XSF Communications Team - 2020-06-28


  1. Vaulor has left
  2. alacer has joined
  3. Licaon_Kter has left
  4. alacer has left
  5. jcbrand has left
  6. peetah has left
  7. peetah has joined
  8. arnaudj has left
  9. arnaudj has joined
  10. Vaulor has joined
  11. Licaon_Kter has joined
  12. debacle has joined
  13. winfried has left
  14. winfried has joined
  15. winfried has left
  16. winfried has joined
  17. arnaudj has left
  18. arnaudj has joined
  19. peetah has left
  20. peetah has joined
  21. emus has left
  22. emus has joined
  23. kikuchiyo has left
  24. debacle has left
  25. kikuchiyo has joined
  26. alacer has joined
  27. arnaudj has left
  28. jcbrand has joined
  29. kikuchiyo has left
  30. kikuchiyo has joined
  31. arnaudj has joined
  32. alacer has left
  33. alacer has joined
  34. kikuchiyo has left
  35. alacer has left
  36. alacer has joined
  37. kikuchiyo has joined
  38. peetah has left
  39. peetah has joined
  40. kikuchiyo has left
  41. kikuchiyo has joined
  42. kikuchiyo has left
  43. kikuchiyo has joined
  44. wurstsalat newsletter question: should a gajim dev post go in the "Articles" section or rather in a separate "News" section ?
  45. alacer has left
  46. alacer has joined
  47. debacle has joined
  48. debacle has left
  49. wurstsalat peetah ?
  50. peetah Depending on the topic, I'd say it goes in the "what's new with dev teams" section we talked about earlier
  51. wurstsalat okay, I’ll add one then
  52. peetah has left
  53. peetah has joined
  54. emus has left
  55. emus has joined
  56. alacer has left
  57. alacer has joined
  58. emus peetah, wurstsalat: Hi guys, just seeing the PR. Do you think that section is really necessary. Now I actually understand your change request. I mean, we have new software + clients and applications. I would then maybe only agree to have a Development section. But actually I prefer to keep it not to separated? What do you think?
  59. wurstsalat I think a blog post of any kind is pretty close to an article
  60. wurstsalat articles can be about development, too. you can have in-depth blog posts, or just announcement blog posts.
  61. wurstsalat not sure if we should draw a line somewhere or if we should just try to find a headline which fits most
  62. emus If you think that is more an article than a blog post you can just drop it to the article section and explaing that they had a developer report or something like this. I would not be so 100% strict about categorization. Just lets do what suits best and its fine
  63. emus makes sense?
  64. wurstsalat peetah?
  65. wurstsalat for me it would be OK to file that blog post under # Articles. what do you think, peetah ?
  66. arnaudj has left
  67. arnaudj has joined
  68. debacle has joined
  69. kikuchiyo has left
  70. Licaon_Kter has left
  71. Licaon_Kter has joined
  72. Licaon_Kter has left
  73. Licaon_Kter has joined
  74. Licaon_Kter has left
  75. peetah The blog post you propose to include is about what has been done since last report about a XMPP related softaware and should be considered as a step leading to the next release of this software
  76. peetah It is exactly what I called a "what's new with dev teams" type of content , though I was giving this section name as an example, not necessarily as it should be put in the newsletter ;)
  77. kikuchiyo has joined
  78. peetah To me, articles type of content are more about presentations of XMPP related software by third parties which are not the authors of said software, proposition of XMPP evolution, arguments about XMPP current status, rants about what's happening in the XMPP ecosystem... anything but specific dev stuff
  79. peetah My point is that dev report and releases are part of the same workflow and should be grouped one way or another
  80. peetah so maybe the solution would be to rename software releases into software news so that we could include dev reports and software releases in the same sub sections
  81. peetah emus, wurstsalat : ^
  82. arnaudj has left
  83. arnaudj has joined
  84. arnaudj has left
  85. pep. where have goffi reports been included all this time?
  86. peetah pep.: https://github.com/xsf/xmpp.org/search?q=Goffi&unscoped_q=Goffi
  87. peetah I don't know if each of them have bee included, but they certainly should be
  88. debacle has left
  89. kikuchiyo has left
  90. kikuchiyo has joined
  91. winfried has left
  92. winfried has joined
  93. winfried has left
  94. winfried has joined
  95. winfried has left
  96. winfried has joined
  97. emus has left
  98. winfried has left
  99. winfried has joined