XSF Communications Team - 2020-06-28


  1. Vaulor has left

  2. alacer has joined

  3. Licaon_Kter has left

  4. alacer has left

  5. jcbrand has left

  6. peetah has left

  7. peetah has joined

  8. arnaudj has left

  9. arnaudj has joined

  10. Vaulor has joined

  11. Licaon_Kter has joined

  12. debacle has joined

  13. winfried has left

  14. winfried has joined

  15. winfried has left

  16. winfried has joined

  17. arnaudj has left

  18. arnaudj has joined

  19. peetah has left

  20. peetah has joined

  21. emus has left

  22. emus has joined

  23. kikuchiyo has left

  24. debacle has left

  25. kikuchiyo has joined

  26. alacer has joined

  27. arnaudj has left

  28. jcbrand has joined

  29. kikuchiyo has left

  30. kikuchiyo has joined

  31. arnaudj has joined

  32. alacer has left

  33. alacer has joined

  34. kikuchiyo has left

  35. alacer has left

  36. alacer has joined

  37. kikuchiyo has joined

  38. peetah has left

  39. peetah has joined

  40. kikuchiyo has left

  41. kikuchiyo has joined

  42. kikuchiyo has left

  43. kikuchiyo has joined

  44. wurstsalat

    newsletter question: should a gajim dev post go in the "Articles" section or rather in a separate "News" section ?

  45. alacer has left

  46. alacer has joined

  47. debacle has joined

  48. debacle has left

  49. wurstsalat

    peetah ?

  50. peetah

    Depending on the topic, I'd say it goes in the "what's new with dev teams" section we talked about earlier

  51. wurstsalat

    okay, I’ll add one then

  52. peetah has left

  53. peetah has joined

  54. emus has left

  55. emus has joined

  56. alacer has left

  57. alacer has joined

  58. emus

    peetah, wurstsalat: Hi guys, just seeing the PR. Do you think that section is really necessary. Now I actually understand your change request. I mean, we have new software + clients and applications. I would then maybe only agree to have a Development section. But actually I prefer to keep it not to separated? What do you think?

  59. wurstsalat

    I think a blog post of any kind is pretty close to an article

  60. wurstsalat

    articles can be about development, too. you can have in-depth blog posts, or just announcement blog posts.

  61. wurstsalat

    not sure if we should draw a line somewhere or if we should just try to find a headline which fits most

  62. emus

    If you think that is more an article than a blog post you can just drop it to the article section and explaing that they had a developer report or something like this. I would not be so 100% strict about categorization. Just lets do what suits best and its fine

  63. emus

    makes sense?

  64. wurstsalat

    peetah?

  65. wurstsalat

    for me it would be OK to file that blog post under # Articles. what do you think, peetah ?

  66. arnaudj has left

  67. arnaudj has joined

  68. debacle has joined

  69. kikuchiyo has left

  70. Licaon_Kter has left

  71. Licaon_Kter has joined

  72. Licaon_Kter has left

  73. Licaon_Kter has joined

  74. Licaon_Kter has left

  75. peetah

    The blog post you propose to include is about what has been done since last report about a XMPP related softaware and should be considered as a step leading to the next release of this software

  76. peetah

    It is exactly what I called a "what's new with dev teams" type of content , though I was giving this section name as an example, not necessarily as it should be put in the newsletter ;)

  77. kikuchiyo has joined

  78. peetah

    To me, articles type of content are more about presentations of XMPP related software by third parties which are not the authors of said software, proposition of XMPP evolution, arguments about XMPP current status, rants about what's happening in the XMPP ecosystem... anything but specific dev stuff

  79. peetah

    My point is that dev report and releases are part of the same workflow and should be grouped one way or another

  80. peetah

    so maybe the solution would be to rename software releases into software news so that we could include dev reports and software releases in the same sub sections

  81. peetah

    emus, wurstsalat : ^

  82. arnaudj has left

  83. arnaudj has joined

  84. arnaudj has left

  85. pep.

    where have goffi reports been included all this time?

  86. peetah

    pep.: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/search?q=Goffi&unscoped_q=Goffi

  87. peetah

    I don't know if each of them have bee included, but they certainly should be

  88. debacle has left

  89. kikuchiyo has left

  90. kikuchiyo has joined

  91. winfried has left

  92. winfried has joined

  93. winfried has left

  94. winfried has joined

  95. winfried has left

  96. winfried has joined

  97. emus has left

  98. winfried has left

  99. winfried has joined