Thursday, December 21, 2017
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
December
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
        1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:15:30] *** Holger has left the room
[00:15:48] *** Holger shows as "online"
[00:17:58] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[00:19:07] *** nyco has left the room
[00:19:11] *** nyco shows as "online"
[00:22:12] *** efrit has joined the room
[00:41:53] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[00:42:14] *** lumi has left the room
[00:55:33] *** @Alacer has left the room
[00:55:41] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[00:56:11] *** jjrh has left the room
[00:56:15] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:16:15] *** jjrh has left the room
[01:16:18] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:16:59] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[01:26:51] *** pep. has left the room
[01:27:27] *** pep. shows as "online"
[01:37:56] *** sonny has left the room
[01:37:58] *** sonny has joined the room
[01:40:06] *** jubalh has left the room
[01:40:13] *** sonny has joined the room
[01:47:24] *** lumi has joined the room
[01:53:26] *** efrit has left the room
[02:09:00] *** stefandxm has joined the room
[02:09:01] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[02:10:03] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[02:16:25] *** Tobias has joined the room
[02:22:44] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[02:52:07] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[03:02:26] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[03:10:22] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[03:27:04] *** uc has left the room
[03:27:04] *** uc has joined the room
[03:27:48] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[03:32:20] *** lumi has joined the room
[03:40:08] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[03:53:29] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[04:08:32] *** lumi has left the room
[04:27:04] *** uc has left the room
[04:27:04] *** uc has joined the room
[04:42:04] *** uc has left the room
[04:42:04] *** uc has joined the room
[04:46:23] *** Zash shows as "online"
[04:57:03] *** uc has left the room
[04:57:03] *** uc has joined the room
[05:12:03] *** uc has left the room
[05:12:03] *** uc has joined the room
[05:22:42] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[05:22:47] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:25:56] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:26:45] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:27:03] *** uc has left the room
[05:27:03] *** uc has joined the room
[05:28:23] *** @Alacer has left the room
[05:31:03] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[05:34:11] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:35:17] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:36:40] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:36:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:39:01] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:39:10] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[05:42:03] *** uc has left the room
[05:42:04] *** uc has joined the room
[05:54:44] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[06:09:27] *** valo has joined the room
[06:10:39] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[06:11:45] *** zinid shows as "online"
[06:12:02] *** uc has left the room
[06:12:03] *** uc has joined the room
[06:14:44] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[06:16:07] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:17:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:19:40] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[06:19:46] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[06:27:03] *** uc has left the room
[06:27:03] *** uc has joined the room
[06:27:53] *** ThurahT shows as "away"
[06:28:48] *** Neustradamus shows as "away"
[06:28:48] *** Neustradamus has left the room
[06:29:47] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[06:30:12] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:33:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:34:16] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[06:36:07] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:36:52] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[06:38:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:38:53] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:39:38] *** uc shows as "online"
[06:39:52] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:42:03] *** uc has left the room
[06:42:03] *** uc shows as "online"
[06:45:02] *** ThurahT has left the room
[06:45:02] *** ThurahT has joined the room
[06:45:58] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:45:58] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[06:51:59] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:51:59] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[06:53:52] *** valo has left the room
[06:53:57] *** valo has joined the room
[06:54:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[06:57:04] *** uc has left the room
[06:57:04] *** uc shows as "online"
[06:59:43] *** Guus has left the room
[06:59:44] *** goffi has joined the room
[06:59:45] *** Guus has joined the room
[06:59:57] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[06:59:57] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:00:29] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[07:03:06] *** zinid has left the room
[07:03:07] *** zinid shows as "online"
[07:05:58] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:05:58] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:10:33] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:11:59] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:11:59] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[07:12:04] *** uc has left the room
[07:12:04] *** uc shows as "online"
[07:12:23] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[07:12:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[07:12:30] *** Guus has left the room
[07:13:01] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:27:19] *** uc has left the room
[07:28:29] *** Guus has joined the room
[07:28:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:38:21] *** ralphm has left the room
[07:38:43] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[07:42:03] *** uc shows as "online"
[07:42:10] *** @Alacer has left the room
[07:43:11] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[07:47:32] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[07:52:20] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:53:11] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[07:54:49] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[07:57:45] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[08:01:32] *** daniel has left the room
[08:01:37] *** daniel has joined the room
[08:01:43] *** remko has joined the room
[08:01:43] *** remko shows as "online"
[08:02:30] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:03:14] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:03:29] *** jere has joined the room
[08:08:27] *** ralphm has left the room
[08:08:57] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:10:31] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:10:31] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:11:52] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:11:55] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:13:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:19:39] *** uc has left the room
[08:19:43] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:23:21] *** remko shows as "away"
[08:25:29] *** daniel shows as "online"
[08:26:21] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[08:26:38] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[08:27:29] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:27:33] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:28:31] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:28:32] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:29:25] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:29:28] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:29:31] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:29:43] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[08:30:09] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:30:25] *** remko shows as "online"
[08:30:56] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[08:30:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[08:31:25] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[08:31:28] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:31:31] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[08:36:57] *** Me has left the room
[08:45:31] *** ralphm has left the room
[08:49:12] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[08:51:53] *** zinid has left the room
[08:52:48] *** jmpman has joined the room
[08:53:58] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:56:05] *** marc shows as "online"
[09:01:25] *** jonasw shows as "online"
[09:02:48] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[09:09:59] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:10:02] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:11:02] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[09:15:30] *** Alex has joined the room
[09:20:54] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:21:59] *** uc shows as "online"
[09:23:32] *** jubalh has joined the room
[09:29:05] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:29:12] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:29:38] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[09:30:00] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:33:23] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:34:25] *** SouL shows as "online"
[09:34:29] *** SouL shows as "online"
[09:34:51] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:36:44] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[09:37:48] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:41:54] *** jere has left the room
[09:42:03] *** jere has joined the room
[09:44:26] *** @Alacer has left the room
[09:47:14] *** daniel has left the room
[09:49:39] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[09:49:40] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[09:51:06] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[09:56:48] *** jmpman has joined the room
[10:05:49] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:05:50] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:05:56] *** jonasw has left the room
[10:07:39] <marc> Ge0rG, wow, XEP-0045 specificies an "invite" URI action. Did you know that?
[10:09:49] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:11:59] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[10:12:09] *** uc has left the room
[10:12:55] <Ge0rG> marc: you can use it to make your client invite somebody else, yeah. What's your point?
[10:13:54] <marc> Ge0rG, just didn't know that there is already a query action with the name "invite" ;)
[10:14:22] *** uc has joined the room
[10:14:22] *** uc has left the room
[10:14:57] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[10:14:57] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[10:14:58] <Ge0rG> marc: if you want to pass on invitations, ?join is the right action
[10:18:29] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:20:15] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:20:25] *** intosi shows as "online"
[10:20:57] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[10:21:55] *** uc has joined the room
[10:22:42] *** lskdjf has left the room
[10:22:43] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[10:22:49] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[10:24:14] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:24:17] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:25:26] <marc> Ge0rG, it just thwarted my plans to use "invite" as action for user invitation :P
[10:26:53] <Ge0rG> marc: Great! Then you can finally follow my suggestion of omitting the action altogether.
[10:27:24] <Ge0rG> marc: because you can't force a specific action on the receiver of the URI anyway.
[10:27:39] <Ge0rG> marc: depending on internal state, it can be any of roster, subscribe, chat
[10:27:40] <marc> Ge0rG, nah, I just define "invite23" as action for user invitation
[10:29:32] <Ge0rG> marc: https://memeexplorer.com/cache/550.jpg
[10:29:45] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:30:51] <marc> Ge0rG, I don't get your last statement. What's your point about "internal state"?
[10:31:25] <Ge0rG> marc: it depends on how far the invitee is enrolled into XMPP
[10:33:24] <marc> Ge0rG, yeah, but that's not related to URI query actions. It's a general problem if I got your point...
[10:33:55] <Ge0rG> marc: it is a problem of the URI action, because you try to tell the invitee client what to do with that action.
[10:34:36] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[10:34:37] <Ge0rG> marc: as the invitee's client, I would do the following on an action-less URI:
- no account --> register first
- have account without this contact --> add contact
- have account with the inviter contact --> open chat
[10:35:11] <Ge0rG> marc: there is no proper action to add a contact, and the invitee can't know the right action anyway.
[10:35:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[10:35:53] <marc> Ge0rG, you can still do this with actions :D the action is just a pointer what this URI is about
[10:36:45] <Ge0rG> marc: yes, but a properly implemented invitee client will ignore the action anyway, so it's only adding complexity
[10:38:28] <marc> Ge0rG, what about "?register"? how would your client determine what to do without this action? :D
[10:39:12] <Ge0rG> marc: did you just switch use cases?
[10:39:41] <marc> Ge0rG, no, your point is that actions are useless in URIs, right?
[10:39:46] <Ge0rG> marc: the ?register action does make sense for the xmpp://account@server URI
[10:39:49] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[10:40:05] <Ge0rG> marc: my point is that actions are useless in "share my JID" URIs
[10:40:08] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:40:10] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:40:43] <Ge0rG> marc: so for user-invitation and for PARS, there is no benefit in an action
[10:41:30] <marc> Ge0rG, okay, not in general?
[10:42:11] <Ge0rG> marc: no
[10:43:07] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[10:43:11] <Ge0rG> marc: sorry that I didn't make that more explicit before.
[10:44:44] <marc> Ge0rG, okay, maybe I can follow you now...
[10:45:32] <Ge0rG> marc: MUCs are shared with the `join` action, proto-accounts are shared with the `register` action, contact invitations are shared with no action - can we agree on that? :)
[10:45:52] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:47:58] <marc> Ge0rG, what are proto-accounts?
[10:48:22] <Ge0rG> marc: the second use case of your proto-XEP, inviting users to your server.
[10:48:34] <Ge0rG> How did we call that? create-account?
[10:48:51] <marc> Ge0rG, okay, I think we can agree on that :)
[10:49:08] <Ge0rG> Phew! 😅
[10:49:19] <marc> :>
[10:53:31] *** daniel has left the room
[10:55:31] *** daniel shows as "online"
[10:56:10] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[10:56:17] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[10:56:18] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[10:56:23] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[10:57:49] *** lumi has joined the room
[10:58:11] *** Alex has left the room
[10:58:54] *** Guus shows as "online"
[11:00:07] *** sonny has left the room
[11:00:14] *** sonny has joined the room
[11:07:57] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:09:36] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:09:41] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:10:43] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[11:12:03] *** uc has left the room
[11:12:04] *** uc has joined the room
[11:16:25] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:18:03] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[11:18:06] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[11:20:43] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[11:25:55] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:25:57] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:32:07] *** ralphm has left the room
[11:33:35] *** remko shows as "away"
[11:35:53] *** jubalh has left the room
[11:36:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:36:59] *** @Alacer has left the room
[11:39:35] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[11:41:12] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm away"
[11:41:12] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[11:43:05] *** efrit has left the room
[11:45:21] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[11:45:23] *** Alex has joined the room
[11:45:24] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:50:59] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:59:29] *** Alex has left the room
[12:01:15] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[12:01:39] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:01:40] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:04:14] *** remko shows as "online"
[12:10:49] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[12:15:28] *** @Alacer has left the room
[12:16:06] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[12:17:48] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:17:49] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:18:47] *** @Alacer has left the room
[12:18:50] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[12:21:27] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:24:50] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:24:50] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[12:30:51] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:30:51] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[12:31:16] *** daniel has left the room
[12:33:20] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[12:33:45] *** jcbrand has joined the room
[12:36:05] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[12:37:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:39:45] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:39:45] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[12:40:07] *** jubalh has left the room
[12:44:22] *** ralphm has left the room
[12:45:47] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:45:47] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[12:47:51] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[12:49:27] *** waqas has joined the room
[12:50:26] *** intosi shows as "online"
[12:51:03] *** jubalh shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[12:55:27] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:55:27] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[12:55:38] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:58:09] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:00:23] *** jcbrand has left the room
[13:03:46] *** ralphm has left the room
[13:06:09] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[13:07:11] *** Holger has left the room
[13:07:15] *** nyco has left the room
[13:07:24] *** Holger shows as "online"
[13:13:24] *** Holger has left the room
[13:15:00] *** nyco shows as "online"
[13:15:30] *** Holger shows as "online"
[13:19:00] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:21:22] *** efrit has left the room
[13:24:30] *** daniel shows as "online"
[13:25:42] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[13:28:09] *** ralphm has left the room
[13:28:14] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[13:28:49] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:34:17] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[13:34:24] *** ralphm has left the room
[13:41:42] *** lumi has left the room
[13:56:39] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[13:57:19] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[13:57:21] *** intosi shows as "online"
[14:00:04] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[14:00:05] *** daniel has left the room
[14:03:35] *** daniel shows as "online"
[14:08:24] *** Alex has joined the room
[14:09:13] *** Alex has left the room
[14:09:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:09:21] *** Alex has joined the room
[14:11:16] *** daniel has left the room
[14:13:18] *** valo has joined the room
[14:14:26] *** ralphm has left the room
[14:19:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:22:58] *** lovetox has joined the room
[14:25:33] *** daniel shows as "online"
[14:25:37] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:25:41] *** Martin has joined the room
[14:27:53] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[14:28:00] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[14:28:04] *** Alex shows as "online"
[14:30:22] *** ralphm changed the title to "XSF Board Meeting | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings"
[14:30:27] *ralphm bangs gavel
[14:30:33] <Guus> o/
[14:30:36] <ralphm> 0. Welcome + Agenda
[14:30:40] <ralphm> Who do we have?
[14:30:41] <Martin> *wave*
[14:31:06] <ralphm> MattJ, nyco?
[14:33:57] <ralphm> Well, that's disappointing
[14:34:02] <Guus> my thoughts
[14:34:26] <Guus> In the interest of getting something done: we do have quorum.
[14:34:45] <Martin> We do indeed
[14:34:48] <ralphm> Indeed.
[14:34:55] <ralphm> Let's continue.
[14:35:04] <ralphm> 1. Char
[14:35:07] <ralphm> 1. Chair
[14:35:20] <Guus> tag, you're it?
[14:35:25] <ralphm> I've seen one volunteer in response to the e-mail I sent out.
[14:36:57] <ralphm> If anyone else wants to volunteer in this meeting, please step up. Otherwise I motion we appoint Ralph Meijer as the Chair of the Board of Directors for the 2017/2018 term.
[14:37:14] <Guus> +1
[14:37:15] <Martin> +1 to that motion
[14:38:05] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[14:38:52] <ralphm> I guess that's sufficient to carry the motion.
[14:39:14] <ralphm> Moving on then.
[14:39:48] <ralphm> 2. List discussion on meeting failures.
[14:40:15] <ralphm> First of all, thanks Dave Cridland for pitching in.
[14:40:45] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:40:56] <ralphm> I personally think that most of the discussion on alternative meeting "venues" is moot if we fail to attend to start with.
[14:41:12] <Martin> Agreed
[14:41:13] <Guus> agreed.
[14:42:07] <ralphm> I do agree we need to all send apologies to the list in case we can't make it
[14:42:24] <ralphm> and we might need to reconsider meeting times
[14:42:59] <ralphm> I understand that with the holidays this is a somewhat more difficult, so let's continue that part of the discussion on list
[14:43:08] <Guus> Although I'm open to changing meeting times, I wonder if that helps. We agreed on this one just weeks ago.
[14:43:12] <ralphm> My suggestion is to at least skip next week
[14:43:18] <ralphm> Indeed
[14:43:33] <Guus> ralphm: shall we skip the week after too?
[14:43:45] *** Guus has left the room
[14:43:46] *** Guus shows as "online"
[14:43:49] <Guus> I at least will be spending my holidays away from home.
[14:44:03] <Martin> If we don't skip the 4th, I'll be sending my apologies. I'm busy at work with meetings all day
[14:44:07] <ralphm> I'm bit hesitant on that, because of FOSDEM nearing
[14:44:23] <ralphm> Ok that's good to know
[14:44:35] <Martin> Skipping next week makes sense to me
[14:44:36] <ralphm> I guess we'll have to do things on-list if pressing for FOSDEM
[14:44:57] <Guus> well, that's two of us being unvailable. I agree that FOSDEM is important, but we can do that on-list (and should perhaps do that more as SCAM instead of Boad anyways)?
[14:45:05] <ralphm> Guus are you still available for FOSDEM stuff?
[14:45:17] <Martin> But I agree with Guus. If asking "when can you reliably turn up for 30mins" burns out after a week or two, then that's a real problem, beyond arranging a time. The time's pointless if people can't commit.
[14:45:35] <nyco> sorry, late (obvious)
[14:45:39] <ralphm> sure, but if board would need to decide on things, it would be good to be able to without a meeting
[14:45:41] <Guus> ralphm: mail will not be an issue. An exact time/date will be (kids, holiday, swimming pool)
[14:46:19] <ralphm> ok, good
[14:46:26] <ralphm> nyco: welcome
[14:47:35] <Guus> nyco, as you've been missing most, I'm interested in our ideas on getting better attendance in these meetings.
[14:47:44] <nyco> voice+video
[14:47:50] <nyco> more fluid
[14:47:54] <ralphm> nyco: the venue is not relevant at all
[14:47:59] <nyco> also visualising
[14:48:04] <ralphm> you have missed all meetings up till now, video wouldn't change that
[14:48:16] <Guus> doorbell, afk for a bit
[14:48:29] <ralphm> I'm not having that discussion until we can reliably show up, on time
[14:48:44] <Guus> bak
[14:48:46] <Guus> back*
[14:48:57] <Guus> what Ralph wrote
[14:49:03] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[14:49:08] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:49:14] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[14:49:16] <Guus> althought voice/video might add something to the meetings, it won't make people appear if they didn't do so before.
[14:49:31] <nyco> that can motivate: listen and be heard
[14:49:43] <nyco> higher bandwidth interactions
[14:49:53] <ralphm> nyco: please stop ignoring the elephant in the room
[14:50:00] <nyco> but isn't our priority to setup the Board priorities for 2018?
[14:50:06] <nyco> please explain
[14:50:19] <ralphm> Our #1 priority is *showing up on time at meeting time*
[14:50:37] <nyco> it is also about committing, making it more attractive, what do you think?.
[14:50:38] <ralphm> After that, we can consider alternative media choices
[14:51:02] <ralphm> You committed to be on the board, there's 0 reason to make it more attractive just for showing up
[14:51:13] <nyco> not forcefully, the priority maybe to assume our role as a board, which is not attending meetings, but producing the valubale things for the foundation to go on
[14:51:19] <ralphm> (and with you I mean all of us)
[14:51:28] <nyco> that is the other way around
[14:51:38] <Guus> nyco, as a group, we agreed to be here
[14:52:00] <Guus> I am personally very annoyed to show up here, making my time available, only to find out that others are not.
[14:52:01] <ralphm> No it is not. We made a commitment (being on the board), then an agreement (meeting on Thursdays at 14:30 UTC).
[14:52:07] <nyco> we're still doing meta-dscussion, betting on the outcome, why not test instead? we'll then get feedback from real experimentation in our context
[14:52:29] <ralphm> nyco: I strongly disagree with you on this.
[14:52:35] <nyco> maybe that meeting shape and goals neeed to be "refactored"
[14:52:44] <Martin> This is not to do with experimentation, this is to do with obligations as a board member, and obligation #1 is to show up.
[14:52:58] <nyco> ralphm you haven't listened yet to what I have to say
[14:53:07] <ralphm> We've been having fruitful meetings since forever, and especially the last few weeks, with just text-based meetings.
[14:53:07] *** McKael shows as "online"
[14:53:26] <nyco> I disagree that attending is the commitment, as long as the XSF goes on shrinking...
[14:53:49] <ralphm> nyco: I did, you are ignoring current practise over a wish to do things differently
[14:53:53] <nyco> I disagree it has been fruitful, taking a decision over the course of three meeting is not
[14:54:04] <nyco> ralphm I confirm
[14:54:55] <nyco> what frustrates me here, is that a short sentenced is considered enough to get a full understanding of what goes behind
[14:55:04] *** lumi has joined the room
[14:55:22] <ralphm> You have voiced your concerns with the way we do meetings, the role of the board, etc. before. I get that
[14:55:32] <ralphm> and might actually agree on several points
[14:55:39] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:55:44] <nyco> the first deliverable for this board is the set of priorities, not the commitment to be present on a text chat that goes nowhere
[14:56:08] <nyco> sure, then what are your solutions? let's discuss/evaluate them all
[14:56:12] <ralphm> but the thing is, that *first* we need to do things properly like we agreed (meeting on certain times, using whatever venue) so we *then* can discuss these things
[14:56:34] <nyco> I strongly oppose and disagree on this process of mind
[14:56:50] <nyco> our focus must be deliver on our duty
[14:56:56] <ralphm> Look, priorities are nice, but that's definitely not the first deliverable. Like any Board of Directors, we simply need to run the company.
[14:56:59] <nyco> a text chat meeting is only a mean
[14:57:09] <nyco> a Trello/JIRA board is another mean
[14:57:29] <nyco> sure, how does a text chat meeting runs the foundation?
[14:57:30] *** Guus has left the room
[14:57:42] <ralphm> Like it has for over 10 years.
[14:57:42] <nyco> again, meta-discussions
[14:57:48] <nyco> so we don't change
[14:57:57] <nyco> how performant do you believe it is?
[14:58:02] <nyco> what'st the outcome?
[14:58:04] *** Alex shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[14:58:22] <Guus> nyco, you're the only one doing meta-discussions at the moment. We simply ask if everyone can be here in time, as we agreed on before.
[14:58:24] <ralphm> The goal of this Foundation is do be a standards body. We are doing well at this, IMO. You might want to /also/ do other things. That's ok, but not a decided goal.
[14:58:24] <nyco> we need a great improvement
[14:58:42] <nyco> > sure, then what are your solutions? let's discuss/evaluate them all
[14:58:43] *** remko shows as "away"
[14:59:00] *** winfried has joined the room
[14:59:22] <nyco> > sure, then what are your solutions? let's discuss/evaluate them all
I elaborate: what is the problem that we agree on?
[14:59:25] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:59:37] <nyco> (side observation: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=xmpp )
[14:59:41] <Guus> I don't see a reason to _not_ have these short, weekly meetings. They can be very effective, especially if everyone prepares by reading up on the mailinglist and trello.
[15:00:05] <ralphm> The problem and the current agenda item is meeting failures
[15:00:20] <Guus> (I would not object to discuss a change of venue, but as it stands, some kind of repeated get-together is something that I'd prefer)
[15:00:42] <ralphm> not alternative venues, alternative goals of the foundation, or how to be more effective
[15:02:06] <ralphm> So, I would like the commitment from all Directors to meet at an agreed-upon time and actually following through with that.
[15:02:10] <nyco> > I don't see a reason to _not_ have these short, weekly meetings. They can be very effective, especially if everyone prepares by reading up on the mailinglist and trello.

that is the point: they are not effective nor efficient at all, as there is very few engagement (I am guilty here as well), nor there is any commitment at all
text chat meetings are orthogonal to this
switching the tool is a good practice for change of mindset
[15:02:20] <nyco> > The problem and the current agenda item is meeting failures
I can agree on that
[15:02:41] *** Alex shows as "online"
[15:02:46] <Guus> Ralphm, as I said on list, I am amazed that we need explicit commitment for that (but you have mine).
[15:02:55] <nyco> so again, and again, and again: what are the problems we agree on and the proposed solutionsSSS
[15:02:56] <Martin> And the sending of apologies ahead of time if you are unable to make the meeting
[15:03:08] <ralphm> I understand having a meeting next week or the week after might be difficult for getting everyone together, so let's focus on all being there on January 11 14:30 UTC.
[15:03:26] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[15:03:31] *** lovetox has left the room
[15:03:45] <ralphm> nyco: the number one problem for me is directors showing up at meeting time
[15:04:03] <ralphm> If we can't do that simple thing, all the other stuff is moot
[15:04:04] <nyco> > not alternative venues, alternative goals of the foundation, or how to be more effective

you said we are a standards body, which is pretty much solidly no change

we used to be JSF for example, we can definitely nurture development, and certainly image
[15:04:31] <ralphm> nyco: I'm not sure how involved you were back then, but JSF was a misnomer
[15:04:47] <ralphm> We've always been little more than a standards body
[15:04:49] <nyco> > nyco: the number one problem for me is directors showing up at meeting time
that is not the problem for me, a more hurtful issue is the lack of engagement and commitment
[15:05:07] <ralphm> And as I said, I'm not necessarily opposed to having other goals, but that's not the topic of this discussion
[15:05:22] *** @Alacer has left the room
[15:05:22] *** waqas has left the room
[15:05:25] <nyco> ralphm please, again, and please again, what are your solutions?
[15:05:29] <Guus> Nyco, when you signed up for board, surely you knew that board typically commits to meeting once a week in chat? Although I'm open for changes, let's discuss that properly, instead of right now, out of the blue.
[15:05:38] <ralphm> nyco: Showing up at agreed upon times
[15:05:55] <nyco> how?
[15:05:59] <Guus> nyco, the first problem that we have now, is that not everyone is showing up for meetings that we agreed on. The solution is simple: be sure that you're here.
[15:06:11] <nyco> how?
[15:06:12] <ralphm> nyco: I set an alarm in my phone to make sure I'm on time
[15:06:20] <nyco> ok, what else?
[15:06:26] <ralphm> nothing else. seems to work
[15:06:40] <Martin> Are we actually having a discussion about how to remember a particular time of day, every week?
[15:06:43] <nyco> we all have information overload and notification fatigue, no one showed up 100%
[15:07:01] <nyco> Martin it seems
[15:07:06] <ralphm> FWIW I did since the elections. I think Guus did too
[15:07:11] <ralphm> But that's not the point
[15:07:17] <nyco> if that is the root cause, not sure how valuable my contributions can be
[15:07:19] <Guus> I was absent once, excused beforehand.
[15:07:19] <ralphm> We all should
[15:07:36] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[15:07:59] <ralphm> nyco: are you saying you don't want to commit to being on time at meetings?
[15:08:11] <nyco> so, I hear the problem is people missing, the solution is alarms, good, note that down in the minutes
[15:08:23] <nyco> now, can we focus on higher outcome?
[15:08:36] <nyco> > nyco: are you saying you don't want to commit to being on time at meetings?
seriously ;-)
[15:08:42] <ralphm> Yes, seriously
[15:08:56] <nyco> that was a great debate, my dear colleagues
[15:08:59] <nyco> ;-)
[15:09:09] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[15:09:15] <Martin> I really don't want the official minutes for this organisation to include "how to remember time, and to set an alarm" that's utterly ridiculous
[15:09:33] <Guus> I'm still not getting why we're debating this in the first place.
[15:09:36] <jonasw> Am I really reading this?
[15:09:39] <Martin> Me neither
[15:09:40] <Guus> nyco, you appear to be on your own on this.
[15:09:45] <Martin> Turn. Up. It's really, really simple.
[15:09:56] <ralphm> I don't understand why we are having that discussion. Several people have expressed annoyance with people missing meetings unannounced. Why is it so bad to discuss that?
[15:10:08] <nyco> > nyco, you appear to be on your own on this.
what are you talking about?
[15:10:35] <Guus> nyco: not committing to be in this chat every week.
[15:10:37] <Martin> I don't have a problem with discussing it, I have a problem with the idea that somehow turning up to a half-hour meeting is onerous, and blaming a lack of an alarm(!) for not remembering to turn up
[15:10:40] <nyco> sure, we debated this, we have a decision, goes to the minutes, no discussion, we must inform and share
[15:11:00] <nyco> > nyco: not committing to be in this chat every week.
serisouly? but, seriously?
[15:11:26] <Guus> I seriously expect all of us to be here, or at least warn others in advance if you can't make it.
[15:11:32] <jonasw> I wonder whether there’s a massive misunderstanding going on here.
[15:11:34] <nyco> agree
[15:11:34] <Guus> that's ... common sense?
[15:11:43] <nyco> jonasw of course there is
[15:11:51] <jonasw> nyco, wanna clear that up maybe?
[15:11:52] <nyco> Guus yes
[15:11:54] <ralphm> nyco: why is that so weird? Is it so strange to just have a baseline of showing up at meetings as a prerequisite to having useful meetings?
[15:12:02] <nyco> jonasw did this, refocussed
[15:12:20] <nyco> what the next item on the agenda?
[15:12:34] <ralphm> nyco: given the clock, the next item is
[15:12:42] <ralphm> 3. Date of Next
[15:12:47] <nyco> January
[15:12:50] <nyco> ?
[15:12:56] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:12:58] *** tim@boese-ban.de shows as "online"
[15:13:13] <ralphm> I suggest the next meeting is on Thursday 11 January at 14:30.
[15:13:26] <ralphm> I expect all directors to be in attendance.
[15:13:27] <nyco> 4th
[15:13:41] <nyco> 11th is too far away
[15:13:50] <ralphm> nyco: 2 board members have expressed difficulty with 4 because of holidays.
[15:13:53] *** Tobias shows as "away"
[15:13:53] <ralphm> and work
[15:13:54] <Guus> Jan 11 works for me (I won't be able to make it 4th).
[15:14:14] <Guus> still
[15:14:15] <Martin> 11th works for me, I'm not available on the 4th, as mentioned at the start of the meeting.
[15:14:18] <nyco> still the rest of us can meet and discuss, not take decision because lack of rough consensus
[15:14:44] <Guus> before we convene
[15:14:45] <ralphm> nyco: we have been doing that for the last three weeks, and did make decisions
[15:14:48] <nyco> 4th with ralphm and MattJ (and nyco)
[15:15:02] <Guus> not convene, disperse...
[15:15:03] <nyco> sure, so 4th, with decisions
[15:15:30] <Guus> can we see if we can have a quick agreement on the young potentials thing? that might affect attendence plans for some people.
[15:16:31] <ralphm> Guus: can you expand on what you mean there? You want to discuss this now, or do you want to know at which meeting we will in January?
[15:16:33] <Guus> I'd be fine with simply making a motion, and vote here, with little discussion, if that's ok with ou.
[15:16:43] <nyco> who for 4th?who for 11th?
[15:16:46] <nyco> 4th
[15:17:11] <Guus> Ralphm: the sponsoring can affect people's descision to go to FOSDEM. Jan 11th is when most will have made their plans already.
[15:17:34] *** remko shows as "online"
[15:17:37] <Guus> So i'd like to see if we can decide on this now.
[15:17:40] *** marc has left the room
[15:19:17] <nyco> > who for 4th?who for 11th?
[15:19:54] *** Alex shows as "online"
[15:20:02] <Guus> As for the meeting on Jan 4th: I don't see a reason for not having it, other than that at least two of us won't be there. If one of the others is not going to make it, you'll have reserved time for pretty much nothign.
[15:21:27] <Guus> I'll in any case be here the 11th, not the 4th.
[15:21:39] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:21:54] *** Guus has left the room
[15:22:00] <ralphm> Guus: I can see that, but I think we need more (financial) details before deciding on this
[15:22:00] <ralphm> I understood
[15:22:00] *** ralphm has left the room
[15:22:00] *** ralphm has joined the room
[15:22:02] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:22:11] *** ralphm has left the room
[15:22:36] *** ralphm has joined the room
[15:23:06] <Guus> ralphm: I propose to make the financial details small enough for them to not matter to the XSF (but potentially, to the recipients).
[15:23:29] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[15:24:21] <ralphm> wow I was unable to connect to any room at muc.xmpp.org
[15:24:44] <ralphm> Guus: that's a bit little to go on
[15:25:05] <Guus> I was going to suggest to offer last editions GSoC students a refund of hotel/travell expenses up to 150 euro, provided that they attend either the summit or FOSDEM.
[15:25:29] <ralphm> just GSoC?
[15:25:33] <Guus> that's a well defined group of people, a well defined requirement, and a low total amount for the XSF.
[15:26:03] <Guus> ralphm: let's start small this year, see if people want to take it. We can always expand that group later.
[15:26:19] <daniel> (and some of the money from google is more or less explicitly for that purpose)
[15:26:28] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[15:26:30] <nyco> > > who for 4th?who for 11th?
[15:26:30] <nyco> note: we did not bang the gavel, please we are still on the meeting
[15:26:30] <nyco> I had connection difficulties, messages lost
[15:27:08] <Guus> Daniel: that's debatable, but it makes for a natural selection of 'young potential', I think.
[15:27:47] <Guus> for the record: in that definition, we would have 3 eligable recipients.
[15:27:52] *** remko shows as "away"
[15:28:01] <ralphm> I'd be ok with that
[15:28:39] <Martin> Yeah, me too
[15:28:49] <Guus> It is official then?
[15:29:00] <Guus> (apologies for the rushed/messy procedure here)
[15:30:31] <daniel> (outsiders comment; i would tie that to the summit; not fosdem)
[15:30:48] <ralphm> nyco?
[15:31:57] <Guus> (daniel: I had considered that, but I don't thnk it's needed - I can elaborate outside of this meeting, unless others want to discuss that now)
[15:32:05] <nyco> what is the question?
[15:32:14] *** remko shows as "online"
[15:32:21] *** marc has left the room
[15:32:34] <ralphm> Guus proposed to provide limited sponsorship for people to attend the XMPP Summit
[15:32:55] <Guus> nyco: I motion that the XSF offers XSF students of last edition of GSoC be reimbursed 150 euro each, when attending next summit and/or fosdem.
[15:33:11] <ralphm> http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/2017-12-21/#15:15:30
[15:33:34] <ralphm> Guus I thought you said only Summit
[15:34:38] <Guus> No I didn't, but I could live with that additional restriction (don't think it's needed though)
[15:35:37] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:35:43] *** ralphm2 has joined the room
[15:36:08] <ralphm2> I'd like them to be at the Summit at least
[15:36:45] <ralphm2> It seems, though that we are having issues with connecting to muc.xmpp.org from some servers
[15:37:11] <ralphm2> I think we have to adjourn and then get consensus on your proposal on list
[15:37:15] <Guus> I had just one hiccup, but others appear more affected.
[15:37:20] <Guus> agreed.
[15:37:33] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[15:37:52] *** Guus has left the room
[15:37:59] *** Guus shows as "online"
[15:38:14] *ralphm2 bangs gavel
[15:39:15] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[15:39:41] <Martin> Thanks ralphm2 & ralphm
[15:40:09] *** winfried has left the room
[15:43:04] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[15:45:03] *** ralphm has left the room
[15:45:14] *** ralphm has joined the room
[15:45:55] <nyco> I agree, when did we get on the agenda item? did I mess messages? have we resolved the next board meeting date?
[15:45:55] <nyco> I lose messages
[15:45:55] <nyco> Test
[15:45:55] <nyco> I lose messages, both on Conversations and Movim
[15:45:55] <nyco> Test2
[15:45:55] <nyco> testtest
[15:45:55] <nyco> aaaaa
[15:46:12] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[15:46:24] <nyco> wow
[15:46:33] <nyco> sorry
[15:46:41] <nyco> seems these were held somewhere
[15:48:28] *** lumi has left the room
[15:49:23] *** SouL has left the room
[15:49:24] *** SouL shows as "online"
[15:49:50] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[15:50:39] <ralphm> :-D
[15:50:53] <ralphm> I just sent a follow-up mail to the Board list
[15:51:54] *** ralphm2 shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:51:54] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:54:47] *** SouL has left the room
[15:54:55] *** SouL shows as "online"
[15:55:59] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[15:57:04] *** uc has left the room
[15:57:04] *** uc has joined the room
[15:57:05] *** Alex shows as "online"
[16:00:40] *** marc has joined the room
[16:04:02] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:04:02] *** ralphm2 shows as "online"
[16:04:27] *** SouL has left the room
[16:04:29] *** SouL shows as "online"
[16:11:22] *** Guus has left the room
[16:11:23] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:13:38] <nyco> I didn't receive it (yet?)
[16:13:49] <nyco> the Board ML has no archive, is it ok?
[16:14:25] *** SamWhited has left the room
[16:14:40] *** remko has left the room
[16:16:59] *** Martin has left the room
[16:17:57] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[16:18:16] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:18:16] *** ralphm2 shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[16:20:45] <intosi> .
[16:21:30] *** Guus has left the room
[16:21:37] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[16:21:45] *** SamWhited has left the room
[16:22:44] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:24:09] *** Guus shows as "online"
[16:24:14] *** jubalh has left the room
[16:25:54] *** McKael shows as "online"
[16:27:53] <nyco> :
[16:28:16] *** ralphm2 shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:28:16] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:28:40] *** nyco has left the room
[16:28:51] *** lumi has joined the room
[16:28:55] *** nyco shows as "online"
[16:30:00] *** Martin has joined the room
[16:30:20] *** Martin shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:34:55] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[16:37:40] *** Martin has left the room
[16:37:40] *** Martin has joined the room
[16:38:08] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:38:09] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:38:36] *** Martin shows as "online"
[16:40:54] *** McKael shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[16:45:58] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:46:02] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:46:03] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[16:48:27] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:48:49] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[16:49:08] *** lovetox has joined the room
[16:49:33] *** stefandxm shows as "online" and his status message is "Available"
[16:51:04] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[16:51:05] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[16:52:16] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[16:53:16] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[16:53:16] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[16:53:23] *** SouL has left the room
[16:53:38] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:54:54] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:54:59] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[16:55:24] *** waqas has joined the room
[16:56:17] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[16:56:26] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:57:17] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:57:17] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:57:51] *** SouL shows as "online"
[16:57:59] *** SouL shows as "online"
[16:58:18] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[16:58:36] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[16:59:45] *** stefandxm shows as "away" and his status message is "Available"
[17:03:01] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:03:52] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:05:02] *** SouL has left the room
[17:06:43] *** jubalh has joined the room
[17:10:19] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[17:10:21] *** Martin has left the room
[17:10:22] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[17:10:31] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:34] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:35] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:36] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:37] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:38] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:38] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:39] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:39] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:39] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:39] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:46] *** sonny has joined the room
[17:10:50] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:57] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:58] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:10:58] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[17:11:32] *** SouL shows as "online"
[17:13:49] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:13:53] *** SouL shows as "online"
[17:19:35] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:20:23] *** SouL has left the room
[17:20:38] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:21:31] *** marc has left the room
[17:22:01] *** SouL shows as "online"
[17:28:18] *** SouL has left the room
[17:30:06] *** Guus has left the room
[17:30:06] *** Guus shows as "online"
[17:34:11] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:36:43] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[17:39:02] *** SouL shows as "online"
[17:39:10] *** SouL shows as "online"
[17:39:51] *** lumi shows as "online"
[17:41:30] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:42:03] *** zinid has left the room
[17:42:10] *** uc has left the room
[17:42:10] *** uc has joined the room
[17:42:30] *** Guus has left the room
[17:43:52] *** ralphm2 shows as "online"
[17:43:52] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:48:16] *** jubalh has joined the room
[17:49:26] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[17:49:30] *** Alex shows as "online"
[17:50:49] *** Holger has left the room
[17:50:55] *** daniel has left the room
[17:51:07] *** Holger shows as "online"
[17:54:17] *** zinid has joined the room
[17:55:53] *** SouL has left the room
[17:56:12] *** zinid has joined the room
[17:57:30] *** SouL shows as "online"
[17:59:48] *** daniel shows as "online"
[18:00:38] *** ralphm2 shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:00:38] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:00:52] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:00:52] *** ralphm2 shows as "online"
[18:01:24] *** jubalh has left the room
[18:01:30] *** zinid has left the room
[18:01:46] <ralphm> …
[18:04:41] *** daniel has left the room
[18:07:02] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:07:05] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:09:46] *** Guus shows as "online"
[18:11:04] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:12:46] *** SouL shows as "online"
[18:15:08] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm away"
[18:16:20] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:16:21] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:16:24] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:17:04] *** SouL has left the room
[18:17:18] *** SouL shows as "online"
[18:17:57] *** intosi shows as "online"
[18:19:46] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "I'm away"
[18:19:47] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[18:23:00] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:23:34] *** SouL has left the room
[18:27:15] *** SouL shows as "online"
[18:28:20] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[18:28:31] *** SouL shows as "online"
[18:28:38] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[18:30:38] *** zinid has joined the room
[18:35:05] *** waqas has left the room
[18:39:50] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[18:41:17] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:41:21] *** intosi shows as "online"
[18:42:05] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:42:05] *** ralphm2 shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:43:50] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:43:52] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[18:44:36] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:46:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:46:59] *** waqas has joined the room
[18:47:00] *** waqas has left the room
[18:48:34] *** SouL has left the room
[18:49:08] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:49:40] *** SouL shows as "online"
[18:51:52] *** SouL shows as "online"
[18:52:07] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:52:43] *** intosi shows as "online"
[18:55:12] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:55:12] *** ralphm2 shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:55:18] *** waqas has joined the room
[18:56:10] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:57:51] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:05:35] *** SouL shows as "online"
[19:05:40] *** SouL shows as "online"
[19:15:43] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:18:26] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:19:40] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:20:13] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:21:08] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:21:34] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:22:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:23:10] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:23:12] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:24:02] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:24:39] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:24:43] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:25:56] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:26:52] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:30:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:34:13] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[19:34:18] *** Tobias shows as "online"
[19:35:11] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:43:56] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:45:12] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:45:52] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:53:59] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:55:05] *** SouL has left the room
[19:57:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:58:34] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:03:29] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:03:52] <nyco> ralphm wins
[20:03:58] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:10:47] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:11:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:12:05] *** nyco has left the room
[20:12:16] *** nyco shows as "online"
[20:12:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:13:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:13:26] *** SouL shows as "online"
[20:13:29] *** SouL shows as "online"
[20:14:46] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:14:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[20:17:28] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:21:03] *** Guus has left the room
[20:21:04] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:25:34] *** jubalh has joined the room
[20:25:41] *** jubalh has left the room
[20:28:01] *** jubalh has joined the room
[20:32:25] *** Alex has left the room
[20:33:30] *** Guus has left the room
[20:37:35] *** Neustradamus shows as "away"
[20:38:46] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[20:41:04] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:55:54] *** jubalh shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[21:00:51] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[21:01:10] *** Guus has left the room
[21:01:10] *** Guus shows as "online"
[21:04:43] *** jubalh shows as "online"
[21:06:03] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:06:35] *** jubalh has left the room
[21:07:04] *** zinid has left the room
[21:09:21] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:10:46] *** zinid has joined the room
[21:11:38] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:12:33] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:13:01] *** jonasw shows as "away"
[21:14:53] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[21:15:30] *** Guus has left the room
[21:30:02] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[21:32:34] *** goffi has left the room
[21:34:12] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[21:39:19] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[21:41:13] *** jubalh has joined the room
[21:42:49] *** Guus shows as "online"
[21:50:50] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:01:04] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[22:04:36] *** jubalh has joined the room
[22:07:16] *** tux has joined the room
[22:10:59] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[22:13:50] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[22:13:55] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[22:16:30] *** tux has joined the room
[22:19:42] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:21:21] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:21:23] *** intosi shows as "online"
[22:28:55] *** jere has left the room
[22:29:03] *** jere has joined the room
[22:31:14] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[22:35:33] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[22:37:35] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[22:39:31] *** ralphm has left the room
[22:42:35] *** jubalh has left the room
[22:50:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[22:53:32] *** lovetox has left the room
[23:00:07] *** sezuan has left the room
[23:02:22] *** Guus has left the room
[23:02:22] *** Guus shows as "online"
[23:05:59] *** daniel shows as "online"
[23:08:28] *** @Alacer has left the room
[23:08:29] *** waqas has left the room
[23:09:01] *** waqas has joined the room
[23:09:49] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[23:15:30] *** Guus has left the room
[23:15:55] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[23:18:57] *** Syndace has left the room
[23:19:00] *** Syndace has joined the room
[23:20:17] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[23:31:37] *** jere has left the room
[23:31:46] *** jere has joined the room
[23:34:35] *** intosi shows as "online"
[23:37:09] *** daniel has left the room
[23:39:47] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:50:11] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[23:50:56] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[23:54:29] *** marc has joined the room
[23:55:24] *** xnyhps has left the room
[23:55:25] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:55:33] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"