-
pep.
> MattJ> I think trying to remove it from the protocol this way is a bad idea > Remove it from the UI, sure I agree.
-
pep.
And yeah extensions could be useful, so we don't have to invent a new bookmark standard each time we want a new feature in there. So we not have an extensible protocol somewhere for that already?✎ -
pep.
And yeah extensions could be useful, so we don't have to invent a new bookmark standard each time we want a new feature in there. Do we not have an extensible protocol somewhere for that already? ✏
-
Zash
Extensible Bookmarks (I promise, this time for sure!) aka Bookmarks 4
-
Zash
And then Boomarks 5 which is actually Extensible Rosters?
-
Ge0rG
Yeah, we need to be able to put group chats into groups. Ideally the same groups as contacts!
-
!XSF_Martin
I'd like to be able to group groupchats. Or to channel channels or whatever the modern speech calls it…
-
Kev
If only we had a place that we could store lists of grouped JIDs.
-
Kev
Under 3921, you could even include arbitrary extensions in there, although 6121 removed that (which I thought was a shame).
-
Ge0rG
Kev: probably because most implementations can't really handle those anyway, see above.
-
flow
Ge0rG, right, Android's xpp3 does not has it, but you could potentially use an xpp3 implementation on Android that has it
-
Ge0rG
Yay, bundling more libraries!
-
flow
well you could just implement the parser interface with xml roundtrip support in your codebase if you want to avoid bunding more libraries :-P
-
Ge0rG
I've heard there is an NIH syndrome pandemic going on