left the room
[12:03:19] *** daniel has left the room
[12:03:28] *** daniel has joined the room
[12:05:50] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[12:05:52] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[12:05:56] *** Tobias has left the room
[12:13:25] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[12:13:46] *** arc has left the room
[12:14:34] *** arc has joined the room
[12:15:22] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[12:15:27] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[12:18:19] *** valo has left the room
[12:18:23] *** valo has joined the room
[12:19:14] *** ralphm has joined the room
[12:19:29] *** goffi has left the room
[12:23:50] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[12:25:39] *** sonny shows as "away"
[12:26:32] *** georg has joined the room
[12:27:58] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:30:14] *** sonny shows as "online"
[12:31:06] *** goffi has left the room
[12:31:35] *** Guus has left the room
[12:33:23] *** goffi has joined the room
[12:37:08] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:38:59] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[12:39:06] *** stefandxm has left the room
[12:39:17] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:40:06] *** zinid shows as "online"
[12:43:17] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[12:44:27] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:44:33] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:44:35] *** Guus has left the room
[12:44:41] *** Guus shows as "online"
[12:46:32] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[12:46:47] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[12:49:02] *** tux shows as "away"
[12:49:11] *** georg has left the room
[12:53:46] *** goffi has left the room
[12:56:35] *** zinid has left the room
[13:00:37] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[13:02:43] *** zinid shows as "online"
[13:05:27] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[13:05:36] *** intosi shows as "online"
[13:07:19] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[13:09:51] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[13:13:21] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[13:13:22] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[13:15:37] *** jubalh shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[13:17:38] *** zinid has left the room
[13:20:10] *** daniel has left the room
[13:20:14] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:22:17] *** intosi shows as "online"
[13:24:14] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[13:24:25] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[13:25:39] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[13:27:29] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[13:27:35] *** nyco has left the room
[13:29:19] *** nyco has joined the room
[13:31:17] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:31:24] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[13:31:26] *** intosi shows as "online"
[13:35:54] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[13:39:17] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:41:20] *** matlag shows as "online"
[13:51:21] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[13:51:26] *** sonny shows as "online"
[13:51:26] *** sonny shows as "online"
[13:53:16] <Guus> I've just added a notification to the XSF Board meeting calendar item, that's on the XSF shared agenda. Could someone please make sure that Google doesn't do something stupid like adding that notification to everyone's agenda?
[13:53:26] <Guus> I've set it to 11 minutes, just to make it slightly different from the default.
[13:53:55] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:56:44] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[13:57:19] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:59:08] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[14:01:21] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:07:08] <SamWhited> jonasw: I'm not sure that we're adding an opt out yet. A football grammar seems fine, if unnecessary, but it's not something I'm going to spend time doing right away
[14:09:33] <jonasw> menh
[14:09:50] <jonasw> I see absolutely no reason not to add an opt-out, to be honest.
[14:12:23] <SamWhited> *formal, even
[14:12:55] <Kev> I liked the idea of you writing a football grammar. Let me have that, please.
[14:13:13] <jonasw> I thought that football grammer is a nickname for some type of grammar representation :)
[14:13:20] <Ge0rG> Kev: do you mean a soccer grammar?
[14:16:05] <SamWhited> This will be a Liverpool F.C. grammar (if kev can live with that), so definitely "football"

[14:18:03] <Ge0rG> But they are playing soccer?
[14:20:10] <SamWhited> No, Atlanta United plays soccer, Liverpool plays football.
[14:20:52] <Ge0rG> Ah, but they are playing the same game, right?
[14:21:18] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[14:21:25] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[14:21:41] <SamWhited> Yes, sorry, I'm fine stretching this joke out now
[14:21:51] <SamWhited> Done, even. I hate phones.
[14:22:00] <jonasw> we all do
[14:27:08] *** Martin has joined the room
[14:27:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:29:03] *** marc has left the room
[14:29:27] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[14:30:26] *MattJ waves
[14:30:38] <Martin> *wave*
[14:30:39] *Guus performs an acrobatic manouvre.
[14:30:40] *ralphm bangs gavel
[14:30:56] <ralphm> 0. Welcome & Agenda
[14:31:04] <ralphm> Hi! Who do we have?
[14:31:13] <Martin> I’m here
[14:31:16] <MattJ> I'm here
[14:31:18] <Guus> I'm here
[14:31:24] <ralphm> nyco?
[14:31:45] *** ralphm changed the title to "XSF Board Meeting | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings"
[14:32:29] <Guus> He might be attending POSS
[14:32:45] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[14:32:51] <Guus> (an event in Paris that he previously expressed interest in)
[14:33:42] <ralphm> Ah, yes.
[14:33:43] <mathieui> he is (or was yesterday, where I saw him)
[14:33:54] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:34:03] <ralphm> Anyone have something for the agenda?
[14:34:14] <Guus> I've added things to Trello last week
[14:34:19] <Guus> apart from those, none.
[14:35:00] <MattJ> I don't think I have anything to add right now
[14:35:06] <ralphm> Ok
[14:35:10] <Martin> Nothing from me
[14:35:17] <ralphm> Who can take minutes?
[14:36:08] <Martin> I’m mobile, so not really in a position to, sorry :(
[14:36:09] <Guus> if no-one outside board members is available, I'll do it.
[14:36:31] <ralphm> 1. D&O insurance
[14:37:07] <Guus> I've talked to Peter. His full response is in Trello.
[14:37:33] <Guus> basically: if board still wants to move forward with this, he will. But he estimates it'll be not cheap.
[14:37:43] <ralphm> Given his response, and no current (potential) officers asking for it right now, let's close this for now
[14:38:05] <Guus> Aren't we asking for this?
[14:38:16] <Martin> Do we know/remember why we started down this path in the first place?
[14:38:46] <Martin> (I’m happy to close it, fwiw, just curious as to why this has hung around for some long)
[14:38:52] <Martin> *so long
[14:39:20] <Guus> if it's a cheap way to help us protect from being financially pressured into doing something, I'd be in favor of getting an insurance.
[14:39:22] <ralphm> Guus: I'm not asking for insurance, no.
[14:39:44] *** Kev has left the room
[14:39:46] *** Kev shows as "online"
[14:39:47] *** Kev shows as "online"
[14:40:11] <Guus> Martin: it was put up by Laura, April 4, 2016.
[14:40:17] <ralphm> I'm also not entirely sure who this will work out with people in Europe.
[14:41:28] <MattJ> From what I can piece together, in 2015 there was a search for a new Treasurer, and the only applicant raised concerns about liability - I don't know if this is what triggered it
[14:41:38] <ralphm> Martin: well, somebody brought it up, stpeter would investigate, that was delayed a bit, everybody lost interest.
[14:41:39] <Guus> given that we've not been financially pressured in the past ... 18 years? ... might be a non-issue.
[14:41:54] <ralphm> The Foundation is not that old yet, but sure
[14:42:26] <Guus> I know it's dead-cheap in the Netherlands, but liability laws are vastly different here.
[14:43:03] <ralphm> Right. I'm not even sure if a Dutch insurance would work with a Delaware company.
[14:43:16] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[14:43:17] <Guus> but if I'm the only one interested, i'm happy to let this go.
[14:43:17] <ralphm> If you want to investigate that, that's fine of course.
[14:43:52] <Guus> Matt, Martin?
[14:44:13] <Martin> I’m happy to let it go
[14:45:05] <ralphm> Ok, archiving.
[14:45:18] <ralphm> 2. Commitments
[14:45:28] <Guus> I'll let Peter know.
[14:46:07] <ralphm> I saw that we asked and can reconfirm our Treasurer and Secretary for another year.
[14:46:10] <MattJ> Sorry, laggy here. I'm happy to pass on the insurance. But I think we'd need actual quotes to make a concrete decision (more than "it's expensive")
[14:47:44] <Guus> indeed, both Alex and Peter are happy to take on their roles another year. Do we need nyco to make it official?
[14:48:14] <ralphm> So I motion we appoint Alexander Gnauck as Secretary for another term.
[14:48:25] <Guus> +1
[14:48:28] <Martin> +1
[14:48:36] <Martin> +1
[14:48:47] *** Martin has left the room
[14:48:51] *** Martin has joined the room
[14:48:53] <ralphm> Done.
[14:48:55] <Martin> +1
[14:49:07] <MattJ> +1
[14:49:11] <ralphm> I motion we appoint Peter Saint-André as Treasurer for another term.
[14:49:15] <MattJ> +1
[14:49:17] <Guus> +1
[14:49:19] <Martin> +!
[14:49:23] <Martin> *+1
[14:49:27] <ralphm> Done
[14:49:57] <Guus> Can we have some kind of thank-you for the work they've been doing so far?
[14:50:03] <ralphm> I think we have to postpone appointing the Chair again.
[14:50:15] <ralphm> Guus: please note this in the minutes, indeed
[14:50:24] *** dwd shows as "online"
[14:50:37] <ralphm> FWIW, I'm happy to continue.
[14:51:06] <ralphm> I just hope that nyco can attend next meeting so we can finish this.
[14:51:22] <Guus> At some point, it'd like to address unscheduled non-attendence.
[14:51:36] <ralphm> I haven't yet acted on finding a new ED, so let's keep that one.
[14:51:53] <ralphm> Guus: right, I did send that message to the Board list for a reason.
[14:52:03] *** daniel shows as "online"
[14:52:23] <Guus> Yes, thanks for that.
[14:52:35] <Guus> but it did not help, sadly.
[14:52:56] <ralphm> Moving on
[14:53:06] <ralphm> 3. Items for discussion
[14:53:18] <ralphm> We only have a few minutes left.
[14:54:12] <ralphm> Given the post-meeting discussion, unless there's disagreement, I'd like to remove the SPIM item for discussion at Board level right now, until there's a more actionably proposal.
[14:54:26] <MattJ> wfm
[14:54:27] <Guus> that works for me.
[14:54:40] <Martin> Fine by me
[14:54:51] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[14:54:52] <Guus> I'd like to discuss board prio's with all present, but it wouldn't hurt for all of us to prepare by adding their own thoughts.
[14:54:59] <Guus> (as a commitment for the week ahead).
[14:55:00] <ralphm> Guus: +1
[14:55:00] *** Kev shows as "away"
[14:55:03] *** Kev shows as "online"
[14:56:10] <MattJ> +1
[14:56:21] <Martin> Sounds like a plan
[14:56:25] <ralphm> Added a card
[14:56:25] <Guus> potential survey is based on that discussion, I think.
[14:56:31] <ralphm> Agreed
[14:56:41] <ralphm> That leaves us with the new card on FOSDEM sponsorship.
[14:56:56] <ralphm> I think this is an interesting topic, that deserves a bit more than 3 minutes
[14:57:11] <Guus> (I'm good for another 10 minutes or so)
[14:57:29] <MattJ> +1. I'm in favour of it generally, but I think we need a broader discussion on financing and fundraising
[14:57:50] <MattJ> We're really bad at both, and I think it's something we need to improve on
[14:57:51] <ralphm> MattJ: can you create a card to that effect?
[14:57:58] <MattJ> Sure
[14:58:05] <ralphm> I propose we then pick that up next week
[14:58:10] <ralphm> also given the short time until FOSDEM
[14:58:24] *** daniel shows as "online"
[14:58:33] <ralphm> 4. AOB
[14:58:50] <ralphm> I didn't see anything for this raised today
[14:58:52] <Martin> None from me
[14:58:58] <ralphm> 5. Time of Next
[14:58:59] <Guus> SCAM should get into gear for FOSDEM/SUMMIT
[14:59:00] <ralphm> +1W
[14:59:04] <ralphm> Guus: agreed
[14:59:26] <ralphm> The confirmation for stands has been extended
[14:59:30] <Guus> +1W works for me.
[14:59:34] <MattJ> +1W wfm
[14:59:37] <Martin> +1W works for me too
[14:59:37] <ralphm> I.e. I didn't get it yet because they are slow
[14:59:50] <ralphm> 6. Close
[14:59:52] <ralphm> Thanks all!
[14:59:55] *ralphm bangs gavel
[14:59:57] <Martin> *wave*
[14:59:59] <MattJ> Thanks
[15:00:02] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[15:00:07] *** ralphm changed the title to "XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings"
[15:00:32] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:00:46] <Ge0rG> So what can we do to improve the SPIM situation?
[15:01:19] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[15:01:41] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[15:01:57] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:02:14] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Work work …"
[15:02:16] <Guus> Ge0rG: stop searching for silver bullets.
[15:02:33] <Guus> I feel that to many proposals get shot down because "that won't fix the problem"
[15:02:45] <Guus> (in general, not by you specifically)
[15:03:08] <Guus> many partial solutions will at least help. Currently, we're not making any progress.
[15:03:09] *** lovetox has joined the room
[15:03:16] *** Martin has left the room
[15:03:59] <moparisthebest> well mainly because there are no silver bullets
[15:04:30] <moparisthebest> if there was a perfect solution for spam, email people would have found it years ago, probably before xmpp became a thing
[15:05:02] <Guus> agreed.
[15:05:36] <lovetox> Just to add to the Last Call XEP-0387 discussion, because im to lazy now to post to the list
[15:05:58] <moparisthebest> solutions should fall neatly in 2 categories: 1. That won't help at all. 2. That might help for a little bit
[15:06:02] *Ge0rG deleted around 1000 spammer accounts in the last 24h.
[15:06:22] <jonasw> obligatory link: https://craphound.com/spamsolutions.txt
[15:06:23] <Ge0rG> lovetox: don't be lazy. Not everyone is reading this MUC
[15:06:30] <lovetox> SamWhited, it seems you are not aware that 0048 on pubsub is not supported by prosody or ejabbered as of right now, so recommending that is a bit over optimistic
[15:06:46] <jonasw> lovetox, not even ejabberd? I thought ejabberd can do that
[15:06:59] <lovetox> only one server to my knowledge
[15:07:05] <lovetox> that conversations server, because holger added it
[15:07:16] <lovetox> i dont know if this has landed in the community version of ejabbered
[15:07:29] *** daniel shows as "online"
[15:07:32] <lovetox> but i doubt it
[15:07:45] <moparisthebest> haha jonasw never saw that, thanks :)
[15:08:19] <lovetox> and even if, this still is a feature then that only one server in its newest version supports, still not something that should recommended, we strife for good interop with the compliance suite
[15:08:26] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[15:08:30] <Ge0rG> lovetox: that was discussed on standards@ I think. Or at least in the last council minutes
[15:08:51] <lovetox> no, the argument revolved around what clients actually use
[15:09:04] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:09:11] <lovetox> and yes of course all clients use private storage
[15:09:19] <edhelas> nope
[15:09:31] <lovetox> but even if not, we cannot recommend something that is not supported by servers
[15:09:34] <edhelas> Movim relies on private PEP node for Bookmarks, only that
[15:09:46] <lovetox> compliance is here so we have good interop between clients and servers
[15:09:49] <Ge0rG> edhelas: Movim also doesn't work on my server :(
[15:09:51] <lovetox> not to promote next level features
[15:09:56] <edhelas> Ge0rG Prosody ?
[15:10:08] <jonasw> lovetox, remember that people wanted to have MIX in there
[15:10:09] <Ge0rG> lovetox: https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/554
[15:10:13] <Ge0rG> edhelas: yeah
[15:10:20] <edhelas> Ge0rG soon :)
[15:10:26] <jonasw> lovetox, I think the actual debate is whether we want the compliance suites to be something which describes what we want to have soon or what is now
[15:10:35] <jonasw> I think SamWhited wants them to be a description of what we want to have.
[15:10:55] <lovetox> in my opinion it should reflect something that is good right now
[15:10:57] <SamWhited> I don't actually understand that discussion; both of them support bookmarks in PEP just fine. Do you mean the persistence thing?
[15:11:03] <lovetox> not what we hope will happen sometimes in the future
[15:11:18] <edhelas> ping Zash
[15:11:29] <lovetox> SamWhited, they dont, they are not supporting 223
[15:11:38] <lovetox> this means all bookmarks are open world readable
[15:11:56] <lovetox> which is not something that we want
[15:12:24] <lovetox> maybe the xep doesnt require it strictly but it should
[15:12:29] <Zash> ENOCTX
[15:12:31] <lovetox> i dont know the wording anymore
[15:12:41] <lovetox> and also this is the reason why nobody really wants to implement this
[15:12:46] <Ge0rG> Zash: bookmarks in PEP
[15:14:06] <lovetox> if gajim gets bookmarks over pep, we test if the server supports 223 fully, if not, we purge the pep node
[15:14:13] <lovetox> and transfer bookmarks to private storage
[15:14:17] <Zash> Not yet
[15:14:26] <jonasw> lovetox, <3
[15:14:29] <jonasw> good job :)
[15:14:45] <jonasw> SamWhited, if you count "bookmarks in PEP work until the next server reboot" as "working", I think we might have a problem.
[15:14:54] <Zash> We've got persistence but access control isn't configurable yet
[15:14:59] <jonasw> SamWhited, if you count "bookmarks in PEP work until the next server reboot, then they’re gone" as "working", I think we might have a problem.
[15:15:11] <jonasw> SamWhited, if you count "bookmarks in PEP work until the next server reboot and are also world-readable, then they’re gone" as "working", I think we might have a problem.
[15:15:21] <SamWhited> fair enough
[15:15:54] <edhelas> Zash access_control is the last missing thing to move Bookmarks to PEP in Prosody ?
[15:16:04] <lovetox> persistence is one thing, support of access_model = whiteliste, the real important one
[15:16:06] <SamWhited> Either way, servers more or less support them and I think we want to encourage that support to be better and document what servers need to give a good experience, not just document what everything is already doing
[15:16:23] <edhelas> SamWhited +1
[15:16:27] <SamWhited> I was pretty sure they already supported private nodes though, but I guess not?
[15:16:29] <Zash> edhelas: No idea
[15:16:48] <jonasw> SamWhited, fair enough
[15:16:58] *** jubalh shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:17:14] <jonasw> I think the main mis-understanding is then whether the suites should document the current real deployment or the future. there seems to be disagreement on that.
[15:17:33] <lovetox> SamWhited, private nodes are supported sometimes
[15:17:43] <lovetox> but often whats missing is the <publish-options> feature
[15:17:49] <jonasw> SamWhited, maybe add a paragraph to this in the introduction, making this absolutely clear (even though I think that the introduction -- which I haven’t read until now, admittedly -- makes it quite clear already that the suites are meant to advance, not do describe)
[15:18:01] <lovetox> that lets the client discover this whithout pulling the whole node config
[15:18:14] <lovetox> pulling node config in turn is also not supported by all server
[15:18:14] <zinid> lovetox, it's missing because there are problems with xdata definition
[15:19:04] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:19:17] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:19:24] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:22:31] *** Kev has left the room
[15:27:29] <Ge0rG> dwd: which MUA are you using? The plaintext quoting it generates doesn't make it possible to distinguish what you wrote from what you are responding to.
[15:29:19] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:36:46] <jonasw> TIL how to force kmail to show a multipart/alternative message as html even though it contains a text/plain part.
[15:37:04] <jonasw> I find it ironic that the HTML message contains *foo* by the way.
[15:37:56] *** stefandxm has left the room
[15:37:59] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[15:38:01] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[15:40:53] *** ralphm has left the room
[15:43:54] *** ralphm has joined the room
[15:46:14] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[15:47:16] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[15:47:21] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[15:59:13] *** ralphm has left the room
[15:59:38] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:59:38] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:06:16] *** stefandxm has left the room
[16:06:42] *** marc shows as "online"
[16:07:00] <jonasw> SamWhited, XEP-0001 has a minimum of 14 days. I hate that.
[16:07:56] <SamWhited> It has had 14 days of LC already, after that it's up to the editor
[16:08:17] <SamWhited> Or at least, that's how I've been treating it. First one is 2 weeks, after that I've done 1 week LCs for lots of things
[16:12:18] <jonasw> hm, sure, but a re-issuance after council switch?
[16:12:32] <jonasw> I’m seeing this in light of Kevins argument
[16:12:43] <jonasw> which I found much more convincing than the argument in XEP-0001 by the way
[16:12:46] *** jubalh has left the room
[16:12:54] *** zinid shows as "online"
[16:14:39] <SamWhited> I still don't see what the council switch has to do with anything; they'll still have plenty of time to review it.
[16:15:02] *** ralphm has joined the room
[16:15:15] *** zinid has left the room
[16:15:21] *** zinid shows as "online"
[16:22:58] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[16:22:59] *** intosi shows as "online"
[16:23:25] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[16:23:58] *** efrit has joined the room
[16:28:47] *** ralphm has left the room
[16:28:53] *** ralphm has joined the room
[16:30:35] *** Holger has left the room
[16:30:44] *** Holger shows as "online"
[16:34:35] <moparisthebest> I just want to know what kind of crappy council member would not comment on a last call on the list and only in the meeting...
[16:34:44] <moparisthebest> I'm not sure I care about their input in that case
[16:36:47] *** Kev shows as "online"
[16:36:47] *** Kev shows as "online"
[16:37:16] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[16:39:08] *** ralphm has joined the room
[16:39:25] <Kev> I think the compliance suites documenting what you need to be a sensible server/client in the current climate, with an eye to the future, is sensible.
[16:40:17] <Kev> So if you currently need to implement X in order to interop with large amounts of the network, we can probably put it in on that basis. Similarly if something isn't well deployed but is stable and the clear direction, we can put it in for that reason.
[16:40:35] <Kev> MIX is a direction, but not stable, so I think putting that in would be wrong.
[16:40:49] <Kev> But '49 is widely needed for interop, so I think we list that.
[16:41:28] <Zash> Maybe the compliance suites should be split into two documents. One that's an implementation report, documenting what most implementations do now. Other is more like a vision statement, describing what we want XMPP to be like in the near(?) future.
[16:42:11] <Kev> I think a vision statement might be a sensible thing, but I don't think it needs to be dated like the compliance suites, which are snapshots of what we expect people to implement at that time.
[16:43:16] <Zash> Kev: It would be tho, it'd be "what we think the future should look like, as of $today"
[16:43:42] <Kev> Yes, but we can keep that updated, there's no particular value in stamping it and calling it done.
[16:43:43] *** tux shows as "online"
[16:43:43] <Zash> Maybe numbered semi-immutable documents aren't optimal for that purpose
[16:44:06] *** arc has left the room
[16:44:08] *** arc has joined the room
[16:44:09] <Zash> But it'd be cool to have something of a history of what we thought the future would look like
[16:45:13] *** arc has left the room
[16:45:29] <Zash> Useful for comparing later, to see which, if any, goals we got anywhere with
[16:45:47] <Kev> I think we'd probably have that just through the attic and the changelog.
[16:46:00] <Zash> I suppose
[16:46:08] *** uc shows as "online"
[16:46:31] <Zash> Could be a blog entry, the exact form is probably not that important
[16:46:37] <Zash> Having a vision is good tho.
[16:46:45] <Kev> Anyway, that is very much not a hill for me to die on - but I think a single living direction document would do just fine.
[16:46:47] <Zash> As is knowing the current state of things
[16:47:18] <Kev> I do think it's worth stamping a date on the compliance suites, which are meant to be "What do I need to implement right now" sort of things.
[16:48:39] <Zash> Which is sorta inbetween.
[16:49:16] <Zash> The IETF used to have implementation reports of some kind IIRC
[16:49:57] *** arc has joined the room
[16:50:39] *** zinid has left the room
[16:50:55] *** efrit has left the room
[16:51:43] *** intosi shows as "online"
[16:51:52] *** zinid shows as "online"
[16:52:08] <fippo> zash: that didn't work
[16:54:14] *** jubalh has joined the room
[16:54:20] *** Syndace has joined the room
[16:56:57] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[16:59:10] *** sonny has left the room
[16:59:12] *** sonny has joined the room
[16:59:50] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[17:04:03] *** nyco has left the room
[17:07:05] *** zinid has left the room
[17:07:30] *** jubalh has left the room
[17:08:11] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:08:40] *** lumi shows as "online"
[17:08:52] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Afwezig"
[17:09:11] *** nyco has joined the room
[17:09:43] *** ralphm has joined the room
[17:10:44] *** zinid shows as "online"
[17:15:03] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:17:14] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:17:18] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:17:51] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[17:21:20] *** zinid has left the room
[17:22:51] *** zinid shows as "online"
[17:23:52] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[17:23:55] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:25:03] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:26:48] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[17:26:50] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[17:28:51] *** zinid has left the room
[17:29:31] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[17:29:40] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:29:51] *** waqas has joined the room
[17:30:39] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:33:12] <Holger> > it seems you are not aware that 0048 on pubsub is not supported by prosody or ejabbered

lovetox: You mean because of the use of publish-options?
[17:34:59] <Holger> I think strictly speaking the use of pubsub#persist_items in the 0048 example isn't 0060-compatible, because 0060 says that publish options MUST be registered or rejected by the server, and this one isn't.
[17:35:21] <Holger> ... isn't registered.
[17:35:42] *** dwd shows as "online"
[17:36:12] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:36:12] *** uc has left the room
[17:36:20] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[17:37:09] <daniel> Holger: i have it on my todo list to register that publish option
[17:37:23] *** zinid shows as "online"
[17:37:55] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:38:40] <Holger> daniel: Ok. FWIW I think it would make sense to just specify that arbitrary node config options can be specified as publish options and that they will always be handled as preconditions.
[17:38:40] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:39:02] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:39:32] *** jubalh has joined the room
[17:39:33] <daniel> i agree
[17:39:45] <daniel> it's probably impossible to get that through council
[17:40:01] <daniel> my last change to xep60 took me a 6 month to push through
[17:40:57] <Holger> Though the result would be equivalent to registering each and every node config option as a publish option to be handled as precondition.
[17:41:07] *** uc has joined the room
[17:41:35] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:42:15] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:42:21] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:42:47] *** stefandxm has left the room
[17:46:10] *** Kev shows as "away"
[17:47:54] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:48:35] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[17:48:39] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:49:17] <daniel> if I change the wording to something like 'any unregistered publish-option must be treated as a precondtion to the node configuartion option of the same name or reject if neither a registered publish option nor a registered node configuartion exists" the already existing entry in the publish-options registry is obsolete
[17:49:54] <daniel> and should probably be deleted in order to not confuse people with an already very confusing XEP
[17:50:16] *** arc has left the room
[17:50:17] *** arc has joined the room
[17:50:22] *** ralphm has joined the room
[17:50:33] *** arc has left the room
[17:50:37] *** arc has joined the room
[17:50:37] <jonasw> daniel, FWIW, I think your idea is sensible, and in case of doubt this could always be made a feature (#publish-options-config-precondition) or something
[17:50:50] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:51:12] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:51:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:51:25] <daniel> at some point the xsf will need an archaeologist to dig up why certain decisions to certain xeps where made in the past
[17:51:40] <jonasw> I wish those things would be documented properly.
[17:51:45] *** jubalh has left the room
[17:54:49] *** daniel has left the room
[17:54:57] *** daniel shows as "online"
[17:55:12] <Ge0rG> Every XEP should contain a strong rationale for surprising decisions.
[17:55:18] *** nyco has left the room
[17:56:51] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[17:57:14] <daniel> Holger, jonasw: if you word it that way you are essentially kissing 'per item overwrite' goodby
[17:57:39] <daniel> which i'm not necessarly opposed to
[17:57:55] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:58:39] <jonasw> daniel, how?
[17:58:47] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[17:59:16] *** nyco has joined the room
[17:59:55] <daniel> well if you say that any publish options that shares the same name with a node config is a precondtion; how would you create a per item override that shares the same name
[18:00:25] <Zash> Would have been easier if it the three kinds of things weren't in the same form
[18:00:25] <daniel> i guess you can still register that with a different name
[18:00:31] <jonasw> what is a per-item override?
[18:00:33] <daniel> Zash yes
[18:00:41] <daniel> jonasw, read the XEP we are talking about
[18:00:48] <jonasw> I have, but it’s been a while :/
[18:00:51] <daniel> jonasw, i don't really know myself :-)
[18:00:56] <Zash> jonasw: What it sounds like.
[18:01:05] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:01:11] <Zash> jonasw: Node configuration overrides per item.
[18:01:16] <daniel> 7.1.5 Publishing Options <- just read that
[18:01:17] <jonasw> Zash, at first I thought "per item override" is something abou treplacing existing items, but that didn’t make sense
[18:01:21] <jonasw> is it setting options per item?
[18:01:24] <jonasw> ahh
[18:01:24] <jonasw> okay
[18:01:31] <jonasw> that sounds ill-defined as heck
[18:01:38] <Zash> And unused afaik
[18:01:39] <daniel> no shit
[18:01:50] <jonasw> I personally don’t have a problem with burning that :)
[18:02:08] <daniel> per item override or the entire xep?
[18:02:08] <jonasw> not that I would matter :)
[18:02:23] <Zash> Per-item access control is a desirable feature tho
[18:02:34] <jonasw> Zash, is it?
[18:02:40] <jonasw> hm, maybe for the social network things
[18:02:46] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:02:46] <jonasw> meh
[18:03:06] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:03:14] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:04:07] <daniel> the path of least resistance is to register persist-items as a precondition and move on with our lives
[18:04:52] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[18:06:53] *** zinid has left the room
[18:06:56] *** zinid shows as "online"
[18:08:25] *** daniel has left the room
[18:08:27] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:08:30] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:08:32] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:10:02] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[18:10:02] *** ThurahT shows as "online"
[18:10:49] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:11:15] *** Guus has left the room
[18:11:16] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:13:09] <Holger> > Holger, jonasw: if you word it that way you are essentially kissing 'per item overwrite' goodby

Sounds good to me :-)
[18:13:28] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[18:13:38] <Holger> > the path of least resistance is to register persist-items as a precondition and move on with our lives

Yup, works for me as well.
[18:14:55] *** jubalh has joined the room
[18:15:02] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:16:12] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:16:16] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[18:16:16] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[18:17:30] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[18:18:41] *** vanitasvitae has joined the room
[18:20:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:21:14] *** Guus has left the room
[18:24:04] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:24:10] *** dwd shows as "online"
[18:24:54] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[18:24:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[18:25:01] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[18:25:31] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:26:02] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:26:16] *** nyco has left the room
[18:27:08] *** daniel has left the room
[18:27:15] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:28:16] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[18:28:16] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[18:29:16] *** nyco has joined the room
[18:30:32] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:36:32] *** ralphm has joined the room
[18:38:16] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:38:40] *** lumi shows as "online"
[18:40:15] *** Kev shows as "away"
[18:46:17] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:46:19] *** jubalh has left the room
[18:46:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:46:39] *** sonny has left the room
[18:46:43] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:47:40] *** sonny has left the room
[18:47:43] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:48:17] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:48:29] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[18:49:00] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[18:49:07] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:49:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:49:55] *** daniel has left the room
[18:50:08] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[18:51:16] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:51:29] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:53:03] *** sonny has left the room
[18:53:06] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:53:27] *** sonny has left the room
[18:53:29] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:53:50] *** Guus has left the room
[18:53:57] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:54:51] *** sonny has left the room
[18:54:53] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:55:33] *** @Alacer has left the room
[18:55:33] *** waqas has left the room
[18:57:14] *** sonny has left the room
[18:57:16] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:57:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:58:17] *** sonny has left the room
[18:58:18] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[18:58:20] *** sonny has joined the room
[18:58:58] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:00:34] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:01:44] *** Guus has left the room
[19:01:45] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:02:45] <daniel> created both https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/556 https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/555
[19:03:00] <daniel> feedback on the wording in 556 welcome
[19:05:18] *** daniel has left the room
[19:05:23] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:05:23] *** debacle has joined the room
[19:09:54] *** debacle has left the room
[19:11:24] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:11:27] *** debacle has joined the room
[19:11:39] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:12:14] *** Guus has left the room
[19:13:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:16:09] *** tux shows as "away" and his status message is "Nicht am PC"
[19:16:43] *** Holger has left the room
[19:16:49] *** Holger shows as "online"
[19:17:12] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:17:23] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:19:33] *** arc has left the room
[19:20:16] *** arc has joined the room
[19:21:47] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:22:09] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[19:23:19] *** uc has joined the room
[19:23:33] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[19:23:40] *** valo has left the room
[19:23:48] *** valo has joined the room
[19:24:00] *** @Alacer has left the room
[19:25:20] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[19:32:32] *** ralphm has joined the room
[19:36:02] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:36:03] *** sonny has left the room
[19:36:05] *** sonny has joined the room
[19:37:20] *** daniel has left the room
[19:37:28] *** daniel shows as "online"
[19:37:29] *** Kev shows as "online"
[19:37:57] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[19:42:01] *** zinid has left the room
[19:43:01] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[19:44:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[19:45:18] *** daniel has left the room
[19:46:16] *** sonny has left the room
[19:47:21] *** lumi shows as "online"
[19:48:24] *** arc has left the room
[19:48:35] *** arc has joined the room
[19:50:02] *** zinid shows as "online"
[19:56:42] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:57:25] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:58:12] *** Kev shows as "away"
[20:00:33] *** zinid has left the room
[20:01:47] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:01:48] *** sonny has joined the room
[20:01:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:04:40] *** zinid has left the room
[20:09:15] *** debacle has left the room
[20:11:11] *** arc has left the room
[20:11:12] *** arc has joined the room
[20:12:16] *** daniel has left the room
[20:12:20] *** daniel has joined the room
[20:12:21] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[20:12:27] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[20:17:47] *** arc has left the room
[20:17:48] *** arc has joined the room
[20:23:35] *** stefandxm has left the room
[20:26:17] *** Tobias has left the room
[20:26:29] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[20:28:31] *** jubalh has joined the room
[20:30:48] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:30:57] *** lumi has left the room
[20:34:33] *** daniel has left the room
[20:40:13] *** daniel shows as "online"
[20:40:54] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[20:41:01] *** sonny has left the room
[20:41:05] *** sonny has joined the room
[20:41:15] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:43:49] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:44:14] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[20:46:26] *** ralphm has joined the room
[20:47:28] *** jonasw has left the room
[20:47:56] *** jubalh has left the room
[20:49:05] *** nyco has left the room
[20:49:17] *** nyco has joined the room
[20:56:04] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[20:58:14] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:00:41] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[21:00:43] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[21:03:10] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[21:03:14] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[21:03:18] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[21:03:57] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[21:07:25] *** ralphm has joined the room
[21:12:16] *** Kev shows as "online"
[21:12:48] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:17:12] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:19:11] *** stefandxm has left the room
[21:21:13] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:22:18] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:25:42] *** lskdjf has left the room
[21:25:42] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[21:26:31] *** daniel has left the room
[21:29:26] *** pep. has left the room
[21:29:26] *** pep. shows as "online"
[21:31:22] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:32:48] *** daniel has left the room
[21:32:55] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:37:39] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[21:37:40] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[21:38:30] *** ralphm has joined the room
[21:46:09] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:46:56] *** daniel has left the room
[21:47:00] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:48:52] *** daniel has left the room
[21:49:48] *** Kev shows as "away"
[21:50:02] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:53:00] *** jonasw has left the room
[21:56:45] *** daniel has left the room
[21:56:51] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:58:55] *** daniel has left the room
[21:59:01] *** daniel shows as "online"
[21:59:16] *** jubalh has joined the room
[21:59:33] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[22:01:29] *** daniel has left the room
[22:01:36] *** daniel shows as "online"
[22:09:06] *** lskdjf has left the room
[22:09:06] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[22:09:25] *** ralphm has joined the room
[22:20:22] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:22:57] *** daniel has left the room
[22:24:18] *** zinid has joined the room
[22:33:26] *** goffi has joined the room
[22:35:15] *** Guus has left the room
[22:35:25] *** Guus shows as "online"
[22:38:46] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[22:39:50] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:49:12] *** marc has left the room
[22:51:36] *** marc has left the room
[22:51:46] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:58:52] *** zinid has left the room
[22:58:52] *** arc has left the room
[22:58:56] *** arc has joined the room
[23:04:10] *** Zash has left the room
[23:08:04] *** jubalh has joined the room
[23:17:33] *** jjrh has left the room
[23:17:36] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[23:18:30] *** jjrh has left the room
[23:18:50] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[23:21:25] *** SamWhited has left the room
[23:26:28] *** jjrh has left the room
[23:26:39] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[23:33:58] *** jubalh has left the room
[23:43:48] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:44:53] *** tux has left the room
[23:49:36] *** arc has left the room
[23:49:37] *** arc has joined the room
[23:51:11] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:52:10] *** arc has left the room
[23:55:21] *** Zash shows as "online"
[23:55:51] *** arc has joined the room