XSF logo XSF Discussion - 2018-11-20


  1. lskdjf has joined
  2. lskdjf has left
  3. lumi has left
  4. jjrh has left
  5. jjrh has left
  6. UsL has left
  7. UsL has joined
  8. lskdjf has joined
  9. ta has left
  10. ta has joined
  11. matlag has left
  12. matlag has joined
  13. jjrh has left
  14. efrit has joined
  15. moparisthebest has left
  16. moparisthebest has joined
  17. jjrh has left
  18. lorddavidiii has left
  19. jjrh has left
  20. lskdjf has left
  21. efrit has left
  22. vinx55 has joined
  23. lskdjf has left
  24. lskdjf has left
  25. l has left
  26. l has joined
  27. ta has left
  28. ta has joined
  29. j.r has joined
  30. vinx55 has left
  31. j.r has joined
  32. lorddavidiii has joined
  33. andrey.g has left
  34. Nekit has joined
  35. andrey.g has joined
  36. j.r has joined
  37. j.r has joined
  38. SamWhited has left
  39. Yagiza has joined
  40. moparisthebest has left
  41. j.r has joined
  42. j.r has joined
  43. ta has left
  44. ta has joined
  45. j.r has joined
  46. j.r has joined
  47. waqas has left
  48. j.r has left
  49. j.r has joined
  50. j.r has left
  51. j.r has joined
  52. Str4tocaster has joined
  53. j.r has joined
  54. Zash has joined
  55. Zash has left
  56. mimi89999 has left
  57. j.r has joined
  58. Nekit has left
  59. Nekit has joined
  60. Zash has joined
  61. Zash has left
  62. Zash has joined
  63. Zash has left
  64. Zash has joined
  65. Zash has left
  66. Zash has joined
  67. Zash has left
  68. j.r has joined
  69. j.r has joined
  70. moparisthebest has left
  71. Zash has joined
  72. Str4tocaster has left
  73. Str4tocaster has joined
  74. !xsf_martin has joined
  75. Str4tocaster has left
  76. Str4tocaster has joined
  77. alacer has joined
  78. j.r has joined
  79. j.r has joined
  80. blabla has joined
  81. alacer has left
  82. alacer has joined
  83. labdsf has left
  84. j.r has joined
  85. alacer has left
  86. j.r has joined
  87. lumi has joined
  88. guusdk has left
  89. guusdk has joined
  90. lorddavidiii has left
  91. lumi has left
  92. andy has joined
  93. daniel has left
  94. lorddavidiii has joined
  95. !xsf_martin has left
  96. Str4tocaster has left
  97. Str4tocaster has joined
  98. daniel has joined
  99. vinx55 has joined
  100. jonas’ Ge0rG, what is that list of XEPs? anything useful for the compliance suites?
  101. Ge0rG jonas’: you mean the "relevant for mobile" list? I think it's covered by the suite already, plus 0184
  102. jonas’ good
  103. lorddavidiii has left
  104. lorddavidiii has joined
  105. daniel I wouldn't hold my breath for chatty though
  106. Nekit has left
  107. Nekit has joined
  108. vinx55 has left
  109. Steve Kille has left
  110. Steve Kille has left
  111. blabla has left
  112. Steve Kille has joined
  113. Ge0rG daniel: because of libpurple?
  114. daniel Just by extrapolating the progress of the last four month
  115. lorddavidiii has left
  116. vaulor has joined
  117. lorddavidiii has joined
  118. labdsf has joined
  119. Yagiza has left
  120. Alex has joined
  121. UsL has left
  122. UsL has joined
  123. goffi has joined
  124. Zash has left
  125. Ge0rG daniel: so because of libpurple.
  126. marc has joined
  127. ThibG has joined
  128. lovetox has joined
  129. lovetox has left
  130. lovetox has joined
  131. ThibG has joined
  132. Ge0rG daniel: are you missing XEPs from Compliance Suite 2019?
  133. daniel Ge0rG: I don't recall anything coming up this year
  134. daniel Maybe the bookmark conversion thing?
  135. Ge0rG avatar something-something?
  136. Alex has left
  137. Alex has joined
  138. vaulor has joined
  139. blabla has joined
  140. rion has left
  141. jonas’ the conversion XEPs would indeed be interesting to have
  142. pep. I was also thinking about bookmarks conversion
  143. pep. Do the xeps that go in there need to be draft or sth?
  144. jonas’ isn’t even MIX in there?
  145. pep. When nobody implements it and it's not exactly clear what the benefits are over existing protocols?
  146. jonas’ ah, no, it’s just an informational footnote that MIX might be coming
  147. lovetox are you talking about server implementing it or client?
  148. lovetox because client its just "dont sync pep and private storage"
  149. Tobias has joined
  150. daniel A client should Stil know about that
  151. jonas’ itym: "its just 'dont sync pep and private storage, but only if the server exposes the feature, otherwise you’re as doomed as ever'"
  152. daniel So even it's not a lot of work
  153. lovetox yes jonas, i might implement it today
  154. jonas’ so yeah, clients need to know about it
  155. jonas’ and even if only to relieve the developers from the nightmares they get when thinking about the mess that synchronization is
  156. Yagiza has joined
  157. Alex has left
  158. Alex has joined
  159. Guus I'm toying with an idea, for to XSF to offer up a prize for development of the best/first/somehow-to-be-qualified new (client?) XMPP software, X-Prize style. My primary motivation is to facilitate the development of new, feature complete / representable software for things that are currently missing from the XMPP eco-system. A decent, free IOS client, perhaps? What do you guys think?
  160. edhelas I like the idea :)
  161. edhelas but maybe put a couple of categories, like the Oscars, best UX, best security, best XMPP support...
  162. Guus I don't have a concrete plan for the shape or form, so yeah, that's all possible.
  163. Guus That said: we have limited resources, so for the incentive to be interesting enough, we might not want to have to split things up to much.
  164. Yagiza has left
  165. edhelas yeah just a few of them, it could be a simple vote and we design a some logos that the winner project can put on their README :D
  166. lovetox you have to be prepared that no client reaches the goal, that would be a bit embarasing then
  167. edhelas "Best XMPP Client of 2018"
  168. Ge0rG jonas’ [10:22]: > and even if only to relieve the developers from the nightmares they get when thinking about the mess that synchronization is _99 issues with sync in the PEP // 99 issues with sync // One bug gets squashed // 98 issues with sync in the PEP_
  169. Seve I would not split if possible, indeed. If it must be a client, I would say something missing. Either features missing in the modern times or a client for a platform with no clients/up-to-date clients
  170. Ge0rG Guus: that calls for a Jabber Software Foundation
  171. Guus You're miscounting, Ge0rG. Last number should be '100'...
  172. alacer has joined
  173. Guus (or more)
  174. Guus lovetox: the challenge need not be time-restricted. If no client reaches the goal, the effort will fizzle out over time, without much harm done.
  175. Guus also, I'm willing to take that chance.
  176. jonas’ Guus, this will be very frustrating for developers who simply cannot invest the time without reliable source of income from the xmpp development :/
  177. Guus Ge0rG: maybe. I don't yet care at this point. 🙂
  178. Guus jonas' - that's one of my concerns - I'd not like to dissuade others.
  179. Ge0rG I'm pretty sure you won't be allowed to do that within the XSF
  180. Guus but, on the other side: the XMPP community would benefit more from having a limited amount of pretty good clients, than a large amount of very shitty ones...
  181. Ge0rG Guus: that's absolutely true
  182. Guus Ge0rG: at this time, I'm first trying to figure out if the idea itself is viable. We can worry about the appropriate vehicle later.
  183. lorddavidiii has left
  184. jonas’ next worry: client developers will cut corners to achieve the requested milestone
  185. jonas’ while this might produce a reasonable product *at the time*, it may lead to horrible, unmaintainable code which leads the client into a dead end (at least for a while)
  186. edhelas if (xsfCheck) behaveFaster();
  187. jonas’ hah
  188. jonas’ #volkswagen
  189. edhelas :D
  190. jonas’ edhelas, are you using https://github.com/auchenberg/volkswagen in movim yet?
  191. edhelas always
  192. Guus jonas' that's valid too. On the one hand, we'd have to come up with criteria that prevent the worst of this. That will be tricky to do, but should be doable
  193. jonas’ edhelas, are you using https://github.com/auchenberg/volkswagen in movim yet?
  194. jonas’ edhelas, are you using https://github.com/hmlb/phpunit-vw in movim yet?
  195. Guus But also, I'm now at a point where I'd love to have a good client on IOS, even if it's unmaintainable and will be shitty in a couple of years time.
  196. Kev Yeah, I'd love to get Swift shipped properly.
  197. lorddavidiii has joined
  198. alacer has left
  199. alacer has joined
  200. Guus Kev: what's keeping you?
  201. Str4tocaster has left
  202. Kev Cycles.
  203. jonas’ Kev, what does blender have to do with that?
  204. Str4tocaster has joined
  205. jonas’ Guus, hm, so a prize for an iOS client?
  206. Guus maybe?
  207. jonas’ that indeed sounds interesting, because that’s the worst platform at the moment
  208. Guus just floating an idea here 🙂
  209. jonas’ and there’s not too much competition
  210. jonas’ so less potential for frustration
  211. jonas’ I’d be totally in favour of that, although that means that my chances from collecting the prize go from 1% to 0% :)
  212. moparisthebest has joined
  213. Ge0rG Guus: have you had a look at Monal recently?
  214. Guus No
  215. Ge0rG Guus: you should. MUC and OMEMO aren't there yet, but there is significant progress and Anu is very responsive to feedback
  216. jonas’ a working XMPP client on iOS probably needs voice chat though
  217. jonas’ to get privileges for push
  218. jonas’ to be finally usable
  219. Guus 👍
  220. Kev A decent iOS client needs more thinking than it seems.
  221. Ge0rG I'm not sure it's really needed if we properly tackle xmpp push
  222. jonas’ so… maybe that should be the goal? but then again, the number you’d have to put on the table to have a freelancer implement audio chat from scratch is .. high
  223. Kev We need to get Push properly sorted for it.
  224. jonas’ Ge0rG, is it? my understanding was that push is unreliable unless you get a voip whitelist
  225. jonas’ Ge0rG, is it? my understanding was that push is unreliable unless you get a voip whitelist mark or whatever
  226. jonas’ but I’m not familiar with iOS development
  227. Kev The VOIP thing was so that you could leave yourself running in the background to defeat TCP being killed when you're backgrounded.
  228. Ge0rG Maybe Monal has that.
  229. jonas’ ah, right
  230. jonas’ that would be better than push, indeed
  231. Kev Not really, I think.
  232. jonas’ but, so, not a requirement
  233. jonas’ Kev, why?
  234. Kev Push and quick resync is the better solution. But we don't have a good resync solution at the moment.
  235. jonas’ except that for push, you need to go through a third-party service
  236. alacer has left
  237. alacer has joined
  238. Str4tocaster has left
  239. daniel I think you can create a decent iOS client without VoIP
  240. daniel Just by using push properly
  241. jonas’ daniel, why has nobody managed to do that yet, though?
  242. Ge0rG Except Push was -1ed
  243. Ge0rG jonas’: lack of developer resources?
  244. jonas’ Ge0rG, hm. "how hard can it be?"
  245. Str4tocaster has joined
  246. Guus jonas' : wanna win a prize? 🙂
  247. daniel > daniel, why has nobody managed to do that yet, though? Because people don't seem to know how I guess
  248. jonas’ Guus, no, I’m not touching iOS
  249. Ge0rG jonas’: ChatSecure has a bug where it duplicates incoming messages, and it's unfixed for half a year now already
  250. jonas’ daniel, do *you* know h ow?
  251. Str4tocaster has left
  252. daniel Or don't have enough time to get familiar with it
  253. jonas’ Ge0rG, yes, but that seems harder than "just" configuring your push server to send the right stuff at the right time
  254. Str4tocaster has joined
  255. Kev I had a fairly decent picture of what was needed, but it was less trivial than it sounds.
  256. daniel > daniel, do *you* know h ow? I know how I would do it yes
  257. Kev Unless I'm just too stupid to see the simple solution.
  258. daniel No it's not trivial
  259. jonas’ daniel, maybe get in touch with $iOSClientDeveloper and get it sorted then?
  260. jonas’ okay
  261. Guus Kev, did you document that?
  262. vinx55 has joined
  263. jonas’ I’ll shut up then :)
  264. Kev You can get by with just Push, but to get the really good experience you also need much faster resyncs than we can currently do.
  265. Kev Guus: There are many aspects to getting this right, including MAM, MIX, Push and Routing2.
  266. Kev So yes, I've been trying to document the various needed moving parts.
  267. Guus Kev: that's why I hoped for existing documentation 🙂
  268. daniel I think Chris kinda knows it too. But since it wasn't build into chatsecure it requires heavy refactoring
  269. daniel And you probably don't want to use a traditional xmpp library
  270. Ge0rG daniel: what about just writing the magic into the XEP?
  271. Kev The thing that I would get a lot of hate for suggesting is that I think there would be value in ... XMPP over HTTP.
  272. Zash has joined
  273. Ge0rG Kev: different from BOSH?
  274. Kev As a quick resync mechanism, so that we could poll in the background.
  275. daniel Well I know how to start and I'm fairly confident I could figure out the missing pieces as I go. But it's not that I could write down a step by step how to
  276. Kev Ge0rG: Yes, just for polling.
  277. Ge0rG Kev: you need cookies / tokens then
  278. Kev Yes.
  279. Ge0rG Kev: also not sure what problem that'll solve, apart from paranoid firewalls
  280. daniel And nobody would then implement it so it would be a wasted effort anyway
  281. Guus Does anyone particularly dislike the idea to have some kind of prize offered up for a good* iOS client?
  282. Kev Ge0rG: It'd let you poll in the background when receiving a bodyless push to just find the content of that message so you could display a notification.
  283. Kev Guus: I do, personally. I think the XSF could better spend its money.
  284. Kev Of which it doesn't have muc.
  285. Kev Of which it doesn't have much.
  286. Guus Kev: on what? I'd love to spend money.
  287. daniel > Ge0rG: It'd let you poll in the background when receiving a bodyless push to just find the content of that message so you could display a notification. You have to be fast and recover all state from disk
  288. Ge0rG Kev: how's that different from an XMPP connection?
  289. daniel But that's it basically
  290. Kev daniel: I don't think you need to recover anything at all, actually.
  291. Kev You could do the full resync once the client is foregrounded again.
  292. Kev Of course, this is much easier if you're willing to have your message content go over Push.
  293. Kev But if you're not, you need some mechanism that can wake the client, have it fetch the message that needs displaying, fetch it, display it, and go back to sleep again without the OS getting angry with you.
  294. daniel Right. Yes I see that your approach is valid as well. But I think one has enough time to do a regular sm catchup if we get fast resume
  295. Ge0rG Kev: that sounds like you are trying to get rid of the cruft of XMPP session setup by replacing XMPP with HTTP, instead of replacing the session setup
  296. daniel Aka instant stream resumption and the like
  297. Kev I wouldn't even try, I think. To do it over XMPP I'd just have fast reconnect, not fast resume, and then just poll that one item over MAM.
  298. Kev And leave the fast resume for when the client is woken up by the user.
  299. jonas’ Kev, that doesn’t sound too bad
  300. Kev Ge0rG: Valid point, see above.
  301. jonas’ soo… XMPP-over-TLS, SASL2+bind2 to do as much as possible in as few as possible roundtrips, query MAM, close connection?
  302. jonas’ (or try to keep connection open if possible)
  303. Kev Something like that, yeah.
  304. alacer has left
  305. daniel Yeah I mean in any case it can be done
  306. Ge0rG &
  307. jonas’ fg
  308. daniel It's just that the developer has to have in depth knowledge of xmpp and design the client from scratch to do this
  309. vinx55 has left
  310. Ge0rG jonas’: -EPERM
  311. Kev I'm not sure the client needs designing from scratch (I don't think we'd need to redesign Swift to do this, although it's a chunk of work), but there are certainly designs that would make it harder.
  312. Kev Ge0rG: You say that, but it clearly worked :D
  313. Str4tocaster has left
  314. Yagiza has joined
  315. Str4tocaster has joined
  316. vinx55 has joined
  317. daniel Sure. Depends on the client of course. Maybe swiften was just designed very well
  318. alacer has joined
  319. alacer has left
  320. alacer has joined
  321. daniel has left
  322. daniel has joined
  323. Yagiza has left
  324. alacer has left
  325. Holger Kev: > The VOIP thing was so that you could leave yourself running in the background to defeat TCP being killed when you're backgrounded. Yes that's how it worked with past iOS versions, AFAIK there's no way to do get that behavior these days. Now you need the VoIP label to get silent notifications, i.e. to have your app woken up rather than notifying the user without waking the app.
  326. genofire has left
  327. Kev I stand corrected.
  328. Holger Kev: > let you poll in the background when receiving a bodyless push You'd still need that VoIP flag to get that 'bodyless push' in the first place. And how does HTTP vs. XMPP help after being woken up?
  329. Kev Keep reading down :)
  330. Holger I did.
  331. Kev It doesn't, you could do the same over XMPP by having a non-session stream making a MAM request.
  332. Holger Ah ok.
  333. Kev As long as you had XMPP-over-TLS, and immediate setup instead of SASL.
  334. Holger didn't grasp that you were still tackling the same point here.
  335. Holger Right.
  336. Holger daniel: > I think you can create a decent iOS client without VoIP I dunno how you'd avoid "New message" notifications though.
  337. Kev Presumably by sending the content in the push notif, which some people would hate, and others would be quite happy with.
  338. jonas’ you can’t do that with OMEMO
  339. Holger With a smarter push mechanism we could avoid sending multiple of those, and once the client *is* woken it can attempt to replace that notification (like ChatSecure already does), but that's not reliable.
  340. Holger Kev: Right.
  341. Kev jonas’: OMEMO is why we can't have nice things :)
  342. jonas’ no, broken mobile OSes are why we can’t have nice things (in this case)
  343. Holger Yes it would be nice if we could offer a knob to optionally include message contents.
  344. Kev I think the "can't send bodyless push" thing might be broken (didn't know about that), but otherwise the whole "suspect in background" thing seems quite sensible to me (also the way Android seems to be going).
  345. daniel > daniel: > I dunno how you'd avoid "New message" notifications though. You can replace the content of a message
  346. daniel You get the new message push, catch up with the real one and then replace it
  347. daniel But yes you need to make the push a bit smarter
  348. daniel But that's not rocket science
  349. Holger Kev: Yes, the big difference so far is that Android doesn't restrict silent notifications. But who knows where they're going.
  350. Kev s/suspect/suspend/, obviously.
  351. Holger daniel: Right, that's what ChatSecure is doing. But that means in 86,9% of all cases, users see a "new message!" notification.
  352. Kev So what's WhatsApp doing here - registering as a VOIP app so it can receive push notifs?
  353. daniel I think the go the replacing route. They just don't have false positives
  354. Holger daniel: The ChatSecure app server generates both a 'New message' notification *and* a 'silent' notification. The latter one is unreliable, but *if* it's delivered, the "catch up and replace" thing is attempted. If it's not, there's no way to do that.
  355. Holger Kev, daniel: I would've assumed silent VoIP notifications.
  356. Holger But I dunno.
  357. daniel But the new message ones are reliable as well, no?
  358. Kev https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/setting_up_a_remote_notification_server/pushing_updates_to_your_app_silently Doesn't say anything about needing to be a VOIP app, AFAICT.
  359. Holger Would be interesting to know what e.g. Signal did before they had VoIP support.
  360. Holger daniel: The 'New message' ones are reliable.
  361. Holger Kev: I'll look it up, it was documented somewhere (and it clearly works that way).
  362. efrit has joined
  363. daniel So figure out when a notification should actually trigger a notification, send a reliable one with a dummy body and the modify it to show the actual content
  364. daniel I don't see the problem with that
  365. daniel You get 30s to modify it https://developer.apple.com/documentation/usernotifications/modifying_content_in_newly_delivered_notifications
  366. daniel This only depends on the app server to figure that and then on the client to do the catchup in 30s
  367. daniel That seems achievable
  368. Kev s/catchup/message discovery/
  369. Kev You might do message discovery with catchup, you might employ a different mechanism.
  370. daniel What ever ☺️
  371. daniel What ever meachism you deem fit to fetch a specific message within 30s
  372. Kev Right.
  373. Holger Ahh, right, "Service App Extension". That's a new thing I think, IIRC Chris mentioned that.
  374. marc has left
  375. Holger That would probably do the trick indeed.
  376. Kev Ok, I've spent a few minutes reading (more than I should, probably), and from what I can tell VOIP pushes will make things better because they're high priority pushes, but shouldn't be necessary for this to work.
  377. Holger Yes yes, I forgot about that thing. Depends on a recent iOS version I think, but apart from that it's probably fine.
  378. marc has joined
  379. daniel I mean 30s is actually *a lot *
  380. Holger has left
  381. daniel I'd be worried if we only had single digit seconds
  382. daniel I mean obviously my users hate metrics and an app 'calling home'. But it'd be fun to get some numbers on the median resume and catch up time in Conversations
  383. efrit has left
  384. Holger has left
  385. vinx55 has left
  386. waqas has joined
  387. j.r has left
  388. j.r has joined
  389. thorsten has joined
  390. Nekit has left
  391. Nekit has joined
  392. thorsten has left
  393. waqas has left
  394. efrit has joined
  395. lorddavidiii has left
  396. thorsten has joined
  397. thorsten has left
  398. jjrh has left
  399. pep. Guus, re prices to give to clients, I agree with jonas’ that this will probably discourage others that don't have enough time to allocate. But I also agree that it would be nice to have some kind of incentive
  400. lorddavidiii has joined
  401. efrit has left
  402. Str4tocaster has left
  403. Guus jonas', you here?
  404. Str4tocaster has joined
  405. lorddavidiii has left
  406. krauq has joined
  407. jonas’ kindof
  408. jonas’ Guus, what’s up?
  409. Guus mind popping over to the iteam muc?
  410. moparisthebest has joined
  411. lorddavidiii has joined
  412. intosi has left
  413. intosi has joined
  414. Str4tocaster has left
  415. Str4tocaster has joined
  416. Str4tocaster has left
  417. Str4tocaster has joined
  418. Str4tocaster has left
  419. Str4tocaster has joined
  420. lnj has joined
  421. Yagiza has joined
  422. Holger has left
  423. lnj has left
  424. j.r has joined
  425. jjrh has left
  426. Str4tocaster has left
  427. Str4tocaster has joined
  428. Str4tocaster has left
  429. Str4tocaster has joined
  430. guusdk has left
  431. guusdk has left
  432. guusdk has joined
  433. rion has left
  434. rion has left
  435. Str4tocaster has left
  436. rion has left
  437. Str4tocaster has joined
  438. efrit has joined
  439. guusdk has joined
  440. Str4tocaster has left
  441. Str4tocaster has joined
  442. Str4tocaster has left
  443. Str4tocaster has joined
  444. Str4tocaster has left
  445. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  446. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  447. Str4tocaster has joined
  448. lnj has joined
  449. efrit has left
  450. Str4tocaster has left
  451. Str4tocaster has joined
  452. ThibG has left
  453. ThibG has joined
  454. thorsten has joined
  455. thorsten has left
  456. Str4tocaster has left
  457. Str4tocaster has joined
  458. Str4tocaster has left
  459. Str4tocaster has joined
  460. lskdjf has left
  461. thorsten has joined
  462. thorsten has joined
  463. Str4tocaster has left
  464. thorsten has left
  465. Str4tocaster has joined
  466. thorsten has joined
  467. thorsten has left
  468. Str4tocaster has left
  469. thorsten has joined
  470. thorsten has left
  471. thorsten has joined
  472. thorsten has left
  473. thorsten has joined
  474. thorsten has left
  475. guusdk has left
  476. guusdk has joined
  477. thorsten has joined
  478. thorsten has left
  479. thorsten has joined
  480. thorsten has left
  481. vanitasvitae has left
  482. Guus Anyone in here that didn't vote yet? 🙂
  483. alacer has joined
  484. Guus if so: you're now looking at your IM-client. You might as well pop off a message to memberbot.
  485. thorsten has joined
  486. thorsten has left
  487. thorsten has joined
  488. MattJ scurries
  489. MattJ Thanks for the reminder
  490. thorsten has left
  491. thorsten has joined
  492. thorsten has left
  493. Link Mauve Thanks, I just did it!
  494. rion has left
  495. alacer has left
  496. alacer has joined
  497. rion has left
  498. thorsten has joined
  499. thorsten has left
  500. rion has left
  501. lorddavidiii has left
  502. Zash has left
  503. l has left
  504. l has left
  505. thorsten has joined
  506. thorsten has left
  507. thorsten has joined
  508. thorsten has left
  509. lorddavidiii has joined
  510. thorsten has joined
  511. alacer has left
  512. thorsten has left
  513. thorsten has joined
  514. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  515. thorsten has left
  516. thorsten has joined
  517. thorsten has left
  518. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  519. Yagiza has left
  520. thorsten has joined
  521. Wiktor has joined
  522. thorsten has left
  523. Yagiza has joined
  524. thorsten has joined
  525. thorsten has left
  526. lorddavidiii has left
  527. thorsten has joined
  528. thorsten has left
  529. Yagiza has left
  530. thorsten has joined
  531. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  532. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  533. efrit has joined
  534. krauq has left
  535. Wiktor has joined
  536. lorddavidiii has joined
  537. Zash has joined
  538. Syndace has joined
  539. vaulor has joined
  540. thorsten has joined
  541. thorsten has left
  542. thorsten has joined
  543. thorsten has left
  544. ThibG has joined
  545. thorsten has joined
  546. thorsten has left
  547. thorsten has joined
  548. thorsten has left
  549. lumi has joined
  550. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  551. thorsten has joined
  552. thorsten has joined
  553. thorsten has left
  554. thorsten has joined
  555. efrit has left
  556. thorsten has left
  557. krauq has joined
  558. andy has left
  559. Zash has left
  560. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  561. waqas has joined
  562. Zash has left
  563. Guus jonas’ kindly commit that missing file 🙂
  564. thorsten has joined
  565. thorsten has left
  566. thorsten has joined
  567. thorsten has left
  568. genofire has left
  569. thorsten has joined
  570. UsL has joined
  571. thorsten has left
  572. thorsten has joined
  573. mightyBroccoli has left
  574. thorsten has left
  575. genofire has joined
  576. efrit has joined
  577. krauq has left
  578. genofire has left
  579. genofire has joined
  580. jonas’ Guus, did
  581. thorsten has joined
  582. thorsten has left
  583. thorsten has joined
  584. thorsten has left
  585. genofire has left
  586. genofire has joined
  587. thorsten has joined
  588. thorsten has left
  589. Syndace daniel, Dino merged our pr for the 12 bytes IV already, nice ^^
  590. genofire has left
  591. genofire has joined
  592. thorsten has joined
  593. thorsten has left
  594. blabla has left
  595. genofire has left
  596. genofire has joined
  597. thorsten has joined
  598. jjrh has left
  599. thorsten has left
  600. thorsten has joined
  601. thorsten has left
  602. mightyBroccoli has joined
  603. thorsten has joined
  604. thorsten has left
  605. thorsten has joined
  606. thorsten has left
  607. daniel Yes I saw that
  608. daniel Now we need to do something about chatsecure
  609. krauq has joined
  610. genofire has left
  611. genofire has joined
  612. krauq has left
  613. thorsten has joined
  614. thorsten has left
  615. thorsten has joined
  616. thorsten has left
  617. thorsten has joined
  618. thorsten has left
  619. blabla has joined
  620. thorsten has joined
  621. !xsf_martin has joined
  622. thorsten has left
  623. genofire has left
  624. genofire has joined
  625. matlag has left
  626. !xsf_martin has joined
  627. jjrh has left
  628. thorsten has joined
  629. genofire has left
  630. thorsten has left
  631. thorsten has joined
  632. thorsten has left
  633. genofire has joined
  634. thorsten has joined
  635. thorsten has left
  636. krauq has joined
  637. thorsten has joined
  638. thorsten has left
  639. daniel has left
  640. daniel has joined
  641. rion has left
  642. thorsten has joined
  643. thorsten has left
  644. thorsten has joined
  645. thorsten has left
  646. thorsten has joined
  647. genofire has left
  648. genofire has joined
  649. thorsten has left
  650. marc has left
  651. daniel has left
  652. daniel has joined
  653. thorsten has joined
  654. daniel has left
  655. Guus has left
  656. daniel has joined
  657. thorsten has left
  658. guusdk has left
  659. guusdk has joined
  660. genofire has left
  661. thorsten has joined
  662. thorsten has left
  663. guusdk has left
  664. guusdk has joined
  665. genofire has joined
  666. thorsten has joined
  667. thorsten has left
  668. genofire has left
  669. thorsten has joined
  670. thorsten has left
  671. genofire has joined
  672. genofire has left
  673. thorsten has joined
  674. lskdjf has joined
  675. thorsten has left
  676. thorsten has joined
  677. thorsten has left
  678. waqas has left
  679. waqas has joined
  680. thorsten has joined
  681. genofire has joined
  682. thorsten has left
  683. waqas has left
  684. waqas has joined
  685. guusdk has left
  686. guusdk has left
  687. guusdk has joined
  688. thorsten has joined
  689. waqas has left
  690. waqas has joined
  691. genofire has left
  692. thorsten has left
  693. genofire has joined
  694. efrit has left
  695. thorsten has joined
  696. thorsten has left
  697. rion has left
  698. thorsten has joined
  699. thorsten has left
  700. waqas has left
  701. waqas has joined
  702. thorsten has joined
  703. thorsten has left
  704. waqas has left
  705. waqas has joined
  706. thorsten has joined
  707. genofire has left
  708. genofire has joined
  709. thorsten has left
  710. Nekit has left
  711. Nekit has joined
  712. thorsten has joined
  713. Tobias has left
  714. thorsten has left
  715. waqas has left
  716. waqas has joined
  717. Alex has left
  718. waqas has left
  719. waqas has joined
  720. tux has joined
  721. genofire has left
  722. waqas has left
  723. waqas has joined
  724. thorsten has joined
  725. thorsten has left
  726. thorsten has joined
  727. genofire has joined
  728. thorsten has left
  729. waqas has left
  730. waqas has joined
  731. waqas has left
  732. waqas has joined
  733. thorsten has joined
  734. thorsten has left
  735. thorsten has joined
  736. rion has left
  737. thorsten has left
  738. vanitasvitae has left
  739. thorsten has joined
  740. thorsten has left
  741. thorsten has joined
  742. thorsten has left
  743. Yagiza has joined
  744. thorsten has joined
  745. Yagiza has left
  746. thorsten has left
  747. vanitasvitae has left
  748. lovetox has left
  749. lovetox has joined
  750. thorsten has joined
  751. thorsten has left
  752. thorsten has joined
  753. thorsten has left
  754. genofire has left
  755. genofire has joined
  756. thorsten has joined
  757. thorsten has left
  758. thorsten has joined
  759. thorsten has left
  760. Yagiza has joined
  761. moparisthebest Guus: it seems like whatever prize the xsf could offer wouldn't be large enough to pay for development, so you still need a dedicated dev who wants it for themselves
  762. thorsten has joined
  763. thorsten has left
  764. moparisthebest And any Dev like that doesn't want to run a crippled phone OS when they can run Android...
  765. thorsten has joined
  766. moparisthebest Hey if Android keeps getting worse though...
  767. Guus moparisthebest: prize money is an incentive, but not paying for all of the development.
  768. thorsten has left
  769. thorsten has joined
  770. tux has joined
  771. Syndace has left
  772. thorsten has left
  773. thorsten has joined
  774. thorsten has left
  775. thorsten has joined
  776. thorsten has joined
  777. thorsten has left
  778. guusdk has left
  779. Yagiza has left
  780. rion has left
  781. Zash The real prize is the bragging rights for your marketing department if you win
  782. Steve Kille has left
  783. Steve Kille has left
  784. Steve Kille has joined
  785. mightyBroccoli has left
  786. mightyBroccoli has joined
  787. no has joined
  788. no has left
  789. MattJ has joined
  790. Steve Kille has left
  791. goffi has joined
  792. labdsf has left
  793. moparisthebest I think there are basically 2 types of devs that would do it
  794. moparisthebest One is with funding and a marketing plan, and it's not gonna be open, line WhatsApp etc
  795. moparisthebest Other is Dev that wants to scratch their own itch, with capability, and using an iPhone full time
  796. moparisthebest I don't think that second one exists
  797. MattJ It shouldn't be overlooked that we have at least two iOS clients already
  798. MattJ It's not necessarily a requirement to write a new one from scratch
  799. MattJ and therefore it may be feasible to fund shorter specific projects on top of existing iOS clients
  800. UsL has joined
  801. moparisthebest Yea that seems more feasible
  802. Ge0rG https://op-co.de/tmp/xep-0184.html#format - the "Note:" below example 4. I think I need to tune the wording some more.
  803. UsL has joined
  804. thorsten has joined
  805. Ge0rG Maybe it's time to do some woodwork instead of writing XEPs.
  806. thorsten has left
  807. genofire has left
  808. genofire has joined
  809. thorsten has joined
  810. thorsten has left
  811. daniel If you started building a bicycle you might not be able to fix it into a car
  812. daniel Especially not as a third party
  813. j.r has left
  814. marc has joined
  815. SamWhited In that case, I feel like xmpp is a bicycle car hybrid where one person keeps taking off bike parts and putting car parts on and one person is doing the opposite and others are just randomly bolting airplane parts on wherever they'll fit.
  816. SamWhited (I missed most context there, but if I interpreted the analogy correctly my point is that I'm starting to think we need a specific mission and set of use cases)
  817. thorsten has joined
  818. thorsten has left
  819. thorsten has joined
  820. thorsten has left
  821. daniel SamWhited: I was talking about clients. I think there is some truth to what you are saying in regards to the protocol but I think it's more severe when it comes to specific clients
  822. daniel A multi use protocol is not an unfixable problem imho
  823. daniel Maybe a hard one
  824. SamWhited ah yah, that applies even better to most clients, assume I was talking about that too
  825. lorddavidiii has left
  826. lorddavidiii has joined
  827. thorsten has joined
  828. thorsten has left
  829. thorsten has joined
  830. thorsten has left
  831. Neustradamus has left
  832. Neustradamus has joined
  833. thorsten has joined
  834. thorsten has left
  835. thorsten has joined
  836. thorsten has joined
  837. thorsten has left
  838. rion has left
  839. thorsten has joined
  840. thorsten has left
  841. thorsten has joined
  842. thorsten has left
  843. Yagiza has joined
  844. Syndace has joined
  845. Yagiza has left
  846. rion has left
  847. lskdjf has joined
  848. labdsf has joined
  849. rion has left
  850. jjrh has left
  851. rion has left
  852. jjrh has left
  853. rion has left
  854. jjrh has left
  855. l has joined
  856. labdsf has left
  857. Alex has joined
  858. jjrh has left
  859. labdsf has joined
  860. genofire has left
  861. genofire has left
  862. guusdk has left
  863. guusdk has joined
  864. daniel has left
  865. daniel has joined
  866. l has joined
  867. Alex has left
  868. Alex has joined
  869. labdsf has left
  870. jonas’ https://github.com/siacs/Conversations/issues/3125#issuecomment-440398906
  871. jonas’ there is a need for a simple way to refer to another message
  872. jonas’ references doesn’t have that use-case
  873. jonas’ can we get that specified quickly?
  874. jonas’ or alternatively rename Message Attaching, because it’s not being used for attaching apparently
  875. Zash What uses it and for what then?
  876. labdsf has joined
  877. jonas’ Zash, see that link please
  878. Zash What, read what I'm commenting on?! Unpossible!
  879. Zash Mkay
  880. Zash Don't make me submit an <in-reply-to/>
  881. Zash or "How to blockchain using thread/@parent"
  882. lovetox im not sure about this for quotation
  883. lovetox but what it actually solves nicely is the case where i want to convey a url with a message
  884. lovetox but i want to encrypt it
  885. lovetox for oob and the sorts, full stanza encryption is necessary
  886. goffi has joined
  887. lovetox this would solve this nicely for omemo
  888. SamWhited has left
  889. pep. Why do we have to fix everything else when we can fix omemo :(
  890. daniel has left
  891. SamWhited has joined
  892. daniel has joined
  893. Alex has left
  894. lovetox daniel said last time, in the last sprint they furhter developed the future omemo version
  895. lovetox so i guess it will happen sometime
  896. Tobias has joined
  897. pep. When it's already too late because the other things around it have been changed?
  898. Tobias has joined
  899. lovetox its never too late for full stanza encryption
  900. lovetox also it about a different wireformat to evolve from signal
  901. blabla has joined
  902. pep. Yeah there's been discussions around that this weekend as well
  903. rion has left
  904. rion has left
  905. rion has left
  906. goffi has joined
  907. Alex has left
  908. SamWhited has left
  909. genofire has left
  910. SamWhited has joined
  911. lorddavidiii has left
  912. pep. "Furthermore, even if 3.4 covered our use case other use cases outside our scope would still have to be implemented in order to be compliant with the whole XEP.", I guess people are also often confused by this.
  913. pep. How many people say they support MUC or Pubsub entirely :)
  914. pep. How many people say they support MUC or Pubsub :)
  915. matlag has left
  916. jjrh has left
  917. SamWhited has left
  918. j.r has joined
  919. matlag has left
  920. jjrh has left
  921. SamWhited has joined
  922. l has joined
  923. l has joined
  924. SamWhited has left
  925. lorddavidiii has joined
  926. Ge0rG lovetox [20:48]: > its never too late for full stanza encryption Nobody expects the Full Stanza Encryption!
  927. Ge0rG Zash [20:35]: > Don't make me submit an <in-reply-to/> And then rewrite Receipts and LMC on top of it!
  928. Ge0rG See discussion in jdev@ today
  929. genofire has left
  930. moparisthebest has left
  931. tux has joined
  932. marc has left
  933. l has joined
  934. efrit has joined
  935. goffi Do you know this https://omemo.im/ ? The website looks like an aggregation of publicly available informations, and it claims to be open source but I don't see any source code. Smells like malicious app
  936. lovetox its not malicious
  937. lovetox it seems to link for downloads directly to other projects
  938. lovetox like gajim, and zom
  939. Zash Except the Android one
  940. lovetox yes
  941. lovetox thats a bit weird
  942. Zash It links to Conversations in the footer
  943. lovetox but i bet its conversations
  944. lovetox relabeld
  945. lskdjf has joined
  946. lovetox but yeah, i dont know that will help the cause
  947. lnj has left
  948. lorddavidiii has left
  949. blabla has left
  950. lorddavidiii has joined
  951. goffi has joined
  952. goffi also here https://www.reddit.com/r/xmpp/comments/9y3ib4/can_you_use_omemo_encryption_across_two_different/ "See omemo.im and test their server and app across yours." by somebody nicknames "omemo82", it doesn't smells good to me
  953. goffi nicknames
  954. goffi nickamed*
  955. goffi arg
  956. goffi nicknamed*
  957. Zash Search for omemo.im on github turns up https://github.com/froghorn82/omemo.im
  958. !xsf_martin has left
  959. SamWhited has joined
  960. genofire has left
  961. blabla has joined
  962. guusdk has left
  963. efrit has left
  964. ralphm has left
  965. vanitasvitae THe commit history is... interesting 😀
  966. alexde has joined
  967. genofire has left
  968. j.r has joined
  969. j.r has joined
  970. lovetox dont understand why people dont try to do something productive
  971. lnj has left
  972. Tobias has joined
  973. lnj has joined
  974. Zash Procrastinating makes the world go round ... later.
  975. Zash has left
  976. Zash has left
  977. lorddavidiii has left
  978. lorddavidiii has joined
  979. alexde has left
  980. lumi has left
  981. goffi has joined
  982. vaulor has joined
  983. vaulor has joined
  984. rion has left
  985. lovetox has left
  986. vaulor has left
  987. MattJ has joined
  988. jjrh has left
  989. moparisthebest has left
  990. l has left
  991. genofire has left
  992. genofire has left