-
moparisthebest
I went ahead and made the change, looking forward to the voting https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/876
-
flow
moparisthebest, I think you need first 5% of the membership to "ask" for the voting
-
jonas’
flow, nowhere was stated in the PR on here that moparisthebest expects this particular PR to be voted on by membership
-
flow
jonas’, true, I'd just wanted to point out to moparisthebest that just doing a PR will probably not lead to a vote
-
Kev
It will.
-
flow
ok, to a vote by board?
-
Kev
It'll automatically (well, with Editor action) trigger a vote by the approving body (Board).
-
jonas’
correct
-
flow
I somehow assumed that moparisthebest expects a membership vote. But anyhow, not in the mood for bureaucracy, I'm in the mood for coffee and a little bit of coding
-
jonas’
get both!
-
jonas’
(I also added the PR as a card to the Board trello)
-
moparisthebest
Sorry yes meant looking forward to board vote
-
moparisthebest
I don't see anything we are doing or could possibly do to maintain that guarantee so it makes sense to remove
-
dwd
You know it's not a guarantee, but an objective, right?
-
moparisthebest
An impossible one though
-
moparisthebest
Might as well guarantee anyone implementing a xep gets rewarded with milk and cookies
-
jonas’
perfection is the enemy of good
-
jonas’
objectively, we can try to avoid encumbaranced(?!) specifications more realistically than we can get everyone milk and cookies
-
jonas’
even though that’d be awesome too
-
Ge0rG
I'm sure that getting milk and cookies for an author whose XEP makes it into draft is well within the XSF capabilities
-
Ge0rG
And probably even within the scope
-
Daniel
can we get that policy up and running before we vote on http upload next week?
-
Ge0rG
Daniel: I don't think so, Board meetings are a day after Council
-
moparisthebest
Daniel: quick put in a crazy pr against it to delay it