emuspep.: I worked everything into the newsletter draft. Also the XEPs to my best understanding. Would be good if you or someone else could compare. It should be only the recent edits https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/index.php?title=XMPP_Newsletter_April_2020&diff=12911&oldid=12910 about the XEPs from March
pep.Is it ok if I have a look tomorrow? I'm still on a piece of code that I'd like to finish :)
emussure - actually I just finished, switched of the light and left that note at your "door" not expecting any reply 😁
emusAnd now im going to bed
emusgot further than expected night
emusgot further than expected tonight
Link MauveNote that GitHub also offers a wiki, using Markdown too (but maybe a different flavour?), fwiw.
Link MauveNote that GitHub also offers a wiki, using Markdown too (but maybe a different flavour than our Pelican?), fwiw.
Link MauveNote that GitHub also offers a wiki fwiw, using Markdown too (but maybe a different flavour than our Pelican?).
emusI think its not good to rely too much on github
SouLHi emus, using GitHub directly sounds a good idea :)
emusWhat do you think about the translation subpages? Ok, there is the problem with subcribtion I guess
emusI think another advantage is that the acces to Github is easier. So we are hopefully able to motivate more people to participate
emusI think another advantage is that the access to Github is easier. So we are hopefully able to motivate more people to participate
emusWhat ever we decide on, do we need to approve that officially in a XSF meeting? or mention on the mailing list
pep.if people who participate agree then it's all good
pep.for this at least
emuspep.: Have you some time to check the xeps or review at all
pep.I'm following the call while checking poezio PRs, will have a look afterwards :)
emusjust ping me
emuspep.: I mean, we dont need today
DebXWoodyHi. I don't use GitHub, but if I remember well, it's not possible to send PR for Wiki.
pep.Which is more or less what happens for the current wiki anyway, once people have powers they can destroy the content if they want
DebXWoodypep., Yes, but they need access
pep.yeah sure, I think that's sane
DebXWoodyThis was just a some note. Anyway, I like the idea (apart from that I don't like github )
pep.I can go along with using the same markup syntax and saner-than-mediawiki versioning
DebXWoodyIf you are going to add more people to the repository (to be able to work on the wiki), you may should think about protecting master branch of the repository. I think this should be possible - but I'm not sure.