XSF logo XSF Discussion - 2019-07-19


  1. UsL has joined
  2. Lance has left
  3. lumi has left
  4. ziggys has left
  5. curen has joined
  6. adityaborikar has left
  7. igoose has left
  8. mimi89999 has left
  9. adityaborikar has joined
  10. mimi89999 has joined
  11. lskdjf has left
  12. Chobbes has joined
  13. Chobbes has left
  14. andrey.g has joined
  15. tom >tom, can you tell my corporate IT dept, they use all the proprietary blackboxes, riverbed, telari, cisco, and palo alto I think it's more of a leadership issue tbh. The places I've worked at, the CEO understood how to sell a product. They were not engineers. They paid engineers to make the engineering detail decisions. That understood that is; after the whole whole reason they are paying them for.
  16. neshtaxmpp has left
  17. tom well, the CEO was more knowing how to lead all the different teams
  18. tom because we did have a sales team and they did sales
  19. tom and an accounting team which managed the money
  20. tom the 'officers' acted as the glue
  21. tom and were very good at it
  22. tom and delegated things they were not good at to people who were
  23. tom then again the product was IP transit, so the quality of the technology was the end goal
  24. tom not just a means
  25. wurstsalat has left
  26. Tobias has left
  27. adityaborikar has left
  28. adityaborikar has joined
  29. neshtaxmpp has joined
  30. pdurbin has joined
  31. pdurbin has left
  32. pdurbin has joined
  33. david has left
  34. david has joined
  35. pdurbin has left
  36. Nekit has joined
  37. curen has left
  38. pdurbin has joined
  39. igoose has joined
  40. adityaborikar has left
  41. Zash has left
  42. Zash has joined
  43. wurstsalat has joined
  44. moparisthebest hmm nyco not a huge deal but I don't think https://github.com/xsf/xeps/commit/6e1c4675714d80824f5f951a64c2d47e14deee4b#diff-48188c65e1a20d564eb9dbe110506a16 is correct either
  45. moparisthebest > the document specifies to DO THIS
  46. moparisthebest is what I meant, probably could be worded better, but two doesn't make sense there to me
  47. moparisthebest maybe "This document specifies an algorithm to additionally look up records..." or "This document specifies a method to additionally look up records..." or "This document specifies a way to additionally look up records..."
  48. waqas has left
  49. Tobias has joined
  50. pdurbin has left
  51. goffi has joined
  52. Lance has joined
  53. pdurbin has joined
  54. alacer has left
  55. alacer has joined
  56. igoose has left
  57. waqas has joined
  58. igoose has joined
  59. goffi has left
  60. goffi has joined
  61. Mikaela has joined
  62. karoshi has joined
  63. igoose has left
  64. igoose has joined
  65. alameyo has left
  66. alameyo has joined
  67. waqas has left
  68. Mikaela has left
  69. Mikaela has joined
  70. debacle has joined
  71. Lance has left
  72. Mikaela has left
  73. Mikaela has joined
  74. jonas’ moparisthebest, huh, you’re right
  75. jonas’ I need to revert htat
  76. jonas’ It somehow made sense to me when I read it, but it doesn’t
  77. andy has joined
  78. pdurbin has left
  79. curen has joined
  80. remko has joined
  81. pdurbin has joined
  82. COM8 has joined
  83. pdurbin has left
  84. COM8 has left
  85. COM8 has joined
  86. frainz has left
  87. pdurbin has joined
  88. COM8 has left
  89. frainz has joined
  90. neshtaxmpp has left
  91. adityaborikar has joined
  92. Ge0rG that DNSSEC vs SRV debate last night, was it based on Travis' email?
  93. jonas’ vice versa probably
  94. Ge0rG oh, the timestamps
  95. Ge0rG How could I have possibly missed the addition of a MUST NOT?
  96. neshtaxmpp has joined
  97. adityaborikar has left
  98. adityaborikar has joined
  99. adityaborikar has left
  100. adityaborikar has joined
  101. igoose has left
  102. lovetox_ has joined
  103. pdurbin has left
  104. eevvoor has joined
  105. adityaborikar has left
  106. pdurbin has joined
  107. adityaborikar has joined
  108. ralphm has left
  109. ralphm has joined
  110. Yagiza has joined
  111. adityaborikar has left
  112. andy has left
  113. andy has joined
  114. mimi89999 has left
  115. mimi89999 has joined
  116. adityaborikar has joined
  117. adityaborikar has left
  118. adityaborikar has joined
  119. debacle has left
  120. adityaborikar has left
  121. frainz has left
  122. frainz has joined
  123. lnj has joined
  124. frainz has left
  125. frainz has joined
  126. sezuan has joined
  127. igoose has joined
  128. lskdjf has joined
  129. lumi has joined
  130. igoose has left
  131. waqas has joined
  132. adityaborikar has joined
  133. Nekit has left
  134. Nekit has joined
  135. adityaborikar has left
  136. adityaborikar has joined
  137. cookie has joined
  138. waqas has left
  139. adityaborikar has left
  140. neshtaxmpp has left
  141. neshtaxmpp has joined
  142. igoose has joined
  143. adityaborikar has joined
  144. adityaborikar has left
  145. adityaborikar has joined
  146. lumi has left
  147. debacle has joined
  148. adityaborikar has left
  149. pdurbin has left
  150. Syndace has left
  151. alacer has left
  152. alacer has joined
  153. Syndace has joined
  154. lovetox_ has left
  155. curen has left
  156. pep. heh, most protoXEPs in the inbox fail at linking to the proper xslt file so the .xml link fails
  157. pep. Maybe we could also have a link to that file in the inbox
  158. Ge0rG that would make sense
  159. pep. I submitted a PR
  160. jonas’ pep., against the nginx config?
  161. pep. ah, no I just added a symlink, just like there were already for the .ent and .dtd
  162. pep. against xsf/xeps
  163. jonas’ I see
  164. pdurbin has joined
  165. Chobbes has joined
  166. pdurbin has left
  167. Chobbes has left
  168. andrey.g has left
  169. igoose has left
  170. eevvoor has left
  171. eevvoor has joined
  172. igoose has joined
  173. andrey.g has joined
  174. lovetox has joined
  175. adityaborikar has joined
  176. waqas has joined
  177. adityaborikar has left
  178. ziggys has joined
  179. adityaborikar has joined
  180. pdurbin has joined
  181. Chobbes has joined
  182. pdurbin has left
  183. adityaborikar has left
  184. adityaborikar has joined
  185. ziggys has left
  186. Chobbes has left
  187. Chobbes has joined
  188. adityaborikar has left
  189. adityaborikar has joined
  190. ziggys has joined
  191. pep. https://bouah.net/2019/07/new-sprint-new-goodies/
  192. dele2 has joined
  193. dele2 has left
  194. adityaborikar has left
  195. adityaborikar has joined
  196. dele has joined
  197. dele has left
  198. adityaborikar has left
  199. mr.fister has joined
  200. winfried has left
  201. winfried has joined
  202. adityaborikar has joined
  203. Chobbes has left
  204. Ge0rG pep.: I've answered to the reactions "thread" now
  205. pep. :)
  206. Chobbes has joined
  207. Chobbes has left
  208. Chobbes has joined
  209. APach has left
  210. eevvoor has left
  211. benne has joined
  212. sezuan has left
  213. pdurbin has joined
  214. APach has joined
  215. Wojtek has joined
  216. pdurbin has left
  217. APach has left
  218. Zash has left
  219. Chobbes has left
  220. Chobbes has joined
  221. Zash has joined
  222. APach has joined
  223. curen has joined
  224. winfried has left
  225. winfried has joined
  226. Chobbes has left
  227. Chobbes has joined
  228. APach has left
  229. Chobbes has left
  230. adityaborikar has left
  231. adityaborikar has joined
  232. matlag has left
  233. matlag has joined
  234. adityaborikar has left
  235. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  236. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  237. adityaborikar has joined
  238. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  239. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  240. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  241. Lance has joined
  242. adityaborikar has left
  243. waqas has left
  244. valo has left
  245. valo has joined
  246. APach has joined
  247. adityaborikar has joined
  248. Douglas Terabyte has left
  249. Douglas Terabyte has joined
  250. rion has left
  251. rion has joined
  252. adityaborikar has left
  253. lumi has joined
  254. larma Ge0rG: I answered your answer ;)
  255. APach has left
  256. mr.fister has left
  257. Ge0rG larma: I think you misread my mail. "Each reaction SHOULD contain a legacy reaction body" ;)
  258. APach has joined
  259. Ge0rG good points on Reactions and LMC, though.
  260. Ge0rG I always disliked LMCs limitation to "the last message"
  261. igoose has left
  262. frainz has left
  263. frainz has joined
  264. pep. I am sure this could be changed, no? I actually liked your point about LMC
  265. igoose has joined
  266. pep. Actually, all except backwards compatibility
  267. Ge0rG Reactions surely can define an exception to the strict LMC rule
  268. Ge0rG even then, it's not an issue.
  269. Ge0rG instead of a correction you see a new legacy reaction
  270. pep. legacy?
  271. pep. "new legacy"?
  272. Ge0rG legacy reaction = body
  273. pep. Ok. Not for me, thanks :x
  274. Ge0rG what's not for you?
  275. mr.fister has joined
  276. frainz has left
  277. adityaborikar has joined
  278. frainz has joined
  279. APach has left
  280. Yagiza has left
  281. waqas has joined
  282. debacle has left
  283. curen has left
  284. adityaborikar has left
  285. larma Ge0rG: no I didn't misread your mail, my opinion is SHOULD NOT or MUST NOT have a body
  286. larma If we do any business rules regarding body
  287. larma A fallback body will render the feature unusable as long as there are legacy clients
  288. pep. And we all know that there will always be legacy clients :)
  289. Ge0rG larma: your reaction seemed to imply you read it as "MUST have"
  290. igoose has left
  291. Ge0rG larma: I disagree. The lack of a legacy body will render the feature unusable.
  292. Ge0rG having that feature will increase the pressure on legacy users.
  293. pep. I disagree with your last statement
  294. pep. Unless you make the fallback broken on purpose to bully implementations, (granted, one could argue 393 is broken and it might be good enough, but not everybody agrees with me on this)
  295. Ge0rG pep.: the more important question is whether you agree with the previous statement ;)
  296. pep. I disagree as well
  297. pep. And I disagree in a more general way than just reactions
  298. pep. I mean I disagree, with your statement
  299. pep. I mean I disagree with your statement
  300. Ge0rG pep.: I see you moved that back to the list. very good
  301. pep. yep
  302. Ge0rG thanks, I'll write a response when I'm less busy.
  303. curen has joined
  304. Wojtek has left
  305. adityaborikar has joined
  306. Chobbes has joined
  307. igoose has joined
  308. Lance has left
  309. igoose has left
  310. Nekit has left
  311. Wojtek has joined
  312. Wojtek has left
  313. Wojtek has joined
  314. alacer has left
  315. Lance has joined
  316. ziggys has left
  317. david has left
  318. david has joined
  319. igoose has joined
  320. Lance I just noticed that there's not really an easy way to get an individual entry out of MAM if you already know its archive id. Closest I can find is requesting the item before/after the id I have, then request 1 item after/before that one, to get the item I originally wanted.
  321. APach has joined
  322. Chobbes has left
  323. Chobbes has joined
  324. Nekit has joined
  325. waqas Lance: You likely want to go for the item before it. Going for the item after and then the item before that is prone to race condition.
  326. Lance Ah, yes
  327. Lance It works ok enough for use case of deep linking into history, if you also want +/-N additional messages of surrounding context
  328. Lance but i was tinkering with saving just the archive id in a pubsub item to do pinned messages
  329. igoose has left
  330. waqas I imagine there was an assumption of "if you know the ID, you already have the message". MAM is not POP, and isn't a full DB system either.
  331. Lance yeah, that makes sense
  332. waqas Though a lot of folks do keep pushing (with some success) to have MAM just be a SQL dialect. It's harder to implement on things which don't have SQL indices and such.
  333. Lance i can resolve it pretty easily by letting my server understand a new custom form field
  334. Lance but this was a "Huh???" moment
  335. igoose has joined
  336. adityaborikar has left
  337. adityaborikar has joined
  338. remko has left
  339. dragonspirit810 has joined
  340. dragonspirit810 has left
  341. eevvoor has joined
  342. eevvoor has left
  343. eevvoor has joined
  344. Chobbes has left
  345. david has left
  346. david has joined
  347. pep_ has joined
  348. pep_ has left
  349. david has left
  350. david has joined
  351. pdurbin has joined
  352. waqas has left
  353. Nekit has left
  354. goffi has left
  355. pdurbin has left
  356. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  357. benne has left
  358. benne has joined
  359. Mikaela has left
  360. karoshi has left
  361. lnj has left
  362. krauq has left
  363. krauq has joined
  364. Wojtek has left
  365. wurstsalat has left
  366. eevvoor has left
  367. david has left
  368. frainz has left
  369. frainz has joined
  370. UsL has left
  371. UsL has joined
  372. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  373. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  374. Douglas Terabyte has left
  375. Douglas Terabyte has joined
  376. curen has left
  377. Douglas Terabyte has left