-
emus
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/903
-
pep.
Yep. Let's refrain from commenting on it if it's not for the form though :P
-
emus
I dont get it?
-
pep.
We try to keep github issues free of standards discussions :)
-
emus
pep.: Ah okay, but it was so thankful 😍 No, is fine, I delete it
-
pep.
no don't
-
pep.
That level is fine :)
-
pep.
It's just that we don't want a real chat in there
-
emus
Ah, okay too late 😅
-
pep.
So we don't multiply discussion venues
-
emus
Now everyone at least got it in their email :) I clicked some emojis
-
pep.
hehe
-
emus
We got Internet connection again, I think I can continue work tonight
-
pep.
great :)
-
pep.
What happened?
-
emus
pep.: "Vodafone" happened^^
-
pep.
hah
-
emus
We dont know what was wrong I could access some sites, some not (I mean everyone in the network). We tried resets etc... now we got a new ....what ever that vodafone router thing is called^^✎ -
emus
We dont know what was wrong: I could access some sites, some not (I mean everyone in the network). We tried resets etc... now we got a new ....what ever that vodafone router thing is called^^ ✏
-
emus
https://blog.process-one.net/go-xmpp-v0-5-0/
-
vanitasvitae
https://blog.jabberhead.tk/2020/03/10/omemo-specification-sprint/
-
emus
i yeahi
-
Martin
vanitasvitae: > Huge thanks to them for having us! Don'rvyou mean hosting?
-
vanitasvitae
having us means basically the same
-
vanitasvitae
"Thanks for having me" is something like "Thanks for being here"
-
emus
Omg.... what exactly do I need to look for in the mailinglist? pep. ?
-
pep.
let me see
-
pep.
There are quite a few :/
-
emus
and, actually, thats March, is that right?
-
emus
I mean, I personally don't 100% get whats important for the newsletter, and how I workthrough it best?
-
pep.
The target of the XSF is developers (XMPP users, not XMPP client users), so it makes sense
-
pep.
(nor XMPP server users)
-
pep.
Ok so.. I have the following:
-
emus
Yes, I understand - but I don understand how to look for what xeps? 😅️
-
emus
As I said - I hate mailing lists xD
-
emus
and mail in general
-
emus
Not that I dont use it actively, but in general, I have my reasons xD
-
emus
sorry, I forgot you also send me the February link
-
emus
So, I just grep something like: https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037037.html
-
emus
Okay, now I think I got it
-
emus
pep. Im gonna collect it, then you can review
-
pep.
ProtoXEP: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037034.html : Simple JSON Messaging - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037063.html : Extended Channel Search - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037035.html : Trust Messages Active: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037032.html : XEP-0345 (Form of Membership Applications) Experimental: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037091.html : XEP-0434 (Trust Messages) Deferred: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036998.html : XEP-0386 (Bind 2.0) Last Call: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036997.html : XEP-0398 (User Avatar to vCard-Based Avatars Conversion) - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037037.html : XEP-0402 (PEP Native Bookmarks) Draft: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036990.html : XEP-0363 (HTTP File Upload) Call for Experience: - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/037071.html : XEP-0066: Out of Band Data - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036992.html : XEP-0368: SRV records for XMPP over TLS - https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2020-February/036986.html : XEP-0198: Stream Management
-
pep.
That's what I have
-
pep.
There are "duplicates", some went through multiple stages in a month
-
emus
Puhh... I have to learn a lot I guesss
-
emus
pep. ProtoXEP = New ?
-
pep.
yes
-
pep.
"Proposed Extension" in the list
-
pep.
Ah wait no
-
pep.
hmmm
-
pep.
hah, that's confusing
-
pep.
"Proposed" is the state XEPs are in when they're in Last Call
-
pep.
But "Proposed Extension" in the list is used for ProtoXEPs :p
-
pep.
Read 0001 someday when you have time :)
-
emus
Okay, Im gonna do it - I think New suits, or?
-
pep.
New suits?
-
emus
The ProtoXEP suits the section 'New', agreed?
-
pep.
Yes
-
emus
I have a better suggestion: We create a new section called: === Miscellaneous ====
-
emus
becuase, what to do with: Call for Experience:
-
emus
Draft:
-
emus
Or.. coming back: ProtoXEP:
-
pep.
So what would it look like?
-
emus
wait+
-
emus
I create the draft
-
pep.
ok
-
emus
pep. I'm not satisfied with formating, but its readable