XSF logo XSF Discussion - 2019-10-15


  1. !XSF_Martin has left
  2. Daniel has joined
  3. pdurbin has joined
  4. !XSF_Martin has joined
  5. pdurbin has left
  6. zach has left
  7. zach has joined
  8. aj has joined
  9. debacle has left
  10. !XSF_Martin has left
  11. Daniel has left
  12. Daniel has joined
  13. !XSF_Martin has joined
  14. UsL has left
  15. Daniel has left
  16. Daniel has joined
  17. zach has left
  18. zach has joined
  19. Daniel has left
  20. Daniel has joined
  21. mukt2 has joined
  22. Douglas Terabyte has joined
  23. mukt2 has left
  24. Yagiza has left
  25. adiaholic has joined
  26. adiaholic has left
  27. adiaholic has joined
  28. zach has left
  29. zach has joined
  30. Chobbes has left
  31. Chobbes has joined
  32. waqas has left
  33. waqas has joined
  34. adiaholic has left
  35. waqas has left
  36. waqas has joined
  37. Chobbes has left
  38. waqas has left
  39. waqas has joined
  40. andy has left
  41. waqas has left
  42. waqas has joined
  43. waqas has left
  44. waqas has joined
  45. waqas has left
  46. waqas has joined
  47. zach has left
  48. zach has joined
  49. pdurbin has joined
  50. neshtaxmpp has left
  51. neshtaxmpp has joined
  52. lskdjf has left
  53. pdurbin has left
  54. pdurbin has joined
  55. !XSF_Martin has left
  56. !XSF_Martin has joined
  57. mukt2 has joined
  58. Daniel has left
  59. Daniel has joined
  60. Daniel has left
  61. zach has left
  62. zach has joined
  63. mukt2 has left
  64. adiaholic has joined
  65. andy has joined
  66. adiaholic has left
  67. xalek has left
  68. Daniel has joined
  69. j.r has left
  70. Nekit has joined
  71. j.r has joined
  72. Yagiza has joined
  73. mimi89999 has left
  74. mimi89999 has joined
  75. j.r has left
  76. Daniel has left
  77. Daniel has joined
  78. karoshi has joined
  79. j.r has joined
  80. Daniel has left
  81. j.r has left
  82. rion has left
  83. rion has joined
  84. j.r has joined
  85. aj has left
  86. mukt2 has joined
  87. mukt2 has left
  88. j.r has left
  89. waqas has left
  90. j.r has joined
  91. ralphm has left
  92. ralphm has joined
  93. david has left
  94. j.r has left
  95. !XSF_Martin has left
  96. !XSF_Martin has joined
  97. emus has joined
  98. Daniel has joined
  99. goffi has joined
  100. zach has left
  101. zach has joined
  102. goffi has left
  103. goffi has joined
  104. wurstsalat has joined
  105. COM8 has joined
  106. j.r has joined
  107. !XSF_Martin has left
  108. Tobias has joined
  109. moparisthebest has left
  110. moparisthebest has joined
  111. UsL has joined
  112. COM8 has left
  113. jubalh has joined
  114. Ge0rG Zash: treat them like chat messages?
  115. zach has left
  116. zach has joined
  117. LNJ has joined
  118. Alex has left
  119. Nekit has left
  120. COM8 has joined
  121. Nekit has joined
  122. Alex has joined
  123. UsL has left
  124. zach has left
  125. zach has joined
  126. j.r has left
  127. j.r has joined
  128. Steve Kille has left
  129. COM8 has left
  130. Steve Kille has joined
  131. zach has left
  132. zach has joined
  133. mukt2 has joined
  134. zach has left
  135. zach has joined
  136. mukt2 has left
  137. zach has left
  138. zach has joined
  139. intosi has joined
  140. neshtaxmpp has left
  141. !XSF_Martin has joined
  142. Dele (Mobile) has joined
  143. gav has joined
  144. mukt2 has joined
  145. neshtaxmpp has joined
  146. Nekit has left
  147. Nekit has joined
  148. LNJ has left
  149. zach has left
  150. mukt2 has left
  151. !XSF_Martin has left
  152. aj has joined
  153. LNJ has joined
  154. !XSF_Martin has joined
  155. LNJ has left
  156. aj has left
  157. !XSF_Martin has left
  158. larma has left
  159. larma has joined
  160. !XSF_Martin has joined
  161. Zash has left
  162. Zash has joined
  163. LNJ has joined
  164. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  165. debacle has joined
  166. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  167. Andrew Nenakhov has joined
  168. Andrew Nenakhov has left
  169. !XSF_Martin has left
  170. !XSF_Martin has joined
  171. eevvoor has joined
  172. debacle has left
  173. pep_ has joined
  174. pep_ has left
  175. Maranda has left
  176. Maranda has joined
  177. Alex has left
  178. !XSF_Martin has left
  179. Alex has joined
  180. j.r has left
  181. !XSF_Martin has joined
  182. lskdjf has joined
  183. j.r has joined
  184. gav has left
  185. gav has joined
  186. !XSF_Martin has left
  187. j.r has left
  188. j.r has joined
  189. !XSF_Martin has joined
  190. adiaholic has joined
  191. pdurbin has left
  192. Nekit has left
  193. j.r has left
  194. Nekit has joined
  195. !XSF_Martin has left
  196. j.r has joined
  197. !XSF_Martin has joined
  198. aliex@exploit.im aliex@exploit.im
  199. aliex@exploit.im aliex@exploit.im hi
  200. Guus ah, my favorite domain. It ranks high in my spamlist.
  201. j.r has left
  202. Chobbes has joined
  203. mukt2 has joined
  204. !XSF_Martin has left
  205. j.r has joined
  206. !XSF_Martin has joined
  207. mukt2 has left
  208. Chobbes has left
  209. Chobbes has joined
  210. j.r has left
  211. !XSF_Martin has left
  212. david has joined
  213. emus has left
  214. !XSF_Martin has joined
  215. Chobbes has left
  216. j.r has joined
  217. j.r has left
  218. pdurbin has joined
  219. adiaholic has left
  220. j.r has joined
  221. pdurbin has left
  222. Chobbes has joined
  223. emus has joined
  224. jubalh has left
  225. jubalh has joined
  226. joerg has joined
  227. edhelas has left
  228. edhelas has joined
  229. jubalh has left
  230. jubalh has joined
  231. adiaholic has joined
  232. Maranda has left
  233. Maranda has joined
  234. !XSF_Martin has left
  235. aj has joined
  236. !XSF_Martin has joined
  237. Wojtek has joined
  238. j.r has left
  239. Shell has left
  240. j.r has joined
  241. UsL has joined
  242. Steve Kille has left
  243. Ge0rG pep., jonas’: please merge https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/841
  244. pep. k
  245. Ge0rG rendered version for quality control: https://op-co.de/tmp/xep-0423.html
  246. Ge0rG (it's got a gimmick for you, pep.)
  247. Steve Kille has joined
  248. pep. hmm is there a revision block somewhere?
  249. Ge0rG pep.: unfortunately, the revision block is not suitable for CS purposes.
  250. Ge0rG pep.: feel free to rip off "Changes since 2019" into the rev block though
  251. pep. What does that mean
  252. Ge0rG pep.: you can't have the "Changes since 2019" in a single place of the revision block
  253. Ge0rG because it has a section for each minor version
  254. Ge0rG so pre-Last-Call and post-Last-Call go into separate blocks there
  255. pep. sure
  256. pep. Are we talking about the same thing
  257. Ge0rG pep.: I don't know?
  258. Ge0rG pep.: what you probably wanted to hear instead of my rant is: no, I didn't add a revision block
  259. Wojtek has left
  260. Wojtek has joined
  261. pep. And yeah that would probably look like your §1.1, since 0.1 is more or less similar to 412 right?
  262. Ge0rG pep.: yes, 0.1 was an identical copy
  263. Ge0rG plus "future changes", which is noted there, of course
  264. UsL has left
  265. pep. Ok let's see..
  266. jonas’ pep., so you’re going to take care of that?
  267. jonas’ please let me see the diff before hitting the button
  268. jonas’ Ge0rG, as mentioned, no revision block is not an option
  269. Ge0rG jonas’: I know. This is why I added §1.1
  270. j.r has left
  271. Ge0rG jonas’: I was just hoping that an Editor would add the rev block so that I don't mess up anything
  272. UsL has joined
  273. pep. jonas’, yeah doing for it now. Ge0rG I have as many chance as you of messing it up :)
  274. pep. going*
  275. Ge0rG pep.: but I don't have that Editor hat, so now I can sleep calmly at night ;)
  276. pdurbin has joined
  277. murabito has left
  278. j.r has joined
  279. murabito has joined
  280. !XSF_Martin has left
  281. !XSF_Martin has joined
  282. pdurbin has left
  283. j.r has left
  284. Nekit has left
  285. Nekit has joined
  286. stpeter has joined
  287. adiaholic has left
  288. Ge0rG hm. Chat Markers were just suggested for addition.
  289. Zash Wasn't that meant to get the overlap with receipts and chat states removed?
  290. Chobbes has left
  291. Ge0rG we also wanted to reword chat states as presence.
  292. pep. Ge0rG, so.. what does that mean for editors
  293. Ge0rG pep.: nothing so far.
  294. Zash Can you even do that wih a Final Standard?
  295. Ge0rG pep.: please go on with your work
  296. pep. ok
  297. Ge0rG pep.: I'll put that into the Last Call bucket.
  298. Ge0rG Zash: sure, given a new XEP number
  299. matlag has left
  300. matlag has joined
  301. j.r has joined
  302. Chobbes has joined
  303. LNJ has left
  304. j.r has left
  305. stpeter has left
  306. chronosx88 has joined
  307. j.r has joined
  308. adiaholic has joined
  309. chronosx88 has left
  310. chronosx88 has joined
  311. stpeter has joined
  312. adiaholic has left
  313. adiaholic has joined
  314. adiaholic has left
  315. stpeter has left
  316. adiaholic has joined
  317. eevvoor has left
  318. pdurbin has joined
  319. Chobbes has left
  320. pdurbin has left
  321. niemand has joined
  322. ralphm FYI, there's been a call for the Decentralized Internet & Privacy devroom at FOSDEM. Discuss over at summit@muc.xmpp.org.
  323. adiaholic has left
  324. aj has left
  325. Shell has joined
  326. j.r has left
  327. Chobbes has joined
  328. jubalh has left
  329. debacle has joined
  330. ralphm has left
  331. ralphm has joined
  332. lovetox has joined
  333. lovetox whats the deal with the published XEPs by pep?
  334. lovetox the are published but the link leads to the old version
  335. jonas’ lovetox, what isn’t?
  336. jonas’ ah, pep. sent the emails too early
  337. pep. oh
  338. pep. CI
  339. Zash Wait for the foreverbuild!
  340. pep. Ok I'll wait for the CI next time
  341. jonas’ CI isn’t the thing you need to wait for
  342. pep. lovetox, you're too quick for me
  343. jonas’ docker hub is broken, too
  344. j.r has joined
  345. jonas’ throws 500s at me
  346. jonas’ pep., you need to wait for https://cloud.docker.com/u/xmppxsf/repository/docker/xmppxsf/xeps/builds to finish
  347. jonas’ the page may not load at the moment, docker cloud/hub seems to be broken
  348. pep. I don't have access to that apparently (I get redirected to the main page)
  349. Zash Mmmmm Cloud
  350. jonas’ pep., that happened to me too, it’s the brokenness right now
  351. jonas’ you should have access
  352. pep. ok
  353. jonas’ pep., maybe send an email in reply to the CS-2020 notification
  354. jonas’ so that people don’t get confused
  355. joerg has left
  356. lovetox why how long does this build take?
  357. lovetox i mean its 20 minutes already
  358. pep. lo[..]oong
  359. jonas’ lovetox, about 1h
  360. jonas’ lovetox, possibly longer if dokcer cloud is currently broken
  361. jonas’ so a note about that seems sensible to have
  362. pep. Here
  363. Ge0rG Looks like our hoster has gone Serverless, eh?
  364. !XSF_Martin has left
  365. Zash It is the modern thing to do, right?
  366. pep. Is there any other good reason to do anything
  367. !XSF_Martin has joined
  368. Zash Depends, do you support Nihilism over XMPP?
  369. adiaholic has joined
  370. mukt2 has joined
  371. adiaholic has left
  372. lskdjf > lskdjf: also I'm curious what your actual problem with 0392 is, besides of it being out-of-scope of the XSF powers. Ge0rG, your question was a day ago, but anyways, now I have the time to answer. It's ok to write down a common way of generating colors, even if maybe not in the standarts track. The specification has it's flaws, but they can be improved, there was a mail on the ML about that. My main problem really is that you want to write 0392 into the compliance suites. Some days ago I complained that I couldn't do slack/github style avatars anymore. You said: "nothing prevents your smart pattern avatar generator from applying the same color as other clients do". But that's wrong, the XEP doesn't allow that. It says: Generate a color, fill a shape with it and render the first character of the name onto it. Thus, if I want to generate an avatar, I'm not allowed to have patterns, I'm not allowed to put two letters onto the avatar. Both are common approaches. If the XEP is in the compliance suites, I have to choose between having a UI that might better fit my application or being an Advanced IM client. You basically hinter potential UI improvements. Also, some environments strongly suggest to use a specific color palette. E.g. GNOME does and Android previously did, too. Or maybe my design department simply evaluated in user studies that this specific green tone fits best into my application. The XEP only allows me to use a specific palette if my device doesn't support otherwise, not if I want/should do so because of other constaints. Thus, I can choose between following the GNOME suggestions and being an advanced XMPP IM client. XMPP is a protocol and the compliance suites should define features. Not a set of user interface rules. We can have things like easy xmpp for that.
  373. mukt2 has left
  374. !XSF_Martin has left
  375. lskdjf s/easy xmpp/modern xmpp
  376. Dele (Mobile) has left
  377. jonas’ lskdjf, > Generate a color, fill a shape with it and render the first character of the name onto it. Okay, I did not intend this to be a *requirement*
  378. jonas’ It was meant as a non-normative inspiration
  379. jubalh has joined
  380. jubalh has left
  381. !XSF_Martin has joined
  382. jubalh has joined
  383. lovetox yeah, i agree, user interface stuff should be strictly separate from XEPs
  384. lovetox only thing you get with putting this stuff into XEPs is, it gets simply ignored
  385. larma jonas’, sorry, but hard to read "auto-generating an avatar SHOULD happen as follows" as an inspiration, inspirations SHOULD use MAY 😉
  386. jonas’ that’s true
  387. lovetox not even a MAY
  388. Zash RFC 2119 language about UI things is weird
  389. lovetox it should be in a different section without any keywords
  390. pep. just "may"
  391. lovetox or not at all in the XEP
  392. pep. (because 8174)
  393. lovetox why does a XEP have to make UI suggestions
  394. jonas’ lovetox, it doesn’t *have* to
  395. lovetox we should find another venue for that
  396. jonas’ lskdjf, I see your points, and I think there is some merit to them
  397. Zash And as pep. touched on, Council isn't made to review UI/UX things.
  398. larma lovetox, as I just wrote "It makes a lot of sense to give hints how things could/should be displayed, especially when it has security implications"
  399. lskdjf > only thing you get with putting this stuff into XEPs is, it gets simply ignored well it's hard to ignore the compliance suites if you want to be an advanced client. You'd have to either do what the XEP says or be downgraded to a basic client just because you want to display two letters in your generated avatars.
  400. pep. Technically it's only a SHOULD. :-°
  401. pep. (I know.)
  402. lskdjf yeah basically everything in there is a SHOULD. So I can ignore the XEP and still be compliant?
  403. Ge0rG lskdjf: we really need to move this to standards. I'm currently not focused enough to give an appropriate response.
  404. Ge0rG My reading of 0392 was to provide a consistent hue value for the visual element associated with a given user, not more and not less.
  405. pep. consistent *through UI
  406. lskdjf Ge0rG, pep brought it to standarts already and you basically replied with "I disagree, I would like to challenge Counil" ... So I fail to see the advantage of going to standards.
  407. LNJ has joined
  408. ralphm has left
  409. ralphm has joined
  410. Ge0rG lskdjf: you can provide your arguments to council. But in fact I much more appreciate your specific feedback on 0392, and I'm sure it will be incorporated to improve it
  411. lskdjf > My reading of 0392 was to provide a consistent hue value for the visual element associated with a given user, not more and not less. that already is problematic. Refer to what I wrote about reasons to use e.g. different color palettes. A body that standartizes a protocol does not have the task to mandate UI.
  412. Nekit has left
  413. lskdjf > But in fact I much more appreciate your specific feedback on 0392, and I'm sure it will be incorporated to improve it I can only repeat: My proplem is that 0392 is in the compliance suites, not 0392 itself. And feedback on 0392 was already given on the ML yesterday.
  414. Ge0rG lskdjf: you just gave additional feedback that wasn't on the list
  415. Ge0rG lskdjf: and as I said, I can't provide adequate feedback right now
  416. Wojtek has left
  417. lovetox hm but still weird that this is a XEP
  418. lovetox as it has really nothing to do with the protocol
  419. lovetox not even remotely
  420. lovetox its only purpose is to shape UI
  421. lovetox weird that this was accepted
  422. lovetox i dont think there is another XEP like that
  423. jonas’ lovetox, `/me` is close
  424. jonas’ and '393 to some extent
  425. jonas’ depending on how you look at it
  426. jonas’ but yes...
  427. jonas’ I’m not sure what a better place for this would be tho
  428. lovetox in these XEPs there is at least something sent over the wire ^^
  429. lovetox i just think we need a place where we put stuff like that
  430. jonas’ true
  431. lovetox the modernxmpp project would be a start for example
  432. pep. lovetox, it's not supposed to be a Standards Track XEP tbh, 392
  433. jonas’ I don’t think that existed back then
  434. stpeter has joined
  435. Zash As I think someone said at last Summit, we can set up a process for this if people want to, like an UX track with a UX review council or a SIG or something.
  436. pep. I don't know about 0245, " /me" is "wire" format, but most of the rest is UI
  437. pep. Zash, sure that'd be more appropriate
  438. lovetox jonas’, this is not meant as a criticism of you writing the XEP, its just an observation from todays viewpoint :)
  439. Wojtek has joined
  440. lskdjf lovetox, as was pointed out on the ML, it's indeed not intended to specify anything but _wire protocol_ in the standarts track, according to XEP-0001.
  441. lskdjf so yeah, technically this XEP shouldn't exist in it's current form
  442. Zash XEP-0245 is Informational at least
  443. lovetox there are actually many XEPs that hin at UI stuff
  444. lovetox or even mandate it
  445. lovetox like larma just wrote on the list, even the avatar xep which has a very early number, mandates how a client should resize avatars
  446. Zash https://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-09-20?p=h#2017-09-20-e90eb46fa7027b61
  447. Zash 17:24:33 Link Mauve "SamWhited, also, why are the compliance suites standards tracks, instead of informational?"
  448. Zash Hah
  449. larma because they are supposed to, for some reason: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0001.html#types-Standards-Track
  450. larma wire protocols and protocol suites are allowed on standards track
  451. arc has joined
  452. stpeter has left
  453. Zash That's clear, yeah.
  454. pdurbin has joined
  455. Zash Hasn't anyone remarked the color XEP being in Standards Track before? Can't find anything in my email archives and there wasn't much discussion at that council meeting.
  456. pep. Yeah no I guess it wasn't on purpose and nobody noticed
  457. Zash 2 years ago!
  458. pdurbin has left
  459. jubalh has left
  460. arc has left
  461. arc has joined
  462. eevvoor has joined
  463. stpeter has joined
  464. murabito has left
  465. arc has left
  466. arc has joined
  467. !XSF_Martin has left
  468. stpeter has left
  469. Neustradamus has joined
  470. LNJ has left
  471. !XSF_Martin has joined
  472. stpeter has joined
  473. chronosx88 has left
  474. Maranda has left
  475. Maranda has joined
  476. matlag has left
  477. matlag has joined
  478. mukt2 has joined
  479. stpeter has left
  480. alameyo has left
  481. alameyo has joined
  482. Nekit has joined
  483. mukt2 has left
  484. Tobias has left
  485. !XSF_Martin has left
  486. LNJ has joined
  487. eevvoor has left
  488. karoshi has left
  489. !XSF_Martin has joined
  490. eevvoor has joined
  491. karoshi has joined
  492. mukt2 has joined
  493. Yagiza has left
  494. neshtaxmpp has left
  495. neshtaxmpp has joined
  496. matlag has left
  497. matlag has joined
  498. !XSF_Martin has left
  499. xalek has joined
  500. pdurbin has joined
  501. wurstsalat has left
  502. !XSF_Martin has joined
  503. pdurbin has left
  504. mimi89999 has left
  505. Nekit has left
  506. david has left
  507. david has joined
  508. mimi89999 has joined
  509. andy has left
  510. david has left
  511. david has joined
  512. lovetox has left
  513. goffi has left
  514. !XSF_Martin has left
  515. mukt2 has left
  516. !XSF_Martin has joined
  517. matlag has left
  518. matlag has joined
  519. matlag has left
  520. matlag has joined
  521. matlag has left
  522. matlag has joined
  523. LNJ has left
  524. matlag has left
  525. matlag has joined
  526. arc has left
  527. arc has joined
  528. eevvoor has left
  529. stpeter has joined
  530. Chobbes has left
  531. j.r has left
  532. j.r has joined
  533. !XSF_Martin has left
  534. emus has left
  535. arc has left
  536. Mikaela has left
  537. Chobbes has joined
  538. stpeter has left
  539. j.r has left
  540. !XSF_Martin has joined
  541. j.r has joined
  542. debacle has left
  543. !XSF_Martin has left
  544. !XSF_Martin has joined
  545. Shell has left
  546. Shell has joined
  547. aj has joined
  548. pdurbin has joined
  549. karoshi has left
  550. pdurbin has left
  551. UsL has left
  552. UsL has joined
  553. !XSF_Martin has left
  554. j.r has left
  555. j.r has joined
  556. !XSF_Martin has joined
  557. mukt2 has joined
  558. Daniel has left
  559. Shell has left
  560. Shell has joined