-
jonasw
SamWhited: you win the bet with "interesting challenge"
-
Seve/SouL
Congrats :)
-
Seve/SouL
Did you post it?
-
jonasw
no
-
pep.
For once it's not xmpp bashing, that's good
-
Ge0rG
hackernews love pointless brain exercises.
-
Ge0rG
jonasw: you should add the Jeff Goldblum quote to the testimonials
-
jonasw
maybe
-
jonasw
-EBUSY though
-
jonasw
oh my god why are people sending pull requests against xmpp-echo-bot
-
Ge0rG
jonasw: somebody woken up the dragon
-
Holger
Finally a successful XMPP project.
-
edhelas
and in 3 months xmpp-echo-bot will support MIX
-
jonasw
it doesn’t even support MUC
-
edhelas
MUC is has been, all the cool kids are using MIX
-
Andrew Nenakhov
MIX is never be 😂
-
Ge0rG
jonasw: you could maybe get by by using GC1.0
-
jonasw
Guus, uh... about https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/579/files#diff-9661ef8d60d796f8a9156c049dba3a30R403
-
jonasw
this doesn’t make sense to me
-
jonasw
ahh, now it does
-
jonasw
enable ≠ resume
-
jonasw
nevermind
-
jonasw
Guus, sorry, another question: why do you use <conflict/> here? https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/579/files/aaf23bf79081c7e1efa6861e2217809a60e13ea1#diff-9661ef8d60d796f8a9156c049dba3a30R431
-
jonasw
this seems extremely confusing to me: 1. conflict doesn’t really signal an invalid value. I think the list consensus was more along the lines of <undefined-condition/> + an application-specific condition element✎ -
jonasw
this seems extremely confusing to me: 1. conflict doesn’t really signal an invalid value. I think the list consensus was more along the lines of <undefined-condition/> + an application-specific condition element 2. conflict is used as error to signal that another connection is currently resuming the stream. this is ambiguous ✏
-
flow
+ no stream management specific stream error
-
flow
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/579/commits/aaf23bf79081c7e1efa6861e2217809a60e13ea1#r205162639
-
Guus
Jonasw, you might be right. Or not. I included it mainly as a byproduct of the list discussion. I'm going to remove all changes other than the one I care about personally (the r/a sync issue) in the interest of advancing _that_ change. Other changes can go in separate PRs.
-
Guus
But first, dinner.
-
Yagiza
About XEP-0280: Message Carbons...
-
Yagiza
It seems to be lacking of point about sending messages between own resources.
-
jonasw
Guus, but this is exatcly about your sync change
-
jonasw
I suspect you might’ve done a copy/paste error or something here
-
Guus
Jonasw, I (intended to) use conflict for a second, different situation to the r/a sync issue (which indeed should have undefined, not conflict).
-
Guus
I'm quite literally at a trampoline with my youngest. Can't fix it now.
-
jonasw
Guus, no worries
-
Guus
Wth
-
Guus
Indefinitely messed up a copy/paste there
-
Guus
https://xmpp.igniterealtime.org:7483/httpfileupload/b5fab7c9-cf37-46ff-965d-e35901087705/yOHexJ7eSPydqT1UmejwMQ.jpg
-
Guus
We progressed from trampoline to cocktails though. Might take while. 😉
-
jonasw
heh
-
Guus
As I wrote in a different MUC: should be fixed now.