Friday, January 05, 2018
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
January
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
       
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:00:25] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:00:37] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:05:03] *** dwd shows as "online"
[00:05:31] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[00:05:41] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:07:34] *** lovetox has left the room
[00:08:05] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[00:14:42] *** dwd has left the room
[00:21:32] *** SouL shows as "online"
[00:21:40] *** SouL shows as "online"
[00:22:07] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[00:26:40] *** ralphm has joined the room
[00:38:13] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[00:43:43] *** jere has left the room
[00:43:48] *** jere has joined the room
[00:56:01] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[00:56:39] *** SamWhited has left the room
[00:58:55] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:04:45] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:05:10] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[01:08:55] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:13:14] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[01:28:43] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:29:01] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:36:45] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:37:55] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:43:09] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:46:13] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:51:15] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:51:19] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[01:51:26] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[01:55:57] *** Syndace has left the room
[01:56:01] *** Syndace has joined the room
[01:56:19] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[01:58:38] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[02:01:55] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[02:02:02] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[02:03:43] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[02:05:06] *** Tobias has joined the room
[02:07:01] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[02:07:06] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[02:25:10] *** hannes has left the room
[02:25:11] *** hannes has joined the room
[02:28:05] *** SouL has left the room
[02:28:18] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[02:33:52] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[02:34:54] *** jere has left the room
[02:35:07] *** jere has joined the room
[02:47:16] *** jere has left the room
[02:48:32] *** jere has joined the room
[03:08:59] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[03:17:19] *** SamWhited has left the room
[03:24:17] *** Zash has left the room
[03:24:17] *** Zash has left the room
[03:24:33] *** Zash has joined the room
[03:24:33] *** Zash shows as "online"
[03:25:15] *** Zash shows as "online"
[03:48:48] *** tux has left the room
[03:48:49] *** tux has joined the room
[04:02:37] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[04:03:24] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[04:04:28] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[04:04:31] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[04:12:21] *** dwd shows as "online"
[04:12:52] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[04:12:55] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[04:17:51] *** dwd has left the room
[04:19:06] *** efrit has joined the room
[04:26:41] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[04:27:18] *** dwd shows as "online"
[04:38:39] *** uc has joined the room
[04:52:43] *** efrit has left the room
[04:52:51] *** efrit has joined the room
[05:03:58] *** efrit has left the room
[05:04:08] *** efrit has joined the room
[05:21:39] *** efrit has left the room
[06:12:58] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:21:51] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[06:21:54] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:45:26] *** jere has left the room
[06:45:37] *** jere has joined the room
[06:45:55] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:45:59] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:47:08] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:47:09] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:52:46] *** ralphm has left the room
[06:54:51] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:56:38] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[06:59:57] *** ralphm has joined the room
[07:02:36] *** jere has left the room
[07:03:04] *** jere has joined the room
[07:15:00] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[07:18:33] *** Guus has left the room
[07:18:34] *** Guus shows as "online"
[07:19:45] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[07:20:23] *** tim@boese-ban.de has joined the room
[07:21:03] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[07:21:22] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[07:21:28] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[07:22:25] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[07:29:32] *** Guus has left the room
[07:36:11] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:37:54] *** daniel has left the room
[07:43:33] *** Guus shows as "online"
[07:43:40] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:49:00] *** Kev shows as "online"
[07:56:45] *** daniel has left the room
[07:56:54] *** daniel has joined the room
[07:57:05] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:06:06] *** ralphm has left the room
[08:11:55] *** zinid has joined the room
[08:15:07] *** mimi89999 shows as "online"
[08:15:30] *** suzyo has joined the room
[08:24:05] *** daniel has left the room
[08:24:22] *** daniel has joined the room
[08:31:08] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[08:34:56] *** marc has left the room
[08:36:38] *** ralphm has left the room
[08:37:08] *** marc has joined the room
[08:45:24] *** Guus has left the room
[08:45:25] *** Guus shows as "online"
[08:45:35] <Flow> jonasw, i've just discussed with ge0rg that entity caps would need a push mechanism for the service's ver attribute because the server may enable a feature dynamically at runtime. I'm not sure if this is something for xep390
[08:47:04] <Ge0rG> there is the implicit assumption that stream features / server caps don't change over the lifetime of a connection.
[08:47:34] <Ge0rG> I suppose the server could send a presence unavailable from the service domain, containing the caps hash.
[08:48:08] <Flow> hmm, my first though was to use a message for the push
[08:48:57] *** hannes has joined the room
[08:49:58] <Ge0rG> Flow: entity caps is using presence everywhere. If you have a presence listener anyway, it would just get reused
[08:51:01] <Flow> good point, but i'm not sure if this justifies
[08:51:05] <Flow> reusing presence
[08:51:22] <Ge0rG> We could just invent a new nonza.
[08:51:52] <Zash> Whut
[08:51:53] <Flow> that only causes trouble when using stream resumption
[08:52:16] <Flow> or maybe not since the features are announced early
[08:52:19] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Work work …"
[08:52:38] <Ge0rG> </s>
[08:53:00] <Zash> Features are still things attached to potentially remote entities, right?
[08:53:05] <Zash> So you want notifications to be routable stanzas.
[08:54:03] <Flow> Zash, so you also think that the service should use an unavailable presence as xep115/390 push?
[08:55:24] <Zash> Flow: Huh?
[08:55:25] <pep.> Could this be used for stuff like pubsub services?
[08:56:32] *** Guus has left the room
[08:56:49] <Flow> pep, not really, a remote service doesn't know that you are using it, so we would need a way to register for caps updates
[08:56:57] <pep.> I know edhelas was interested in having sth similar to caps for that
[08:57:06] <Flow> which seems a little but to much for a problem that hasn't been a problem since xep115 exists
[08:57:16] <Ge0rG> just send out presence pushes to all entities that ever asked for your caps :P
[08:57:31] <Flow> Ge0rG, for all eternity?
[08:57:49] <pep.> As querying a service with thousands if nodes can be quite heavy
[08:58:38] <Zash> Flow: I'm probably missing tons of context here
[08:58:40] <Ge0rG> while we are at it, there is no caching for disco#items.
[08:59:18] <Flow> Zash, I don't think so, it's really just "what if your service gets a new feature at runtime"
[08:59:20] <Ge0rG> Zash: context is: a client wants to cache its server's entity caps, but those can change when modules get (un)loaded
[08:59:28] <Flow> (which isn't really a practical problem)
[08:59:56] <Flow> Ge0rG, like client's caching disco#items?
[08:59:58] <Zash> disco-sub!
[09:00:03] *** ralphm has left the room
[09:00:25] <Ge0rG> Flow: there are rather static and more dynamic disco#items...
[09:01:04] <Ge0rG> The typical flow is:
1) query domain for disco#items
2) iterate over each item's disco#info
[09:01:05] <Flow> Ge0rG, true
[09:01:19] <Ge0rG> maybe adding the caps into disco#items would already prove sufficient, as we can't skip 1 anyway
[09:01:33] *** suzyo has joined the room
[09:01:35] *** ralphm has joined the room
[09:01:44] <Flow> Ge0rG, that doesn't sound like a bad idea
[09:02:11] <Ge0rG> I'm full of good ideas. Implementation is what matters :P
[09:02:53] <Flow> only problem is that xep30 has a "<item/> SHOULD be empty"
[09:03:28] <Ge0rG> just add a new attribute to item :P
[09:03:41] <Flow> but the schema!
[09:03:51] <Ge0rG> unknown attributes must be ignored?
[09:04:00] <Flow> says who?
[09:04:12] *** marc shows as "online"
[09:04:22] <Flow> (not saying that isn't what I'm doing)
[09:04:25] <Ge0rG> general consensus
[09:05:10] <marc> Ge0rG, I'm pondering if we should skip account creation on this XEP for simplicity and make an own XEP (with a reference to this one) later. What do you think?
[09:05:29] <pep.> Depends on how strict you want your parser. I know often it helps fond bugs when you are
[09:05:55] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:05:56] <pep.> find*
[09:06:18] <Ge0rG> marc: that's what I was telling you in the beginning :P
[09:06:57] <marc> Ge0rG, no, you had the idea to combine PARS and my account creation becaus they are similar :p
[09:07:09] *** remko has joined the room
[09:07:09] *** remko shows as "online"
[09:07:41] <Ge0rG> marc: if we skip account creation out, we can just rewrite PARS to be a server-side adhoc command triggered thing, and add the `ibr` flag to the spec for servers supporting that.
[09:08:10] <Ge0rG> marc: but honestly, I've seen multiple situations in the past where the account creation flow would make sense.
[09:08:24] <marc> Ge0rG, :D
[09:08:38] <marc> Okay, let's keep it then?
[09:08:47] <Ge0rG> marc: I wouldn't even mind putting both use cases into PARS.
[09:09:15] <marc> hm, doesn't fit the name PARS IMO
[09:09:18] <marc> at least account creation
[09:09:23] *** remko shows as "online"
[09:09:24] *** remko shows as "online"
[09:10:22] *** remko has left the room
[09:11:33] <Ge0rG> marc: good point.
[09:12:27] <Ge0rG> marc: I suppose renaming PARS into "Easy Onboarding" would be counter-productive. Some nerds already know what "PARS" stands for.
[09:12:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:13:08] <Ge0rG> jonasw: being the editor, is there prior case law, or do you consider it a good idea to rename an XEP when its scope shifts?
[09:14:34] <Kev> I'd expect Council to be involved in the shifting of scope, at least.
[09:15:05] <Kev> One can't really get Council to accept an Experimental XEP for one purpose, and then change the purpose of the XEP.
[09:15:34] *** daniel has joined the room
[09:15:46] *** daniel shows as "online"
[09:16:46] <Ge0rG> Kev: okay, so we have PARS. And we want to extend it to carry a flag that the token may also be used for IBR. And then we further want to extend it to allow "account sharing" where an admin sends a link to friends to easily onboard them.
[09:17:04] <Ge0rG> They are using the same wire format
[09:17:12] <Ge0rG> And are all belonging to "Easy Onboarding"
[09:17:17] <Kev> That doesn't seem to be particularly changing the scope much.
[09:17:57] <Ge0rG> Kev: it's not "Pre-Authenticated Roster Subscription" any more, but rather "Pre-Authenticated User Onboarding"
[09:19:12] <Kev> Yeah.
[09:19:39] <Ge0rG> so it's not changing the purpose, but still shifting the focus
[09:20:48] <Kev> This isn't particularly ringing alarm bells for me.
[09:22:32] <pep.> PARS -> PAUO, hmm
[09:22:54] <pep.> I preferred the first name Ge0rG :p
[09:23:08] <Ge0rG> pep.: me too. Will need to come up with a new catchy backronym first.
[09:24:46] *** Martin has joined the room
[09:25:00] <pep.> And the discussion about caps ended
[09:26:50] *** goffi has joined the room
[09:26:52] <Ge0rG> marc: so have you written down anything yesterday?
[09:27:02] *** daniel has left the room
[09:27:38] <marc> Ge0rG, no, not anything. What's the plan now? New XEP, re-using PARS XEP?
[09:28:47] <Ge0rG> marc: I'm ambivalent about leaving account-creation in or out.
[09:29:14] <Ge0rG> marc: maybe a new "Easy Onboarding" XEP is better suited.
[09:29:25] <Ge0rG> or maybe... dunno
[09:29:34] *Ge0rG lacks coffee
[09:29:43] <marc> Ge0rG, a new XEP for user invitation and account creation as is?
[09:30:24] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[09:30:45] *** ralphm has joined the room
[09:31:26] *** Martin has left the room
[09:31:26] *** Martin has joined the room
[09:31:51] *** la|r|ma has joined the room
[09:32:03] *** Martin shows as "online"
[09:32:31] <Ge0rG> marc: there are three user stories I see as relevant:
1) explicit account sharing --> uses PARS-style URI with token and custom IBR payload <xmpp://invitee@domain?register;preauth=XXX>
2) roster invitation with IBR to somebody without an account --> uses the IBR wire format from #1, server auto-enrosters user
3) roster invitation with IBR to somebody with existing account --> uses PARS as is
[09:32:48] <Ge0rG> #2 and #3 share the <xmpp:inviter@domain?add;preauth=XXX;ibr> URI
[09:33:44] <Ge0rG> we could make three XEPs: PARS, a new XEP for account-sharing + the new IBR payload, a new "Easy Onboarding" XEP bringing them all together
[09:34:04] *** Guus has left the room
[09:34:53] <Ge0rG> or just two XEPs: PARS and a new one for everything else.
[09:35:21] <Ge0rG> or stick everything into PARS, because there is so much overlap between #1 and #2 and between #2 and #3
[09:38:13] *** Alex has joined the room
[09:38:21] *** Alex shows as "online"
[09:39:52] <marc> Ge0rG, I agree but I don't know what's the best solution regarding XEP(s) for it
[09:45:41] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:49:35] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[09:54:44] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[09:55:10] *** SouL shows as "online"
[09:55:24] *** SouL shows as "online"
[09:59:20] *** daniel has left the room
[09:59:30] *** daniel has joined the room
[10:05:38] *** waqas has left the room
[10:12:29] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:12:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[10:17:44] *** lumi has joined the room
[10:19:33] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[10:25:56] *** zinid shows as "online"
[10:26:10] *** Kev shows as "away"
[10:27:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[10:27:59] *** daniel has left the room
[10:28:09] *** daniel has joined the room
[10:28:16] *** ralphm has left the room
[10:29:33] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:32:59] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:43:00] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[10:43:06] *** daniel has left the room
[10:43:27] *** daniel has joined the room
[10:45:02] *** goffi has left the room
[10:51:25] *** Kev shows as "online"
[10:54:41] <Ge0rG> From a symmetry perspective, #1 and PARS are similar to each other as they are building blocks that can be combined in #2
[10:54:55] <Ge0rG> so it wouldn't make much sense to have PARS separate, but not IBR+
[10:55:36] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[10:59:40] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[11:04:03] *** zinid has left the room
[11:04:07] *** zinid shows as "online"
[11:05:26] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[11:08:27] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:08:35] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:08:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:10:03] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[11:12:52] *** Kev has left the room
[11:13:52] *** suzyo has joined the room
[11:15:21] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:17:57] <marc> Ge0rG: So, a new XEP for account creation and user invitation as already planned?
[11:18:28] <Ge0rG> marc: no
[11:18:44] *** daniel shows as "online"
[11:18:47] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[11:18:54] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[11:19:03] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[11:19:12] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:19:34] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:20:23] *** Alex has left the room
[11:23:31] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[11:23:34] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[11:25:20] *** daniel has left the room
[11:26:34] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[11:28:10] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[11:28:49] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:28:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[11:32:15] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[11:33:34] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[11:49:37] *** suzyo has left the room
[11:50:49] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away"
[11:50:54] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:51:08] *** Martin shows as "online"
[11:51:23] *** Martin shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[11:52:42] *** daniel has left the room
[11:52:50] *** daniel has joined the room
[11:54:14] *** goffi has joined the room
[11:55:33] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[11:56:45] *** suzyo has joined the room
[12:04:22] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[12:04:24] *** lumi shows as "online"
[12:07:51] *** remko shows as "away"
[12:09:13] *** zinid has left the room
[12:11:09] *** valo has joined the room
[12:11:19] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:11:40] *** winfried has joined the room
[12:14:24] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[12:14:29] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away"
[12:15:30] *** Kev shows as "away"
[12:15:33] *** Kev shows as "online"
[12:17:25] *** @Alacer has left the room
[12:17:29] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[12:18:41] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away"
[12:19:03] *** lumi shows as "online"
[12:19:23] *** Alex has joined the room
[12:19:45] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[12:19:57] *** Martin shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:20:01] *** Martin shows as "online"
[12:25:07] *** SouL has left the room
[12:27:16] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[12:27:30] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[12:27:31] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[12:29:46] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[12:30:10] *** SouL shows as "online"
[12:30:14] *** remko shows as "online"
[12:34:27] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[12:37:18] *** daniel has left the room
[12:38:13] *** daniel has joined the room
[12:39:27] <Ge0rG> marc: after some more pondering I'd say we need exactly one new XEP.
[12:40:09] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:41:46] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[12:45:59] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[12:46:01] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[12:46:02] *** lumi shows as "online"
[12:46:08] *** daniel has left the room
[12:46:37] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[12:46:44] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[12:46:49] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[12:46:50] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[12:48:05] *** daniel has joined the room
[12:48:49] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[12:51:33] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[12:51:38] *** hannes has left the room
[12:53:17] *** hannes has joined the room
[12:54:40] *** Kev shows as "away"
[12:55:10] *** Kev shows as "online"
[12:57:15] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[13:02:10] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[13:02:33] *** daniel has left the room
[13:02:59] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:03:32] *** jere has joined the room
[13:04:16] *** hannes has left the room
[13:05:49] *** matlag shows as "online"
[13:07:23] *** tim@boese-ban.de has left the room
[13:09:20] *** hannes has joined the room
[13:12:10] *** Martin shows as "online"
[13:12:10] *** Martin shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[13:12:34] *** daniel has left the room
[13:12:49] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:12:55] *** Holger has left the room
[13:21:25] *** daniel has left the room
[13:21:39] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:25:34] <marc> Ge0rG, and what's the content of this new XEP?
[13:26:41] *** ralphm has joined the room
[13:26:47] <Ge0rG> marc: a description of the two use cases and how a receiving client should handle them, the wire protocol for IBR+token and a reference to PARS
[13:30:07] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:30:32] <marc> Ge0rG, two use cases = account creation & user invitation?
[13:30:40] <Ge0rG> marc: right
[13:30:54] <Ge0rG> marc: there is really no need to distinguish between #2 and #3 from yesterday's discussion
[13:32:00] *** jere has left the room
[13:32:11] *** jere has joined the room
[13:32:34] *** jere has left the room
[13:33:26] <marc> Ge0rG, -> no "ibr" parameter?
[13:34:28] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[13:34:52] <Ge0rG> marc:
account creation --> `xmpp://newuser@domain?register;preauth=XXX`
user invitation --> `xmpp:inviter@domain?roster;preauth=XXX;ibr`
[13:36:14] <marc> Ge0rG, wtf, we discussed 2h regarding the action parameter and you didn't like it and now you have "?roster"? :D
[13:36:19] *** jjrh has left the room
[13:36:22] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[13:36:26] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[13:36:50] <Ge0rG> marc:
account creation --> `xmpp://newuser@domain?register;preauth=XXX`
user invitation --> `xmpp:inviter@domain?;preauth=XXX;ibr`
[13:36:53] *** la|r|ma has left the room
[13:37:00] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[13:37:04] <marc> :D
[13:37:15] <marc> And no "?;" please :)
[13:37:15] <Ge0rG> marc: for some reason I used ?roster in one place in 0379, but not in the other places.
[13:37:37] <Ge0rG> ?; = empty action, not to be confused with:
?: = elvis operator
[13:38:10] <marc> "?;" doesn't make sense IMO, we discussed it already ;)
[13:38:49] <marc> Ge0rG, well, for PARS-only the "?roster" action makes sense, doesn't it?
[13:39:19] <marc> Not not in combination with "ibr", I thought that's what came out last time we discussed the action parameter stuff
[13:39:25] <marc> s/Not/But
[13:39:26] <Ge0rG> marc: generally speaking, the ?roster action doesn't make any sense, ever.
[13:39:52] <marc> Ge0rG, okay, you should update your XEP then
[13:40:00] <Ge0rG> marc: we should update 0147
[13:40:20] <Ge0rG> except nobody cared about it two years ago.
[13:40:58] <marc> Ge0rG, I would mention server-side PARS in the new XEP and make a reference to the PARS XEP, okay?
[13:41:10] <marc> For server-side PARS the server returns the normal PARS URI
[13:41:42] <Ge0rG> marc: for server-side PARS, the server returns either a normal PARS URI or one with `ibr` flag.
[13:41:52] <Ge0rG> I don't know if the ibr flag needs to have a value, though.
[13:42:01] <Ge0rG> URI parsing is a art.
[13:42:18] <marc> Not really :)
[13:42:22] <marc> Ge0rG, a value?
[13:42:27] <marc> Like "ibr=" ?
[13:43:24] <Ge0rG> marc: like `ibr=1`
[13:43:33] <Ge0rG> because an empty value is not much more than no value at all
[13:43:33] <marc> No
[13:43:45] <marc> Empty values are fine
[13:43:49] <marc> See action parameters :D
[13:46:48] <Ge0rG> marc: no, there is actually a problem here. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5122#section-2.2 Only allows the query type (i.e. action) to be valueless
[13:46:57] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[13:47:23] <Ge0rG> query parameters need to have an "=" between key and value, albeit the value might be empty
[13:48:43] <Ge0rG> furhermore, xmpp://domain/ is invalid
[13:49:25] <marc> Okay, that's all XMPP URI related :-/
[13:49:58] <marc> But that means we need an action type
[13:50:20] <marc> At least one "iquerytype"
[13:50:36] <marc> Well, exactly one "iquerytype"
[13:51:07] <Ge0rG> marc: iquerytype may be empty, leading us back to ?;
[13:51:58] <marc> This URI definition is really shitty...
[13:52:36] <Ge0rG> marc: it never was designed for what we are doing with it now.
[13:53:20] <Ge0rG> We could have `xmpp:inviter@domain?preauth=XXX;ibr=YYY` but I don't want to add a second token for the sake of adding a second token.
[13:53:42] <Ge0rG> especially as other applications will want to append crpyto keys and then render everything as a QR code
[13:55:09] <marc> You forgot "?;"
[13:55:15] <marc> Ugly as hell...
[13:55:35] *** daniel has joined the room
[13:55:43] *** goffi has left the room
[13:56:04] <Ge0rG> marc: yeah, ?preauth is a violation already.
[13:56:50] <marc> Ge0rG, fix your XEP then :D
[13:57:47] <Ge0rG> marc: to what? `?;`?
[13:58:28] <marc> Yes :>
[13:59:15] <Ge0rG> Can do, I suppose. Let's hope my parser won't crash on that
[13:59:18] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[14:00:04] <marc> Or we change the RFC :D
[14:00:18] <Ge0rG> Muhahaha!
[14:00:23] <Ge0rG> Sorry.
[14:01:14] *** lumi has joined the room
[14:04:34] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[14:04:39] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:06:50] *** daniel has left the room
[14:07:03] *** daniel has joined the room
[14:08:09] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:08:36] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[14:08:43] *** goffi has joined the room
[14:08:55] <Ge0rG> > This document extends the "roster" URI action defined in XEP-0147 with a new key-value parameter named "preauth" to store the generated token.
So maybe it's action=roster after all?
[14:09:33] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[14:09:50] *** Alex has left the room
[14:10:41] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[14:11:08] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:11:11] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[14:16:26] *** intosi has joined the room
[14:19:23] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[14:19:36] *** Guus has joined the room
[14:20:15] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[14:24:09] *** goffi shows as "online"
[14:27:21] *** daniel has left the room
[14:27:35] *** daniel has joined the room
[14:31:32] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:31:48] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[14:31:52] *** goffi has left the room
[14:32:52] *** SouL has left the room
[14:34:27] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:34:31] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:43:15] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:43:16] *** lovetox has joined the room
[14:44:41] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:47:08] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[14:49:43] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:54:27] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:55:31] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[14:55:43] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[14:55:47] *** Martin shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[14:55:51] *** Martin shows as "online"
[15:08:48] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[15:10:16] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:13:44] *** hannes has left the room
[15:13:56] *** suzyo has joined the room
[15:18:02] *** hannes has joined the room
[15:20:39] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:23:09] *** remko shows as "away"
[15:24:05] *** lumi has left the room
[15:24:15] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:27:56] *** matlag has left the room
[15:28:01] *** matlag shows as "online"
[15:28:58] *** remko shows as "online"
[15:30:39] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:30:44] *** Kev shows as "away"
[15:30:45] *** Kev shows as "away"
[15:31:52] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:31:55] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:33:03] *** ralphm has left the room
[15:34:03] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:34:03] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:35:49] *** Alex has joined the room
[15:36:36] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:36:36] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:37:09] *** lskdjf has left the room
[15:37:10] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[15:37:59] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:38:12] *** Kev shows as "away"
[15:42:33] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[15:43:19] *** remko shows as "away"
[15:47:06] <marc> Ge0rG, ?action=roster;preauth=TOKEN ?
[15:47:32] <Ge0rG> marc: no, `?roster;preauth=TOKEN`
[15:47:48] <Ge0rG> marc: I the action string is `roster`
[15:48:11] <marc> Now we're at the beginning :D
[15:48:21] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[15:48:39] <Ge0rG> marc: not at all
[15:48:48] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[15:49:37] <marc> Ge0rG, we discussed the action stuff already and got to the point where we both agreed that we don't want the "roster" action :)
[15:50:39] <Ge0rG> marc: yes, but then I reread https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0379.html#link_generation and realized it's the missing link
[15:52:11] *** remko shows as "online"
[15:53:27] <marc> And now you're convinced that we should use ?roster ?
[15:54:10] <Ge0rG> marc: I'm now more indifferent to using `roster` or ``
[15:55:17] *** zinid shows as "online"
[15:58:21] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[16:03:12] *** Kev shows as "online"
[16:04:50] *** marc has left the room
[16:05:03] *** marc shows as "online"
[16:05:29] *** @Alacer has left the room
[16:05:33] *** @Alacer has joined the room
[16:05:55] *** marc has left the room
[16:06:07] *** marc shows as "online"
[16:06:42] *** SouL shows as "online"
[16:07:20] *** SouL shows as "online"
[16:09:17] <marc> Ge0rG, I would use "roster" for optical reason :D
[16:09:19] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:09:33] <SamWhited> I've got a meeting later to (hopefully) convince work to book me a ticket to FOSDEM; we have cheap-ish flights from here to Frankfurt, Amsterdam, and probably a few other places. Anyone on that side of the pond know where it's easiest/cheapest to catch a train to the summit/FOSDEM so I can give work some rough price estimates?
[16:09:34] *** ralphm has left the room
[16:09:52] <SamWhited> (flying to Brussels directly is way more expensive for whatever reason)
[16:10:16] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: probably more expensive because of EU administration
[16:10:35] <mathieui> fyi tickets from paris were fairly cheap last time I looked
[16:11:18] <SamWhited> That would probably be a good option too; I think flying there is relatively cheap
[16:12:15] <mathieui> amsterdam-brussels looks like ~50€
[16:12:26] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: a one direction train ride FFM-Brussels is ~3hrs and 70-125€, depending on rate
[16:12:59] <mathieui> SamWhited, https://www.trainline.eu/ has most regional prices for western europe
[16:13:02] *** ralphm has joined the room
[16:14:19] *** tux has left the room
[16:14:54] *** Holger has left the room
[16:15:02] *** Holger has joined the room
[16:16:59] <mathieui> damn, the price of the train tickets doubled since two weeks ago
[16:19:30] <SamWhited> I should book this soon… I hate coordinating trips like this.
[16:23:48] <remko> SamWhited: AFAIK, there should be belgian trains from amsterdam, but not frankfurt.
[16:23:52] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:24:03] <remko> SamWhited: Belgian trains are www.belgianrail.be
[16:24:36] <SamWhited> Yah, looks like I'd have to go to Cologne and transfer if I did FRA
[16:24:53] <SamWhited> AMS looks the cheapest overall anyways though; or I could be super cheap and take a bus from there.
[16:25:11] <remko> there are also trains to cologne, yes
[16:25:23] <SamWhited> Although I wouldn't mind accidentally getting stuck for a day or two in Paris on my way back if I were to do that… and it's not much more expensive
[16:25:25] <Ge0rG> German trains are pretty expensive, though
[16:25:39] <remko> the train to cologne is belgian
[16:25:41] <SamWhited> Actually, I wouldn't mind exploring Amsterdam either, so I guess either would be fine
[16:25:42] <daniel> SamWhited: there is also one from Frankfurt Main station to Brussels. Not sure if that's better than transferring in Cologne though
[16:25:47] <remko> but yeah, getting from frankfurt to there might be expensive
[16:25:55] <SamWhited> daniel: I think that one was more expensive, let me pull it up again
[16:26:15] <SamWhited> yah, roughly twice the price
[16:26:34] <Ge0rG> bus from FRA to Brussels would be ~20€
[16:26:45] <mathieui> yeah but like 10 hours or something?
[16:26:50] <Ge0rG> not sure you want to have a 6-7hr trip though.
[16:26:56] <SamWhited> yah, if I'm doing the bus I'm doing FRA
[16:26:59] <SamWhited> err, AMS
[16:27:05] <SamWhited> too many airports
[16:27:17] <Ge0rG> Why can't we route XSF participants via XMPP?
[16:27:26] <Ge0rG> Why can't we route XSF Summit participants via XMPP?
[16:27:46] <Kev> I've just realised it's quicker (by a margin) for me to fly Cardiff to Amsterdam and Amsterdam to Brussels than to go to Brussels by train.
[16:28:01] <remko> SamWhited: Frankfurt is also twice as far away from brussels than amsterdam. So Paris, Brussels, Amsterdam, Eindhoven are your best bets for airports.
[16:28:08] <jjrh> Can one remotely attend the XSF fosdem?
[16:28:16] <remko> Kev: including waiting time in airports?
[16:28:26] <Kev> Seems to.
[16:28:47] <Ge0rG> jjrh: yes, there's Cisco WebEx.
[16:28:48] <SamWhited> Train ride time doesn't count, because I'm 5 and riding trains is the best (maybe it wears off if you live somewhere that actually has reasonable trains though)
[16:29:05] <remko> there's also ecological footprint to bear in mind ;)
[16:29:07] <edhelas> for https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0157.html is it possible to put MUC as well ? I'd like to put our chatroom for support-addresses
[16:29:10] <jjrh> Awesome (minus the webex part)
[16:29:15] <mathieui> SamWhited, don’t forget to add like 10-15€ for paris tickets though (it’s stupidly expensive)
[16:29:39] <SamWhited> *nods* I'm not actually sure if they'd care about that, but I figured I might as well give them the lowest prices I can find while trying to convince them
[16:29:46] <Kev> TBH, the worst part of the trip back is usually getting up early and getting to the station, which would be no better (actually worse) getting to the airport instead.
[16:30:03] <Kev> I usually leave the hotel 'early' and get back home late afternoon.
[16:30:09] <Ge0rG> edhelas: "This contact information may include email addresses, web URLs, and JabberIDs" - I see no reason not to give a MUC with "?join"
[16:30:11] <remko> Kev: and more stress. Flying is always more stress, and less legroom :)
[16:30:25] <mathieui> yeah, that
[16:30:56] <mathieui> more stress, more processes and lineups, and less legroom
[16:31:13] <mathieui> (and expensive water)
[16:31:14] <Kev> This is all getting close. I probably have to start thinking seriously about booking stuff next week. Do we have venues and hotels arranged yet?
[16:31:25] *Ge0rG probably had some 20.000km of train rides last year. That does wear off.
[16:31:28] <SamWhited> Flying's not so bad if you're not in the U.S., but I still hate it. Trains I can find a table, order food, and have a surface to put my laptop on
[16:31:33] <daniel> Train prices are unpredictable unfortunately. I'm paying 22 Euro for Dresden Brussels. That's 700km and a 9 hour train ride by high speed train
[16:32:05] <jjrh> SamWhited, flying in Canada is still a crappy experience.
[16:32:10] <remko> i was expecting the IC option from amsterdam to be cheapest, but apparently, the high speed train is cheaper
[16:32:21] <remko> so yeah, very unpredictable
[16:33:16] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:33:32] <mathieui> well, still more predictable than planes
[16:34:00] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:34:01] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:34:05] <edhelas> Ge0rG yeah I though the same
[16:34:07] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:34:09] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:34:13] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:34:15] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:34:48] <Ge0rG> edhelas: I'm actually pondering about doing the same for yax.im.
[16:35:31] <edhelas> https://github.com/movim/movim/issues/490#issuecomment-355592163
[16:36:29] <Ge0rG> edhelas: you could just display the link and reuse xmpp: linkification
[16:45:44] *** Kev shows as "away"
[16:47:19] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[16:50:13] *** ralphm has joined the room
[16:52:21] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:52:21] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:53:18] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[16:54:19] <daniel> If you are into trains you should take the FRA - Cologne - Brussels trains instead of FRA - Frankfurt central - Brussels. Because the FRA - Cologne section is one of the few sections where the high speed trains actually reach their top speed. And the FRA train station is amazing. It's predominantly severed by high speed trains and just seeing the trains enter the station is amazing in itself.
[16:54:52] <SamWhited> that's tempting me to do that instead of AMS
[16:56:15] *** Martin shows as "online"
[16:56:16] *** Martin shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:57:22] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:57:22] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:58:27] *** Martin shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[16:58:59] *** Martin shows as "online"
[16:59:15] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[16:59:56] *** lskdjf has left the room
[16:59:57] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:00:34] *** lskdjf has left the room
[17:00:34] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:01:09] *** lskdjf has left the room
[17:01:09] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:02:17] <remko> on the other hand, in amsterdam, you can legally get cannabis :)
[17:02:44] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:03:08] <remko> you know, the other kind of trainspotting
[17:03:16] <SamWhited> I see what you did there…
[17:03:49] <daniel> remko: I don't think that's a good argument these days for Americans
[17:03:59] <SamWhited> In Austin it's "illegal", but also invisible to cops, which is very convenient
[17:04:08] <SamWhited> But yah, that's what Colorado is for
[17:04:17] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[17:04:33] <Kev> There's no good argument for Americans.
[17:04:40] <Kev> Oh, right, I see what you mean.
[17:05:04] <SamWhited> *snort* it's true
[17:05:09] *** zinid has left the room
[17:05:23] *** lskdjf has left the room
[17:05:23] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:06:14] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[17:07:15] <moparisthebest> my only question is if it's invisible to cops, if you wrap something in it, does that become invisible too?
[17:08:03] *** lskdjf has left the room
[17:08:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:08:42] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:08:58] *** intosi shows as "online"
[17:09:23] *** intosi shows as "online"
[17:09:25] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:09:27] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[17:09:30] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[17:09:48] *** lskdjf has left the room
[17:09:48] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:12:07] <SamWhited> Tentatively added myself to the summit list since I'm reasonably sure I can convince work with this. Hotel is still a problem until we know what the group discount is though.
[17:13:20] *** lskdjf has left the room
[17:13:21] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:15:19] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:16:51] <Kev> Do we have a hotel sorted, then?
[17:16:55] *Kev heads off to the wiki
[17:17:30] <SamWhited> not as far as I know, that's always the problem for me. Work wants to book early and at the same time I book a flight, but hotel isn't done until a week or so before
[17:17:37] <Zash> That is the question
[17:17:40] <SamWhited> And by "always" I mean "last year and this year"
[17:17:51] <daniel> Kev: according to my logs Guus signed something and sent it over but is still waiting to hear back from them
[17:18:05] <Kev> SamWhited: Yeah, it wasn't always this way.
[17:18:08] <daniel> That's a lot entry from the 28th though
[17:18:17] *** Tobias has joined the room
[17:19:36] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[17:20:05] <Kev> Oh, yes, wiki says it's the Thon again.
[17:22:24] *** remko shows as "away"
[17:23:06] *** Kev shows as "online"
[17:24:26] *** daniel has left the room
[17:24:56] <Ge0rG> daniel: I don't think you get to go through Frankfurt main station if you are going from the airport to Cologne
[17:25:03] *** daniel has joined the room
[17:26:31] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:26:44] <daniel> Ge0rG: I was talking about the airport station (FRA)
[17:27:02] <Ge0rG> daniel: ah, alright then. Don't have special memories about that one, though the Frankfurt skyline is rather impressive.
[17:27:24] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[17:27:31] <Ge0rG> But yeah, FRA->Cologne is the track where you can actually go 300km/h
[17:28:00] <daniel> Ge0rG: I guess you are not into trains then 😀
[17:28:36] <Ge0rG> daniel: as I said, I'm travelling around 20k km per year by train ;)
[17:28:36] *** intosi shows as "online"
[17:31:14] <daniel> And as far as skylines are concerned I prefer the ride into Cologne. Less pretentious 😀
[17:31:31] <SamWhited> Cologne is less pretentious? That's impressive
[17:32:01] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:32:55] <Ge0rG> SamWhited: frankfurt is full of bankster skyscrapers, cologne has a rather classic appeal
[17:33:40] <daniel> I'm from Cologne I should say
[17:33:47] *** tux has joined the room
[17:33:48] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:33:49] <daniel> So there might be some bias
[17:33:52] <SamWhited> Yah, but Cologne is known for Eau de Cologne, and nothing is more pretentious than that!
[17:39:34] *** lumi has joined the room
[17:39:38] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:39:42] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[17:40:03] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:40:14] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:40:45] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:41:18] *** Martin has left the room
[17:41:24] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:43:40] *** ralphm has joined the room
[17:46:24] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[17:52:18] *** Kev has left the room
[17:53:48] *** hannes has joined the room
[17:53:53] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:57:11] *** remko shows as "online"
[18:00:16] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[18:03:32] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[18:06:40] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:06:44] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[18:08:13] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[18:09:48] *** Kev shows as "away" and his status message is "Weekend"
[18:09:56] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[18:20:30] *** remko shows as "away"
[18:22:51] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[18:24:59] *** Alex has left the room
[18:27:30] *** Alex has joined the room
[18:32:05] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[18:46:56] *** ralphm has joined the room
[18:47:38] *** lumi shows as "online"
[18:52:07] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[18:58:45] *** daniel has left the room
[18:58:59] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[19:00:38] *** daniel has joined the room
[19:01:01] *** Syndace has left the room
[19:01:04] *** Syndace has joined the room
[19:27:18] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[19:27:34] *** Guus has left the room
[19:27:41] *** Guus has joined the room
[19:30:06] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[19:33:14] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:34:18] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[19:34:24] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[19:35:03] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:36:17] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[19:38:48] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[19:39:36] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:44:10] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[19:45:00] *** lumi shows as "online"
[19:45:12] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[19:45:38] *** Guus has left the room
[19:45:39] *** Guus has joined the room
[19:48:06] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[19:51:00] *** hannes has left the room
[19:51:14] *** hannes has joined the room
[19:53:02] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[19:54:25] *** daniel has left the room
[19:54:29] *** daniel has joined the room
[19:54:40] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[19:56:32] *** Guus has left the room
[20:04:51] <SamWhited> Some SCAM person may want to try and put us on this list: https://fosdem.org/2018/fringe/
[20:04:57] <SamWhited> Which I just found out was a thing
[20:05:39] *** waqas has joined the room
[20:05:40] *** waqas has left the room
[20:06:21] *** Alex has left the room
[20:11:13] *** vanitasvitae shows as "away" and his status message is " (Abwesend wegen Untätigkeit für mehr als 5 Minuten)"
[20:13:44] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[20:26:54] <Kev> Maybe. It's not clear that it would be good to do so, at least to me.
[20:28:00] <Kev> If we assume that anyone actively involved in the community already knows about the summit, that means someone finding us on Fringe is someone not actively involved. If they're an active XMPP person who just happens to be outside the community, them knowing about the Summit might be great.
[20:28:12] *** ralphm has joined the room
[20:28:23] <Kev> But if they're a person with a bit of an interest and wants to come along to find out what we're about, the Summit might not be an inviting place for them.
[20:28:45] <Kev> Lots of strong opinions, very technical discussions, sometimes getting a bit heated, with little time for someone to get up to speed on what's going on.
[20:29:24] <Kev> 5 minutes at the stand at FOSDEM would probably be better outreach for them.
[20:30:13] <Kev> Your milage may reasonably vary :)
[20:30:28] <SamWhited> I would assume that new people who don't know anything about XMPP wouldn't read that page with a description on it and then decide to go (and if they did they'd know what they were getting into)
[20:30:48] *** daniel has left the room
[20:30:52] *** daniel has joined the room
[20:30:59] <SamWhited> And if they don't, it doesn't stop most people who won't go from seeing the booth
[20:31:19] *** zinid has left the room
[20:33:34] *** jabberatdemo has joined the room
[20:34:39] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:34:41] <Kev> I realise you can reasonably make the argument that it's good to put us there. I don't agree, but this isn't a thing where I'm clearly right and you're clearly wrong :)
[20:34:54] *** jabberatdemo has left the room
[20:43:52] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:43:55] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:45:25] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:45:29] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:48:37] *** ralphm has joined the room
[20:53:09] *** waqas has joined the room
[20:53:56] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:54:01] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[20:57:03] *** hannes has joined the room
[20:58:25] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[20:58:30] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[21:01:52] *** daniel has left the room
[21:01:57] *** daniel has joined the room
[21:03:53] *** suzyo has joined the room
[21:06:22] *** lumi has left the room
[21:09:30] *** ralphm has left the room
[21:10:24] *** goffi has left the room
[21:11:36] *** daniel has left the room
[21:11:43] *** daniel has joined the room
[21:19:10] *** ralphm has joined the room
[21:20:37] *** hannes has left the room
[21:21:17] *** la|r|ma shows as "online"
[21:23:17] *** hannes has joined the room
[21:32:45] *** jjrh has left the room
[21:32:50] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[21:34:29] *** Guus has joined the room
[21:39:27] *** ralphm has joined the room
[21:43:07] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[21:43:12] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[21:43:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[21:44:54] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[21:49:45] *** ralphm has joined the room
[21:52:18] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:55:54] *** jjrh has left the room
[21:55:57] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[22:02:26] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[22:02:57] *** remko shows as "online"
[22:03:27] *** SamWhited has left the room
[22:04:44] *** remko has left the room
[22:10:35] *** ralphm has left the room
[22:13:41] *** daniel has left the room
[22:13:46] *** daniel has joined the room
[22:19:03] *** zinid has joined the room
[22:24:15] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:28:45] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:30:19] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:31:49] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:32:09] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:32:45] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:35:11] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:36:25] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:37:27] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:37:28] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:40:25] *** ralphm has joined the room
[22:43:11] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:47:58] *** xnyhps shows as "online"
[22:50:12] *** Alex has joined the room
[22:50:37] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:58:36] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[22:59:34] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:03:26] *** marc has left the room
[23:03:34] *** marc shows as "online"
[23:11:37] *** SamWhited shows as "online"
[23:17:25] *** xnyhps shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[23:18:33] <pep.> Is this up-to-date? https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/XSF_Infrastructure Some services are using docker now right? And systems on the machines seem particularly old
[23:30:22] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[23:32:13] *** hannes has joined the room
[23:32:25] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[23:33:51] *** valo has left the room
[23:34:08] *** Holger has left the room
[23:37:08] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[23:37:14] *** Ge0rG shows as "online"
[23:41:23] *** Holger has joined the room
[23:46:26] *** hannes has left the room
[23:46:29] *** hannes has joined the room
[23:47:45] *** marc has left the room
[23:49:32] *** hannes has left the room
[23:49:34] *** hannes has joined the room
[23:53:51] *** Alex has left the room