Monday, January 07, 2019
xsf@muc.xmpp.org
January
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
  1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
             
XSF Discussion | Logs: http://logs.xmpp.org/xsf/ | Agenda https://trello.com/b/Dn6IQOu0/board-meetings

[00:02:13] *** vaulor has left the room
[00:02:16] *** vaulor has joined the room
[00:05:52] *** mightyBroccoli has joined the room
[00:09:59] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[00:12:57] *** igoose has left the room
[00:13:01] *** Guus has left the room
[00:13:01] *** Guus has joined the room
[00:13:33] *** l has left the room
[00:13:45] *** l shows as "online"
[00:14:00] *** l has left the room
[00:14:52] *** Guus has left the room
[00:14:55] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[00:15:19] *** oli has joined the room
[00:19:28] *** Maranda has left the room
[00:25:51] *** genofire shows as "online"
[00:26:13] *** Guus has joined the room
[00:31:23] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[00:33:14] *** UsL has left the room
[00:33:14] *** UsL has joined the room
[00:35:43] *** Half-ShotX shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[00:37:59] *** thorsten has joined the room
[00:38:58] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[00:39:29] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[00:40:11] *** lskdjf has left the room
[00:40:11] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[00:41:18] *** lskdjf has left the room
[00:41:18] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[00:41:23] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[00:45:43] *** Half-ShotX shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[00:51:58] *** lskdjf has left the room
[00:51:59] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[01:06:16] *** lskdjf has left the room
[01:15:31] *** lskdjf has left the room
[01:15:35] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[01:23:39] *** genofire shows as "online"
[01:28:41] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[01:36:18] *** Tobias has joined the room
[01:38:41] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[01:44:29] *** Syndace has left the room
[01:47:34] *** thorsten has left the room
[01:47:44] *** thorsten has joined the room
[01:51:30] *** Syndace has joined the room
[01:55:15] *** lskdjf has left the room
[01:55:20] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[02:02:43] *** Lance has joined the room
[02:02:43] *** Lance shows as "online"
[02:07:30] *** Lance has left the room
[02:08:21] *** Guus has left the room
[02:08:22] *** Guus has joined the room
[02:08:24] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[02:08:52] *** Guus has left the room
[02:13:29] *** krauq has left the room
[02:14:07] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[02:14:52] *** Guus has joined the room
[02:16:03] *** lumi has left the room
[02:18:08] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[02:22:03] *** alacer has joined the room
[02:23:47] *** alacer has left the room
[02:23:53] *** alacer has joined the room
[02:24:21] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[02:29:23] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[02:30:42] *** waqas has left the room
[02:31:03] *** Guus has left the room
[02:31:03] *** Guus has joined the room
[02:32:52] *** efrit has joined the room
[02:32:52] *** Guus has left the room
[02:36:10] *** alacer has left the room
[02:36:13] *** alacer has joined the room
[02:39:26] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[02:39:26] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[02:39:36] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[02:49:09] *** Guus has joined the room
[02:49:49] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[02:52:47] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[02:54:46] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[03:00:12] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[03:00:40] *** ta has left the room
[03:00:48] *** ta shows as "online"
[03:01:06] *** Guus has left the room
[03:01:06] *** Guus has joined the room
[03:02:52] *** Guus has left the room
[03:10:01] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[03:10:08] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[03:19:16] *** ta has left the room
[03:20:12] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[03:20:12] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[03:21:42] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[03:28:43] *** ta shows as "online"
[03:37:40] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[03:37:44] *** sezuan shows as "online"
[03:42:19] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[03:43:23] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[03:47:36] *** alacer has left the room
[03:51:10] *** alacer has joined the room
[03:53:00] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[03:53:05] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[03:58:51] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[03:59:34] *** alacer has left the room
[03:59:36] *** alacer has joined the room
[03:59:44] *** Guus has joined the room
[04:03:51] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[04:03:55] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[04:04:22] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[04:13:58] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[04:13:59] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[04:15:55] *** Guus has left the room
[04:15:56] *** Guus has joined the room
[04:17:53] *** Guus has left the room
[04:24:07] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[04:24:08] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[04:29:43] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[04:29:43] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[04:29:46] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[04:31:54] *** efrit has left the room
[04:34:08] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[04:47:37] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[04:47:37] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[05:04:25] *** waqas has joined the room
[05:05:07] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[05:11:34] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[05:26:49] *** alacer has left the room
[05:27:59] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[05:34:05] *** Erkan Files has joined the room
[05:36:20] *** j.r has joined the room
[05:37:39] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[05:46:05] *** j.r has left the room
[05:51:11] *** mimi89999 has left the room
[05:51:18] *** mimi89999 has joined the room
[05:55:03] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[05:57:40] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[06:03:19] *** alacer has joined the room
[06:05:53] *** krauq shows as "online"
[06:14:53] *** j.r has joined the room
[06:16:17] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[06:18:48] *** lorddavidiii has joined the room
[06:19:40] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[06:25:29] *** steven has left the room
[06:27:46] *** krauq shows as "online"
[06:29:55] *** mtavares has joined the room
[06:36:50] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[06:38:11] *** goffi has joined the room
[06:38:44] *** goffi shows as "online"
[06:39:17] *** goffi has left the room
[06:39:40] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[06:39:59] *** goffi has joined the room
[06:40:07] *** goffi shows as "online"
[06:40:15] *** labdsf has left the room
[06:42:19] *** Zash has left the room
[06:46:45] *** Zash has joined the room
[06:46:53] *** Zash shows as "online"
[06:47:26] *** labdsf has joined the room
[06:49:21] *** mtavares has left the room
[06:49:22] *** mtavares has joined the room
[06:50:57] *** labdsf has left the room
[06:50:58] *** labdsf has joined the room
[06:51:46] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[06:52:23] *** Guus has joined the room
[06:53:52] *** Guus has left the room
[06:54:28] *** j.r has joined the room
[06:55:08] *** MattJ shows as "dnd"
[06:55:41] *** MattJ has left the room
[06:55:45] *** MattJ shows as "dnd"
[06:56:56] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[06:58:34] *** Yagiza has joined the room
[06:58:45] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Доступен"
[07:00:36] *** andy has joined the room
[07:00:36] *** ta has left the room
[07:00:39] *** ta has joined the room
[07:01:41] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[07:03:15] *** cookie shows as "online"
[07:03:52] *** lumi has joined the room
[07:03:53] *** andy has left the room
[07:03:57] *** andy has joined the room
[07:07:27] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:07:41] *** labdsf has left the room
[07:07:43] *** labdsf has joined the room
[07:09:51] *** ta shows as "online"
[07:11:14] *** andy has left the room
[07:11:14] *** andy has joined the room
[07:12:32] *** Yagiza shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус из-за бездействия более чем 10 минут"
[07:15:03] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:18:49] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[07:21:40] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[07:24:04] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[07:24:16] *** !xsf_Martin has joined the room
[07:26:40] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[07:27:00] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[07:31:40] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[07:32:50] *** !xsf_Martin has left the room
[07:33:45] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:35:44] *** thorsten has joined the room
[07:38:08] *** Guus has joined the room
[07:42:37] *** Maranda has joined the room
[07:42:37] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[07:42:37] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[07:42:38] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[07:46:52] *** Guus has left the room
[07:46:53] *** Guus has joined the room
[07:47:05] *** Erkan Files has joined the room
[07:48:21] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[07:48:37] *** Maranda has left the room
[07:48:57] *** Kev shows as "online"
[07:49:01] *** Maranda has joined the room
[07:49:29] *** Erkan Files has left the room
[07:50:04] *** Erkan Files has joined the room
[07:50:33] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[07:50:39] *** intosi shows as "online"
[07:53:37] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Доступен"
[07:53:52] *** Guus has left the room
[07:54:31] *** Maranda shows as "away" and his status message is " (Assente per inattività dopo più di 5 minuti)"
[07:54:35] *** thorsten has left the room
[07:55:49] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[07:58:49] *** lumi has left the room
[08:00:32] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[08:01:00] *** mtavares has left the room
[08:01:05] *** andy shows as "away"
[08:01:24] *** Seve has left the room
[08:02:12] *** thorsten has joined the room
[08:02:53] *** andy shows as "online"
[08:03:50] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[08:03:54] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[08:05:14] *** mtavares has joined the room
[08:06:42] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[08:11:41] *** andy shows as "away"
[08:13:03] *** lnj has joined the room
[08:14:34] *** oli has joined the room
[08:15:21] *** alacer has left the room
[08:16:41] *** andy shows as "xa"
[08:18:13] *** alacer has joined the room
[08:20:40] *** andy shows as "online"
[08:21:13] *** MattJ shows as "online"
[08:24:19] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[08:25:20] *** alacer has left the room
[08:26:18] *** ta shows as "online"
[08:28:39] *** vaulor has joined the room
[08:28:42] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[08:29:16] *** andy shows as "away"
[08:29:18] *** labdsf has left the room
[08:29:19] *** labdsf has joined the room
[08:31:31] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[08:31:35] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:31:36] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[08:31:50] *** Guus has joined the room
[08:32:06] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[08:32:11] *** mtavares has joined the room
[08:32:19] *** Andrew Nenakhov has left the room
[08:32:55] *** Andrew Nenakhov has joined the room
[08:33:00] *** Guus has left the room
[08:33:01] *** Guus has joined the room
[08:33:15] *** Maranda shows as "away" and his status message is " (Assente per inattività dopo più di 5 minuti)"
[08:33:41] *** oli has left the room
[08:33:43] *** oli has joined the room
[08:34:16] *** andy shows as "xa"
[08:39:33] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[08:39:33] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[08:42:17] *** lumi has joined the room
[08:42:17] *** lumi shows as "online"
[08:42:22] *** lumi shows as "online"
[08:42:22] *** lumi shows as "online"
[08:42:22] *** lumi shows as "online"
[08:42:22] *** lumi shows as "online"
[08:42:55] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[08:43:15] *** Maranda shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Non disponibile per inattività dopo più di 15 minuti)"
[08:43:47] *** lnj has left the room
[08:43:52] *** Yagiza shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус из-за бездействия более чем 10 минут"
[08:44:44] *** Nekit has joined the room
[08:44:52] *** Guus has left the room
[08:49:18] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[08:50:31] *** Zash shows as "online"
[08:54:29] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[08:57:23] *** lovetox has joined the room
[08:58:19] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[08:58:44] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[08:59:23] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[08:59:25] *** Half-ShotX shows as "online"
[09:00:23] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[09:01:51] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[09:02:57] *** krauq shows as "online"
[09:04:58] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[09:04:59] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[09:05:23] *** Maranda shows as "away" and his status message is " (Assente per inattività dopo più di 5 minuti)"
[09:05:53] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[09:06:00] *** Maranda has left the room
[09:06:49] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[09:08:56] *** genofire has left the room
[09:09:25] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[09:10:17] *** l has joined the room
[09:11:54] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[09:13:10] *** labdsf has left the room
[09:14:43] *** mtavares has joined the room
[09:14:46] *** Guus has joined the room
[09:15:05] *** labdsf has joined the room
[09:16:33] *** andy shows as "online"
[09:17:33] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[09:18:17] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[09:19:44] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[09:20:52] *** krauq shows as "online"
[09:22:29] *** goffi has joined the room
[09:22:31] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[09:22:35] *** goffi shows as "online"
[09:22:36] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[09:24:29] *** igoose has joined the room
[09:25:42] *** ThibG has left the room
[09:25:46] *** ThibG has joined the room
[09:27:32] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[09:29:46] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[09:30:01] *** Kev shows as "online"
[09:31:54] *** lorddavidiii has left the room
[09:32:40] *** Guus has joined the room
[09:33:30] *** Guus shows as "online"
[09:33:45] *** nyco has joined the room
[09:34:16] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[09:37:11] *** Kev shows as "away"
[09:42:21] *** lorddavidiii has joined the room
[09:42:28] *** Kev shows as "online"
[09:42:31] <goffi> Hi. I don't get Evgeny answer, can anybody explain me how clustered database are affected by the fact that we use or not an attribute to specify level of ordering?
[09:52:40] *** Kev shows as "away"
[09:53:58] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[10:00:48] *** thorsten has left the room
[10:01:22] *** thorsten has joined the room
[10:04:04] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[10:04:56] *** igoose has left the room
[10:07:52] *** Zash shows as "online"
[10:08:06] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[10:08:43] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Work work …"
[10:09:37] <waqas> goffi: Most distributed and replicated databases tend to be eventually consistent, such that one db node may have a different modification timestamp for an item than another node in the cluster.
[10:10:28] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[10:12:34] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[10:13:16] <waqas> (mysql and postgres for example have async replication, they are ACID for a node, but not for the cluster; many nosql dbs are similar)
[10:18:19] *** Alex has joined the room
[10:19:38] <goffi> waqas: so he's not actually answering to the question (which is about adding an attribute to handle the order vs using order of <order/> elements), but talking about the feature in general, and only arguing about the modification time right?
[10:21:03] *** lnj has joined the room
[10:21:33] <goffi> And this sounds like implementation details, nothing prevent to add a field to the database which is set when the item is received, before any replication.
[10:21:39] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[10:21:40] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[10:22:37] <goffi> "order by" is used in SQL which can be used with clusters, so I don't see how this is different here.
[10:23:11] *** Alex has left the room
[10:24:57] <waqas> goffi: Consistent order for a mutable ordering value like last-modified time (vs an "immutable one", like creation-time) really works in SQL dbs with a single node, or which have cluster-wide write locks.
[10:25:27] *** nyco has left the room
[10:25:50] <waqas> In mysql for example, a write to one db replica does may take some time before it's written to the rest of the cluster.
[10:26:14] <waqas> So different nodes in the cluster may have a different understanding of last-modified time at any given point in time
[10:27:02] <waqas> Pagination is tough as well. You request page 1. Then you request page 2, except page 1 results may already be invalid by the time you ask for page 2.
[10:27:22] <waqas> Since last modified order is changing all the time
[10:27:34] *** lnj has left the room
[10:28:35] <waqas> I don't want to speak for Evgeny, I'm just assuming the above is what he means.
[10:29:12] *** mtavares has joined the room
[10:29:21] <Zash> Database synchronization is hard.
[10:29:22] <goffi> waqas: pagination issue is already mentioned in RSM. I'm not against adding a flag in the result saying it may be inconsistent.
[10:29:53] <jonas’> goffi, no pagination is not covered with RSM as soon as you order by a mutable field
[10:30:17] <jonas’> well, it is covered
[10:30:20] <jonas’> but it’s not safe anymore
[10:31:19] *** andy shows as "away"
[10:31:21] <goffi> "The set of items that match a query MAY change over time, even during the time that a requesting entity pages through the result set (e.g., a set of chatrooms, since rooms can be created and destroyed at any time). The paging protocol outlined in this section is designed so that entities MAY provide the following features" (§2.2)
[10:31:54] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[10:31:56] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[10:32:01] *** Alex has joined the room
[10:33:46] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:34:57] <MattJ> I'm confused by your one email which says " the order affect the whole archive, not just a result set" and in a following email "it's true that the order inside the page is not influenced."
[10:35:11] <goffi> waqas: thanks about the explanation. I think this should be mentioned in the XEP, and maybe a flag could be added.
[10:36:18] *** andy shows as "xa"
[10:36:37] <goffi> MattJ: the first message was because yesterday it didn't seemed clear that the ordering was on the full history (i.e. we are not ordering the says 10 items we ask for, but we are ordering the whole archive and getting the 10 first items from that)
[10:37:08] <MattJ> Right
[10:37:47] *** Kev shows as "away"
[10:37:59] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[10:38:04] *** lovetox has left the room
[10:38:19] <goffi> Matthew: the second is because there is currently no mechanism to say, inside the page result we get, that we want the first item to be the most recent or the least recent. Currently the XEP state (not explictly enough apparently, I'll fix that), that the first item of the page is always the most recent, regarless if we are getting the result normally, or backward using RSM.
[10:38:38] *** andy shows as "online"
[10:39:05] *** mtavares has left the room
[10:39:06] *** mtavares has joined the room
[10:39:38] *** Kev shows as "online"
[10:40:37] <MattJ> I'm personally leaning towards just having another field in the existing MAM query form, to keep things simple
[10:40:45] <MattJ> and then we can fix pubsub separately
[10:40:47] <goffi> waqas: by the way, the last modification time is currently the default ordering using XEP-0060 without anything else. There is actually no "modification" notion, it's just a new item, but that the result it the same.
[10:41:06] <MattJ> I think the problems are slightly different, because you can't update a MAM entry (and never will be able to)
[10:41:25] <goffi> MattJ: you mean extending XEP-0313 directly or havint a new XEP which extend MAM ?
[10:41:40] <MattJ> I was planning to extend XEP-0313
[10:41:55] <Zash> MattJ: Message corrections...
[10:41:56] <MattJ> and the problem with MAM isn't which property to sort on, it's simply which direction to sort in
[10:41:58] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[10:42:07] <MattJ> The problem with pubsub is not the direction, but the property
[10:42:10] <Kev> > I think the problems are slightly different, because you can't update a MAM entry (and never will be able to)

Not 100% true, because of redaction, but close enough.
[10:42:55] <MattJ> and another reason not to solve both with the same protocol, is that the server implementation for both of these is quite different
[10:43:04] <goffi> MattJ: what about MAM with Pubsub (which is the case I'm most interested in) ? The item can be overwritten there.
[10:43:20] <MattJ> Yet the order-by XEP only allows discovery of support for <order>, not within a specific protocol
[10:43:41] <Ge0rG> cant we just implement SQL replication over XMPP and be done?
[10:43:43] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[10:43:46] <goffi> I can fix that and only use is with MAM for Pubsub, it doesn't really make sense in the other case anyway.
[10:43:50] <MattJ> I don't know - I have nothing to do with MAM-with-pubsub, never have, and I'm still unconvinced whether I ever will
[10:44:52] <goffi> I think filtering should have been a pubsub thing instead of a MAM thing, but today it's the only tool we have to filter items in Pubsub.
[10:45:30] <goffi> and it's a really important feature for most of use cases I have with Pubsub.
[10:46:52] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[10:46:56] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[10:47:52] *** oli has joined the room
[10:48:48] <goffi> the MAM example in the order-by protoXEP is about Pubsub
[10:49:38] *** labdsf has left the room
[10:49:39] *** labdsf has joined the room
[10:51:11] <MattJ> if we add order reversal to MAM, interaction with order-by would get confusing if that also let you select asc/desc
[10:51:22] <MattJ> Otherwise, they could probably live together
[10:51:30] <MattJ> But I don't know if I can imagine implementing it personally
[10:51:38] <MattJ> Hmm
[10:52:32] <MattJ> Maybe I can, in the context of pubsub, but basically it would be a separate implementation
[10:52:34] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[10:52:49] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[10:53:04] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[10:53:40] <Zash> PubSub in Prosody is squeezed through an abstract LRU cache, so that level would have to be thrown out and rebuilt
[10:54:32] <MattJ> goffi, does a config item on the pubsub node definitely not fulfil your requirements?
[10:54:49] <MattJ> (a config item that says "sort by update" or "sort by creation")
[10:55:07] <Zash> "keep order on ower-write"
[10:55:09] <MattJ> or do you need this control at the time of query?
[10:55:26] <Zash> There's no update in PubSub, only implicit deletion
[10:58:48] <waqas> I think the basic use-case being supported is just showing microblog posts by time they were first posted vs time when they were last modified. Last modified is current state, right?
[10:59:25] <goffi> MattJ: for some use cases I need to do it at query time. For instance for a forum, I want to be able to have last modified message popup on top, or have it by creation date.
[10:59:56] <goffi> Zash: no there is no update in Pubsub, that's why the "date of modification" is explained in the XEP, the business logic is changed.
[11:00:22] <goffi> waqas: last modified is current state yes.
[11:00:25] *** frainz has joined the room
[11:00:25] *** ta has left the room
[11:00:28] *** ta has joined the room
[11:00:33] <ralphm> The idea is to _add_ business logic so that overwriting implies updating, right?
[11:00:37] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:39] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:40] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:41] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:43] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:44] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:45] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:46] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:48] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:50] *** ta shows as "online"
[11:00:52] <goffi> ralphm: yes
[11:01:57] <goffi> But also to have a way, later, to order by a field for instance (e.g. prioriy of a ticket, or evaluation of an answer to a question).
[11:03:01] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[11:06:17] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[11:06:31] *** andy shows as "away"
[11:09:34] *** Alex has left the room
[11:09:38] *** Alex has joined the room
[11:11:31] *** andy shows as "xa"
[11:11:45] *** andy shows as "online"
[11:17:09] *** andy shows as "away"
[11:18:06] *** efrit has joined the room
[11:18:20] *** andy shows as "online"
[11:18:33] *** Kev shows as "away"
[11:23:09] *** alacer has joined the room
[11:24:40] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[11:25:17] *** nyco has joined the room
[11:26:41] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[11:31:15] *** tux has left the room
[11:33:35] *** ThibG has joined the room
[11:33:57] *** andy has left the room
[11:34:14] *** igoose has joined the room
[11:37:39] *** alacer has left the room
[11:44:37] *** lovetox has joined the room
[11:44:43] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[11:47:35] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[11:48:35] *** mimi89999 has joined the room
[11:48:47] *** daniel has joined the room
[11:51:47] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[11:52:08] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[11:52:08] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[11:52:09] *** alacer has joined the room
[11:52:21] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[11:53:20] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[11:53:25] *** vanitasvitae shows as "online"
[11:54:01] *** vanitasvitae has left the room
[11:55:02] *** tux shows as "online"
[11:56:44] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[11:57:17] *** Maranda has joined the room
[11:58:01] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[11:58:17] *** alacer has left the room
[12:03:23] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[12:03:24] *** intosi shows as "online"
[12:09:17] *** mtavares has left the room
[12:12:11] *** mtavares has joined the room
[12:13:38] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:16:49] *** lumi shows as "online"
[12:17:05] *** Seve shows as "online"
[12:17:22] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[12:17:25] *** intosi shows as "online"
[12:17:43] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[12:18:44] *** andy has joined the room
[12:27:37] *** alacer has joined the room
[12:29:01] *** j.r has joined the room
[12:30:54] *** mrDoctorWho has left the room
[12:31:01] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[12:35:54] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[12:36:03] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[12:37:42] *** lnj has joined the room
[12:38:11] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[12:38:23] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[12:40:29] *** oli has joined the room
[12:41:31] *** andy shows as "away"
[12:44:14] *** Ge0rG has left the room
[12:46:31] *** andy shows as "xa"
[12:47:12] *** oli has left the room
[12:48:33] *** oli has joined the room
[12:49:06] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[12:49:38] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[12:50:10] *** Kev shows as "online"
[12:50:20] *** alacer has left the room
[12:52:20] *** alacer has joined the room
[12:54:56] *** andy shows as "online"
[13:01:35] *** andy shows as "away"
[13:05:42] *** efrit has left the room
[13:06:02] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[13:06:35] *** andy shows as "xa"
[13:06:57] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[13:08:24] *** alacer has left the room
[13:11:14] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:11:35] *** Zash shows as "online"
[13:12:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[13:12:10] *** Alex shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[13:13:10] *** alacer has joined the room
[13:13:48] *** andy shows as "online"
[13:14:24] *** krauq shows as "online"
[13:17:15] *** matlag shows as "online"
[13:18:56] *** pep. shows as "online"
[13:20:01] *** alacer has left the room
[13:20:47] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:21:16] *** alacer has joined the room
[13:30:00] *** lskdjf has left the room
[13:30:01] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[13:30:15] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[13:31:44] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[13:31:55] *** andy shows as "away"
[13:32:10] *** Alex shows as "xa" and his status message is "Auto-Status (untätig)"
[13:32:19] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[13:34:29] *** andy shows as "online"
[13:34:53] *** lorddavidiii has left the room
[13:35:46] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[13:37:58] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[13:38:57] *** lorddavidiii has joined the room
[13:43:12] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[13:44:14] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[13:44:48] *** waqas has left the room
[13:44:55] *** waqas has joined the room
[13:45:02] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:48:34] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[13:48:51] *** Alex shows as "online"
[13:49:17] *** mrDoctorWho shows as "online"
[13:50:15] *** andy shows as "away"
[13:51:08] *** andy shows as "online"
[13:51:50] *** Yagiza has left the room
[13:52:30] *** alacer has left the room
[13:52:32] *** alacer has joined the room
[13:54:50] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[13:57:38] *** lnj has left the room
[14:02:47] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[14:08:05] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[14:08:07] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[14:08:13] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[14:10:09] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:11:46] *** l shows as "online"
[14:12:30] *** nyco shows as "online"
[14:12:30] *** alacer has left the room
[14:14:00] *** andy shows as "away"
[14:15:12] *** andy shows as "online"
[14:15:39] *** labdsf has left the room
[14:16:10] *** Andrew Nenakhov has left the room
[14:16:35] *** oli shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:17:29] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[14:22:27] *** Maranda has left the room
[14:23:06] *** waqas has left the room
[14:23:18] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[14:24:10] *** mtavares has joined the room
[14:24:21] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:25:32] *** Alex shows as "online"
[14:25:34] *** Alex shows as "online"
[14:25:34] *** Alex shows as "online"
[14:25:46] *** Alex has left the room
[14:25:50] *** Alex has joined the room
[14:26:35] *** oli shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:26:39] *** labdsf has joined the room
[14:28:49] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[14:29:12] *** Alex has left the room
[14:29:17] *** Alex has joined the room
[14:30:53] *** jjrh has left the room
[14:31:33] *** oli shows as "online"
[14:33:30] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[14:33:49] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[14:33:52] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[14:34:19] *** Andrew Nenakhov has joined the room
[14:36:16] *** Maranda shows as "online"
[14:36:54] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[14:37:12] *** Maranda has left the room
[14:40:03] *** nyco has left the room
[14:42:52] *** nyco shows as "online"
[14:44:04] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[14:44:59] *** oli shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[14:45:48] *** andy shows as "away"
[14:47:20] *** Alex shows as "online"
[14:47:36] *** andy shows as "online"
[14:48:04] *** Alex shows as "online"
[14:49:25] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[14:52:24] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[14:52:56] *** andy has left the room
[14:53:42] *** daniel has left the room
[14:54:55] *** oli shows as "online"
[14:55:40] *** lskdjf has joined the room
[14:57:13] *** lnj has joined the room
[14:57:43] *** mtavares has joined the room
[14:57:45] *** daniel has joined the room
[14:59:48] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[15:00:26] *** j.r has joined the room
[15:01:07] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta has left the room
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:10] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:11] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:11] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:12] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:13] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:14] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:14] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:15] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:17] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:17] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:22] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:01:50] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:01:56] *** ta has left the room
[15:02:44] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[15:03:38] *** lnj has left the room
[15:03:56] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[15:05:20] *** ta shows as "online"
[15:07:35] *** nyco has left the room
[15:08:30] *** jjrh has left the room
[15:08:33] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[15:09:40] *** nyco shows as "online"
[15:11:22] *** mtavares has joined the room
[15:14:29] *** UsL has left the room
[15:15:15] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[15:15:20] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[15:15:20] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[15:15:49] *** UsL has joined the room
[15:21:37] *** lumi shows as "away" and his status message is "(Idle 10 min)"
[15:21:52] *** jjrh has left the room
[15:22:05] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[15:23:11] *** Kev shows as "away"
[15:24:28] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[15:26:23] *** Holger shows as "online" and his status message is "I'm available"
[15:27:42] *** Alex has left the room
[15:28:50] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[15:32:46] *** Kev shows as "online"
[15:33:04] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[15:35:16] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[15:35:22] *** nyco has left the room
[15:36:08] *** waqas has joined the room
[15:39:36] *** Yagiza has joined the room
[15:39:51] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Доступен"
[15:40:39] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[15:45:57] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[15:52:01] *** waqas has left the room
[15:52:24] *** mtavares has left the room
[15:55:16] *** lovetox has left the room
[15:56:17] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[15:56:17] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[15:58:26] *** mtavares has joined the room
[16:00:17] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:00:20] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[16:01:58] *** Yagiza shows as "away" and his status message is "Автостатус из-за бездействия более чем 10 минут"
[16:02:30] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[16:02:32] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:02:39] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[16:04:01] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[16:04:25] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:04:28] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[16:05:12] *** ta has left the room
[16:06:17] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:06:19] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[16:06:25] *** l has left the room
[16:06:50] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[16:07:49] *** jjrh has left the room
[16:07:53] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[16:09:25] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[16:11:37] *** lumi shows as "xa" and his status message is "(Idle 60 min)"
[16:11:48] *** l shows as "online"
[16:15:22] *** alacer has joined the room
[16:16:57] *** lumi shows as "online"
[16:17:25] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[16:19:31] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[16:23:47] *** lorddavidiii has joined the room
[16:24:48] *** mtavares has joined the room
[16:27:57] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[16:30:00] *** Holger shows as "away" and his status message is "Auto-away (idle)"
[16:32:02] *** marc_ has joined the room
[16:35:16] *** mtavares has joined the room
[16:35:31] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[16:36:24] *** neshtaxmpp has joined the room
[16:36:28] *** neshtaxmpp shows as "online"
[16:39:05] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[16:44:05] *** labdsf has left the room
[16:44:07] *** labdsf has joined the room
[16:46:41] *** labdsf has left the room
[16:46:44] *** labdsf has joined the room
[16:48:28] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[16:48:29] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[16:50:42] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[16:51:36] *** lnj has joined the room
[16:51:48] *** UsL has left the room
[16:51:49] *** UsL has joined the room
[16:53:44] *** lovetox has joined the room
[16:55:07] *** labdsf has left the room
[16:55:09] *** labdsf has joined the room
[16:57:21] *** dwd shows as "online"
[16:58:11] *** labdsf has left the room
[16:58:12] *** labdsf has joined the room
[16:59:30] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[17:00:39] *** labdsf has left the room
[17:00:40] *** labdsf has joined the room
[17:06:43] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:07:02] <dwd> Hi folks.
[17:07:15] <Ge0rG> Hey dwd, back from holidays?
[17:07:31] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[17:07:36] *** intosi shows as "online"
[17:07:50] <dwd> Yeah, holidays plus family emergency, unfortunately.
[17:08:14] <Ge0rG> dwd: sorry to hear that. Hope things are normalizing again
[17:08:17] *** mtavares has joined the room
[17:08:20] <dwd> So I have an interesting problem with the XMPP Summit, and I wondered if anyone else had the same issue.
[17:08:58] <dwd> My new boss said he looked at the details for the XMPP Summit, and concluded it wasn't happening because there was nothing on the website and wiki page.
[17:09:32] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[17:09:34] <jonas’> the wiki page doesn’t look exactly empty tom e?
[17:10:05] <Guus> dwd - I am happy to facilitate later tonight
[17:10:28] <Guus> I'm about on my way back home, which will take some time.
[17:10:54] <Guus> In the mean time, if someone feels like drafting a blog post... 🙂
[17:11:20] <jonas’> we do have a blog post, don’t we?
[17:11:23] <dwd> jonas’, The Agenda is empty, for instance.
[17:11:27] <jonas’> https://xmpp.org/2018/11/xmpp-summit-23/
[17:11:46] <dwd> jonas’, And the blog post *is* there, but several articles down and not easily visible from the website.
[17:11:58] <jonas’> (that’s true, which is why I didn’t link it in the first place)
[17:12:02] <Guus> so, some kind of banner on the home page?
[17:12:11] <jonas’> the summit is members-only, isn’t it?
[17:12:14] <Ge0rG> maybe linking the blog post from the wiki would be a start?
[17:12:15] <Zash> pin it
[17:12:20] <dwd> jonas’, Not as far as I know.
[17:12:21] <Guus> ok, I need to go now
[17:12:30] <dwd> Guus, I'll catch you later...
[17:12:34] <jonas’> dwd, if what you say is true, a banner on the website would make sense, indeed
[17:12:38] <Guus> but I would welcome more exposure
[17:12:46] *** Guus has left the room
[17:12:53] <jonas’> I can probably draft some HTML for a b anner on the website, but someone will have to do the design fine-tuning
[17:13:31] <Ge0rG> jonas’: what about a box of upcoming events?
[17:13:36] *** marc_ has left the room
[17:13:36] <jonas’> Ge0rG, complexity
[17:13:40] <jonas’> I want this simple now
[17:13:43] <Ge0rG> it could be on the wiki as well, and feature elections and the like
[17:13:51] <Ge0rG> speaking of which... there is still no election page for Q1
[17:13:53] *** !xsf_Martin has joined the room
[17:14:22] <Guus> > I can probably draft some HTML for a b anner on the website, but someone will have to do the design fine-tuning
💓
[17:14:33] <jonas’> that’s a nice box you got there
[17:14:37] <dwd> jonas’, The problem isn't just a banner. The problem is that if it weren't for my insisting it's really A Thing, my manager wouldn't have believed it's a real event.
[17:14:53] <jonas’> dwd, yes, I see your point
[17:14:59] *** krauq has left the room
[17:15:13] <jonas’> however, the banner is something I can do, and which I realised when browsing $anotherOrgs page recently that it is something the XSF lacks
[17:15:14] <Guus> The banner, linking to a Thing-definion
[17:15:15] <Ge0rG> dwd: isn't that kind of symptomatic for XSF events?
[17:15:18] <jonas’> (announcing the event loudly on the main page)
[17:15:20] <Zash> SCAM needs a bigger marketing budget?
[17:15:23] <dwd> Ge0rG, Yes.
[17:16:11] <dwd> But here's the thing - right now, XMPP jobs, whilst relatively few, are very highly paid. There seems to be a lot of XMPP about, in some well-resourced areas. We should be getting really good attendence.
[17:16:40] <dwd> So I'm wondering if the reason we're not is because it's not seen as a normal corporate-friendly event.
[17:16:43] <jonas’> Cobol jobs have the same classification
[17:17:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:17:16] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:17:16] <jonas’> dwd, for starters, from my perception, summit was members-only
[17:17:16] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:17:16] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:17:28] <jonas’> we’re not really advertising it to non-members
[17:17:39] <dwd> jonas’, No, and that can't be a good thing.
[17:17:45] <Ge0rG> from my perception, Summit is heavily biased to new protocol design, which is not typically something for newcomers
[17:17:51] *** intosi shows as "away" and his status message is "Away"
[17:18:00] <dwd> jonas’, The Dinner *is* members-only, though we've rarely enforced that.
[17:18:15] <Ge0rG> The one time I attended The Dinner, I wasn't a member.
[17:18:46] <dwd> Ge0rG, Yes, but we had an interesting session abotu where XMPP was used last time, which was really fascinating to me.
[17:18:48] <Zash> Members +1 ish?
[17:18:55] <dwd> Zash, Roughly.
[17:19:49] *** mtavares has joined the room
[17:19:58] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:20:03] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[17:20:04] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[17:21:15] <dwd> But I wonder if we could [re-]introduce talks and other things that look a little more conference-y. We've done so before, but I think that making the Summit look a little more professional (ie, corporate) would help people expense travel to it, and therefore attend.
[17:21:55] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:21:58] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:22:02] <jonas’> seems legit
[17:22:04] <Ge0rG> dwd: that sounds like a great idea. Maybe have one day of talks and one day of workshops?
[17:22:11] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:22:21] <Ge0rG> Even just calling what we do every year "workshops" will already make it more enterprisey
[17:22:23] <jonas’> not that I consider myself to have a chance to attend on company budget, considering that we’re so not XMPP
[17:22:24] <Zash> That sounds fine
[17:22:58] <Guus> Let's add this to the agenda of the upcoming summit?
[17:23:15] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[17:23:18] <Guus> Also, I would not mind having more than one per year
[17:23:30] <Ge0rG> there used to be two, across the pond
[17:23:44] <Guus> We're we could differentiate
[17:23:46] <dwd> Ge0rG, I was thinking just an afternoon to start with, but yes.
[17:24:22] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:24:26] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:24:35] <Guus> dwd: would you mind drafting a semi static summit event description for on the website?
[17:24:38] <Ge0rG> dwd: an afternoon of talks? Sure
[17:25:01] <Guus> We can have jonas’ banner link to it
[17:25:09] <Guus> There's a start.
[17:25:11] <Zash> There's these sprint things
[17:25:20] <dwd> Guus, I'll scribble some text.
[17:25:40] <dwd> Zash, You mean the hackathon type things? The IETF seems to get people to come to those.
[17:25:46] <Guus> Then add the sprint thing (cc pep. )
[17:26:00] <jonas’> ohmygod
[17:26:19] <jonas’> `npm i` then run `grunt` to compile Sass.
[17:26:20] <jonas’> why
[17:26:35] <jonas’> I take my "I can do a banner" back
[17:26:36] <Guus> Ok, I'm starting my car engine, afk.
[17:26:48] <Zash> dwd: something something ask pep.
[17:27:11] *** 404.city has joined the room
[17:27:27] <dwd> jonas’, This is why I said I would "scribble some text".
[17:27:57] <Zash> jonas’: what in the what and also why?
[17:28:42] *** frainz has left the room
[17:29:01] *** frainz has joined the room
[17:29:03] <pep.> !
[17:29:15] *** jjrh has left the room
[17:29:17] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[17:30:08] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[17:30:27] *** !xsf_Martin has left the room
[17:30:50] *** !xsf_Martin has joined the room
[17:30:50] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:50] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:50] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:57] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:57] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:58] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:58] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:58] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:58] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:58] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:30:58] *** !xsf_Martin shows as "online"
[17:32:45] <jonas’> https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/498 dwd, Guus
[17:33:48] *** 404.city shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:34:25] *** daniel has joined the room
[17:35:31] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[17:35:37] *** mtavares has joined the room
[17:36:02] <Kev> I think running a Real Conference for XMPP might be a good idea.
[17:36:20] *** 404.city shows as "online"
[17:36:39] <Ge0rG> Yes, and that doesn't need to be the Summit
[17:36:45] <Zash> Doit
[17:36:47] <dwd> Kev, I agree, but I think adapting the Summit to increase engagement probably gives the most overall benefit.
[17:37:07] <Kev> I don't think "We've got a room in the Cisco offices for a couple of days" is really it, though. What we do is perfect (well, YKWIM) for what we get out of it, which is advancing the state of XMPP with technical discussions, but a long way off being appealing as a Conference.
[17:37:30] <Kev> Which isn't to say we couldn't do a thing instead of the Summit (in it's usual form) instead, at the same time
[17:37:32] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[17:37:38] *** Steve Kille has left the room
[17:38:10] <dwd> Well, if we re-cast the bulk of the Summit as being "workshops" and "open panels", it might work, but I take your point.
[17:38:19] *dwd nips off to pick up son.
[17:38:30] <Kev> It might, but I don't think one room at Cisco is what we need for this.
[17:39:24] <Kev> There's nothing stopping us doing a Conference and having protocol advancement sessions, either.
[17:39:38] <jonas’> except manpower
[17:39:40] <Kev> But probably not all of it, and I think it needs more prior organisation than a Summit.
[17:39:40] <Ge0rG> Those are separate goals - make Summit look more enterprisey while keeping the content / make a conference appealing to commercial xmpp users
[17:39:50] *** labdsf has left the room
[17:39:52] *** labdsf has joined the room
[17:39:54] *** 404.city has left the room
[17:40:07] <Kev> There's "Try to make the Summit easy to expense for the usual sort of crowd" and "draw more people to the Summit"
[17:40:23] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[17:42:20] *** Steve Kille has joined the room
[17:42:23] *** oli shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:42:26] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:43:22] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[17:43:57] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "Hampton"
[17:44:46] *** ralphm has left the room
[17:44:51] *** lovetox shows as "away"
[17:45:03] *** oli shows as "online"
[17:45:56] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[17:46:57] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[17:47:04] *** frainz has left the room
[17:47:09] *** frainz has joined the room
[17:47:32] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[17:47:39] *** daniel has joined the room
[17:48:37] *** labdsf has left the room
[17:48:38] *** labdsf has joined the room
[17:48:39] <Erkan Files> > There's "Try to make the Summit easy to expense for the usual sort of crowd" and "draw more people to the Summit"
Does that mean that newbies should be able to participate and understand most of the "things" there?
[17:49:41] <Zash> Depends on what kind of newbie
[17:50:05] *** lovetox shows as "online"
[17:50:10] *** frainz has joined the room
[17:53:22] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[17:54:22] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[17:54:52] <Erkan Files> Like me
[17:56:50] *** Lance has joined the room
[17:56:51] *** Lance shows as "online"
[17:57:52] *** Lance has left the room
[17:58:18] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[17:59:26] <ralphm> So usually there is a bunch of discussion on protocol, like the last few times with MIX.
[17:59:39] <ralphm> Some of those can be really indepth, some not so.
[17:59:41] *** frainz has joined the room
[18:00:19] <Zash> What kind of participant would such an event aim for?
[18:00:32] <ralphm> So it depends on whether newbie means: “I haven't been around for long”, or “I don't know much about the protocols”
[18:01:54] <ralphm> I also want to note that we potentially have more rooms this year. Rudy (of Cisco) wrote: “I did in the meanwhile book the rooms Cassiopea and Electra (can be combined to a single larger, wider space) as well as the adjacent room Centaurus which you could use as a break room for speakers, organisers, logistics, ….”
[18:02:00] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[18:02:50] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[18:04:12] *** Kev shows as "away"
[18:04:27] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[18:05:23] *** mtavares shows as "online"
[18:10:54] *** dwd shows as "online"
[18:14:25] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[18:16:03] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:18:09] *** Guus has left the room
[18:18:10] *** Guus has joined the room
[18:18:10] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:18:14] *** ThibG has joined the room
[18:24:45] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[18:25:20] *** Kev shows as "online"
[18:26:02] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:26:09] <Erkan Files> ralphm: Where is Cisco located
[18:26:13] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:26:21] <ralphm> Diegem
[18:26:51] <ralphm> https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Summit_23
[18:27:10] <Zash> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29455013
[18:27:18] <Erkan Files> > So it depends on whether newbie means: “I haven't been around for long”, or “I don't know much about the protocols”
I dont know much about the protocolls.

My fear is that just the time and this MUC arent enough to get out of this kind of newbie status...
[18:28:08] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:28:50] *** Guus has left the room
[18:29:19] *** labdsf has left the room
[18:29:20] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:29:21] *** labdsf has joined the room
[18:29:29] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[18:29:34] *** labdsf has left the room
[18:29:36] *** labdsf has joined the room
[18:33:05] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[18:34:25] *** j.r has joined the room
[18:37:27] *** Kev shows as "away"
[18:37:36] *** labdsf has left the room
[18:37:38] *** labdsf has joined the room
[18:37:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[18:37:56] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[18:43:05] *** ralphm shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[18:45:05] *** labdsf has left the room
[18:45:08] *** labdsf has joined the room
[18:48:47] <lovetox> what about https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-xtls.html
[18:48:53] <lovetox> how long does stuff stay in the inbox?
[18:48:56] <lovetox> forever?
[18:49:35] <Zash> until the end of time
[18:54:06] *** Guus has joined the room
[18:54:38] *** daniel has left the room
[18:55:27] <Neustradamus> mrDoctorWho
[18:55:55] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[18:56:58] *** daniel has joined the room
[18:57:56] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[19:00:41] *** ta has left the room
[19:00:41] *** ta has left the room
[19:00:55] *** ta has joined the room
[19:00:55] *** ta shows as "online"
[19:01:18] *** ralphm shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:02:49] *** marc_ has joined the room
[19:07:47] *** moparisthebest shows as "online"
[19:09:29] *** labdsf has left the room
[19:09:31] *** labdsf has joined the room
[19:10:56] *** ralphm shows as "online"
[19:11:16] *** ralphm has left the room
[19:11:36] *** lovetox shows as "away"
[19:13:50] *** alacer has left the room
[19:14:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:14:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:14:51] *** jjrh has left the room
[19:14:54] *** jjrh has joined the room
[19:14:54] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:14:54] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:14:54] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:14:55] *** Guus has left the room
[19:14:56] *** Guus has joined the room
[19:14:59] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:14:59] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:14:59] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:14:59] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:15:04] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:15:04] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:15:04] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:15:04] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:15:04] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:15:04] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:15:07] *** jjrh shows as "online"
[19:16:00] *** genofire has left the room
[19:16:50] *** Guus has left the room
[19:18:01] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:19:11] *** sezuan has left the room
[19:19:27] *** sezuan shows as "online"
[19:19:52] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:20:55] *** lovetox shows as "online"
[19:22:25] *** Guus has joined the room
[19:22:45] *** l shows as "online"
[19:22:50] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:24:34] *** dwd shows as "online"
[19:26:14] <jonas’> lovetox, it’s never deleted
[19:30:13] <pep.> https://dpaste.de/BjkD/raw something like that for sprints would do? thoughts?
[19:30:21] <pep.> I'll send a patch
[19:32:14] *** labdsf has left the room
[19:34:56] *** labdsf has joined the room
[19:36:48] *** oli shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:37:43] *** j.r has left the room
[19:38:24] *** oli shows as "online"
[19:40:29] <ralphm> Sure!
[19:43:56] <pep.> https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/499
[19:45:36] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[19:47:10] *** mtavares shows as "online"
[19:48:00] *** j.r has joined the room
[19:53:11] *** Guus shows as "online"
[19:53:29] <Guus> I'm back home
[19:53:37] <Guus> Thanks for all of the ideas, people
[19:53:37] <jonas’> wb
[19:54:06] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[19:54:13] <Guus> I'd suggest keeping the summit pretty much as-is, and have another, more conferency, event, at another date.
[19:54:27] <Guus> I simply like the summit format - it has its own value.
[19:54:35] <jonas’> I tend to agree, even though I only participated remotely
[19:54:38] <Guus> side note: the Cisco offices are not publicly accessible.
[19:54:47] <jonas’> (I’ll have to figure out how to do that this year :/)
[19:54:56] <Guus> for a conferency-type of deal, we might want to consider using a different venue
[19:55:02] <jonas’> agreed
[19:55:06] *** Zash has left the room
[19:55:10] <pep.> I'm all for this new idea :)
[19:55:15] <pep.> well, maybe not new idea
[19:55:24] <pep.> But I want to see it implemented
[19:55:36] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[19:55:58] <Guus> In any case, I'd suggest to not deviate to much from the Summit format for the upcoming event - as it's close, I'd like to avoid confusion.
[19:56:13] <jonas’> very much +1
[19:56:18] <pep.> Sure
[19:56:30] <jonas’> btw, I’m happy to hack in more crappy inline CSS to make this fancier: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/498
[19:56:34] <jonas’> but I’m at the limits of my creativity
[19:56:42] <jonas’> so if anyone provides a mockup, I’m happy to try to achieve that
[19:57:22] <Guus> jonas’ it looks great to me - although I'd prefer a flashy / contrasting color, to pull in attention
[19:57:31] <pep.> nit: can this be vcentered?
[19:57:36] <pep.> the text inside the box
[19:57:44] <Guus> and cente....whathesaid
[19:57:56] <jonas’> centering is trivial (and you probably mean hcenter)
[19:58:03] <pep.> I mean vcenter
[19:58:04] <jonas’> please suggest colors, I’m really bad at picking those
[19:58:11] <jonas’> pep., oh, you’re right
[19:58:13] <Guus> reddish or yellowish
[19:58:19] <jonas’> Guus, I guessed that much
[19:58:22] <Guus> I actually ment vcenter 🙂
[19:58:23] <jonas’> the details are the tricky part
[19:59:18] <pep.> vcentering was still one of the fun things to do when ran away from "the web"
[19:59:33] <jonas’> in this case, I just had to kill the margin-bottom of the p which holds the text
[19:59:36] <Guus> jonas’ we use this blue for active menus: maybe that'd work: #008CBA
[20:00:05] <jonas’> makes the link unreadable obviously
[20:00:26] <jonas’> I could make the entire thing clickable though
[20:00:36] <jonas’> which would do the trick
[20:00:48] <Guus> yeah, I suck at this more than you do 😃
[20:00:54] *** !xsf_Martin has left the room
[20:02:06] *** dwd shows as "online"
[20:02:12] *** Guus has left the room
[20:02:21] *** Guus shows as "online"
[20:02:31] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:03:09] <jonas’> https://sotecware.net/images/dont-puush-me/OSJcUNBVjbMmS8ipFMSXmQUiLGu7U6qA7XjNO1t-3lQ.png
[20:03:21] <jonas’> I think this is fair
[20:03:27] *** genofire has joined the room
[20:03:40] <pep.> LGTM
[20:03:51] *** goffi has joined the room
[20:04:07] <jonas’> updated the PR: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/498
[20:04:10] *** goffi shows as "online"
[20:04:48] <Guus>
[20:08:07] *** Andrew Nenakhov has joined the room
[20:10:33] <goffi> If I get it well, I find this comment deeply depressing: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18847472
[20:10:58] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:13:05] <goffi> Telehash is a project from Jeremie Miller right?
[20:15:00] <Guus> well, it's an answer to a direct question on the status of telehash: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18827032
[20:15:18] <Guus> so it's not an unsolicited "by the way, look at this" type of comment.
[20:15:33] <goffi> Guus: yes, and it's coming from the Telehash core team apparently.
[20:16:10] <goffi> Guus: no that's not my point, my point is that Telehash, a project founded by Jeremie Miller, creator of Jabber, is using Slack to communicate.
[20:16:13] <jonas’> looking at the screenshot after a while, this looks *so* much more alive now
[20:16:28] <jonas’> with the upcoming event and all
[20:16:32] <jonas’> we should be doing this for all our upcoming events
[20:16:45] <Guus> @jonas` definitely.
[20:16:48] <jonas’> I wonder whether we can somehow integrate this with the blog, so that we don’t have to micro-manage tihs, but I don’t think that’s easy
[20:16:50] <pep.> jonas’, sprints and all?
[20:17:04] <jonas’> yes
[20:17:05] <goffi> yes the banner looks nice.
[20:17:10] *** mtavares shows as "online"
[20:17:12] <Guus> i'd love to replace that top-right wiki thing
[20:17:20] <jonas’> top-right wiki thing?
[20:17:30] <fippo> goffi: temas was one of the folks running jabberstudio.org back in the early days :-|
[20:17:52] <goffi> fippo: that's even more depressing :(
[20:18:10] <Guus> jonas’ https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Main_Page, top right, "upcoming events"
[20:18:19] <jonas’> ahh
[20:18:25] <jonas’> it needs an update, too
[20:18:37] <jonas’> I’m going ahead and deleting the past stuff
[20:18:49] <Guus> I'd love for the website to become more 'active' or 'community driven', or whatver
[20:18:59] <jonas’> unlikely to happen with the current framework
[20:19:05] <jonas’> we need to figure out why it doesn’t build correctly locally
[20:19:10] <Guus> jonas’ please do, but move them to the archive page.
[20:19:27] <jonas’> which archive pages
[20:19:29] <jonas’> which archive page?
[20:19:51] <Guus> see link in box below 'recent events' 🙂
[20:20:12] *** Andrew Nenakhov has joined the room
[20:20:14] <Guus> what I typically do is move 'upcoming' to 'recent', and move the last few 'recents' to the archive.
[20:20:30] *** Zash has left the room
[20:20:30] <jonas’> ugh
[20:20:34] <jonas’> I’m incompetent sometimes
[20:20:44] <jonas’> also, doing like three things at the same time while having had way not enough sleep isn’t good for me
[20:20:45] <jonas’> fixing
[20:20:56] <Guus> hehe
[20:21:08] *** lumi has left the room
[20:21:11] *** Zash has joined the room
[20:21:24] <goffi> oh cool, Evgeny message was a misunderstanding.
[20:21:45] <Guus> also, it might be good to mention that the bar for adding/modifying the website is a lot lower than some people might think. I invite everyone to suggest changes.
[20:22:07] <jonas’> Guus, does that look good to you? https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/Main_Page
[20:22:41] <Guus> jonas’ sure, thanks.
[20:22:45] <Guus> it's no biggy either way
[20:22:47] <jonas’> regarding the website bar: it is non-trivial to test the website locally due to the strict version requirements on pelican
[20:23:09] <jonas’> not to mention that CSS changes require some (possibly web "standard", but still) npm installation stuff
[20:23:27] <Guus> right, it might currently be hard to apply a change, tehcnically, but I had a discussion last week where people where under the impression that only a few people get to decide what goes on the website
[20:23:40] <jonas’> effectively, only a few people do ;-)
[20:23:46] <jonas’> tohse with power over the uhge green merge button
[20:23:50] <Guus> right, but I'd _love_ to change that
[20:24:02] <jonas’> I don’t
[20:24:13] <Guus> sure, there are a few gatekeepers, but content-wise, I'd love it live more.
[20:24:17] <jonas’> yes
[20:24:26] <Guus> PRs are excellent
[20:24:32] <Guus> for this.
[20:24:34] <jonas’> yes
[20:25:24] <pep.> If a gate-keeper could merge or review my PR for the sprints that'd be great :)
[20:25:37] <Guus> pep. I actually added a comment 🙂
[20:26:03] *** lovetox shows as "away"
[20:26:07] <jonas’> I second Guus’ comment
[20:26:07] <pep.> heh, sure I can change that. So I'd reverse the order of the list as well right
[20:26:24] <Guus> (also, Seve , I'm painfully aware that there's still your PR to review)
[20:26:49] <jonas’> what’s blocking that?
[20:26:56] <Guus> my time.
[20:27:00] <Guus> or attention span
[20:27:06] <Guus> simply didn't get around to it.
[20:27:08] <jonas’> I mean, is this a content or a technical issue which needs to be reviewed?
[20:27:24] <jonas’> note that one cannot test the menu locally with current pelican versions as of now
[20:27:27] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[20:27:30] <pep.> Should I add dates in these lists?
[20:27:39] <jonas’> pep., dates would be good, especially for upcoming
[20:27:49] <Guus> pep. if you think it's helpful to interested people, yeah!
[20:28:01] <jonas’> try to answer where, when, and if possible, what
[20:28:03] *** oli shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:28:09] *** oli shows as "online"
[20:28:19] <Guus> jonas’ I simply haven't taken the time to look at it yet.
[20:28:26] <pep.> What is usually a bit difficult, as it's discussed really close to the date
[20:28:52] <pep.> Except for Brussels maybe where it was said it would be about UX from the start
[20:29:05] *** Andrew Nenakhov has left the room
[20:29:10] *** Andrew Nenakhov has joined the room
[20:29:18] <Guus> pep. do something like: "medio January"
[20:29:21] *** waqas has joined the room
[20:29:32] <Guus> "or Q1 2019"
[20:29:46] <jonas’> I sense a misunderstanding
[20:29:53] <pep.> hmm?
[20:30:31] <Guus> misunderstanding?
[20:30:41] <pep.> Is it me or there's a lot of latin being used in this community? :P
[20:31:03] <jonas’> Guus, aren’t the sprint dates fixed?
[20:31:05] <jonas’> like, konwn
[20:31:08] <jonas’> like, known
[20:31:08] <pep.> They are
[20:31:09] <jonas’> goddamnit
[20:31:16] <pep.> Well, at some point
[20:31:23] <jonas’> so I think that Guus misread your sentence "What is usually a bit difficult, as it's discussed really close to the date" (which I did too)
[20:31:39] <pep.> "What" is usually a bit difficult
[20:31:42] <jonas’> yeah
[20:32:54] *** jjrh has left the room
[20:32:59] <pep.> https://bpaste.net/raw/57647708077f ?
[20:33:06] <pep.> Not sure how that will show
[20:33:15] <Guus> Aaah, I was under the impression that the final date was known only pretty close to the event.
[20:33:21] <Guus> so, a misunderstanding indeed. 🙂
[20:34:13] <jonas’> pep., so, yeah, exact dates please
[20:34:17] <jonas’> this was just confusion
[20:34:17] <Guus> pep, if you have actual dates (days), I'd use those.
[20:34:29] <Guus> yup, sorry for that.
[20:34:52] <pep.> hmm, brussels is two not consecutive days, in different months
[20:34:57] <pep.> That's going to be annoying
[20:35:39] *** waqas has left the room
[20:35:41] *** waqas has joined the room
[20:36:20] <Guus> hehe, whatever works 🙂 I'll not twist your arm behind your back to have exact dates 🙂
[20:36:31] <Guus> I'm already very happy that this goes on the website in the first place
[20:36:33] <pep.> Thanks, I appreciate
[20:36:39] <pep.> I like my arm very much
[20:36:46] <pep.> I like my arm very much where it is
[20:38:00] <jonas’> pep., what
[20:38:01] <jonas’> I don’t get it
[20:38:13] <jonas’> if it’s two different events, it should get two entries
[20:38:16] <jonas’> so you can put exact dates on each?
[20:38:53] <pep.> It's the "same" event, just that the summit "appeared" in between :P
[20:39:07] <jonas’> sorry, I think I’m too tired to follow this
[20:39:32] *** tux shows as "dnd" and his status message is "Work Work"
[20:39:42] *** tux shows as "online"
[20:39:49] <pep.> I think roel wanted to do two days, but asking people to be there tuesday _and_ wednesday was a bit too much, considering most of us are going to the summit and fosdem.
[20:40:12] <pep.> So they're going to do 30th (wed), and there's something that might happen on the 1st, at fosdem maybe, I don't know much
[20:40:32] <jonas’> I see
[20:40:48] <Guus> pep. just add wednesday, and note on the wiki page that there might be a follow-up after FOSDEM
[20:40:56] <jonas’> I’d just list "Jan 30th, Feb 1st, 2019 (around FOSDEM), Brussels" as link text
[20:40:58] <pep.> *At fosdem
[20:41:02] <jonas’> or just Jan 30th, that’d probably work too
[20:41:06] <pep.> yeah
[20:41:55] <Guus> I'd be happy with any of the above. Go for it 🙂
[20:42:00] <pep.> Should I use british of usican on the website?
[20:42:48] <pep.> Should I use british or usican on the website?
[20:42:50] <pep.> (tired)
[20:42:59] <jonas’> so tired
[20:43:04] <jonas’> go for US when in doubt
[20:43:09] *** igoose has left the room
[20:43:09] <jonas’> we use it in XEPs, too
[20:43:34] *** igoose has joined the room
[20:44:02] <Guus> use letters for months
[20:44:06] <Guus> and avoid confusion
[20:44:12] <jonas’> yeah
[20:44:21] <jonas’> or ISO format, but words read better in the list
[20:44:48] <pep.> "March 30-31st, 2019." ?
[20:44:58] <Guus> I'd not use the year
[20:45:11] <Guus> maybe in the archive
[20:45:26] <jonas’> I’d add the year
[20:45:37] <jonas’> you can never be sure whether a website is kept up-to-date
[20:45:38] <Guus> but for the upcoming events, they should be sufficiently close
[20:45:42] <pep.> I would add the year as well, it can be confusing otherwise
[20:45:49] *Guus shrugs.
[20:45:49] <jonas’> and when reading a list, it’s always good to see that right away
[20:45:50] <pep.> and yeah what jonas’ says
[20:45:55] <jonas’> pep., that format looks readable to me
[20:46:02] *Guus is still not going to twist arms.
[20:46:17] <jonas’> I’m worried about the "still" :)
[20:46:25] <pep.> :D
[20:46:36] <Guus> got to keep the suspense goin' 🙂
[20:46:39] <jonas’> :D
[20:47:31] *** Yagiza shows as "online" and his status message is "Доступен"
[20:47:39] <pep.> https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/499
[20:47:43] <Guus> Was dwd going to write a text descirbing the summit?
[20:47:55] <jonas’> I’m not sure
[20:48:13] <jonas’> pep., "March" is now duplicated in the list item
[20:48:27] <pep.> Ah fail.
[20:48:50] <jonas’> I’d also probably have put it this way:
* [Brussels, January 30th, 2019](...) (around FOSDEM)
[20:48:52] <jonas’> but that’s just my preference
[20:48:55] <jonas’> not going to twist arms, either
[20:49:07] *** lovetox shows as "online"
[20:49:10] <pep.> Please stop threatening my arms
[20:49:20] <jonas’> I am not threatening your (or anybodies) arms :)
[20:49:42] <Guus> time to get creative with the body parts?
[20:49:55] *Guus takes out his trusty IRC-trout...
[20:50:46] *** dwd shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[20:51:10] <pep.> not the trout!
[20:51:39] <jonas’> :D
[20:51:43] <jonas’> (t)rusty, probably
[20:51:52] <pep.> here, pushed again
[20:51:52] <jonas’> also, isn’t trusty EOL ;-)
[20:52:01] <Guus> unrelated side note: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/issues/497
[20:52:06] <jonas’> I like it now, Guus
[20:52:08] <Guus> this concerns me
[20:52:09] <jonas’> I like it now, pep.
[20:52:16] <jonas’> Guus, it concerns me, too
[20:52:20] <jonas’> board should definitely look into that
[20:52:24] <jonas’> I would’ve made a PR
[20:52:24] <Guus> push the button, jonas’ !
[20:52:31] <jonas’> but I’m not sure where we list sponsors, typically
[20:52:33] <jonas’> and how
[20:52:34] <jonas’> and such
[20:52:35] <jonas’> youknow
[20:52:37] *** neshtaxmpp has joined the room
[20:52:42] *** neshtaxmpp shows as "online"
[20:52:50] <jonas’> Guus, as board member, can you maybe comment that the Board will take this seriously?
[20:52:56] <jonas’> leaving this uncommented for 3 days is... a bit meh
[20:53:03] <Guus> you're right
[20:53:10] <jonas’> I HIT THE BUTTON
[20:53:12] <jonas’> :)
[20:53:19] <jonas’> (I am tired and getting silly)
[20:56:14] <pep.> How long does the website take to build again?
[20:56:41] <Guus> ages.
[20:56:44] <jonas’> Guus, no
[20:56:51] <jonas’> in total I think 10 - 15 minutes until it’s live
[20:56:58] <pep.> k, thanks
[20:57:00] <Guus> that's what I said.
[20:57:06] <Guus> 🙂
[20:57:06] <jonas’> Guus, you’re not an editor, obviously
[20:57:11] <Guus> hahaha
[20:57:14] <jonas’> that takes 60 minutes+
[20:57:15] <Guus> touche
[20:57:21] <jonas’> so ... the website is rather fast.
[20:57:23] *** Erkan Files has left the room
[20:57:32] <jonas’> we have a super-fancy banner on https://xmpp.org now :) thanks for the input :)
[20:57:48] <pep.> jonas’, we need the full package, incremental builds etc. :P
[20:57:56] <pep.> Or do you have that already
[20:58:00] <jonas’> no.
[20:58:06] <jonas’> then it would take like 5 minutes, not 60
[21:00:46] *** dwd shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[21:02:12] *** mtavares has joined the room
[21:09:51] *** mtavares has left the room
[21:10:01] *** mimi89999 has joined the room
[21:10:01] <Guus> well, while we're being effective: is there anything that we can do to speed https://github.com/xmpp-observatory along?
[21:10:23] <jonas’> somebody needs to figure out how to teach the involved DNS relsover libraries about the new root zone keys
[21:10:36] <jonas’> that’s the current remaining issue with xmpp.net
[21:10:39] <pep.> https://xmpp.org/community/events.html "Krakow (soon)", any idea when this "soon" is due for?
[21:10:41] <jonas’> (that I am aware of)
[21:10:54] <jonas’> pep., remove it
[21:11:09] <jonas’> (or maybe check the git-blame first)
[21:11:10] <pep.> Also same page, it references Summit 22
[21:11:11] <Guus> jonas’ I'm not even sure I understand what you said.
[21:11:21] <jonas’> pep., clean it, while you’re at it
[21:11:55] <Guus> pep. also, that's the link to last years' summit
[21:11:55] <jonas’> Guus, xmpp.net works, except for the issue that it cannot validate DNSSEC currently. So any zone which uses DNSSEC appears to be broken to it. This needs fixing.
[21:12:06] <pep.> Guus, yes
[21:12:18] *** lovetox shows as "away"
[21:12:28] <Guus> you can safely remove all events, they're from last year, at best.
[21:12:28] <jonas’> (it cannot validate DNSSEC because it uses the old keys for the root zone which have been exchanged recently in a surprisingly ostentatious ceremony)
[21:12:47] <jonas’> Guus, so somebody needs to teach the libraries which are baked into the xmppoke docker thing about the new keys
[21:13:00] <Guus> I don't know how DNS zone / key / ceremony works.
[21:13:07] <jonas’> it is fun
[21:13:33] <Guus> is this a configuration thingy, or a code change thingy?
[21:13:39] <jonas’> probably code change thingy
[21:13:43] <jonas’> because the keys are embedded in the library
[21:13:48] <jonas’> worst case one needs to patch the binary file
[21:14:10] <pep.> https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/500
[21:14:57] <Guus> pep, please remove all events
[21:15:01] <Guus> they're from 2017
[21:15:09] *** Alex has joined the room
[21:15:12] *** lovetox shows as "online"
[21:15:22] <pep.> oh
[21:15:36] <Guus> oh, actually
[21:15:37] <Guus> no
[21:15:41] <Guus> the berlin one was from last december
[21:16:01] *** Yagiza has left the room
[21:16:03] <pep.> The berlin meetup is ongoing
[21:16:14] <pep.> I mean it's recurring, rather
[21:16:14] <Guus> stockholm can be removed
[21:16:27] <pep.> FOSDEM can also be updated
[21:16:35] <Guus> london can be removed
[21:17:04] <Guus> and Paris is also outdated
[21:17:12] <Guus> so, only keep Berlin 🙂
[21:17:41] <pep.> pushed
[21:18:27] <Guus> looks good. I'll let Travis do its thing, but am happy to merge
[21:18:32] <Guus> Thanks for doing all this guys!
[21:20:28] <pep.> goffi, https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/FOSDEM_2019 do you mind adding your talk if you have time?
[21:20:49] <pep.> There's also JC in there
[21:20:56] <pep.> Dele I guess
[21:21:07] <goffi> pep.: yes I will, but probably tomorrow, start to be tired now
[21:21:10] <pep.> thanks
[21:21:24] <Guus> jonas’ are you technically capable of doing the DNS zone magic that you just referred to, or should I direct my pretty-pleases at MattJ or others?
[21:21:35] <goffi> pep.: please ping me again if I haven't done tomorrow evening
[21:21:54] *** vaulor has joined the room
[21:23:51] <pep.> k
[21:24:40] <MattJ> Guus, direct at me
[21:24:57] <MattJ> But I have less than zero time at the moment
[21:25:01] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:25:12] <Guus> MattJ I have cherries-on-top to offer, to sweeten the deal.
[21:25:18] <Guus> ah
[21:25:24] <Guus> is there anyone else capable of doing this?
[21:25:37] <Guus> with zero+ time available, hopefully?
[21:25:58] <pep.> MattJ, does that mean Guus owes you time now
[21:26:11] <pep.> For asking
[21:26:22] <MattJ> It's just a matter of updating the Dockerfile to install a newer version of a dependency from a package that Zash already made
[21:26:26] <Guus> pep. I have a tab going with him 🙂
[21:26:45] <MattJ> and modifying it to stop using that dependency as a submodule which it currently compiles itself iirc
[21:26:45] <Guus> oh, I can do that, I think
[21:27:21] *** mtavares has joined the room
[21:27:21] *** lorddavidiii has left the room
[21:28:32] *** marc_ has left the room
[21:31:56] *** waqas has left the room
[21:31:59] *** waqas has joined the room
[21:33:28] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[21:35:44] <Guus> MattJ / Zash can you identify said dependency, and the replacement package?
[21:35:58] *** MattJ shows as "dnd"
[21:36:26] <Guus> luaunbound?
[21:36:32] <Guus> (sounds DNSsie?)
[21:36:39] <pep.> yes
[21:36:51] <pep.> I mean, it is dnssie
[21:37:07] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[21:38:34] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[21:38:42] <Guus> I'm guestimating that this is the desired fix: https://code.zash.se/luaunbound/rev/3c3f017f35ac
[21:39:19] *** lovetox shows as "away"
[21:40:00] *** lovetox shows as "online"
[21:42:41] *** efrit has joined the room
[21:43:30] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[21:45:25] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[21:47:04] <oli> lovetox: why are you interested in XTLS? client-to-client as in Jingle or something else?
[21:48:02] <lovetox> yes jingle, but im not interested in it, Gajim already implements it
[21:48:11] <lovetox> im just wondering why it never made it experimental
[21:48:53] *** lnj has left the room
[21:49:26] *** mtavares has joined the room
[21:51:54] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[21:54:28] *** tux shows as "online"
[21:54:34] *** tux has left the room
[21:55:37] <oli> lovetox: encrypted jingle?
[21:58:35] <oli> ok, yes, it's in the code.
[22:02:06] *** oli has left the room
[22:02:25] <Guus> https://github.com/xmpp-observatory/xmppoke/pull/3 <-- incredibly naive copy/paste thingy
[22:02:25] *** oli has joined the room
[22:02:27] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[22:02:29] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[22:02:39] *** mtavares shows as "online"
[22:07:05] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[22:08:59] *** Kev shows as "online"
[22:12:27] *** ta shows as "online"
[22:12:41] <Guus> jonas’ how do I test this fix locally? I need to run against a zone with DNS SEC?
[22:13:08] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[22:16:32] *** mtavares has left the room
[22:16:33] *** mtavares shows as "online"
[22:20:24] <Guus> Hmm, I'm getting 'bogus dnssec' banners, which probably is an indication of failure. 😕
[22:23:09] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[22:23:09] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[22:25:48] *** Steve Kille shows as "online" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:26:10] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:11] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:16] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:17] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:26:17] *** oli shows as "online"
[22:28:46] *** ta shows as "online"
[22:29:27] *** ta has left the room
[22:29:27] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[22:29:44] *** ta shows as "online"
[22:31:21] *** oli has left the room
[22:31:35] *** oli has joined the room
[22:33:15] *** Alex has left the room
[22:35:19] *** Guus has left the room
[22:35:56] *** oli has left the room
[22:36:00] *** oli has joined the room
[22:37:15] *** oli has left the room
[22:37:17] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[22:37:18] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[22:37:38] *** oli has joined the room
[22:38:20] *** oli has left the room
[22:45:07] *** waqas has left the room
[22:45:10] *** waqas has joined the room
[22:46:17] <MattJ> Guus: yes, that's the bug
[22:47:08] <MattJ> Pretty sure I confirmed a fix in a temporary container where I installed the package manually
[22:52:40] *** Steve Kille shows as "away" and his status message is "At Home"
[22:53:01] *** genofire shows as "online"
[22:55:39] *** l has left the room
[22:58:03] *** lovetox shows as "away"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta has left the room
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta has left the room
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:56] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:57] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:58] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:59] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:01:59] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:01] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:02] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:05] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:06] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:08] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:08] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:09] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:10] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:11] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:12] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:12] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:12] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:12] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:13] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:13] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:14] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:14] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:15] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:15] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:15] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:15] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:15] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:16] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:02:18] *** ta shows as "online"
[23:04:55] *** Kev shows as "away"
[23:06:04] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[23:08:16] *** MattJ shows as "away"
[23:11:33] *** genofire shows as "online"
[23:12:20] *** lovetox shows as "online"
[23:15:00] *** Ge0rG shows as "away"
[23:15:01] *** Ge0rG shows as "dnd"
[23:17:26] *** genofire shows as "away" and his status message is " (Away as a result of being idle more than 5 min)"
[23:19:31] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[23:22:59] <Guus> MattJ: im unsure what I'm doing. Locally, it didn't appear to work. Maybe I need to provide the commit message suggested trust file somehow.
[23:24:21] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[23:27:26] *** genofire shows as "xa" and his status message is " (Not available as a result of being idle more than 15 min)"
[23:30:40] *** lovetox has left the room
[23:32:45] *** Neustradamus has left the room
[23:32:56] *** Neustradamus has joined the room
[23:35:34] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:36:49] *** l shows as "online"
[23:36:51] *** l has left the room
[23:37:37] *** lskdjf has left the room
[23:37:37] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:39:33] *** moparisthebest has left the room
[23:40:02] *** moparisthebest has joined the room
[23:41:33] *** waqas has left the room
[23:41:37] *** waqas has joined the room
[23:41:44] *** Half-ShotX has left the room
[23:45:24] *** oli has joined the room
[23:45:36] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:49:24] *** Half-ShotX has joined the room
[23:51:55] *** genofire shows as "online"
[23:57:04] *** lskdjf shows as "online"
[23:57:27] *** lskdjf shows as "online"