-
pep.
https://upload.bouah.net/upload/wzkwDvGLK6dZEPs8/r6zxit9KT3GWYAVujAWXEw.jpg
-
pep.
Currently at WriteTheDocs in Prague
-
pep.
Daniel: ^
-
Daniel
should i tweet that?
-
Daniel
otherwise i'm missing context
-
pep.
Hmm, dunno
-
pep.
Mostly wanted to share and have opinions, if there's any :)
-
Daniel
it seems very low level. it will certainly be interesting but I can’t help but wonder if some people are not looking into something more high level (using a library)
-
Daniel
or i mean you do have that on your list as well. but it might make sense to go backward through that list
-
Daniel
just my 2c because you asked for opinions
-
pep.
k
-
pep.
I think that's the kind of introduction we don't have. It is low-level, and will go into some protocol details indeed. And the work we (you) started at GPN could certainly be plugged in 3.
-
pep.
Also, see the "TODO: propose tags for XEPs". Do we have that already somewhere or not?
-
SouL
I don't think so, where's that TODO?
-
pep.
On my notes :)
-
pep.
I was asked if there was anything like this to help search through XEPs
-
pep.
The current /extensions/ page only really allows searching through XEP statuses
-
SouL
This has been discussed some times, but as far ad I know we don't have it. I would say it really is a popular demand
-
ralphm
Whenever I have the urge to search through XEPs I just 'ag' on the repo checkout. But I can see how it might be useful to have it on the website.