XSF Communications Team - 2019-10-16

  1. arnaudj has left

  2. arnaudj has joined

  3. Martin has left

  4. Martin has joined

  5. Martin has left

  6. Martin has joined

  7. afp has left

  8. Martin has left

  9. Martin has joined

  10. afp has joined

  11. jcbrand has joined

  12. Martin has left

  13. Martin has joined

  14. Martin has left

  15. Martin has joined

  16. LNJ has joined

  17. Martin has left

  18. Martin has joined

  19. Martin has left

  20. emus has joined

  21. debacle has joined

  22. nyco has joined

  23. nyco has left

  24. Martin has joined

  25. Martin has left

  26. debacle has left

  27. Martin has joined

  28. arnaudj has left

  29. arnaudj has joined

  30. emus has left

  31. emus has joined

  32. Martin has left

  33. Martin has joined

  34. arnaudj has left

  35. arnaudj has joined

  36. Martin has left

  37. Martin has joined

  38. ralphm has left

  39. emus has left

  40. arnaudj has left

  41. arnaudj has joined

  42. emus has joined

  43. emus has left

  44. emus has joined

  45. debacle has joined

  46. pep.


  47. emus

    https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/EU-Parlament-empfiehlt-Jabber-statt-WhatsApp-und-prueft-Signal-4557826.html what?

  48. Nÿco has left

  49. arnaudj has left

  50. arnaudj has joined

  51. pep.

    yeah, we're actually trying to find out if the whole thing is legitimate.

  52. pep.

    The source seems to be this german article

  53. jcbrand has left

  54. debacle has left

  55. jcbrand has joined

  56. debacle has joined

  57. arnaudj has left

  58. jcbrand has left

  59. arnaudj has joined

  60. jcbrand has joined

  61. emus

    I can try to request information from the author

  62. emus

    I have better idea - can someone with an official XSF address ask her? and also say that they are official member?

  63. emus


  64. emus

    Eva-Maria Weiß

  65. pep.

    I don't think anyone has official xsf addresses?

  66. pep.

    That's not a service that the xsf offers (could be a cool thing to members, but definitely not enough resources)

  67. Wojtek

    @pep. some hosted-solution? cost-wise that shouldn’t amount to much and management could be done manually (with current turnover of incoming/outgouing members)?

  68. pep.

    Wojtek, that could be an option. I wouldn't use any gmail hosted account though for example (and it's the most obvious I can think of).

  69. pep.

    I guess I'm not the only one who like self-hosting in this community :)

  70. pep.

    I guess I'm not the only one who likes self-hosting in this community :)

  71. emus

    Ok, then I do it

  72. afp has left

  73. Wojtek

    @pep. I rather had in mind mailbox.com from germany :-) seems quite privacy oriented but paid (quite inexpensive0

  74. ralphm has joined

  75. Wojtek

    self-hosting is cool and all, but given resource-constraints (and I assume this would be more man-power than money) it could be problematic

  76. afp has joined

  77. pep.

    tbh, I'd rather use the money to have the XSF pay for people to handle this kind of things (regarding the article) for us. People who know, and in time, not 3 months after the fact

  78. emus

    Yes, that would be great. but is there a donation possibility/+?

  79. emus


  80. pep.

    The XSF has money, it's just not being used.

  81. emus


  82. pep.

    (it's not like there's plenty of money either, but enough to start with)

  83. emus

    it should be invested instead of not I think

  84. Martin has left

  85. Martin has joined

  86. jcbrand has left

  87. jcbrand has joined

  88. Martin has left

  89. emus has left

  90. Martin has joined

  91. LNJ has left

  92. Martin has left

  93. Martin has joined

  94. Martin has left

  95. Martin has joined

  96. debacle has left

  97. jcbrand has left

  98. Martin has left

  99. Martin has joined

  100. arnaudj has left

  101. arnaudj has joined