XSF Communications Team - 2020-04-30

emus: martin's instructions works fine for me

but it operates on Echolon repo ✏

peetah: Muy bien! Looking forward. Ah okay, I thought so. will advise the next time. yes thats me

good then :)

Did I something wrong to do so?

Will create the next draft today already

how about putting all the raw urls into real links ?

peetah: What do you mean?

[text](link) ? That will be parsed into a nice text later? you can change the view already

for example, instead of "Twitter: https://twitter.com/user/status/blabla" , we write "[Twitter](https://twitter.com/user/status/blabla)

same for the URLs in XEPs descriptions

I added a PR concerning the above proposition that you can merge if you are ok with it

🤔 that happended? Maybe I forgot at one point

I just did

ok

emus, do you have access to @xmpp at mastodon? last post still says that the february newsletter issue is open for link submission..

sorry , I messed up with the PR titles... not used to use github interface

ok I may have messed with more than the titles…

I see two PRs on your repo, but the content includes more than my changes

wurstsalat: no I dont have access

peetah: Will check. Dont know what going on there

emus: I don't know if that is an error or not, but you included the "URL => links" changes for the Updated XEPs while you said that it was bothering you to do so since it was modifying what you copied

I can understand your reluctance for XEPs links, but could'nt we at least make these changes for the social networks and the licence ?

The new draft is open for commits! 🎉 https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/pull/706

peetah: mom

> I can understand your reluctance for XEPs links, but could'nt we at least make these changes for the social networks and the licence ? jcbrand pep. What do you think?

I'm not sure I understand

> emus: I don't know if that is an error or not, but you included the "URL => links" changes for the Updated XEPs while you said that it was bothering you to do so since it was modifying what you copied Thanks for telling me

pep.: rather than having URLs lingering around by themselves, we might as well replace them by links , which I find nicer and obvious when publishing on the web

yep this ^

Yeah I don't see why not. URLs do look uglier :p

😁 I agree, but just dont want to make any decisions on my own

pep.: cool

going for dinner guys, see you later 👋

Ah ok it's not for this specific draft is it

pep.: the recent link?

yeah

no, its the new one already

pep.: just head to pull request

Ah, April

there is also the april one

yes

pep.: the very last entry!

Right yeah, maybe "just" link occurences of "XEP-xxxx" to the appropriate url

okay, will do later