peetahemus: martin's instructions works fine for me
peetahbut it operates on Echelon repo
peetahbut it operates on Echolon repo
emuspeetah: Muy bien! Looking forward.
Ah okay, I thought so. will advise the next time. yes thats me
peetahgood then :)
emusDid I something wrong to do so?
emusWill create the next draft today already
peetahhow about putting all the raw urls into real links ?
emuspeetah: What do you mean?
emus[text](link) ? That will be parsed into a nice text later? you can change the view already
peetahfor example, instead of "Twitter: https://twitter.com/user/status/blabla" , we write "[Twitter](https://twitter.com/user/status/blabla)
peetahsame for the URLs in XEPs descriptions
peetahI added a PR concerning the above proposition that you can merge if you are ok with it
emus🤔 that happended? Maybe I forgot at one point
peetahI just did
wurstsalatemus, do you have access to @xmpp at mastodon? last post still says that the february newsletter issue is open for link submission..
peetahsorry , I messed up with the PR titles... not used to use github interface
peetahok I may have messed with more than the titles…
peetahI see two PRs on your repo, but the content includes more than my changes
emuswurstsalat: no I dont have access
emuspeetah: Will check. Dont know what going on there
peetahemus: I don't know if that is an error or not, but you included the "URL => links" changes for the Updated XEPs while you said that it was bothering you to do so since it was modifying what you copied
peetahI can understand your reluctance for XEPs links, but could'nt we at least make these changes for the social networks and the licence ?
emusThe new draft is open for commits! 🎉
emus> I can understand your reluctance for XEPs links, but could'nt we at least make these changes for the social networks and the licence ?
What do you think?
pep.I'm not sure I understand
emus> emus: I don't know if that is an error or not, but you included the "URL => links" changes for the Updated XEPs while you said that it was bothering you to do so since it was modifying what you copied
Thanks for telling me
peetahpep.: rather than having URLs lingering around by themselves, we might as well replace them by links , which I find nicer and obvious when publishing on the web
emusyep this ^
pep.Yeah I don't see why not. URLs do look uglier :p
pep.reads the draft
emus😁 I agree, but just dont want to make any decisions on my own
emusgoing for dinner guys, see you later 👋
pep.Ah ok it's not for this specific draft is it
emuspep.: the recent link?
emusno, its the new one already
emuspep.: just head to pull request
emusthere is also the april one
emuspep.: the very last entry!
pep.Right yeah, maybe "just" link occurences of "XEP-xxxx" to the appropriate url