-
pep.
lovetox_, you answered to me again :p
-
lovetox_
damn it
-
lovetox_
yeah but standards is cc
-
lovetox_
so does this work?
-
pep.
yeah it does
-
pep.
I hadn't noticed the CC
-
pep.
Just noticed that you ended up in the wrong folder
-
lovetox_
thunderbird has a nice Answer to List option
-
lovetox_
gmail hasnt sadly
-
pep.
Also top posting :(
-
Ge0rG
I've recently searched for something xmpp related and ddg displayed https://svn.xmpp.org/feeds/all.atom.xml as a hit. The hostname exists, the certificate is wrong, but the atom feed looks like from our blog. Maybe iteam should kill the svn hostname? Cc MattJ Kev
-
jonas’
yeah, it probably simply aliases to xmpp.org on the web server side of things
-
Link Mauve
“12:22:07 flow> which we may should rename to something like <description-text/>”, I’ll add that to my long-overdue JingleFT list of things to fix.
-
pep.
jonas’, "<xs:attribute name='max_items' type='xs:positiveInteger' use='optional'/>" :(
-
Daniel
if examples are not normative i don’t see max_items mentioned anywhere in the XEP
-
Daniel
so i don’t even know where to add the clarified definition of max_items
-
pep.
jonas’, hmm, maybe it's not for that max_items, sorry
-
pep.
"pubsub#purge_offline: Whether to purge all items when the relevant publisher goes offline", what does this mean? What's the use-case for this
-
jonas’
who knows
-
Zash
I'm sure it's useful for something.
-
Zash
Like removing the future status-in-PEP when you go offline?
-
Zash
Or mood/activity
-
pep.
Ô pubsub globs, (edhelas, goffi), have you not run into the max_items issue before? (I'm sure you have)
-
pep.
Zash, oh
-
Daniel
am I seeing that correctly that the only place to specify max_items behaviour is in the label of the data form in 16.4.4?
-
pep.
yeah, instead of poezio issuing a (3) retract(s) when going offline
-
lovetox_
Daniel if you add a paragraph do it also for pubsub#item_expire
-
Daniel
lovetox_, what do you mean?
-
lovetox_
its the same deal
-
lovetox_
a field you have to set to a positive integer, and there is no "whatever the servers max is" option
-
Daniel
ok
-
Daniel
i wasn’t going to add a paragraph. but yeah I can clarify that as well :-)
-
lovetox_
also pubsub#children_max
-
lovetox_
Daniel, you modifed pubsub#children
-
lovetox_
instead of pubsub#children_max
-
lovetox_
i dont know what children exactly holds, but its not a number
-
Zash
Isn't that about the pubsub tree structure thing with nodes and leafs?
-
Daniel
lovetox_, fixing
-
Daniel
fixed
-
flow
Link Mauve, +1, is the list public somewhere? Maybe even in the wiki?
-
MattJ
B 🙁
-
Zash
🅱
-
goffi
pep., which max_items issue? Sorry I have little time to read logs
-
pep.
https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2019-October/036502.html
-
pep.
Just read the first mail. I'm sure you're also hitting similar issues for normal microblog/pubsub
-
jonas’
Daniel, as I said in my mail, I think the max_items thing deserves a feature
-
jonas’
no wait, I got confused between PRs
-
jonas’
servers which don’t support that will probably simply fail
-
lovetox_
yes jonas’ servers should not accept values they can nothing do with
-
pep.
https://www.ccc.de/en/updates/2019/36c3-in-leipzig if anybody wants to talk at CCC
-
emus
That would be great. It can also be made from several once to reflect different "sections" of xmpp. And we might get contact to the jabber.ccc.de guys to overwork their servers? 😀